Loading…

The origin of the hydrochloric acid in the gastric tubules

In 1823 William Prout brought forward the view that the acid normally existing in the stomach was free hydrochloric acid, or to quote his own words, "free or, at least, unsaturated muriatic acid." This opinion was based on the analyses made by him of the gastric contents of the rabbit and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a biological character Containing papers of a biological character, 1910-11, Vol.83 (561), p.56-93
Main Author: Fitzgerald, Mabel Purefoy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-3ae200981a885eaca9135911d2f053c3ae7e93b65a0fea3c9926b324dd28c7f43
cites
container_end_page 93
container_issue 561
container_start_page 56
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a biological character
container_volume 83
creator Fitzgerald, Mabel Purefoy
description In 1823 William Prout brought forward the view that the acid normally existing in the stomach was free hydrochloric acid, or to quote his own words, "free or, at least, unsaturated muriatic acid." This opinion was based on the analyses made by him of the gastric contents of the rabbit and of other animals, and of the fluid ejected from the human stomach in severe cases of dyspepsia. He said further: "With respect to the nature of this acid, very various opinions have been entertained. Some of the older chemists seem to have considered it as an acid sui generis; by others it was supposed to be the phosphoric, the acetic, the lactic, etc. No less various have been the opinions respecting its origin and use, some supposing that it is derived from the stomach itself, and is essential to the digestive process, other that it is derived from the food, or is a result of fermentation, etc. ; in short, there seems to be no physiological subject so imperfectly understood, or concerning which there has been such a variety of opinions." These words written in retrospection by the first exponent of the free hydrochloric acid theory, when read in the twentieth century, have the significance also of a prognostication, for during the past eighty-seven years interminable discussion has ensued between the advocates of the mineral and organic acid theories respectively, and in spite of the efforts of the physiologist, biologist, and bio-chemist in their several fields, uncertainly still exists on many and similar points. This is true in particular of the structure or structures of the gastric mucosa directly concerned with the formation and secretion of the hydrochloric acid, as well as of the existence even of hydrochloric acid in a demonstrable form within the glad tubules.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.1910.0067
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_80363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>80363</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>80363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-3ae200981a885eaca9135911d2f053c3ae7e93b65a0fea3c9926b324dd28c7f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j1FLwzAUhYMoOKevPvjUP9CZ9DZt4psOncJQcVMfQ5amW-ZcRtKK9debWhmI6FM498u55x6EjgkeEMzZqfOb2YDwIDHO8h3USzCFmBNGd1EPc4pjQjjsowPvlxiHAUt76Gy60JF1Zm7WkS2jKqhFUzirFqswVZFUpogCa8Fc-qqdVfWsXml_iPZKufL66Pvto8ery-nwOh7fjW6G5-NYQZ5WMUidhDRGJGNUSyU5AcoJKZIy3KcCzjWHWUYlLrUExXmSzSBJiyJhKi9T6KNBt1c5673Tpdg48ypdIwgWbXPRNhdtc9E2DwboDM424TCrjK4asbS1Wwf5t8v-53qY3F8QjukbA0MzIjADgnOgGMSH2Xwta7FgIIz3tRbtp58RvxNPusSlr6zbtmIYMggw7qDxlX7fQuleRLDmVDyxVDyPbqeU0Ymg8Am-Opkm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The origin of the hydrochloric acid in the gastric tubules</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Fitzgerald, Mabel Purefoy</creator><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Mabel Purefoy</creatorcontrib><description>In 1823 William Prout brought forward the view that the acid normally existing in the stomach was free hydrochloric acid, or to quote his own words, "free or, at least, unsaturated muriatic acid." This opinion was based on the analyses made by him of the gastric contents of the rabbit and of other animals, and of the fluid ejected from the human stomach in severe cases of dyspepsia. He said further: "With respect to the nature of this acid, very various opinions have been entertained. Some of the older chemists seem to have considered it as an acid sui generis; by others it was supposed to be the phosphoric, the acetic, the lactic, etc. No less various have been the opinions respecting its origin and use, some supposing that it is derived from the stomach itself, and is essential to the digestive process, other that it is derived from the food, or is a result of fermentation, etc. ; in short, there seems to be no physiological subject so imperfectly understood, or concerning which there has been such a variety of opinions." These words written in retrospection by the first exponent of the free hydrochloric acid theory, when read in the twentieth century, have the significance also of a prognostication, for during the past eighty-seven years interminable discussion has ensued between the advocates of the mineral and organic acid theories respectively, and in spite of the efforts of the physiologist, biologist, and bio-chemist in their several fields, uncertainly still exists on many and similar points. This is true in particular of the structure or structures of the gastric mucosa directly concerned with the formation and secretion of the hydrochloric acid, as well as of the existence even of hydrochloric acid in a demonstrable form within the glad tubules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-1193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-9185</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1910.0067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animal glands ; Chlorides ; Gastric mucosa ; Mucosa ; Potassium ; Prussian blue reaction ; Salts ; Secretion ; Stomach ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a biological character, 1910-11, Vol.83 (561), p.56-93</ispartof><rights>Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-3ae200981a885eaca9135911d2f053c3ae7e93b65a0fea3c9926b324dd28c7f43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/80363$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/80363$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Mabel Purefoy</creatorcontrib><title>The origin of the hydrochloric acid in the gastric tubules</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a biological character</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B</addtitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B</addtitle><description>In 1823 William Prout brought forward the view that the acid normally existing in the stomach was free hydrochloric acid, or to quote his own words, "free or, at least, unsaturated muriatic acid." This opinion was based on the analyses made by him of the gastric contents of the rabbit and of other animals, and of the fluid ejected from the human stomach in severe cases of dyspepsia. He said further: "With respect to the nature of this acid, very various opinions have been entertained. Some of the older chemists seem to have considered it as an acid sui generis; by others it was supposed to be the phosphoric, the acetic, the lactic, etc. No less various have been the opinions respecting its origin and use, some supposing that it is derived from the stomach itself, and is essential to the digestive process, other that it is derived from the food, or is a result of fermentation, etc. ; in short, there seems to be no physiological subject so imperfectly understood, or concerning which there has been such a variety of opinions." These words written in retrospection by the first exponent of the free hydrochloric acid theory, when read in the twentieth century, have the significance also of a prognostication, for during the past eighty-seven years interminable discussion has ensued between the advocates of the mineral and organic acid theories respectively, and in spite of the efforts of the physiologist, biologist, and bio-chemist in their several fields, uncertainly still exists on many and similar points. This is true in particular of the structure or structures of the gastric mucosa directly concerned with the formation and secretion of the hydrochloric acid, as well as of the existence even of hydrochloric acid in a demonstrable form within the glad tubules.</description><subject>Animal glands</subject><subject>Chlorides</subject><subject>Gastric mucosa</subject><subject>Mucosa</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Prussian blue reaction</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Secretion</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0950-1193</issn><issn>2053-9185</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1910</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j1FLwzAUhYMoOKevPvjUP9CZ9DZt4psOncJQcVMfQ5amW-ZcRtKK9debWhmI6FM498u55x6EjgkeEMzZqfOb2YDwIDHO8h3USzCFmBNGd1EPc4pjQjjsowPvlxiHAUt76Gy60JF1Zm7WkS2jKqhFUzirFqswVZFUpogCa8Fc-qqdVfWsXml_iPZKufL66Pvto8ery-nwOh7fjW6G5-NYQZ5WMUidhDRGJGNUSyU5AcoJKZIy3KcCzjWHWUYlLrUExXmSzSBJiyJhKi9T6KNBt1c5673Tpdg48ypdIwgWbXPRNhdtc9E2DwboDM424TCrjK4asbS1Wwf5t8v-53qY3F8QjukbA0MzIjADgnOgGMSH2Xwta7FgIIz3tRbtp58RvxNPusSlr6zbtmIYMggw7qDxlX7fQuleRLDmVDyxVDyPbqeU0Ymg8Am-Opkm</recordid><startdate>19101126</startdate><enddate>19101126</enddate><creator>Fitzgerald, Mabel Purefoy</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><general>Harrison and Sons</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19101126</creationdate><title>The origin of the hydrochloric acid in the gastric tubules</title><author>Fitzgerald, Mabel Purefoy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-3ae200981a885eaca9135911d2f053c3ae7e93b65a0fea3c9926b324dd28c7f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1910</creationdate><topic>Animal glands</topic><topic>Chlorides</topic><topic>Gastric mucosa</topic><topic>Mucosa</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Prussian blue reaction</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Secretion</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Mabel Purefoy</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a biological character</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fitzgerald, Mabel Purefoy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The origin of the hydrochloric acid in the gastric tubules</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a biological character</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B</stitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B</addtitle><date>1910-11-26</date><risdate>1910</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>561</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>56-93</pages><issn>0950-1193</issn><eissn>2053-9185</eissn><abstract>In 1823 William Prout brought forward the view that the acid normally existing in the stomach was free hydrochloric acid, or to quote his own words, "free or, at least, unsaturated muriatic acid." This opinion was based on the analyses made by him of the gastric contents of the rabbit and of other animals, and of the fluid ejected from the human stomach in severe cases of dyspepsia. He said further: "With respect to the nature of this acid, very various opinions have been entertained. Some of the older chemists seem to have considered it as an acid sui generis; by others it was supposed to be the phosphoric, the acetic, the lactic, etc. No less various have been the opinions respecting its origin and use, some supposing that it is derived from the stomach itself, and is essential to the digestive process, other that it is derived from the food, or is a result of fermentation, etc. ; in short, there seems to be no physiological subject so imperfectly understood, or concerning which there has been such a variety of opinions." These words written in retrospection by the first exponent of the free hydrochloric acid theory, when read in the twentieth century, have the significance also of a prognostication, for during the past eighty-seven years interminable discussion has ensued between the advocates of the mineral and organic acid theories respectively, and in spite of the efforts of the physiologist, biologist, and bio-chemist in their several fields, uncertainly still exists on many and similar points. This is true in particular of the structure or structures of the gastric mucosa directly concerned with the formation and secretion of the hydrochloric acid, as well as of the existence even of hydrochloric acid in a demonstrable form within the glad tubules.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><doi>10.1098/rspb.1910.0067</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-1193
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a biological character, 1910-11, Vol.83 (561), p.56-93
issn 0950-1193
2053-9185
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_80363
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Animal glands
Chlorides
Gastric mucosa
Mucosa
Potassium
Prussian blue reaction
Salts
Secretion
Stomach
Urine
title The origin of the hydrochloric acid in the gastric tubules
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A12%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20origin%20of%20the%20hydrochloric%20acid%20in%20the%20gastric%20tubules&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B,%20Containing%20papers%20of%20a%20biological%20character&rft.au=Fitzgerald,%20Mabel%20Purefoy&rft.date=1910-11-26&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=561&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=56-93&rft.issn=0950-1193&rft.eissn=2053-9185&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.1910.0067&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E80363%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-3ae200981a885eaca9135911d2f053c3ae7e93b65a0fea3c9926b324dd28c7f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=80363&rfr_iscdi=true