Loading…

China's Move towards a Global Economic Core in the Twenty-first Century?: Prospects, Constraints, Consequences

After declaring "Reform and Opening" in 1978, the Chinese export economy entered the global commodity chains by fulfilling low skill and low cost contract manufacturing for global buyers. This article examines the specific conditions allowing China to overcome the peripheral status of low-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review - Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies, Historical Systems, and Civilizations Historical Systems, and Civilizations, 2013-01, Vol.36 (3-4), p.351-385
Main Author: Komlosy, Andrea
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 385
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 351
container_title Review - Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies, Historical Systems, and Civilizations
container_volume 36
creator Komlosy, Andrea
description After declaring "Reform and Opening" in 1978, the Chinese export economy entered the global commodity chains by fulfilling low skill and low cost contract manufacturing for global buyers. This article examines the specific conditions allowing China to overcome the peripheral status of low-end manufacture to become a leading economic center of the world economy. Size, cultural heritage, labor regime, work ethic, and political system are among the factors which explain why and how dependency could be transformed into the position of a global competitor, taking control over global communication and production lines. This article also examines consequences of the success story. Catching up in the world economy goes hand in hand with social and regional polarization within the country, as well as with a new international dominance. Neighbors become outsourcing locations and suppliers of raw materials, international relations help to secure commodity flows; China begins to demonstrate military presence. In the case of China, economic core formation is inseparably linked to the question of global hegemony. Does the rise of a new global core, promoting new alliances in the Global South, represent the emergence of a multi-polar world? Or will we rather face a hegemonic shift, China aiming to take over U.S.-hegemony? The Chinese case offers a good occasion to re-evaluate core and periphery as analytical tools. It shows that the categories undergo change and redefinition; that history, size, political power, and cultural features are as decisive for economic performance as purely economic features. And that changing positions of one great power in the world economy, do have consequences in intra and interstate relations, rendering core and periphery relational, entangled categories.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_90000021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90000021</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90000021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j92t-b89555f1458607e1ebb679c20706ee08274ad6262929d334fae438fa30a0c5043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjE9LwzAcQIMoWDc_gpCbp8Cvv_xrTiJlbsLESw-7jbRNWEvXSBId_fYq-i7vnd4VKZCjZkLIwzUpoBSaGeB4S-5SGgG4KZEXZFefhtk-JvoWvhzN4WJjn6il2ym0dqKbLszhPHS0DtHRYab55GhzcXNemB9iyrT-6c-4PK3JjbdTcvf_XpHmZdPUO7Z_377Wz3s2GsysrYyU0pdCVgq0K13bKm06BA3KOahQC9srVGjQ9JwLb53glbccLHQSBF-Rh7_tmHKIx484nG1cjgZ-wZJ_A6UCRM4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>China's Move towards a Global Economic Core in the Twenty-first Century?: Prospects, Constraints, Consequences</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Komlosy, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Komlosy, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>After declaring "Reform and Opening" in 1978, the Chinese export economy entered the global commodity chains by fulfilling low skill and low cost contract manufacturing for global buyers. This article examines the specific conditions allowing China to overcome the peripheral status of low-end manufacture to become a leading economic center of the world economy. Size, cultural heritage, labor regime, work ethic, and political system are among the factors which explain why and how dependency could be transformed into the position of a global competitor, taking control over global communication and production lines. This article also examines consequences of the success story. Catching up in the world economy goes hand in hand with social and regional polarization within the country, as well as with a new international dominance. Neighbors become outsourcing locations and suppliers of raw materials, international relations help to secure commodity flows; China begins to demonstrate military presence. In the case of China, economic core formation is inseparably linked to the question of global hegemony. Does the rise of a new global core, promoting new alliances in the Global South, represent the emergence of a multi-polar world? Or will we rather face a hegemonic shift, China aiming to take over U.S.-hegemony? The Chinese case offers a good occasion to re-evaluate core and periphery as analytical tools. It shows that the categories undergo change and redefinition; that history, size, political power, and cultural features are as decisive for economic performance as purely economic features. And that changing positions of one great power in the world economy, do have consequences in intra and interstate relations, rendering core and periphery relational, entangled categories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-9032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-445X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Research Foundation of the State University of New York</publisher><ispartof>Review - Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies, Historical Systems, and Civilizations, 2013-01, Vol.36 (3-4), p.351-385</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Research Foundation of the State University of New York</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90000021$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90000021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Komlosy, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>China's Move towards a Global Economic Core in the Twenty-first Century?: Prospects, Constraints, Consequences</title><title>Review - Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies, Historical Systems, and Civilizations</title><description>After declaring "Reform and Opening" in 1978, the Chinese export economy entered the global commodity chains by fulfilling low skill and low cost contract manufacturing for global buyers. This article examines the specific conditions allowing China to overcome the peripheral status of low-end manufacture to become a leading economic center of the world economy. Size, cultural heritage, labor regime, work ethic, and political system are among the factors which explain why and how dependency could be transformed into the position of a global competitor, taking control over global communication and production lines. This article also examines consequences of the success story. Catching up in the world economy goes hand in hand with social and regional polarization within the country, as well as with a new international dominance. Neighbors become outsourcing locations and suppliers of raw materials, international relations help to secure commodity flows; China begins to demonstrate military presence. In the case of China, economic core formation is inseparably linked to the question of global hegemony. Does the rise of a new global core, promoting new alliances in the Global South, represent the emergence of a multi-polar world? Or will we rather face a hegemonic shift, China aiming to take over U.S.-hegemony? The Chinese case offers a good occasion to re-evaluate core and periphery as analytical tools. It shows that the categories undergo change and redefinition; that history, size, political power, and cultural features are as decisive for economic performance as purely economic features. And that changing positions of one great power in the world economy, do have consequences in intra and interstate relations, rendering core and periphery relational, entangled categories.</description><issn>0147-9032</issn><issn>2327-445X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjE9LwzAcQIMoWDc_gpCbp8Cvv_xrTiJlbsLESw-7jbRNWEvXSBId_fYq-i7vnd4VKZCjZkLIwzUpoBSaGeB4S-5SGgG4KZEXZFefhtk-JvoWvhzN4WJjn6il2ym0dqKbLszhPHS0DtHRYab55GhzcXNemB9iyrT-6c-4PK3JjbdTcvf_XpHmZdPUO7Z_377Wz3s2GsysrYyU0pdCVgq0K13bKm06BA3KOahQC9srVGjQ9JwLb53glbccLHQSBF-Rh7_tmHKIx484nG1cjgZ-wZJ_A6UCRM4</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Komlosy, Andrea</creator><general>Research Foundation of the State University of New York</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>China's Move towards a Global Economic Core in the Twenty-first Century?</title><author>Komlosy, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j92t-b89555f1458607e1ebb679c20706ee08274ad6262929d334fae438fa30a0c5043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Komlosy, Andrea</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Review - Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies, Historical Systems, and Civilizations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Komlosy, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>China's Move towards a Global Economic Core in the Twenty-first Century?: Prospects, Constraints, Consequences</atitle><jtitle>Review - Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies, Historical Systems, and Civilizations</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>351-385</pages><issn>0147-9032</issn><eissn>2327-445X</eissn><abstract>After declaring "Reform and Opening" in 1978, the Chinese export economy entered the global commodity chains by fulfilling low skill and low cost contract manufacturing for global buyers. This article examines the specific conditions allowing China to overcome the peripheral status of low-end manufacture to become a leading economic center of the world economy. Size, cultural heritage, labor regime, work ethic, and political system are among the factors which explain why and how dependency could be transformed into the position of a global competitor, taking control over global communication and production lines. This article also examines consequences of the success story. Catching up in the world economy goes hand in hand with social and regional polarization within the country, as well as with a new international dominance. Neighbors become outsourcing locations and suppliers of raw materials, international relations help to secure commodity flows; China begins to demonstrate military presence. In the case of China, economic core formation is inseparably linked to the question of global hegemony. Does the rise of a new global core, promoting new alliances in the Global South, represent the emergence of a multi-polar world? Or will we rather face a hegemonic shift, China aiming to take over U.S.-hegemony? The Chinese case offers a good occasion to re-evaluate core and periphery as analytical tools. It shows that the categories undergo change and redefinition; that history, size, political power, and cultural features are as decisive for economic performance as purely economic features. And that changing positions of one great power in the world economy, do have consequences in intra and interstate relations, rendering core and periphery relational, entangled categories.</abstract><pub>Research Foundation of the State University of New York</pub><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-9032
ispartof Review - Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies, Historical Systems, and Civilizations, 2013-01, Vol.36 (3-4), p.351-385
issn 0147-9032
2327-445X
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_90000021
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
title China's Move towards a Global Economic Core in the Twenty-first Century?: Prospects, Constraints, Consequences
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T02%3A40%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=China's%20Move%20towards%20a%20Global%20Economic%20Core%20in%20the%20Twenty-first%20Century?:%20Prospects,%20Constraints,%20Consequences&rft.jtitle=Review%20-%20Fernand%20Braudel%20Center%20for%20the%20Study%20of%20Economies,%20Historical%20Systems,%20and%20Civilizations&rft.au=Komlosy,%20Andrea&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=351-385&rft.issn=0147-9032&rft.eissn=2327-445X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E90000021%3C/jstor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j92t-b89555f1458607e1ebb679c20706ee08274ad6262929d334fae438fa30a0c5043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=90000021&rfr_iscdi=true