Mediterranean Diet Adherence in Individuals with Prediabetes and Unknown Diabetes: The [e-mail] Study

• Published in: Annals of nutrition and metabolism 2013-01, Vol.62 (4), p.339-346
• Main Authors: Ortega, E., Franch, J., Castell, C., Goday, A., Ribas-Barba, L., Soriguer, F., Vendrell, J., Casamitjana, R., Bosch-Comas, A., Bordiú, E., Calle-Pascual, A., Carmena, R., Castaño, L., Catalá, M., Delgado, E., Gaztambide, S., Girbés, J., López-Alba, A., Martínez-Larrad, M.T., Menéndez, E., Mora-Peces, I., Pascual-Manich, G., Rojo-Martínez, G., Serrano-Rios, M., Urrutía, I., Valdés, S., Vázquez, J. A., Gomis, R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose - analysis; Case-Control Studies; Compliance; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes; Diabetes Mellitus - epidemiology; Diet; Diet Surveys; Diet, Mediterranean; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Original Paper; Patient Compliance; Prediabetic State - epidemiology; Prevalence; Spain - epidemiology
• ISSN: 0250-6807; 1421-9697
• DOI: 10.1159/000346553

Background and Aims: Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) is causally related to diabetes and is a dietary pattern recommended to individuals with diabetes. We investigated MedDiet adherence in individuals with prediabetes and unknown (PREDM/UKDM) or known diabetes (KDM) compared to those with normal glucose metabolism (NORMAL). Methods: This was a national, population-based, cross-sectional, cluster-sampling study. MedDiet adherence was scored (MedScore, mean ± SD 24 ± 5) using a qualitative food frequency questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between MedScore and PREDM/UKDM or KDM versus control subjects. Results: We evaluated 5,076 individuals. Mean age was 50 years, 57% were female, 826 (582/244) were PREDM/UKDM, 478 were KDM and 3,772 were NORMAL. Mean age increased across MedScore tertiles (46, 51 and 56 years, p < 0.0001). Higher age-adjusted adherence to MedDiet (5-unit increment in the MedScore) was associated with lower and nondifferent odds (OR, 95% CI) of prevalent PREDM/UKDM (0.88, 0.81-0.96, p = 0.001) and KDM (0.97, 0.87-1.07, p = 0.279), respectively, compared to individuals in the NORMAL group. Conclusions: In a representative sample of the whole Spanish population, MedDiet adherence is independently associated with PREDM/UKDM. Therapeutic intervention may be, in part, responsible for the lack of differences in adherence observed between the KDM and NORMAL groups. However, reverse causation bias cannot be ruled out in cross-sectional studies.