Loading…

The Western Spring Beauties, Claytonia lanceolata (Montiaceae): A Review and Revised Taxonomy For California

The taxonomic history of Claytonia lanceolata is fraught with confusion. Poor preservation of diagnostic characteristics on museum specimens and incomplete original descriptionsmade from limited reference material have resulted in inadequate characterization of morphological features and geographic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Systematic botany 2017-06, Vol.42 (2), p.283-300
Main Authors: Stoughton, Thomas R., Jolles, Diana D., O'Quinn, Robin L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b546t-e7a85f608be99c483d35cd04e5b21bfdb53a2a916beb33cef5fc4c4043f8d1293
cites
container_end_page 300
container_issue 2
container_start_page 283
container_title Systematic botany
container_volume 42
creator Stoughton, Thomas R.
Jolles, Diana D.
O'Quinn, Robin L.
description The taxonomic history of Claytonia lanceolata is fraught with confusion. Poor preservation of diagnostic characteristics on museum specimens and incomplete original descriptionsmade from limited reference material have resulted in inadequate characterization of morphological features and geographic distributions, particularly for plants in more xeric areas of California. In this paper, we investigate populations previously thought to belong to C. lanceolata and provide an updated taxonomy for Californian taxa based largely on morphological observations and geographic records. These data are corroborated by evidence of genetic polymorphisms and ecological divergence. Claytonia obovata was synonymized with C. lanceolata in 1966 and remained unrecognized until now because previous treatments misinterpreted morphological variation in C. lanceolata s. s. Claytonia peirsonii is a new combination for a species comprising four subspecies endemic to the Desert Southwest, three of which are new to science. Two new species are described here: Claytonia panamintensis, known in California only from the Panamint Mountains but ranging morewidely across southern Nevada, and Claytonia serpenticola. The latter species shares a similar geographic rangewith C. obovata in the Klamath-Siskiyou region of northern California and southwestern Oregon, and these two occur in close sympatry through much of their respective distributions. We also provide molecular evidence to support retention of the name C. lanceolata for populations in California that do not fall into any of the aforementioned new species or combinations. Taxa accepted in this paper are best distinguished from each other by their habitat (many are apparently edaphic endemics), betalain pigmentation, inflorescence architecture, and morphology of cauline leaves, subterranean stems, and flowers.
doi_str_mv 10.1600/036364417X695475
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_44821432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>aspt/sb/2017/00000042/00000002/art00006</ingid><galeid>A493847752</galeid><jstor_id>44821432</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A493847752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b546t-e7a85f608be99c483d35cd04e5b21bfdb53a2a916beb33cef5fc4c4043f8d1293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1rVDEQxS-i4Fp990XIowW35vN--CLrYrVQFdoVfQtzcydrlrtJSbK1619vdrcqFcTkIUPmnB_Mmap6yugJqyl9SUUtailZ87XulGzUvWrClGynXHB5v5rs2tPSVw-rRymtKKVdTdmkGhffkHzBlDF6cnkVnV-SNwib7DC9IPMRtjl4B2QEbzCMkIE8_xB8dmAQ8PgVmZELvHb4nYAf9mXCgSzgJviw3pLTEMkcRmdDLJTH1QMLY8Int-9R9fn07WL-fnr-6d3ZfHY-7ZWs8xQbaJWtadtj1xnZikEoM1CJquest0OvBHDoWN1jL4RBq6yRRlIpbDsw3omj6uTAXcKI2nkbcgRT7oBrZ4JH68r_THailU2jeDEc3zEUTcabvIRNSvrs8uKulh60JoaUIlpdUltD3GpG9W4V-u9VFMuzg2WVcoi_9VK2nEmxQ3489Ev66DPoVdhEXxLSzmhIV_kXUulryT3XnHJGO1rrnV0PaGEzZp0h6uUPneoCfP0P4J6W-kJgjab7I_ltQbmGmHdF_SfC3oUS2P9n_AlxHMBe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Western Spring Beauties, Claytonia lanceolata (Montiaceae): A Review and Revised Taxonomy For California</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Stoughton, Thomas R. ; Jolles, Diana D. ; O'Quinn, Robin L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stoughton, Thomas R. ; Jolles, Diana D. ; O'Quinn, Robin L.</creatorcontrib><description>The taxonomic history of Claytonia lanceolata is fraught with confusion. Poor preservation of diagnostic characteristics on museum specimens and incomplete original descriptionsmade from limited reference material have resulted in inadequate characterization of morphological features and geographic distributions, particularly for plants in more xeric areas of California. In this paper, we investigate populations previously thought to belong to C. lanceolata and provide an updated taxonomy for Californian taxa based largely on morphological observations and geographic records. These data are corroborated by evidence of genetic polymorphisms and ecological divergence. Claytonia obovata was synonymized with C. lanceolata in 1966 and remained unrecognized until now because previous treatments misinterpreted morphological variation in C. lanceolata s. s. Claytonia peirsonii is a new combination for a species comprising four subspecies endemic to the Desert Southwest, three of which are new to science. Two new species are described here: Claytonia panamintensis, known in California only from the Panamint Mountains but ranging morewidely across southern Nevada, and Claytonia serpenticola. The latter species shares a similar geographic rangewith C. obovata in the Klamath-Siskiyou region of northern California and southwestern Oregon, and these two occur in close sympatry through much of their respective distributions. We also provide molecular evidence to support retention of the name C. lanceolata for populations in California that do not fall into any of the aforementioned new species or combinations. Taxa accepted in this paper are best distinguished from each other by their habitat (many are apparently edaphic endemics), betalain pigmentation, inflorescence architecture, and morphology of cauline leaves, subterranean stems, and flowers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-6445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-2324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1600/036364417X695475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Plant Toxonomists</publisher><subject>Caryophyllidae ; Edaphic Endemism ; Morphology ; Natural History ; Observations ; Phylogenetic Systematics ; Physiological aspects ; Plant taxonomy ; Species Complex ; Statistical Ordination</subject><ispartof>Systematic botany, 2017-06, Vol.42 (2), p.283-300</ispartof><rights>2017 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists</rights><rights>Copyright 2017 American Society of Plant Taxonomists</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 American Society of Plant Taxonomists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b546t-e7a85f608be99c483d35cd04e5b21bfdb53a2a916beb33cef5fc4c4043f8d1293</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44821432$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44821432$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stoughton, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolles, Diana D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Quinn, Robin L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Western Spring Beauties, Claytonia lanceolata (Montiaceae): A Review and Revised Taxonomy For California</title><title>Systematic botany</title><description>The taxonomic history of Claytonia lanceolata is fraught with confusion. Poor preservation of diagnostic characteristics on museum specimens and incomplete original descriptionsmade from limited reference material have resulted in inadequate characterization of morphological features and geographic distributions, particularly for plants in more xeric areas of California. In this paper, we investigate populations previously thought to belong to C. lanceolata and provide an updated taxonomy for Californian taxa based largely on morphological observations and geographic records. These data are corroborated by evidence of genetic polymorphisms and ecological divergence. Claytonia obovata was synonymized with C. lanceolata in 1966 and remained unrecognized until now because previous treatments misinterpreted morphological variation in C. lanceolata s. s. Claytonia peirsonii is a new combination for a species comprising four subspecies endemic to the Desert Southwest, three of which are new to science. Two new species are described here: Claytonia panamintensis, known in California only from the Panamint Mountains but ranging morewidely across southern Nevada, and Claytonia serpenticola. The latter species shares a similar geographic rangewith C. obovata in the Klamath-Siskiyou region of northern California and southwestern Oregon, and these two occur in close sympatry through much of their respective distributions. We also provide molecular evidence to support retention of the name C. lanceolata for populations in California that do not fall into any of the aforementioned new species or combinations. Taxa accepted in this paper are best distinguished from each other by their habitat (many are apparently edaphic endemics), betalain pigmentation, inflorescence architecture, and morphology of cauline leaves, subterranean stems, and flowers.</description><subject>Caryophyllidae</subject><subject>Edaphic Endemism</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Natural History</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Phylogenetic Systematics</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plant taxonomy</subject><subject>Species Complex</subject><subject>Statistical Ordination</subject><issn>0363-6445</issn><issn>1548-2324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkd1rVDEQxS-i4Fp990XIowW35vN--CLrYrVQFdoVfQtzcydrlrtJSbK1619vdrcqFcTkIUPmnB_Mmap6yugJqyl9SUUtailZ87XulGzUvWrClGynXHB5v5rs2tPSVw-rRymtKKVdTdmkGhffkHzBlDF6cnkVnV-SNwib7DC9IPMRtjl4B2QEbzCMkIE8_xB8dmAQ8PgVmZELvHb4nYAf9mXCgSzgJviw3pLTEMkcRmdDLJTH1QMLY8Int-9R9fn07WL-fnr-6d3ZfHY-7ZWs8xQbaJWtadtj1xnZikEoM1CJquest0OvBHDoWN1jL4RBq6yRRlIpbDsw3omj6uTAXcKI2nkbcgRT7oBrZ4JH68r_THailU2jeDEc3zEUTcabvIRNSvrs8uKulh60JoaUIlpdUltD3GpG9W4V-u9VFMuzg2WVcoi_9VK2nEmxQ3489Ev66DPoVdhEXxLSzmhIV_kXUulryT3XnHJGO1rrnV0PaGEzZp0h6uUPneoCfP0P4J6W-kJgjab7I_ltQbmGmHdF_SfC3oUS2P9n_AlxHMBe</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Stoughton, Thomas R.</creator><creator>Jolles, Diana D.</creator><creator>O'Quinn, Robin L.</creator><general>American Society of Plant Toxonomists</general><general>The American Society of Plant Taxonomists, Inc</general><general>American Society of Plant Taxonomists, Inc</general><general>American Society of Plant Taxonomists</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>The Western Spring Beauties, Claytonia lanceolata (Montiaceae): A Review and Revised Taxonomy For California</title><author>Stoughton, Thomas R. ; Jolles, Diana D. ; O'Quinn, Robin L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b546t-e7a85f608be99c483d35cd04e5b21bfdb53a2a916beb33cef5fc4c4043f8d1293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Caryophyllidae</topic><topic>Edaphic Endemism</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Natural History</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Phylogenetic Systematics</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plant taxonomy</topic><topic>Species Complex</topic><topic>Statistical Ordination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stoughton, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolles, Diana D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Quinn, Robin L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>Systematic botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stoughton, Thomas R.</au><au>Jolles, Diana D.</au><au>O'Quinn, Robin L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Western Spring Beauties, Claytonia lanceolata (Montiaceae): A Review and Revised Taxonomy For California</atitle><jtitle>Systematic botany</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>283-300</pages><issn>0363-6445</issn><eissn>1548-2324</eissn><abstract>The taxonomic history of Claytonia lanceolata is fraught with confusion. Poor preservation of diagnostic characteristics on museum specimens and incomplete original descriptionsmade from limited reference material have resulted in inadequate characterization of morphological features and geographic distributions, particularly for plants in more xeric areas of California. In this paper, we investigate populations previously thought to belong to C. lanceolata and provide an updated taxonomy for Californian taxa based largely on morphological observations and geographic records. These data are corroborated by evidence of genetic polymorphisms and ecological divergence. Claytonia obovata was synonymized with C. lanceolata in 1966 and remained unrecognized until now because previous treatments misinterpreted morphological variation in C. lanceolata s. s. Claytonia peirsonii is a new combination for a species comprising four subspecies endemic to the Desert Southwest, three of which are new to science. Two new species are described here: Claytonia panamintensis, known in California only from the Panamint Mountains but ranging morewidely across southern Nevada, and Claytonia serpenticola. The latter species shares a similar geographic rangewith C. obovata in the Klamath-Siskiyou region of northern California and southwestern Oregon, and these two occur in close sympatry through much of their respective distributions. We also provide molecular evidence to support retention of the name C. lanceolata for populations in California that do not fall into any of the aforementioned new species or combinations. Taxa accepted in this paper are best distinguished from each other by their habitat (many are apparently edaphic endemics), betalain pigmentation, inflorescence architecture, and morphology of cauline leaves, subterranean stems, and flowers.</abstract><pub>American Society of Plant Toxonomists</pub><doi>10.1600/036364417X695475</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-6445
ispartof Systematic botany, 2017-06, Vol.42 (2), p.283-300
issn 0363-6445
1548-2324
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_44821432
source JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Caryophyllidae
Edaphic Endemism
Morphology
Natural History
Observations
Phylogenetic Systematics
Physiological aspects
Plant taxonomy
Species Complex
Statistical Ordination
title The Western Spring Beauties, Claytonia lanceolata (Montiaceae): A Review and Revised Taxonomy For California
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A12%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Western%20Spring%20Beauties,%20Claytonia%20lanceolata%20(Montiaceae):%20A%20Review%20and%20Revised%20Taxonomy%20For%20California&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20botany&rft.au=Stoughton,%20Thomas%20R.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=283-300&rft.issn=0363-6445&rft.eissn=1548-2324&rft_id=info:doi/10.1600/036364417X695475&rft_dat=%3Cgale_jstor%3EA493847752%3C/gale_jstor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b546t-e7a85f608be99c483d35cd04e5b21bfdb53a2a916beb33cef5fc4c4043f8d1293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A493847752&rft_ingid=aspt/sb/2017/00000042/00000002/art00006&rft_jstor_id=44821432&rfr_iscdi=true