Loading…

Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B

Background/Aims: Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we investigated 63 patients with CHB and liver fibrosis....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gut and liver 2017-05, Vol.11 (3), p.401
Main Authors: Tiffany P. Hennedige, Gang Wang, Fiona P. Leung, Hind S. Alsaif, Lynette Ls Teo, Seng Gee Lim, Aileen Wee, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
Format: Article
Language:Korean
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 401
container_title Gut and liver
container_volume 11
creator Tiffany P. Hennedige
Gang Wang
Fiona P. Leung
Hind S. Alsaif
Lynette Ls Teo
Seng Gee Lim
Aileen Wee
Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
description Background/Aims: Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we investigated 63 patients with CHB and liver fibrosis. DWI was performed with both breath-hold (DWIBH) and free-breathing (DWI-FB) sequences (b=0, 500). The mean liver stiffness and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated by drawing regions of interest maps. Fibrosis staging according to the METAVIR system was independently performed by an experienced pathologist. A receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the accuracy of MRE, DWI-BH and DWI-FB in the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis. The performance of the detection of significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis (F4) was also evaluated by comparing areas under the ROC. Results: There was a moderate and significantly negative correlation between the ADC values and liver stiffness. The accuracies for the detection of ≥F2/≥F3/F4 stage fibrosis with DWI-FB, DWI-BH and MRE were 0.84/0.76/0.72, 0.72/0.83/0.79 and 0.99/0.99/0.98, respectively. The performance of MRE was significantly better than DWI-FB and DWI-BH. There were no significant differences between the performance of DWI-FB and DWI-BH. Conclusions: MRE is more accurate than DWI for the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis in CHB. (Gut Liver 2017;11:401-408)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kiss</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kiss_primary_3518764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>3518764</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>3518764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kiss_primary_35187643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jL0KwkAQhK9Q8PcJbPYFBJNooq0aiYWNCJZh1ctlNd6F24sQfHkTtLYa-Oab6Yi-t4rCqe8vg54YMN9ns9Dzo0VfvA-otHR0haNko1FfJcQFsjPKYpnXgPoGW8qyisloOEtSuZM32D9RkVZAGlzeTF5YVOhaxWSQyBLbyx1drGHi1trk1uiGfTvXwPVIdDMsWI5_ORSTXXzaJNMHMaelpSfaOg0W3jIK58H_9gPfLEgv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Tiffany P. Hennedige ; Gang Wang ; Fiona P. Leung ; Hind S. Alsaif ; Lynette Ls Teo ; Seng Gee Lim ; Aileen Wee ; Sudhakar K. Venkatesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiffany P. Hennedige ; Gang Wang ; Fiona P. Leung ; Hind S. Alsaif ; Lynette Ls Teo ; Seng Gee Lim ; Aileen Wee ; Sudhakar K. Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aims: Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we investigated 63 patients with CHB and liver fibrosis. DWI was performed with both breath-hold (DWIBH) and free-breathing (DWI-FB) sequences (b=0, 500). The mean liver stiffness and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated by drawing regions of interest maps. Fibrosis staging according to the METAVIR system was independently performed by an experienced pathologist. A receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the accuracy of MRE, DWI-BH and DWI-FB in the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis. The performance of the detection of significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis (F4) was also evaluated by comparing areas under the ROC. Results: There was a moderate and significantly negative correlation between the ADC values and liver stiffness. The accuracies for the detection of ≥F2/≥F3/F4 stage fibrosis with DWI-FB, DWI-BH and MRE were 0.84/0.76/0.72, 0.72/0.83/0.79 and 0.99/0.99/0.98, respectively. The performance of MRE was significantly better than DWI-FB and DWI-BH. There were no significant differences between the performance of DWI-FB and DWI-BH. Conclusions: MRE is more accurate than DWI for the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis in CHB. (Gut Liver 2017;11:401-408)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1976-2283</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>대한간학회</publisher><subject>Diffusion weighted ; Elastography ; Liver cirrhosis</subject><ispartof>Gut and liver, 2017-05, Vol.11 (3), p.401</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiffany P. Hennedige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gang Wang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiona P. Leung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hind S. Alsaif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynette Ls Teo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seng Gee Lim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aileen Wee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudhakar K. Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B</title><title>Gut and liver</title><addtitle>Gut and Liver</addtitle><description>Background/Aims: Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we investigated 63 patients with CHB and liver fibrosis. DWI was performed with both breath-hold (DWIBH) and free-breathing (DWI-FB) sequences (b=0, 500). The mean liver stiffness and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated by drawing regions of interest maps. Fibrosis staging according to the METAVIR system was independently performed by an experienced pathologist. A receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the accuracy of MRE, DWI-BH and DWI-FB in the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis. The performance of the detection of significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis (F4) was also evaluated by comparing areas under the ROC. Results: There was a moderate and significantly negative correlation between the ADC values and liver stiffness. The accuracies for the detection of ≥F2/≥F3/F4 stage fibrosis with DWI-FB, DWI-BH and MRE were 0.84/0.76/0.72, 0.72/0.83/0.79 and 0.99/0.99/0.98, respectively. The performance of MRE was significantly better than DWI-FB and DWI-BH. There were no significant differences between the performance of DWI-FB and DWI-BH. Conclusions: MRE is more accurate than DWI for the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis in CHB. (Gut Liver 2017;11:401-408)</description><subject>Diffusion weighted</subject><subject>Elastography</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><issn>1976-2283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9jL0KwkAQhK9Q8PcJbPYFBJNooq0aiYWNCJZh1ctlNd6F24sQfHkTtLYa-Oab6Yi-t4rCqe8vg54YMN9ns9Dzo0VfvA-otHR0haNko1FfJcQFsjPKYpnXgPoGW8qyisloOEtSuZM32D9RkVZAGlzeTF5YVOhaxWSQyBLbyx1drGHi1trk1uiGfTvXwPVIdDMsWI5_ORSTXXzaJNMHMaelpSfaOg0W3jIK58H_9gPfLEgv</recordid><startdate>20170530</startdate><enddate>20170530</enddate><creator>Tiffany P. Hennedige</creator><creator>Gang Wang</creator><creator>Fiona P. Leung</creator><creator>Hind S. Alsaif</creator><creator>Lynette Ls Teo</creator><creator>Seng Gee Lim</creator><creator>Aileen Wee</creator><creator>Sudhakar K. Venkatesh</creator><general>대한간학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170530</creationdate><title>Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B</title><author>Tiffany P. Hennedige ; Gang Wang ; Fiona P. Leung ; Hind S. Alsaif ; Lynette Ls Teo ; Seng Gee Lim ; Aileen Wee ; Sudhakar K. Venkatesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_35187643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Diffusion weighted</topic><topic>Elastography</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiffany P. Hennedige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gang Wang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiona P. Leung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hind S. Alsaif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynette Ls Teo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seng Gee Lim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aileen Wee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudhakar K. Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><collection>KISS = 한국의핵심지식정보자원</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><jtitle>Gut and liver</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiffany P. Hennedige</au><au>Gang Wang</au><au>Fiona P. Leung</au><au>Hind S. Alsaif</au><au>Lynette Ls Teo</au><au>Seng Gee Lim</au><au>Aileen Wee</au><au>Sudhakar K. Venkatesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B</atitle><jtitle>Gut and liver</jtitle><addtitle>Gut and Liver</addtitle><date>2017-05-30</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>401</spage><pages>401-</pages><issn>1976-2283</issn><abstract>Background/Aims: Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we investigated 63 patients with CHB and liver fibrosis. DWI was performed with both breath-hold (DWIBH) and free-breathing (DWI-FB) sequences (b=0, 500). The mean liver stiffness and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated by drawing regions of interest maps. Fibrosis staging according to the METAVIR system was independently performed by an experienced pathologist. A receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the accuracy of MRE, DWI-BH and DWI-FB in the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis. The performance of the detection of significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis (F4) was also evaluated by comparing areas under the ROC. Results: There was a moderate and significantly negative correlation between the ADC values and liver stiffness. The accuracies for the detection of ≥F2/≥F3/F4 stage fibrosis with DWI-FB, DWI-BH and MRE were 0.84/0.76/0.72, 0.72/0.83/0.79 and 0.99/0.99/0.98, respectively. The performance of MRE was significantly better than DWI-FB and DWI-BH. There were no significant differences between the performance of DWI-FB and DWI-BH. Conclusions: MRE is more accurate than DWI for the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis in CHB. (Gut Liver 2017;11:401-408)</abstract><pub>대한간학회</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1976-2283
ispartof Gut and liver, 2017-05, Vol.11 (3), p.401
issn 1976-2283
language kor
recordid cdi_kiss_primary_3518764
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects Diffusion weighted
Elastography
Liver cirrhosis
title Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A46%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20Resonance%20Elastography%20and%20Diffusion%20Weighted%20Imaging%20in%20the%20Evaluation%20of%20Hepatic%20Fibrosis%20in%20Chronic%20Hepatitis%20B&rft.jtitle=Gut%20and%20liver&rft.au=Tiffany%20P.%20Hennedige&rft.date=2017-05-30&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=401&rft.pages=401-&rft.issn=1976-2283&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss%3E3518764%3C/kiss%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_35187643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=3518764&rfr_iscdi=true