Loading…

The comparative study to evaluate the effect of palonosetron monotherapy versus palonosetron with dexamethasone combination therapy for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Background: 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are effective and safe on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Palonosetron, the newest 5-HT3 antagonist, has potent antiemetic property. We hypothesized that a combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone could more decrease...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Korean journal of anesthesiology 2012-10, Vol.63 (4), p.334
Main Authors: Jung Woo Park, Jin Woo Jun, Yun Hee Lim, Sang Seok Lee, Byung Hoon Yoo, Kye Min Kim, Jun Heum Yon, Ki Hyuk Hong
Format: Article
Language:Korean
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 334
container_title Korean journal of anesthesiology
container_volume 63
creator Jung Woo Park
Jin Woo Jun
Yun Hee Lim
Sang Seok Lee
Byung Hoon Yoo
Kye Min Kim
Jun Heum Yon
Ki Hyuk Hong
description Background: 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are effective and safe on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Palonosetron, the newest 5-HT3 antagonist, has potent antiemetic property. We hypothesized that a combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone could more decrease PONV than palonosetron alone. Methods: Among the patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery, mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty or thyroidectomy under general anesthesia, eighty four female patients with at least two PONV risk factors were enrolled in this study. They were received randomly 0.075 mg palonosetron and 4 mg dexamethasone (group C) or 0.075 mg palonosetron alone (group P). The severity of PONV using Rhodes index and the percentage of complete response during postoperative 24 hours were compared between groups. Results: The frequency of mild/moderate/great/severe PONV based on Rhodes index were 9.8%/0%/0%/0% and 9.3%/2.3%/2.3%/0% in group P and group C, respectively. Complete response for PONV was observed in 90.2% and 86% of patients in group P and group C, respectively. The overall incidence of PONV in group P and C was 9.8% and 14%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: There were no differences between palonosetron monotherapy and combination therapy of palonosetron and dexamethasone in patients with high emetogenic risk.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kiss</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kiss_primary_3105100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>3105100</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>3105100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kiss_primary_31051003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jkFOAzEMRbMAiQp6Aja-QKUM04F2jUAcoPvK7TidiEkcxZ7AnIzrEaqyYMPKX37-er4yiwdru9XjutnemKWIP9h2Y5_Wm267MF-7geDIIWFG9YVAdOpnUAYqOE6oBFovyDk6KrCDhCNHFtLMEUKNFWdMMxTKMslf_uF1gJ4-MZAOKBzProOP1VXxb9VxhpSpUDyvfywsyokuP0WchBAw9lA4ePXxdGeuHY5Cy8u8NfevL7vnt9W7F9mn7APmed82tmusbf-n3zNUYt8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The comparative study to evaluate the effect of palonosetron monotherapy versus palonosetron with dexamethasone combination therapy for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources</source><creator>Jung Woo Park ; Jin Woo Jun ; Yun Hee Lim ; Sang Seok Lee ; Byung Hoon Yoo ; Kye Min Kim ; Jun Heum Yon ; Ki Hyuk Hong</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung Woo Park ; Jin Woo Jun ; Yun Hee Lim ; Sang Seok Lee ; Byung Hoon Yoo ; Kye Min Kim ; Jun Heum Yon ; Ki Hyuk Hong</creatorcontrib><description>Background: 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are effective and safe on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Palonosetron, the newest 5-HT3 antagonist, has potent antiemetic property. We hypothesized that a combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone could more decrease PONV than palonosetron alone. Methods: Among the patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery, mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty or thyroidectomy under general anesthesia, eighty four female patients with at least two PONV risk factors were enrolled in this study. They were received randomly 0.075 mg palonosetron and 4 mg dexamethasone (group C) or 0.075 mg palonosetron alone (group P). The severity of PONV using Rhodes index and the percentage of complete response during postoperative 24 hours were compared between groups. Results: The frequency of mild/moderate/great/severe PONV based on Rhodes index were 9.8%/0%/0%/0% and 9.3%/2.3%/2.3%/0% in group P and group C, respectively. Complete response for PONV was observed in 90.2% and 86% of patients in group P and group C, respectively. The overall incidence of PONV in group P and C was 9.8% and 14%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: There were no differences between palonosetron monotherapy and combination therapy of palonosetron and dexamethasone in patients with high emetogenic risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2005-6419</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>대한마취통증의학회</publisher><subject>Dexamethasone ; Palonosetron ; PONV</subject><ispartof>Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2012-10, Vol.63 (4), p.334</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung Woo Park</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin Woo Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun Hee Lim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang Seok Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byung Hoon Yoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kye Min Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun Heum Yon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ki Hyuk Hong</creatorcontrib><title>The comparative study to evaluate the effect of palonosetron monotherapy versus palonosetron with dexamethasone combination therapy for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting</title><title>Korean journal of anesthesiology</title><addtitle>Korean Journal of Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>Background: 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are effective and safe on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Palonosetron, the newest 5-HT3 antagonist, has potent antiemetic property. We hypothesized that a combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone could more decrease PONV than palonosetron alone. Methods: Among the patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery, mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty or thyroidectomy under general anesthesia, eighty four female patients with at least two PONV risk factors were enrolled in this study. They were received randomly 0.075 mg palonosetron and 4 mg dexamethasone (group C) or 0.075 mg palonosetron alone (group P). The severity of PONV using Rhodes index and the percentage of complete response during postoperative 24 hours were compared between groups. Results: The frequency of mild/moderate/great/severe PONV based on Rhodes index were 9.8%/0%/0%/0% and 9.3%/2.3%/2.3%/0% in group P and group C, respectively. Complete response for PONV was observed in 90.2% and 86% of patients in group P and group C, respectively. The overall incidence of PONV in group P and C was 9.8% and 14%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: There were no differences between palonosetron monotherapy and combination therapy of palonosetron and dexamethasone in patients with high emetogenic risk.</description><subject>Dexamethasone</subject><subject>Palonosetron</subject><subject>PONV</subject><issn>2005-6419</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9jkFOAzEMRbMAiQp6Aja-QKUM04F2jUAcoPvK7TidiEkcxZ7AnIzrEaqyYMPKX37-er4yiwdru9XjutnemKWIP9h2Y5_Wm267MF-7geDIIWFG9YVAdOpnUAYqOE6oBFovyDk6KrCDhCNHFtLMEUKNFWdMMxTKMslf_uF1gJ4-MZAOKBzProOP1VXxb9VxhpSpUDyvfywsyokuP0WchBAw9lA4ePXxdGeuHY5Cy8u8NfevL7vnt9W7F9mn7APmed82tmusbf-n3zNUYt8</recordid><startdate>20121030</startdate><enddate>20121030</enddate><creator>Jung Woo Park</creator><creator>Jin Woo Jun</creator><creator>Yun Hee Lim</creator><creator>Sang Seok Lee</creator><creator>Byung Hoon Yoo</creator><creator>Kye Min Kim</creator><creator>Jun Heum Yon</creator><creator>Ki Hyuk Hong</creator><general>대한마취통증의학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121030</creationdate><title>The comparative study to evaluate the effect of palonosetron monotherapy versus palonosetron with dexamethasone combination therapy for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting</title><author>Jung Woo Park ; Jin Woo Jun ; Yun Hee Lim ; Sang Seok Lee ; Byung Hoon Yoo ; Kye Min Kim ; Jun Heum Yon ; Ki Hyuk Hong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_31051003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Dexamethasone</topic><topic>Palonosetron</topic><topic>PONV</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung Woo Park</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin Woo Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun Hee Lim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang Seok Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byung Hoon Yoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kye Min Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun Heum Yon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ki Hyuk Hong</creatorcontrib><collection>KISS</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><jtitle>Korean journal of anesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung Woo Park</au><au>Jin Woo Jun</au><au>Yun Hee Lim</au><au>Sang Seok Lee</au><au>Byung Hoon Yoo</au><au>Kye Min Kim</au><au>Jun Heum Yon</au><au>Ki Hyuk Hong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The comparative study to evaluate the effect of palonosetron monotherapy versus palonosetron with dexamethasone combination therapy for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting</atitle><jtitle>Korean journal of anesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>Korean Journal of Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>2012-10-30</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>334</spage><pages>334-</pages><issn>2005-6419</issn><abstract>Background: 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are effective and safe on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Palonosetron, the newest 5-HT3 antagonist, has potent antiemetic property. We hypothesized that a combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone could more decrease PONV than palonosetron alone. Methods: Among the patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery, mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty or thyroidectomy under general anesthesia, eighty four female patients with at least two PONV risk factors were enrolled in this study. They were received randomly 0.075 mg palonosetron and 4 mg dexamethasone (group C) or 0.075 mg palonosetron alone (group P). The severity of PONV using Rhodes index and the percentage of complete response during postoperative 24 hours were compared between groups. Results: The frequency of mild/moderate/great/severe PONV based on Rhodes index were 9.8%/0%/0%/0% and 9.3%/2.3%/2.3%/0% in group P and group C, respectively. Complete response for PONV was observed in 90.2% and 86% of patients in group P and group C, respectively. The overall incidence of PONV in group P and C was 9.8% and 14%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: There were no differences between palonosetron monotherapy and combination therapy of palonosetron and dexamethasone in patients with high emetogenic risk.</abstract><pub>대한마취통증의학회</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2005-6419
ispartof Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2012-10, Vol.63 (4), p.334
issn 2005-6419
language kor
recordid cdi_kiss_primary_3105100
source PubMed Central; ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
subjects Dexamethasone
Palonosetron
PONV
title The comparative study to evaluate the effect of palonosetron monotherapy versus palonosetron with dexamethasone combination therapy for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20comparative%20study%20to%20evaluate%20the%20effect%20of%20palonosetron%20monotherapy%20versus%20palonosetron%20with%20dexamethasone%20combination%20therapy%20for%20prevention%20of%20postoperative%20nausea%20and%20vomiting&rft.jtitle=Korean%20journal%20of%20anesthesiology&rft.au=Jung%20Woo%20Park&rft.date=2012-10-30&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=334&rft.pages=334-&rft.issn=2005-6419&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss%3E3105100%3C/kiss%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_31051003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=3105100&rfr_iscdi=true