Loading…

Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation

PURPOSE. This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of advanced prosthodontics 2019, Vol.11 (6), p.350-357
Main Authors: Ko, Byeong-Dae, Son, KeunBaDa, Kang, Seok Hyon, Lee, Kyu-Bok
Format: Article
Language:Korean
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 357
container_issue 6
container_start_page 350
container_title The journal of advanced prosthodontics
container_volume 11
creator Ko, Byeong-Dae
Son, KeunBaDa
Kang, Seok Hyon
Lee, Kyu-Bok
description PURPOSE. This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the 3 electronic torque driver types (W&H, SAESHIN, and NSK group) and 9 for each group. The screws were fastened at the implant fixture by three electronic torque drivers using the tightening torques recommended by the manufacturers of the drivers. After 10 minutes, the screws were again fastened at the implant fixture with equal torque. Then, the loosening torques were measured with an MGT12 torque gauge (MARK-10, Inc.). This measurement procedure was repeated 10 times under loosening torques of 15 Ncm, 25 Ncm, and 35 Ncm. In the statistical analysis, all values of loosening torque were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05) for comparative evaluation. RESULTS. There were significant inter-group differences at loosening torques of 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm (P.05). The SAESHIN driver showed the closest loosening torque at 35 Ncm. CONCLUSION. The most accurate loosening torques were SAESHIN at 35 Ncm, and NSK at 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm. Since the loosening torque may vary depending on the tightening torques and electronic torque drivers, periodic calibration of the electronic torque driver is recommended.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201908551717126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO201908551717126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2019085517171263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNir0KwjAYRYMoWLTv8C2OhTRtmupWRPFncHEvMU0gGBNN0oJvbwdxljPcw-VMUEIwphmr83L6c1zNURqCvmFaFKxipEzQsRGi91y8wSnotFLSSxtBGimid1YLiM6_egmd14P0YQMNCPd4cs_jeIAcuOlHdXaJZoqbINPvLtBqv7tuD9ldh6hb2wXTnprzheB8jWtKczZCquLf7gPqCz0O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ko, Byeong-Dae ; Son, KeunBaDa ; Kang, Seok Hyon ; Lee, Kyu-Bok</creator><creatorcontrib>Ko, Byeong-Dae ; Son, KeunBaDa ; Kang, Seok Hyon ; Lee, Kyu-Bok</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE. This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the 3 electronic torque driver types (W&amp;H, SAESHIN, and NSK group) and 9 for each group. The screws were fastened at the implant fixture by three electronic torque drivers using the tightening torques recommended by the manufacturers of the drivers. After 10 minutes, the screws were again fastened at the implant fixture with equal torque. Then, the loosening torques were measured with an MGT12 torque gauge (MARK-10, Inc.). This measurement procedure was repeated 10 times under loosening torques of 15 Ncm, 25 Ncm, and 35 Ncm. In the statistical analysis, all values of loosening torque were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05) for comparative evaluation. RESULTS. There were significant inter-group differences at loosening torques of 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm (P&lt;.05). The accuracy of the NSK driver was the highest, followed by SAESHIN and W&amp;H. There was no significant difference between NSK and W&amp;H at 35 Ncm (P&gt;.05). The SAESHIN driver showed the closest loosening torque at 35 Ncm. CONCLUSION. The most accurate loosening torques were SAESHIN at 35 Ncm, and NSK at 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm. Since the loosening torque may vary depending on the tightening torques and electronic torque drivers, periodic calibration of the electronic torque driver is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2005-7806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2005-7814</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2019, Vol.11 (6), p.350-357</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ko, Byeong-Dae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, KeunBaDa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Seok Hyon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyu-Bok</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation</title><title>The journal of advanced prosthodontics</title><addtitle>The journal of advanced prosthodontics</addtitle><description>PURPOSE. This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the 3 electronic torque driver types (W&amp;H, SAESHIN, and NSK group) and 9 for each group. The screws were fastened at the implant fixture by three electronic torque drivers using the tightening torques recommended by the manufacturers of the drivers. After 10 minutes, the screws were again fastened at the implant fixture with equal torque. Then, the loosening torques were measured with an MGT12 torque gauge (MARK-10, Inc.). This measurement procedure was repeated 10 times under loosening torques of 15 Ncm, 25 Ncm, and 35 Ncm. In the statistical analysis, all values of loosening torque were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05) for comparative evaluation. RESULTS. There were significant inter-group differences at loosening torques of 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm (P&lt;.05). The accuracy of the NSK driver was the highest, followed by SAESHIN and W&amp;H. There was no significant difference between NSK and W&amp;H at 35 Ncm (P&gt;.05). The SAESHIN driver showed the closest loosening torque at 35 Ncm. CONCLUSION. The most accurate loosening torques were SAESHIN at 35 Ncm, and NSK at 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm. Since the loosening torque may vary depending on the tightening torques and electronic torque drivers, periodic calibration of the electronic torque driver is recommended.</description><issn>2005-7806</issn><issn>2005-7814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNir0KwjAYRYMoWLTv8C2OhTRtmupWRPFncHEvMU0gGBNN0oJvbwdxljPcw-VMUEIwphmr83L6c1zNURqCvmFaFKxipEzQsRGi91y8wSnotFLSSxtBGimid1YLiM6_egmd14P0YQMNCPd4cs_jeIAcuOlHdXaJZoqbINPvLtBqv7tuD9ldh6hb2wXTnprzheB8jWtKczZCquLf7gPqCz0O</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Ko, Byeong-Dae</creator><creator>Son, KeunBaDa</creator><creator>Kang, Seok Hyon</creator><creator>Lee, Kyu-Bok</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation</title><author>Ko, Byeong-Dae ; Son, KeunBaDa ; Kang, Seok Hyon ; Lee, Kyu-Bok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2019085517171263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ko, Byeong-Dae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, KeunBaDa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Seok Hyon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyu-Bok</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>The journal of advanced prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ko, Byeong-Dae</au><au>Son, KeunBaDa</au><au>Kang, Seok Hyon</au><au>Lee, Kyu-Bok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation</atitle><jtitle>The journal of advanced prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>The journal of advanced prosthodontics</addtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>350-357</pages><issn>2005-7806</issn><eissn>2005-7814</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE. This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the 3 electronic torque driver types (W&amp;H, SAESHIN, and NSK group) and 9 for each group. The screws were fastened at the implant fixture by three electronic torque drivers using the tightening torques recommended by the manufacturers of the drivers. After 10 minutes, the screws were again fastened at the implant fixture with equal torque. Then, the loosening torques were measured with an MGT12 torque gauge (MARK-10, Inc.). This measurement procedure was repeated 10 times under loosening torques of 15 Ncm, 25 Ncm, and 35 Ncm. In the statistical analysis, all values of loosening torque were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05) for comparative evaluation. RESULTS. There were significant inter-group differences at loosening torques of 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm (P&lt;.05). The accuracy of the NSK driver was the highest, followed by SAESHIN and W&amp;H. There was no significant difference between NSK and W&amp;H at 35 Ncm (P&gt;.05). The SAESHIN driver showed the closest loosening torque at 35 Ncm. CONCLUSION. The most accurate loosening torques were SAESHIN at 35 Ncm, and NSK at 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm. Since the loosening torque may vary depending on the tightening torques and electronic torque drivers, periodic calibration of the electronic torque driver is recommended.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2005-7806
ispartof The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2019, Vol.11 (6), p.350-357
issn 2005-7806
2005-7814
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201908551717126
source PubMed Central
title Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A12%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20different%20electronic%20torque%20drivers:%20A%20comparative%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20advanced%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Ko,%20Byeong-Dae&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=350-357&rft.issn=2005-7806&rft.eissn=2005-7814&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO201908551717126%3C/kisti%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2019085517171263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true