Loading…

Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography

Background: The presence of an acromial spur implies a rotator cuff disorder due to impingement between the acromial spur and the rotator cuff. The purpose of the study was to observe acromial spurs using ultrasonography and to compare measurements between plain radiographs and sonograms. Methods: W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinics in shoulder and elbow 2021, Vol.24 (1), p.15-20
Main Authors: Kim, Hyungsuk, Choi, Syungkyun, Park, Soo Bin, Song, Hyun Seok
Format: Article
Language:Korean
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Clinics in shoulder and elbow
container_volume 24
creator Kim, Hyungsuk
Choi, Syungkyun
Park, Soo Bin
Song, Hyun Seok
description Background: The presence of an acromial spur implies a rotator cuff disorder due to impingement between the acromial spur and the rotator cuff. The purpose of the study was to observe acromial spurs using ultrasonography and to compare measurements between plain radiographs and sonograms. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 51 consecutive patients with acromial spurs, which were interpreted on preoperative plain radiographs (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal tilt) and preoperative sonograms. The ultrasonography transducer was held vertically and continuously moved laterally, which corresponded to the long axis of the long head of the biceps. The distance from the most distal margin of the original acromion to the most projected point of the acromial spur was measured. Results: No significant difference was found between the plain radiograph and ultrasonography measurements (p=0.186). A moderate to strong correlation was detected between the ultrasonography and supraspinatus outlet-view measurements (r=0.776, p=0.000). Conclusions: Anteriorly projected acromial spurs were well-visualized by ultrasonography. No discrepancy in acromial spur length was detected between the use of plain radiography (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal-tilt view) and ultrasonography. The correlation coefficients between the plain radiography and ultrasonography measurements exceeded 0.7.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202122349848764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO202122349848764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2021223498487643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrEKwjAUQNEgChbtP2RxLDTvBZOOIhXRwcW9pGprMCYlrxH8ex38AKd7hjthGYDWhVYgpl-jxkIjqjnLiWxbSoRKiRIzJuqXccmMNngeOm4uMTytcZyGFHki63ue3BgNBR_6aIb7e8lmnXF0y39dsNWuPm_3xcPSaBt_JdccNscTlCAAUFZaarWW-O_3AdSTNHs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kim, Hyungsuk ; Choi, Syungkyun ; Park, Soo Bin ; Song, Hyun Seok</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyungsuk ; Choi, Syungkyun ; Park, Soo Bin ; Song, Hyun Seok</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The presence of an acromial spur implies a rotator cuff disorder due to impingement between the acromial spur and the rotator cuff. The purpose of the study was to observe acromial spurs using ultrasonography and to compare measurements between plain radiographs and sonograms. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 51 consecutive patients with acromial spurs, which were interpreted on preoperative plain radiographs (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal tilt) and preoperative sonograms. The ultrasonography transducer was held vertically and continuously moved laterally, which corresponded to the long axis of the long head of the biceps. The distance from the most distal margin of the original acromion to the most projected point of the acromial spur was measured. Results: No significant difference was found between the plain radiograph and ultrasonography measurements (p=0.186). A moderate to strong correlation was detected between the ultrasonography and supraspinatus outlet-view measurements (r=0.776, p=0.000). Conclusions: Anteriorly projected acromial spurs were well-visualized by ultrasonography. No discrepancy in acromial spur length was detected between the use of plain radiography (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal-tilt view) and ultrasonography. The correlation coefficients between the plain radiography and ultrasonography measurements exceeded 0.7.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2383-8337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2288-8721</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2021, Vol.24 (1), p.15-20</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyungsuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Syungkyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soo Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Hyun Seok</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography</title><title>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</title><addtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</addtitle><description>Background: The presence of an acromial spur implies a rotator cuff disorder due to impingement between the acromial spur and the rotator cuff. The purpose of the study was to observe acromial spurs using ultrasonography and to compare measurements between plain radiographs and sonograms. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 51 consecutive patients with acromial spurs, which were interpreted on preoperative plain radiographs (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal tilt) and preoperative sonograms. The ultrasonography transducer was held vertically and continuously moved laterally, which corresponded to the long axis of the long head of the biceps. The distance from the most distal margin of the original acromion to the most projected point of the acromial spur was measured. Results: No significant difference was found between the plain radiograph and ultrasonography measurements (p=0.186). A moderate to strong correlation was detected between the ultrasonography and supraspinatus outlet-view measurements (r=0.776, p=0.000). Conclusions: Anteriorly projected acromial spurs were well-visualized by ultrasonography. No discrepancy in acromial spur length was detected between the use of plain radiography (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal-tilt view) and ultrasonography. The correlation coefficients between the plain radiography and ultrasonography measurements exceeded 0.7.</description><issn>2383-8337</issn><issn>2288-8721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyrEKwjAUQNEgChbtP2RxLDTvBZOOIhXRwcW9pGprMCYlrxH8ex38AKd7hjthGYDWhVYgpl-jxkIjqjnLiWxbSoRKiRIzJuqXccmMNngeOm4uMTytcZyGFHki63ue3BgNBR_6aIb7e8lmnXF0y39dsNWuPm_3xcPSaBt_JdccNscTlCAAUFZaarWW-O_3AdSTNHs</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Kim, Hyungsuk</creator><creator>Choi, Syungkyun</creator><creator>Park, Soo Bin</creator><creator>Song, Hyun Seok</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography</title><author>Kim, Hyungsuk ; Choi, Syungkyun ; Park, Soo Bin ; Song, Hyun Seok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2021223498487643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyungsuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Syungkyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soo Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Hyun Seok</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hyungsuk</au><au>Choi, Syungkyun</au><au>Park, Soo Bin</au><au>Song, Hyun Seok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography</atitle><jtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</jtitle><addtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>15-20</pages><issn>2383-8337</issn><eissn>2288-8721</eissn><abstract>Background: The presence of an acromial spur implies a rotator cuff disorder due to impingement between the acromial spur and the rotator cuff. The purpose of the study was to observe acromial spurs using ultrasonography and to compare measurements between plain radiographs and sonograms. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 51 consecutive patients with acromial spurs, which were interpreted on preoperative plain radiographs (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal tilt) and preoperative sonograms. The ultrasonography transducer was held vertically and continuously moved laterally, which corresponded to the long axis of the long head of the biceps. The distance from the most distal margin of the original acromion to the most projected point of the acromial spur was measured. Results: No significant difference was found between the plain radiograph and ultrasonography measurements (p=0.186). A moderate to strong correlation was detected between the ultrasonography and supraspinatus outlet-view measurements (r=0.776, p=0.000). Conclusions: Anteriorly projected acromial spurs were well-visualized by ultrasonography. No discrepancy in acromial spur length was detected between the use of plain radiography (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal-tilt view) and ultrasonography. The correlation coefficients between the plain radiography and ultrasonography measurements exceeded 0.7.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2383-8337
ispartof Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2021, Vol.24 (1), p.15-20
issn 2383-8337
2288-8721
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202122349848764
source PubMed Central Free; EZB Electronic Journals Library
title Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A10%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20acromial%20spur%20using%20ultrasonography&rft.jtitle=Clinics%20in%20shoulder%20and%20elbow&rft.au=Kim,%20Hyungsuk&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=15-20&rft.issn=2383-8337&rft.eissn=2288-8721&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO202122349848764%3C/kisti%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2021223498487643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true