Loading…

Colonoscopic Polypectomy Preferences of Asian Endoscopists: Results of a Survey-Based Study

Background/Aims: The clinical practice pattern of polypectomy is not well-investigated in Asian countries. We aimed to survey Asian endoscopists about their preferred polypectomy techniques for given conditions and images of polyps. Methods: A survey was performed using questionnaires composed of tw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gut and liver 2021-05, Vol.15 (3), p.391
Main Authors: Dong-hoon Yang, Bayasgalan Luvsandagva, Quang Trung Tran, Achmad Fauzi, Panida Piyachaturawat, Thida Soe, Zhiqin Wong, Jeong-sik Byeon
Format: Article
Language:Korean
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 391
container_title Gut and liver
container_volume 15
creator Dong-hoon Yang
Bayasgalan Luvsandagva
Quang Trung Tran
Achmad Fauzi
Panida Piyachaturawat
Thida Soe
Zhiqin Wong
Jeong-sik Byeon
description Background/Aims: The clinical practice pattern of polypectomy is not well-investigated in Asian countries. We aimed to survey Asian endoscopists about their preferred polypectomy techniques for given conditions and images of polyps. Methods: A survey was performed using questionnaires composed of two parts: a scenariobased questionnaire using scenarios of polyps, which were adopted from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, and an image-based questionnaire using provided endoscopic images of polyps. Results: A total of 154 endoscopists participated in this survey. The most preferred resection techniques for diminutive (≤5 mm), small (6-9 mm), and benign-looking intermediate (10-19 mm) nonpedunculated polyps were cold forceps polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), respectively, in both the scenario- and image-based questionnaires. For benign-looking large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were preferred in the scenario- and image-based surveys, respectively. In case of malignant nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and ESD were preferred for intermediate-sized and large lesions, respectively, according to the scenario-based survey. However, ESD was preferred in both intermediate-sized and large malignant nonpedunculated polyps according to the imagebased survey. Trainee endoscopists, endoscopists working in referral centers, and endoscopists in the colorectal cancer-prevalent countries were independently associated with preference of cold snare polypectomy for removing small polyps. Conclusions: The polypectomy practice patterns of Asian endoscopists vary, and cold snare polypectomy was not the most preferred resection method for polyps
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kiss</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kiss_primary_3887680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>3887680</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>3887680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kiss_primary_38876803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9yrsKwjAUgOEMCtbLE7icFyj0gm1001JxLNbNoYT0FKJpU3JSIW8vqLPTP3z_jAXxPs_CJOHpgi2JHlGUxUm-C9i9MNoMhqQZlYTKaD-idKb3UFns0OIgkcB0cCQlBiiH9vuSowNckSbtPiygnuwLfXgShC3Ubmr9ms07oQk3v67Y9lzeikv4VETNaFUvrG9SzvOMR-l_fQMXnD0j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colonoscopic Polypectomy Preferences of Asian Endoscopists: Results of a Survey-Based Study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dong-hoon Yang ; Bayasgalan Luvsandagva ; Quang Trung Tran ; Achmad Fauzi ; Panida Piyachaturawat ; Thida Soe ; Zhiqin Wong ; Jeong-sik Byeon</creator><creatorcontrib>Dong-hoon Yang ; Bayasgalan Luvsandagva ; Quang Trung Tran ; Achmad Fauzi ; Panida Piyachaturawat ; Thida Soe ; Zhiqin Wong ; Jeong-sik Byeon</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aims: The clinical practice pattern of polypectomy is not well-investigated in Asian countries. We aimed to survey Asian endoscopists about their preferred polypectomy techniques for given conditions and images of polyps. Methods: A survey was performed using questionnaires composed of two parts: a scenariobased questionnaire using scenarios of polyps, which were adopted from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, and an image-based questionnaire using provided endoscopic images of polyps. Results: A total of 154 endoscopists participated in this survey. The most preferred resection techniques for diminutive (≤5 mm), small (6-9 mm), and benign-looking intermediate (10-19 mm) nonpedunculated polyps were cold forceps polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), respectively, in both the scenario- and image-based questionnaires. For benign-looking large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were preferred in the scenario- and image-based surveys, respectively. In case of malignant nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and ESD were preferred for intermediate-sized and large lesions, respectively, according to the scenario-based survey. However, ESD was preferred in both intermediate-sized and large malignant nonpedunculated polyps according to the imagebased survey. Trainee endoscopists, endoscopists working in referral centers, and endoscopists in the colorectal cancer-prevalent countries were independently associated with preference of cold snare polypectomy for removing small polyps. Conclusions: The polypectomy practice patterns of Asian endoscopists vary, and cold snare polypectomy was not the most preferred resection method for polyps &lt;10 mm in size, in contrast to recent guidelines. (Gut Liver 2021;15:391-400)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1976-2283</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>대한소화기학회</publisher><subject>Colon ; Polyp ; Polypectomy ; Rectum ; Survey</subject><ispartof>Gut and liver, 2021-05, Vol.15 (3), p.391</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dong-hoon Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayasgalan Luvsandagva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quang Trung Tran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achmad Fauzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panida Piyachaturawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thida Soe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhiqin Wong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong-sik Byeon</creatorcontrib><title>Colonoscopic Polypectomy Preferences of Asian Endoscopists: Results of a Survey-Based Study</title><title>Gut and liver</title><addtitle>Gut and Liver</addtitle><description>Background/Aims: The clinical practice pattern of polypectomy is not well-investigated in Asian countries. We aimed to survey Asian endoscopists about their preferred polypectomy techniques for given conditions and images of polyps. Methods: A survey was performed using questionnaires composed of two parts: a scenariobased questionnaire using scenarios of polyps, which were adopted from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, and an image-based questionnaire using provided endoscopic images of polyps. Results: A total of 154 endoscopists participated in this survey. The most preferred resection techniques for diminutive (≤5 mm), small (6-9 mm), and benign-looking intermediate (10-19 mm) nonpedunculated polyps were cold forceps polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), respectively, in both the scenario- and image-based questionnaires. For benign-looking large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were preferred in the scenario- and image-based surveys, respectively. In case of malignant nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and ESD were preferred for intermediate-sized and large lesions, respectively, according to the scenario-based survey. However, ESD was preferred in both intermediate-sized and large malignant nonpedunculated polyps according to the imagebased survey. Trainee endoscopists, endoscopists working in referral centers, and endoscopists in the colorectal cancer-prevalent countries were independently associated with preference of cold snare polypectomy for removing small polyps. Conclusions: The polypectomy practice patterns of Asian endoscopists vary, and cold snare polypectomy was not the most preferred resection method for polyps &lt;10 mm in size, in contrast to recent guidelines. (Gut Liver 2021;15:391-400)</description><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Polyp</subject><subject>Polypectomy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Survey</subject><issn>1976-2283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9yrsKwjAUgOEMCtbLE7icFyj0gm1001JxLNbNoYT0FKJpU3JSIW8vqLPTP3z_jAXxPs_CJOHpgi2JHlGUxUm-C9i9MNoMhqQZlYTKaD-idKb3UFns0OIgkcB0cCQlBiiH9vuSowNckSbtPiygnuwLfXgShC3Ubmr9ms07oQk3v67Y9lzeikv4VETNaFUvrG9SzvOMR-l_fQMXnD0j</recordid><startdate>20210530</startdate><enddate>20210530</enddate><creator>Dong-hoon Yang</creator><creator>Bayasgalan Luvsandagva</creator><creator>Quang Trung Tran</creator><creator>Achmad Fauzi</creator><creator>Panida Piyachaturawat</creator><creator>Thida Soe</creator><creator>Zhiqin Wong</creator><creator>Jeong-sik Byeon</creator><general>대한소화기학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210530</creationdate><title>Colonoscopic Polypectomy Preferences of Asian Endoscopists: Results of a Survey-Based Study</title><author>Dong-hoon Yang ; Bayasgalan Luvsandagva ; Quang Trung Tran ; Achmad Fauzi ; Panida Piyachaturawat ; Thida Soe ; Zhiqin Wong ; Jeong-sik Byeon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_38876803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Polyp</topic><topic>Polypectomy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Survey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dong-hoon Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayasgalan Luvsandagva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quang Trung Tran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achmad Fauzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panida Piyachaturawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thida Soe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhiqin Wong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong-sik Byeon</creatorcontrib><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS)</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><jtitle>Gut and liver</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dong-hoon Yang</au><au>Bayasgalan Luvsandagva</au><au>Quang Trung Tran</au><au>Achmad Fauzi</au><au>Panida Piyachaturawat</au><au>Thida Soe</au><au>Zhiqin Wong</au><au>Jeong-sik Byeon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colonoscopic Polypectomy Preferences of Asian Endoscopists: Results of a Survey-Based Study</atitle><jtitle>Gut and liver</jtitle><addtitle>Gut and Liver</addtitle><date>2021-05-30</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><pages>391-</pages><issn>1976-2283</issn><abstract>Background/Aims: The clinical practice pattern of polypectomy is not well-investigated in Asian countries. We aimed to survey Asian endoscopists about their preferred polypectomy techniques for given conditions and images of polyps. Methods: A survey was performed using questionnaires composed of two parts: a scenariobased questionnaire using scenarios of polyps, which were adopted from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, and an image-based questionnaire using provided endoscopic images of polyps. Results: A total of 154 endoscopists participated in this survey. The most preferred resection techniques for diminutive (≤5 mm), small (6-9 mm), and benign-looking intermediate (10-19 mm) nonpedunculated polyps were cold forceps polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), respectively, in both the scenario- and image-based questionnaires. For benign-looking large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were preferred in the scenario- and image-based surveys, respectively. In case of malignant nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and ESD were preferred for intermediate-sized and large lesions, respectively, according to the scenario-based survey. However, ESD was preferred in both intermediate-sized and large malignant nonpedunculated polyps according to the imagebased survey. Trainee endoscopists, endoscopists working in referral centers, and endoscopists in the colorectal cancer-prevalent countries were independently associated with preference of cold snare polypectomy for removing small polyps. Conclusions: The polypectomy practice patterns of Asian endoscopists vary, and cold snare polypectomy was not the most preferred resection method for polyps &lt;10 mm in size, in contrast to recent guidelines. (Gut Liver 2021;15:391-400)</abstract><pub>대한소화기학회</pub><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1976-2283
ispartof Gut and liver, 2021-05, Vol.15 (3), p.391
issn 1976-2283
language kor
recordid cdi_kiss_primary_3887680
source PubMed Central
subjects Colon
Polyp
Polypectomy
Rectum
Survey
title Colonoscopic Polypectomy Preferences of Asian Endoscopists: Results of a Survey-Based Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A18%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colonoscopic%20Polypectomy%20Preferences%20of%20Asian%20Endoscopists:%20Results%20of%20a%20Survey-Based%20Study&rft.jtitle=Gut%20and%20liver&rft.au=Dong-hoon%20Yang&rft.date=2021-05-30&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.pages=391-&rft.issn=1976-2283&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss%3E3887680%3C/kiss%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_38876803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=3887680&rfr_iscdi=true