Timing Problems in Contract Breach Decisions1

In contracts susceptible to efficient breach, each party has an American option to breach and pay damages rather than perform. She will repudiate early if the expected decrease in damages liability resulting from her partner's mitigation exceeds the expected value of the terminated contract, in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of law & economics 1998-04, Vol.41 (1), p.163-208
Main Authors: Triantis, Alexander J., Triantis, George G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Business orders
Contract breaches
Contract law
Contracts
Cost efficiency
Executory contracts
Legal liability
Mitigation of damages
Options contracts
Specific performance
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 208
container_issue 1
container_start_page 163
container_title The Journal of law & economics
container_volume 41
creator Triantis, Alexander J.
Triantis, George G.
description In contracts susceptible to efficient breach, each party has an American option to breach and pay damages rather than perform. She will repudiate early if the expected decrease in damages liability resulting from her partner's mitigation exceeds the expected value of the terminated contract, including the option to breach in the future. We show that each party has the incentive to repudiate earlier than socially optimal because expectation damages compensate the nonrepudiating party only for the loss of the completed exchange and not the value of its lost breach option. This inefficiency is particularly acute in long‐term, fixed‐price contracts in which the cost of performance to the promisor and the value to the promisee are volatile and uncorrelated. We explore various responses to this problem, including vertical integration, changes in contract remedies (including specific performance), flexible price provisions, and the capital structure of each party.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/467388
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_725663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/467388</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/467388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_7256633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ybsOgjAUgOETo4l4ewGXvkC1F1rqKmoYHdhJJVVLoDU9LL69Ds7-yzf8ABvOdpwZvc91IY2ZQMaVLKgSRk0hY0wIKrjRc1ggduxbfsgzoLUffHiQa4q33g1IfCBlDGOy7UiOydn2SU6u9ehjQL6C2d326NY_l7C9nOuyoh2OMTWv5Aeb3k0hlNZS_r8fI7Uwdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Timing Problems in Contract Breach Decisions1</title><source>Nexis UK</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>University of Chicago Press Journals</source><creator>Triantis, Alexander J. ; Triantis, George G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Triantis, Alexander J. ; Triantis, George G.</creatorcontrib><description>In contracts susceptible to efficient breach, each party has an American option to breach and pay damages rather than perform. She will repudiate early if the expected decrease in damages liability resulting from her partner's mitigation exceeds the expected value of the terminated contract, including the option to breach in the future. We show that each party has the incentive to repudiate earlier than socially optimal because expectation damages compensate the nonrepudiating party only for the loss of the completed exchange and not the value of its lost breach option. This inefficiency is particularly acute in long‐term, fixed‐price contracts in which the cost of performance to the promisor and the value to the promisee are volatile and uncorrelated. We explore various responses to this problem, including vertical integration, changes in contract remedies (including specific performance), flexible price provisions, and the capital structure of each party.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/467388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Business orders ; Contract breaches ; Contract law ; Contracts ; Cost efficiency ; Executory contracts ; Legal liability ; Mitigation of damages ; Options contracts ; Specific performance</subject><ispartof>The Journal of law &amp; economics, 1998-04, Vol.41 (1), p.163-208</ispartof><rights>1998 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Triantis, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantis, George G.</creatorcontrib><title>Timing Problems in Contract Breach Decisions1</title><title>The Journal of law &amp; economics</title><description>In contracts susceptible to efficient breach, each party has an American option to breach and pay damages rather than perform. She will repudiate early if the expected decrease in damages liability resulting from her partner's mitigation exceeds the expected value of the terminated contract, including the option to breach in the future. We show that each party has the incentive to repudiate earlier than socially optimal because expectation damages compensate the nonrepudiating party only for the loss of the completed exchange and not the value of its lost breach option. This inefficiency is particularly acute in long‐term, fixed‐price contracts in which the cost of performance to the promisor and the value to the promisee are volatile and uncorrelated. We explore various responses to this problem, including vertical integration, changes in contract remedies (including specific performance), flexible price provisions, and the capital structure of each party.</description><subject>Business orders</subject><subject>Contract breaches</subject><subject>Contract law</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Executory contracts</subject><subject>Legal liability</subject><subject>Mitigation of damages</subject><subject>Options contracts</subject><subject>Specific performance</subject><issn>0022-2186</issn><issn>1537-5285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNp9ybsOgjAUgOETo4l4ewGXvkC1F1rqKmoYHdhJJVVLoDU9LL69Ds7-yzf8ABvOdpwZvc91IY2ZQMaVLKgSRk0hY0wIKrjRc1ggduxbfsgzoLUffHiQa4q33g1IfCBlDGOy7UiOydn2SU6u9ehjQL6C2d326NY_l7C9nOuyoh2OMTWv5Aeb3k0hlNZS_r8fI7Uwdw</recordid><startdate>199804</startdate><enddate>199804</enddate><creator>Triantis, Alexander J.</creator><creator>Triantis, George G.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>199804</creationdate><title>Timing Problems in Contract Breach Decisions1</title><author>Triantis, Alexander J. ; Triantis, George G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_7256633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Business orders</topic><topic>Contract breaches</topic><topic>Contract law</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Executory contracts</topic><topic>Legal liability</topic><topic>Mitigation of damages</topic><topic>Options contracts</topic><topic>Specific performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Triantis, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantis, George G.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Journal of law &amp; economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Triantis, Alexander J.</au><au>Triantis, George G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Timing Problems in Contract Breach Decisions1</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of law &amp; economics</jtitle><date>1998-04</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>163-208</pages><issn>0022-2186</issn><eissn>1537-5285</eissn><abstract>In contracts susceptible to efficient breach, each party has an American option to breach and pay damages rather than perform. She will repudiate early if the expected decrease in damages liability resulting from her partner's mitigation exceeds the expected value of the terminated contract, including the option to breach in the future. We show that each party has the incentive to repudiate earlier than socially optimal because expectation damages compensate the nonrepudiating party only for the loss of the completed exchange and not the value of its lost breach option. This inefficiency is particularly acute in long‐term, fixed‐price contracts in which the cost of performance to the promisor and the value to the promisee are volatile and uncorrelated. We explore various responses to this problem, including vertical integration, changes in contract remedies (including specific performance), flexible price provisions, and the capital structure of each party.</abstract><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/467388</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2186
ispartof The Journal of law & economics, 1998-04, Vol.41 (1), p.163-208
issn 0022-2186
1537-5285
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_725663
source Nexis UK; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; University of Chicago Press Journals
subjects Business orders
Contract breaches
Contract law
Contracts
Cost efficiency
Executory contracts
Legal liability
Mitigation of damages
Options contracts
Specific performance
title Timing Problems in Contract Breach Decisions1
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A07%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Timing%20Problems%20in%20Contract%20Breach%20Decisions1&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20law%20&%20economics&rft.au=Triantis,%20Alexander%20J.&rft.date=1998-04&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=163-208&rft.issn=0022-2186&rft.eissn=1537-5285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/467388&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E10.1086/467388%3C/jstor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_7256633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/467388&rfr_iscdi=true