Loading…

전자건강기록 데이터 기반 욕창 발생 예측모델의 개발 및 평가

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop predictive models for pressure ulcer incidence using electronic health record (EHR) data and to compare their predictive validity performance indicators with that of the Braden Scale used in the study hospital. Methods: A retrospective case-control s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2019-10, Vol.49 (5), p.575-585
Main Authors: 박슬기, 박현애, 황희, Park, Seul Ki, Park, Hyeoun-Ae, Hwang, Hee
Format: Article
Language:Korean
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 585
container_issue 5
container_start_page 575
container_title Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
container_volume 49
creator 박슬기
박현애
황희
Park, Seul Ki
Park, Hyeoun-Ae
Hwang, Hee
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop predictive models for pressure ulcer incidence using electronic health record (EHR) data and to compare their predictive validity performance indicators with that of the Braden Scale used in the study hospital. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in Korea. Data of 202 pressure ulcer patients and 14,705 non-pressure ulcer patients admitted between January 2015 and May 2016 were extracted from the EHRs. Three predictive models for pressure ulcer incidence were developed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and decision tree modeling. The predictive validity performance indicators of the three models were compared with those of the Braden Scale. Results: The logistic regression model was most efficient with a high area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) estimate of 0.97, followed by the decision tree model (AUC 0.95), Cox proportional hazards regression model (AUC 0.95), and the Braden Scale (AUC 0.82). Decreased mobility was the most significant factor in the logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, and the endotracheal tube was the most important factor in the decision tree model. Conclusion: Predictive validity performance indicators of the Braden Scale were lower than those of the logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and decision tree models. The models developed in this study can be used to develop a clinical decision support system that automatically assesses risk for pressure ulcers to aid nurses.
doi_str_mv 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.5.575
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201931262479200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO201931262479200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-k647-cae6b356e2e37842cfa4586ce74dc7ccfa73a496ab5056713fa75579e20809b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUD9Lw0AcPUTBUvsFnG5xTLzc3e8uN5bi_0IHO7iVJL1CTOkSP4BgBx1KXQpBGrGbOJ3QIYtfKLl-BxN0ev_gwXsIHXvE5YST0_skmLmUeMrlygUXJOyhFiWKORL8u_2GE3CYkOwQddI0DglRhCulZAvd2o-5fX8tv7elWZWFqTY5rhbG5tvd3ODGMBm2bytrfnBl1vYpxzZ7tsWm-vqsFoXNM1yadZ3U6RLvli-leTxCB5NgmurOP7bR8Pxs2Lt0-oOLq1637ySCSycKtAgZCE01kz6n0STg4ItISz6OZFRLyQKuRBACASE9VhsAUmlKfKJCYG108lebxOlDPJqN0-nounszaJ5gHhWUS1UvZ785aGtn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>전자건강기록 데이터 기반 욕창 발생 예측모델의 개발 및 평가</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>박슬기 ; 박현애 ; 황희 ; Park, Seul Ki ; Park, Hyeoun-Ae ; Hwang, Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>박슬기 ; 박현애 ; 황희 ; Park, Seul Ki ; Park, Hyeoun-Ae ; Hwang, Hee</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop predictive models for pressure ulcer incidence using electronic health record (EHR) data and to compare their predictive validity performance indicators with that of the Braden Scale used in the study hospital. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in Korea. Data of 202 pressure ulcer patients and 14,705 non-pressure ulcer patients admitted between January 2015 and May 2016 were extracted from the EHRs. Three predictive models for pressure ulcer incidence were developed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and decision tree modeling. The predictive validity performance indicators of the three models were compared with those of the Braden Scale. Results: The logistic regression model was most efficient with a high area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) estimate of 0.97, followed by the decision tree model (AUC 0.95), Cox proportional hazards regression model (AUC 0.95), and the Braden Scale (AUC 0.82). Decreased mobility was the most significant factor in the logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, and the endotracheal tube was the most important factor in the decision tree model. Conclusion: Predictive validity performance indicators of the Braden Scale were lower than those of the logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and decision tree models. The models developed in this study can be used to develop a clinical decision support system that automatically assesses risk for pressure ulcers to aid nurses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2005-3673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2093-758X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.5.575</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 2019-10, Vol.49 (5), p.575-585</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>박슬기</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>박현애</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>황희</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seul Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyeoun-Ae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Hee</creatorcontrib><title>전자건강기록 데이터 기반 욕창 발생 예측모델의 개발 및 평가</title><title>Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing</title><addtitle>대한간호학회지</addtitle><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop predictive models for pressure ulcer incidence using electronic health record (EHR) data and to compare their predictive validity performance indicators with that of the Braden Scale used in the study hospital. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in Korea. Data of 202 pressure ulcer patients and 14,705 non-pressure ulcer patients admitted between January 2015 and May 2016 were extracted from the EHRs. Three predictive models for pressure ulcer incidence were developed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and decision tree modeling. The predictive validity performance indicators of the three models were compared with those of the Braden Scale. Results: The logistic regression model was most efficient with a high area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) estimate of 0.97, followed by the decision tree model (AUC 0.95), Cox proportional hazards regression model (AUC 0.95), and the Braden Scale (AUC 0.82). Decreased mobility was the most significant factor in the logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, and the endotracheal tube was the most important factor in the decision tree model. Conclusion: Predictive validity performance indicators of the Braden Scale were lower than those of the logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and decision tree models. The models developed in this study can be used to develop a clinical decision support system that automatically assesses risk for pressure ulcers to aid nurses.</description><issn>2005-3673</issn><issn>2093-758X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUD9Lw0AcPUTBUvsFnG5xTLzc3e8uN5bi_0IHO7iVJL1CTOkSP4BgBx1KXQpBGrGbOJ3QIYtfKLl-BxN0ev_gwXsIHXvE5YST0_skmLmUeMrlygUXJOyhFiWKORL8u_2GE3CYkOwQddI0DglRhCulZAvd2o-5fX8tv7elWZWFqTY5rhbG5tvd3ODGMBm2bytrfnBl1vYpxzZ7tsWm-vqsFoXNM1yadZ3U6RLvli-leTxCB5NgmurOP7bR8Pxs2Lt0-oOLq1637ySCSycKtAgZCE01kz6n0STg4ItISz6OZFRLyQKuRBACASE9VhsAUmlKfKJCYG108lebxOlDPJqN0-nounszaJ5gHhWUS1UvZ785aGtn</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>박슬기</creator><creator>박현애</creator><creator>황희</creator><creator>Park, Seul Ki</creator><creator>Park, Hyeoun-Ae</creator><creator>Hwang, Hee</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>전자건강기록 데이터 기반 욕창 발생 예측모델의 개발 및 평가</title><author>박슬기 ; 박현애 ; 황희 ; Park, Seul Ki ; Park, Hyeoun-Ae ; Hwang, Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-k647-cae6b356e2e37842cfa4586ce74dc7ccfa73a496ab5056713fa75579e20809b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>박슬기</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>박현애</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>황희</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seul Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyeoun-Ae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>박슬기</au><au>박현애</au><au>황희</au><au>Park, Seul Ki</au><au>Park, Hyeoun-Ae</au><au>Hwang, Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>전자건강기록 데이터 기반 욕창 발생 예측모델의 개발 및 평가</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing</jtitle><addtitle>대한간호학회지</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>575-585</pages><issn>2005-3673</issn><eissn>2093-758X</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop predictive models for pressure ulcer incidence using electronic health record (EHR) data and to compare their predictive validity performance indicators with that of the Braden Scale used in the study hospital. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in Korea. Data of 202 pressure ulcer patients and 14,705 non-pressure ulcer patients admitted between January 2015 and May 2016 were extracted from the EHRs. Three predictive models for pressure ulcer incidence were developed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and decision tree modeling. The predictive validity performance indicators of the three models were compared with those of the Braden Scale. Results: The logistic regression model was most efficient with a high area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) estimate of 0.97, followed by the decision tree model (AUC 0.95), Cox proportional hazards regression model (AUC 0.95), and the Braden Scale (AUC 0.82). Decreased mobility was the most significant factor in the logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, and the endotracheal tube was the most important factor in the decision tree model. Conclusion: Predictive validity performance indicators of the Braden Scale were lower than those of the logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and decision tree models. The models developed in this study can be used to develop a clinical decision support system that automatically assesses risk for pressure ulcers to aid nurses.</abstract><doi>10.4040/jkan.2019.49.5.575</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2005-3673
ispartof Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 2019-10, Vol.49 (5), p.575-585
issn 2005-3673
2093-758X
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201931262479200
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title 전자건강기록 데이터 기반 욕창 발생 예측모델의 개발 및 평가
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%EC%A0%84%EC%9E%90%EA%B1%B4%EA%B0%95%EA%B8%B0%EB%A1%9D%20%EB%8D%B0%EC%9D%B4%ED%84%B0%20%EA%B8%B0%EB%B0%98%20%EC%9A%95%EC%B0%BD%20%EB%B0%9C%EC%83%9D%20%EC%98%88%EC%B8%A1%EB%AA%A8%EB%8D%B8%EC%9D%98%20%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%20%EB%B0%8F%20%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Korean%20Academy%20of%20Nursing&rft.au=%EB%B0%95%EC%8A%AC%EA%B8%B0&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=575-585&rft.issn=2005-3673&rft.eissn=2093-758X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4040/jkan.2019.49.5.575&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO201931262479200%3C/kisti%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-k647-cae6b356e2e37842cfa4586ce74dc7ccfa73a496ab5056713fa75579e20809b53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true