Loading…

Evaluation of Ceftriaxone Utilization at Multicenter Study

Background/Aims: As bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents has grown due to the increasing use of antimicrobial agents, we sought to evaluate the suitability of ceftriaxone usage (representative of third generation cephalosporins) at 10 university hospitals in Korea. Methods: We prospectively...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Korean journal of internal medicine 2009-12, Vol.24 (4), p.374
Main Authors: Hyuck Lee, Dong Sik Jung, Joon Sup Yeom, Jun Seong Son, Sook In Jung, Yeon Sook Kim, Chun Kwan Kim, Hyun Ha Chang, Shin Woo Kim, Hyun Kyun Ki, Chi Sook Moon, Doo Ryeon Chung, Kyong Ran Peck
Format: Article
Language:Korean
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 374
container_title The Korean journal of internal medicine
container_volume 24
creator Hyuck Lee
Dong Sik Jung
Joon Sup Yeom
Jun Seong Son
Sook In Jung
Yeon Sook Kim
Chun Kwan Kim
Hyun Ha Chang
Shin Woo Kim
Hyun Kyun Ki
Chi Sook Moon
Doo Ryeon Chung
Kyong Ran Peck
description Background/Aims: As bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents has grown due to the increasing use of antimicrobial agents, we sought to evaluate the suitability of ceftriaxone usage (representative of third generation cephalosporins) at 10 university hospitals in Korea. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the appropriateness of antibiotic usage in 400 adult patients who received ceftriaxone between February 1, 2006 and June 30, 2006. Drug utilization evaluation (DUE) methods were based on standards set forth by the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. The DUE criteria used in this study were modified to be more suitable in our hospital setting: justification of drug use, critical and process indications, complications, and outcome measures. Results: The average patient age was 64.4 years. The utilization of ceftriaxone was appropriate in 262 cases (65.5%) for the justification of use, while inappropriate use was observed in 138 cases (34.5%). Common reasons for inappropriate use of ceftriaxone included continued empiric use for presumed infections, prophylactic perioperative injection, and empiric therapy for fever. Most of the critical indications showed a high rate of suitability (66.5-98.5%). Complications occurred in 37 cases (9.3%). With respect to outcome measures, clinical responses were observed in 60.7% of cases, while only 15.7% of cases showed evidence of infection eradication via negative cultures. Conclusions: Appropriate use (65.5%) of ceftriaxone was higher than inappropriate use (34.5%) at university hospitals in Korea. Inappropriate utilization, however, including continued empiric use for presumed infections and prophylactic perioperative injection remained high. Intensification of educational programs and antibiotic control systems for ceftriaxone is needed to improve the suitability of antimicrobial use. (Korean J Intern Med 2009;24:374-380)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kiss</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kiss_primary_2831957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>2831957</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>2831957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kiss_primary_28319573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ybsKwjAUANAgChbtF7jkBwp5mFhdS8XFSZ1L1AQuxlSSG7F-vYPOTmc4I1IIxlSl9bIek4ILoSspmZySMiU4MyY515ypgmzap_HZIPSB9o421mEE8-qDpScED-9vGaT77BEuNqCN9ID5OszJxBmfbPlzRhbb9tjsqhuk1D0i3E0cOlFLvlYr-X8_0Y8zog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Ceftriaxone Utilization at Multicenter Study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hyuck Lee ; Dong Sik Jung ; Joon Sup Yeom ; Jun Seong Son ; Sook In Jung ; Yeon Sook Kim ; Chun Kwan Kim ; Hyun Ha Chang ; Shin Woo Kim ; Hyun Kyun Ki ; Chi Sook Moon ; Doo Ryeon Chung ; Kyong Ran Peck</creator><creatorcontrib>Hyuck Lee ; Dong Sik Jung ; Joon Sup Yeom ; Jun Seong Son ; Sook In Jung ; Yeon Sook Kim ; Chun Kwan Kim ; Hyun Ha Chang ; Shin Woo Kim ; Hyun Kyun Ki ; Chi Sook Moon ; Doo Ryeon Chung ; Kyong Ran Peck</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aims: As bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents has grown due to the increasing use of antimicrobial agents, we sought to evaluate the suitability of ceftriaxone usage (representative of third generation cephalosporins) at 10 university hospitals in Korea. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the appropriateness of antibiotic usage in 400 adult patients who received ceftriaxone between February 1, 2006 and June 30, 2006. Drug utilization evaluation (DUE) methods were based on standards set forth by the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. The DUE criteria used in this study were modified to be more suitable in our hospital setting: justification of drug use, critical and process indications, complications, and outcome measures. Results: The average patient age was 64.4 years. The utilization of ceftriaxone was appropriate in 262 cases (65.5%) for the justification of use, while inappropriate use was observed in 138 cases (34.5%). Common reasons for inappropriate use of ceftriaxone included continued empiric use for presumed infections, prophylactic perioperative injection, and empiric therapy for fever. Most of the critical indications showed a high rate of suitability (66.5-98.5%). Complications occurred in 37 cases (9.3%). With respect to outcome measures, clinical responses were observed in 60.7% of cases, while only 15.7% of cases showed evidence of infection eradication via negative cultures. Conclusions: Appropriate use (65.5%) of ceftriaxone was higher than inappropriate use (34.5%) at university hospitals in Korea. Inappropriate utilization, however, including continued empiric use for presumed infections and prophylactic perioperative injection remained high. Intensification of educational programs and antibiotic control systems for ceftriaxone is needed to improve the suitability of antimicrobial use. (Korean J Intern Med 2009;24:374-380)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1226-3303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2005-6648</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>대한내과학회</publisher><subject>Ceftriaxone ; Drug utilization review</subject><ispartof>The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2009-12, Vol.24 (4), p.374</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hyuck Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong Sik Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joon Sup Yeom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun Seong Son</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sook In Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeon Sook Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun Kwan Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun Ha Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin Woo Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun Kyun Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi Sook Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doo Ryeon Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyong Ran Peck</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Ceftriaxone Utilization at Multicenter Study</title><title>The Korean journal of internal medicine</title><addtitle>The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine</addtitle><description>Background/Aims: As bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents has grown due to the increasing use of antimicrobial agents, we sought to evaluate the suitability of ceftriaxone usage (representative of third generation cephalosporins) at 10 university hospitals in Korea. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the appropriateness of antibiotic usage in 400 adult patients who received ceftriaxone between February 1, 2006 and June 30, 2006. Drug utilization evaluation (DUE) methods were based on standards set forth by the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. The DUE criteria used in this study were modified to be more suitable in our hospital setting: justification of drug use, critical and process indications, complications, and outcome measures. Results: The average patient age was 64.4 years. The utilization of ceftriaxone was appropriate in 262 cases (65.5%) for the justification of use, while inappropriate use was observed in 138 cases (34.5%). Common reasons for inappropriate use of ceftriaxone included continued empiric use for presumed infections, prophylactic perioperative injection, and empiric therapy for fever. Most of the critical indications showed a high rate of suitability (66.5-98.5%). Complications occurred in 37 cases (9.3%). With respect to outcome measures, clinical responses were observed in 60.7% of cases, while only 15.7% of cases showed evidence of infection eradication via negative cultures. Conclusions: Appropriate use (65.5%) of ceftriaxone was higher than inappropriate use (34.5%) at university hospitals in Korea. Inappropriate utilization, however, including continued empiric use for presumed infections and prophylactic perioperative injection remained high. Intensification of educational programs and antibiotic control systems for ceftriaxone is needed to improve the suitability of antimicrobial use. (Korean J Intern Med 2009;24:374-380)</description><subject>Ceftriaxone</subject><subject>Drug utilization review</subject><issn>1226-3303</issn><issn>2005-6648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ybsKwjAUANAgChbtF7jkBwp5mFhdS8XFSZ1L1AQuxlSSG7F-vYPOTmc4I1IIxlSl9bIek4ILoSspmZySMiU4MyY515ypgmzap_HZIPSB9o421mEE8-qDpScED-9vGaT77BEuNqCN9ID5OszJxBmfbPlzRhbb9tjsqhuk1D0i3E0cOlFLvlYr-X8_0Y8zog</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Hyuck Lee</creator><creator>Dong Sik Jung</creator><creator>Joon Sup Yeom</creator><creator>Jun Seong Son</creator><creator>Sook In Jung</creator><creator>Yeon Sook Kim</creator><creator>Chun Kwan Kim</creator><creator>Hyun Ha Chang</creator><creator>Shin Woo Kim</creator><creator>Hyun Kyun Ki</creator><creator>Chi Sook Moon</creator><creator>Doo Ryeon Chung</creator><creator>Kyong Ran Peck</creator><general>대한내과학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Ceftriaxone Utilization at Multicenter Study</title><author>Hyuck Lee ; Dong Sik Jung ; Joon Sup Yeom ; Jun Seong Son ; Sook In Jung ; Yeon Sook Kim ; Chun Kwan Kim ; Hyun Ha Chang ; Shin Woo Kim ; Hyun Kyun Ki ; Chi Sook Moon ; Doo Ryeon Chung ; Kyong Ran Peck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_28319573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Ceftriaxone</topic><topic>Drug utilization review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hyuck Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong Sik Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joon Sup Yeom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun Seong Son</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sook In Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeon Sook Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun Kwan Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun Ha Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin Woo Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun Kyun Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi Sook Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doo Ryeon Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyong Ran Peck</creatorcontrib><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS)</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><jtitle>The Korean journal of internal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hyuck Lee</au><au>Dong Sik Jung</au><au>Joon Sup Yeom</au><au>Jun Seong Son</au><au>Sook In Jung</au><au>Yeon Sook Kim</au><au>Chun Kwan Kim</au><au>Hyun Ha Chang</au><au>Shin Woo Kim</au><au>Hyun Kyun Ki</au><au>Chi Sook Moon</au><au>Doo Ryeon Chung</au><au>Kyong Ran Peck</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Ceftriaxone Utilization at Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>The Korean journal of internal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>374</spage><pages>374-</pages><issn>1226-3303</issn><eissn>2005-6648</eissn><abstract>Background/Aims: As bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents has grown due to the increasing use of antimicrobial agents, we sought to evaluate the suitability of ceftriaxone usage (representative of third generation cephalosporins) at 10 university hospitals in Korea. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the appropriateness of antibiotic usage in 400 adult patients who received ceftriaxone between February 1, 2006 and June 30, 2006. Drug utilization evaluation (DUE) methods were based on standards set forth by the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. The DUE criteria used in this study were modified to be more suitable in our hospital setting: justification of drug use, critical and process indications, complications, and outcome measures. Results: The average patient age was 64.4 years. The utilization of ceftriaxone was appropriate in 262 cases (65.5%) for the justification of use, while inappropriate use was observed in 138 cases (34.5%). Common reasons for inappropriate use of ceftriaxone included continued empiric use for presumed infections, prophylactic perioperative injection, and empiric therapy for fever. Most of the critical indications showed a high rate of suitability (66.5-98.5%). Complications occurred in 37 cases (9.3%). With respect to outcome measures, clinical responses were observed in 60.7% of cases, while only 15.7% of cases showed evidence of infection eradication via negative cultures. Conclusions: Appropriate use (65.5%) of ceftriaxone was higher than inappropriate use (34.5%) at university hospitals in Korea. Inappropriate utilization, however, including continued empiric use for presumed infections and prophylactic perioperative injection remained high. Intensification of educational programs and antibiotic control systems for ceftriaxone is needed to improve the suitability of antimicrobial use. (Korean J Intern Med 2009;24:374-380)</abstract><pub>대한내과학회</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1226-3303
ispartof The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2009-12, Vol.24 (4), p.374
issn 1226-3303
2005-6648
language kor
recordid cdi_kiss_primary_2831957
source PubMed Central
subjects Ceftriaxone
Drug utilization review
title Evaluation of Ceftriaxone Utilization at Multicenter Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Ceftriaxone%20Utilization%20at%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Korean%20journal%20of%20internal%20medicine&rft.au=Hyuck%20Lee&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=374&rft.pages=374-&rft.issn=1226-3303&rft.eissn=2005-6648&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss%3E2831957%3C/kiss%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_28319573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=2831957&rfr_iscdi=true