Loading…

Exploring Visual Selective Attention towards Novel Stimuli in Alzheimer's Disease Patients

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with selective attention impairments, which could contribute to cognitive and functional deficits. Selective attention can be explored through examination of novelty preference. Aims: In this study, we quantified novelty preference in AD patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra 2015-12, Vol.5 (3), p.492-502
Main Authors: Chau, Sarah A., Herrmann, Nathan, Eizenman, Moshe, Chung, Jonathan, Lanctôt, Krista L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b02eddb76928d12e2cfc12a7bb7d229208a50fbd5c92b537375d34f8c95d775b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b02eddb76928d12e2cfc12a7bb7d229208a50fbd5c92b537375d34f8c95d775b3
container_end_page 502
container_issue 3
container_start_page 492
container_title Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra
container_volume 5
creator Chau, Sarah A.
Herrmann, Nathan
Eizenman, Moshe
Chung, Jonathan
Lanctôt, Krista L.
description Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with selective attention impairments, which could contribute to cognitive and functional deficits. Selective attention can be explored through examination of novelty preference. Aims: In this study, we quantified novelty preference in AD patients by measuring visual scanning behaviour using an eye tracking paradigm. Methods: Mild-to-moderate AD patients and elderly controls viewed slides containing novel and repeated images simultaneously. The outcome measure was time spent on specific images, with novelty preference defined by greater relative fixation time (RFT) on novel versus repeated images. Cognitive status (Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, SMMSE) and attention (Digit Span, DS) were also measured. Results: AD patients (age 79.2 ± 6.7 years, SMMSE 22.2 ± 4.0, n = 41) and controls (age 76.2 ± 6.4 years, SMMSE 28.1 ± 2.0, n = 24) were similar in age, education and sex. Compared with controls, AD patients had lower RFT on novel than on repeated images (F 1,63 = 11.18, p = 0.001). Further, reduced RFT was associated with lower scores on SMMSE (r 63 = 0.288, p = 0.020) and DS (r 63 = 0.269, p = 0.030). Within individuals, novelty preference was detected in 92.3% of patients and in 100% of controls. Conclusion: These findings suggest that novelty preference, measured by visual scanning behaviour, can differentiate cognitively healthy and impaired people and may offer a nonverbal, less cognitively demanding method of assessing selective attention.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000442383
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_442383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_11400625842e4d90924aba1973faaf28</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1772148145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b02eddb76928d12e2cfc12a7bb7d229208a50fbd5c92b537375d34f8c95d775b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkctv1DAQhy0EolXpgTtCkTgAhwU_4_hSadUuUKkCJB4HLpZjT7YuTrzYzvL46wmkRK3EySPPN589-iH0kOAXhAj1EmPMOWUNu4MOSV3zleA1v3ujPkDHOV9NGBZCccXvowNaKyFYQw_Rl82PXYjJD9vqs8-jCdUHCGCL30O1LgWG4uNQlfjdJJert3EPE1F8PwZf-aFah1-X4HtIT3N15jOYDNV7U_w0lx-ge50JGY6vzyP06dXm4-mb1cW71-en64uV5QqXVYspONfKWtHGEQrUdpZQI9tWOkoVxY0RuGudsIq2gkkmhWO8a6wSTkrRsiN0PntdNFd6l3xv0k8djdd_L2LaapOKtwE0IRzjmoqGU-BOYUW5aQ1RknXGdLSZXCezaze2PTg77ZFMuCW93Rn8pd7GveZSSsX4JHh2LUjx2wi56N5nCyGYAeKYNZGSEt4QLib0-YzaFHNO0C3PEKz_RKuXaCf28c1_LeS_ICfg0Qx8NWkLaQGW-Sf_bZ9tNjOhd65jvwET-bN_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772148145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring Visual Selective Attention towards Novel Stimuli in Alzheimer's Disease Patients</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Karger Open Access</source><creator>Chau, Sarah A. ; Herrmann, Nathan ; Eizenman, Moshe ; Chung, Jonathan ; Lanctôt, Krista L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chau, Sarah A. ; Herrmann, Nathan ; Eizenman, Moshe ; Chung, Jonathan ; Lanctôt, Krista L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with selective attention impairments, which could contribute to cognitive and functional deficits. Selective attention can be explored through examination of novelty preference. Aims: In this study, we quantified novelty preference in AD patients by measuring visual scanning behaviour using an eye tracking paradigm. Methods: Mild-to-moderate AD patients and elderly controls viewed slides containing novel and repeated images simultaneously. The outcome measure was time spent on specific images, with novelty preference defined by greater relative fixation time (RFT) on novel versus repeated images. Cognitive status (Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, SMMSE) and attention (Digit Span, DS) were also measured. Results: AD patients (age 79.2 ± 6.7 years, SMMSE 22.2 ± 4.0, n = 41) and controls (age 76.2 ± 6.4 years, SMMSE 28.1 ± 2.0, n = 24) were similar in age, education and sex. Compared with controls, AD patients had lower RFT on novel than on repeated images (F 1,63 = 11.18, p = 0.001). Further, reduced RFT was associated with lower scores on SMMSE (r 63 = 0.288, p = 0.020) and DS (r 63 = 0.269, p = 0.030). Within individuals, novelty preference was detected in 92.3% of patients and in 100% of controls. Conclusion: These findings suggest that novelty preference, measured by visual scanning behaviour, can differentiate cognitively healthy and impaired people and may offer a nonverbal, less cognitively demanding method of assessing selective attention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-5464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-5464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000442383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26955382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Alzheimer's disease ; Attention dysfunction/cognition ; Novelty preference ; Original ; Original Research Article ; Selective attention ; Visual attention ; Visual scanning</subject><ispartof>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra, 2015-12, Vol.5 (3), p.492-502</ispartof><rights>2015 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by S. Karger AG, Basel 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b02eddb76928d12e2cfc12a7bb7d229208a50fbd5c92b537375d34f8c95d775b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b02eddb76928d12e2cfc12a7bb7d229208a50fbd5c92b537375d34f8c95d775b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7024-6637</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4777934/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4777934/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27635,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26955382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chau, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eizenman, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanctôt, Krista L.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring Visual Selective Attention towards Novel Stimuli in Alzheimer's Disease Patients</title><title>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra</title><addtitle>Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra</addtitle><description>Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with selective attention impairments, which could contribute to cognitive and functional deficits. Selective attention can be explored through examination of novelty preference. Aims: In this study, we quantified novelty preference in AD patients by measuring visual scanning behaviour using an eye tracking paradigm. Methods: Mild-to-moderate AD patients and elderly controls viewed slides containing novel and repeated images simultaneously. The outcome measure was time spent on specific images, with novelty preference defined by greater relative fixation time (RFT) on novel versus repeated images. Cognitive status (Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, SMMSE) and attention (Digit Span, DS) were also measured. Results: AD patients (age 79.2 ± 6.7 years, SMMSE 22.2 ± 4.0, n = 41) and controls (age 76.2 ± 6.4 years, SMMSE 28.1 ± 2.0, n = 24) were similar in age, education and sex. Compared with controls, AD patients had lower RFT on novel than on repeated images (F 1,63 = 11.18, p = 0.001). Further, reduced RFT was associated with lower scores on SMMSE (r 63 = 0.288, p = 0.020) and DS (r 63 = 0.269, p = 0.030). Within individuals, novelty preference was detected in 92.3% of patients and in 100% of controls. Conclusion: These findings suggest that novelty preference, measured by visual scanning behaviour, can differentiate cognitively healthy and impaired people and may offer a nonverbal, less cognitively demanding method of assessing selective attention.</description><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Attention dysfunction/cognition</subject><subject>Novelty preference</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Selective attention</subject><subject>Visual attention</subject><subject>Visual scanning</subject><issn>1664-5464</issn><issn>1664-5464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M--</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkctv1DAQhy0EolXpgTtCkTgAhwU_4_hSadUuUKkCJB4HLpZjT7YuTrzYzvL46wmkRK3EySPPN589-iH0kOAXhAj1EmPMOWUNu4MOSV3zleA1v3ujPkDHOV9NGBZCccXvowNaKyFYQw_Rl82PXYjJD9vqs8-jCdUHCGCL30O1LgWG4uNQlfjdJJert3EPE1F8PwZf-aFah1-X4HtIT3N15jOYDNV7U_w0lx-ge50JGY6vzyP06dXm4-mb1cW71-en64uV5QqXVYspONfKWtHGEQrUdpZQI9tWOkoVxY0RuGudsIq2gkkmhWO8a6wSTkrRsiN0PntdNFd6l3xv0k8djdd_L2LaapOKtwE0IRzjmoqGU-BOYUW5aQ1RknXGdLSZXCezaze2PTg77ZFMuCW93Rn8pd7GveZSSsX4JHh2LUjx2wi56N5nCyGYAeKYNZGSEt4QLib0-YzaFHNO0C3PEKz_RKuXaCf28c1_LeS_ICfg0Qx8NWkLaQGW-Sf_bZ9tNjOhd65jvwET-bN_</recordid><startdate>20151217</startdate><enddate>20151217</enddate><creator>Chau, Sarah A.</creator><creator>Herrmann, Nathan</creator><creator>Eizenman, Moshe</creator><creator>Chung, Jonathan</creator><creator>Lanctôt, Krista L.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><general>Karger Publishers</general><scope>M--</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-6637</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151217</creationdate><title>Exploring Visual Selective Attention towards Novel Stimuli in Alzheimer's Disease Patients</title><author>Chau, Sarah A. ; Herrmann, Nathan ; Eizenman, Moshe ; Chung, Jonathan ; Lanctôt, Krista L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b02eddb76928d12e2cfc12a7bb7d229208a50fbd5c92b537375d34f8c95d775b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Attention dysfunction/cognition</topic><topic>Novelty preference</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Selective attention</topic><topic>Visual attention</topic><topic>Visual scanning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chau, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eizenman, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanctôt, Krista L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Karger Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals(OpenAccess)</collection><jtitle>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chau, Sarah A.</au><au>Herrmann, Nathan</au><au>Eizenman, Moshe</au><au>Chung, Jonathan</au><au>Lanctôt, Krista L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring Visual Selective Attention towards Novel Stimuli in Alzheimer's Disease Patients</atitle><jtitle>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra</jtitle><addtitle>Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra</addtitle><date>2015-12-17</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>492</spage><epage>502</epage><pages>492-502</pages><issn>1664-5464</issn><eissn>1664-5464</eissn><abstract>Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with selective attention impairments, which could contribute to cognitive and functional deficits. Selective attention can be explored through examination of novelty preference. Aims: In this study, we quantified novelty preference in AD patients by measuring visual scanning behaviour using an eye tracking paradigm. Methods: Mild-to-moderate AD patients and elderly controls viewed slides containing novel and repeated images simultaneously. The outcome measure was time spent on specific images, with novelty preference defined by greater relative fixation time (RFT) on novel versus repeated images. Cognitive status (Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, SMMSE) and attention (Digit Span, DS) were also measured. Results: AD patients (age 79.2 ± 6.7 years, SMMSE 22.2 ± 4.0, n = 41) and controls (age 76.2 ± 6.4 years, SMMSE 28.1 ± 2.0, n = 24) were similar in age, education and sex. Compared with controls, AD patients had lower RFT on novel than on repeated images (F 1,63 = 11.18, p = 0.001). Further, reduced RFT was associated with lower scores on SMMSE (r 63 = 0.288, p = 0.020) and DS (r 63 = 0.269, p = 0.030). Within individuals, novelty preference was detected in 92.3% of patients and in 100% of controls. Conclusion: These findings suggest that novelty preference, measured by visual scanning behaviour, can differentiate cognitively healthy and impaired people and may offer a nonverbal, less cognitively demanding method of assessing selective attention.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>26955382</pmid><doi>10.1159/000442383</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-6637</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-5464
ispartof Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra, 2015-12, Vol.5 (3), p.492-502
issn 1664-5464
1664-5464
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_442383
source PubMed Central; Karger Open Access
subjects Alzheimer's disease
Attention dysfunction/cognition
Novelty preference
Original
Original Research Article
Selective attention
Visual attention
Visual scanning
title Exploring Visual Selective Attention towards Novel Stimuli in Alzheimer's Disease Patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T08%3A43%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20Visual%20Selective%20Attention%20towards%20Novel%20Stimuli%20in%20Alzheimer's%20Disease%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Dementia%20and%20geriatric%20cognitive%20disorders%20extra&rft.au=Chau,%20Sarah%20A.&rft.date=2015-12-17&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=492&rft.epage=502&rft.pages=492-502&rft.issn=1664-5464&rft.eissn=1664-5464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000442383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E1772148145%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b02eddb76928d12e2cfc12a7bb7d229208a50fbd5c92b537375d34f8c95d775b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772148145&rft_id=info:pmid/26955382&rfr_iscdi=true