Loading…

ELEMENTI DI UN DIBATTITO

T. de Mauro, A. Asor Rosa, A. Di Majo, G. Penati, S.J. Woolf, E. Grendi, P. Marenco discuss the role of intellectuals, the birth of mass culture, the hypothesis of a «counterculture» opposed to the ruling culture. In the course of the debate Giuncarlo Penati claims that intellectuals, especially in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quaderni storici 1972-05, Vol.7 (20 (2)), p.619-630
Main Authors: Rosa, Alberto Asor, De Mauro, Tullio, della Loggia, Ernesto Galli, Woolf, Stuart J., Grendi, Edoardo, Marenco, Franco
Format: Article
Language:Italian
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 630
container_issue 20 (2)
container_start_page 619
container_title Quaderni storici
container_volume 7
creator Rosa, Alberto Asor
De Mauro, Tullio
della Loggia, Ernesto Galli
Woolf, Stuart J.
Grendi, Edoardo
Marenco, Franco
description T. de Mauro, A. Asor Rosa, A. Di Majo, G. Penati, S.J. Woolf, E. Grendi, P. Marenco discuss the role of intellectuals, the birth of mass culture, the hypothesis of a «counterculture» opposed to the ruling culture. In the course of the debate Giuncarlo Penati claims that intellectuals, especially in their capacity as philosophers, hold themselves responsible for the crisis of culture and do not consider themselves mere spectators. The crisis is felt to be positive, or at least potentially so, in that it is a questioning and search for the meaning, beyond the level of mere historical actuality, of human reality both in our own and in all times. Franco Marenco then discusses the problem of working-class culture breaking through bourgeois hegemony. He asserts that one of the main features is the refusal of the role of «mediation» between conflicting class interests and makes a distinction between undercurrents of working-class consciousness and the use of traditional bourgeois channels. An «alternative culture», he affirms, should add a dynamic element to Asor Rosa's model which, as it stands, seems too restrictive.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_43776411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43776411</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43776411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_437764113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDYw1DUzNjDnYOAqLs4yMDAwNTQ242SQcPVx9XX1C_FUcPFUCPUDkk6OISGeIf48DKxpiTnFqbxQmptB1s01xNlDN6u4JL8ovqAoMzexqDLexNjc3MzE0NCYkDwAFtcifw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>ELEMENTI DI UN DIBATTITO</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Rosa, Alberto Asor ; De Mauro, Tullio ; della Loggia, Ernesto Galli ; Woolf, Stuart J. ; Grendi, Edoardo ; Marenco, Franco</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Alberto Asor ; De Mauro, Tullio ; della Loggia, Ernesto Galli ; Woolf, Stuart J. ; Grendi, Edoardo ; Marenco, Franco</creatorcontrib><description>T. de Mauro, A. Asor Rosa, A. Di Majo, G. Penati, S.J. Woolf, E. Grendi, P. Marenco discuss the role of intellectuals, the birth of mass culture, the hypothesis of a «counterculture» opposed to the ruling culture. In the course of the debate Giuncarlo Penati claims that intellectuals, especially in their capacity as philosophers, hold themselves responsible for the crisis of culture and do not consider themselves mere spectators. The crisis is felt to be positive, or at least potentially so, in that it is a questioning and search for the meaning, beyond the level of mere historical actuality, of human reality both in our own and in all times. Franco Marenco then discusses the problem of working-class culture breaking through bourgeois hegemony. He asserts that one of the main features is the refusal of the role of «mediation» between conflicting class interests and makes a distinction between undercurrents of working-class consciousness and the use of traditional bourgeois channels. An «alternative culture», he affirms, should add a dynamic element to Asor Rosa's model which, as it stands, seems too restrictive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-6307</identifier><language>ita</language><publisher>Stabilimento Tip. Editoriale Urbinate</publisher><subject>CLASSI SOCIALI E IDEOLOGIE</subject><ispartof>Quaderni storici, 1972-05, Vol.7 (20 (2)), p.619-630</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43776411$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43776411$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Alberto Asor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mauro, Tullio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>della Loggia, Ernesto Galli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolf, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grendi, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marenco, Franco</creatorcontrib><title>ELEMENTI DI UN DIBATTITO</title><title>Quaderni storici</title><description>T. de Mauro, A. Asor Rosa, A. Di Majo, G. Penati, S.J. Woolf, E. Grendi, P. Marenco discuss the role of intellectuals, the birth of mass culture, the hypothesis of a «counterculture» opposed to the ruling culture. In the course of the debate Giuncarlo Penati claims that intellectuals, especially in their capacity as philosophers, hold themselves responsible for the crisis of culture and do not consider themselves mere spectators. The crisis is felt to be positive, or at least potentially so, in that it is a questioning and search for the meaning, beyond the level of mere historical actuality, of human reality both in our own and in all times. Franco Marenco then discusses the problem of working-class culture breaking through bourgeois hegemony. He asserts that one of the main features is the refusal of the role of «mediation» between conflicting class interests and makes a distinction between undercurrents of working-class consciousness and the use of traditional bourgeois channels. An «alternative culture», he affirms, should add a dynamic element to Asor Rosa's model which, as it stands, seems too restrictive.</description><subject>CLASSI SOCIALI E IDEOLOGIE</subject><issn>0301-6307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDYw1DUzNjDnYOAqLs4yMDAwNTQ242SQcPVx9XX1C_FUcPFUCPUDkk6OISGeIf48DKxpiTnFqbxQmptB1s01xNlDN6u4JL8ovqAoMzexqDLexNjc3MzE0NCYkDwAFtcifw</recordid><startdate>19720501</startdate><enddate>19720501</enddate><creator>Rosa, Alberto Asor</creator><creator>De Mauro, Tullio</creator><creator>della Loggia, Ernesto Galli</creator><creator>Woolf, Stuart J.</creator><creator>Grendi, Edoardo</creator><creator>Marenco, Franco</creator><general>Stabilimento Tip. Editoriale Urbinate</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19720501</creationdate><title>ELEMENTI DI UN DIBATTITO</title><author>Rosa, Alberto Asor ; De Mauro, Tullio ; della Loggia, Ernesto Galli ; Woolf, Stuart J. ; Grendi, Edoardo ; Marenco, Franco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_437764113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ita</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><topic>CLASSI SOCIALI E IDEOLOGIE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Alberto Asor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mauro, Tullio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>della Loggia, Ernesto Galli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolf, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grendi, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marenco, Franco</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Quaderni storici</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosa, Alberto Asor</au><au>De Mauro, Tullio</au><au>della Loggia, Ernesto Galli</au><au>Woolf, Stuart J.</au><au>Grendi, Edoardo</au><au>Marenco, Franco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ELEMENTI DI UN DIBATTITO</atitle><jtitle>Quaderni storici</jtitle><date>1972-05-01</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>20 (2)</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>630</epage><pages>619-630</pages><issn>0301-6307</issn><abstract>T. de Mauro, A. Asor Rosa, A. Di Majo, G. Penati, S.J. Woolf, E. Grendi, P. Marenco discuss the role of intellectuals, the birth of mass culture, the hypothesis of a «counterculture» opposed to the ruling culture. In the course of the debate Giuncarlo Penati claims that intellectuals, especially in their capacity as philosophers, hold themselves responsible for the crisis of culture and do not consider themselves mere spectators. The crisis is felt to be positive, or at least potentially so, in that it is a questioning and search for the meaning, beyond the level of mere historical actuality, of human reality both in our own and in all times. Franco Marenco then discusses the problem of working-class culture breaking through bourgeois hegemony. He asserts that one of the main features is the refusal of the role of «mediation» between conflicting class interests and makes a distinction between undercurrents of working-class consciousness and the use of traditional bourgeois channels. An «alternative culture», he affirms, should add a dynamic element to Asor Rosa's model which, as it stands, seems too restrictive.</abstract><pub>Stabilimento Tip. Editoriale Urbinate</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-6307
ispartof Quaderni storici, 1972-05, Vol.7 (20 (2)), p.619-630
issn 0301-6307
language ita
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_43776411
source JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects CLASSI SOCIALI E IDEOLOGIE
title ELEMENTI DI UN DIBATTITO
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A54%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ELEMENTI%20DI%20UN%20DIBATTITO&rft.jtitle=Quaderni%20storici&rft.au=Rosa,%20Alberto%20Asor&rft.date=1972-05-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=20%20(2)&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=630&rft.pages=619-630&rft.issn=0301-6307&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E43776411%3C/jstor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_437764113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43776411&rfr_iscdi=true