Loading…

Tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points with rotary and reciprocating instruments

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points (AGPs) with various rotary and reciprocating instruments. Materials and Methods: Using a profile analyzer, tip and taper measurements were taken of 10 AGPs of each of the 14...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2023, Vol.48 (48), p.22.1-22.8
Main Authors: Julia Niero Zanatta Streck, Sabrina Arcaro, Renan Antonio Ceretta, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Josiane de Almeida, Patricia Maria Poli Kopper, Anarela Vassen Bernardi
Format: Article
Language:Korean
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 22.8
container_issue 48
container_start_page 22.1
container_title Restorative dentistry & endodontics
container_volume 48
creator Julia Niero Zanatta Streck
Sabrina Arcaro
Renan Antonio Ceretta
Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi
Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia
Josiane de Almeida
Patricia Maria Poli Kopper
Anarela Vassen Bernardi
description Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points (AGPs) with various rotary and reciprocating instruments. Materials and Methods: Using a profile analyzer, tip and taper measurements were taken of 10 AGPs of each of the 14 models available from Odous de Deus and the 4 models available from Dentsply-Maillefer. Diameter measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals, from 3 mm from the tip (D3) to 16 mm. Results: Based on the mean values obtained, 3-dimensional (3D) models of the AGPs were drawn in Autodesk Fusion 360 and superimposed on 3D models of each instrument selected (Mtwo, Reciproc, RaCe, K3, and ProDesign Logic) to determine the compatibility between the instrument and the AGP. Data corresponding to the tips and tapers of the various AGPs, as well as the tip and taper differences between the AGPs and the instruments, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The tapers of the AGPs were subject to the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association No. 57 standard. The Odous de Deus extra-long medium and extra-long extra-medium AGPs were shown to be compatible with Mtwo, K3, and ProDesign Logic instruments with taper 0.06 and tip sizes 25 and 30, while the Dentsply fine and fine medium cones were compatible with Mtwo, RaCe, and K3 instruments with conicity of 0.04 and tip sizes 35 and 40. Conclusions: Both the Odous de Deus and Dentsply commercial brands included 2 AGP models with tip (D3) and taper compatibility with Mtwo, RaCe, K3, and/or Prodesign Logic instruments.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202332443240659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO202332443240659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2023324432406593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjE2LAjEQRIMoKOp_6MseB4Yk87HHZVFED3vxLjFmtHEmCekW8d8bQTzvoaiCeryRmEmpdNHUdT3-7KqdiiURHkutm6pVjZyJbo8RjD8Bm-gS2DBEw3jEHvkBoQNjrSMK6QHnG7MpMmQvBmJAzwR35AukwCb_L0lyFmMKNiv8GdATp9vgMrkQk8705Jbvnouv9Wr_uymuSIwHf6L-sP3Z_clSKiW1zinr6lv9l3sC_6lIpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points with rotary and reciprocating instruments</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Julia Niero Zanatta Streck ; Sabrina Arcaro ; Renan Antonio Ceretta ; Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi ; Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia ; Josiane de Almeida ; Patricia Maria Poli Kopper ; Anarela Vassen Bernardi</creator><creatorcontrib>Julia Niero Zanatta Streck ; Sabrina Arcaro ; Renan Antonio Ceretta ; Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi ; Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia ; Josiane de Almeida ; Patricia Maria Poli Kopper ; Anarela Vassen Bernardi</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points (AGPs) with various rotary and reciprocating instruments. Materials and Methods: Using a profile analyzer, tip and taper measurements were taken of 10 AGPs of each of the 14 models available from Odous de Deus and the 4 models available from Dentsply-Maillefer. Diameter measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals, from 3 mm from the tip (D3) to 16 mm. Results: Based on the mean values obtained, 3-dimensional (3D) models of the AGPs were drawn in Autodesk Fusion 360 and superimposed on 3D models of each instrument selected (Mtwo, Reciproc, RaCe, K3, and ProDesign Logic) to determine the compatibility between the instrument and the AGP. Data corresponding to the tips and tapers of the various AGPs, as well as the tip and taper differences between the AGPs and the instruments, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The tapers of the AGPs were subject to the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association No. 57 standard. The Odous de Deus extra-long medium and extra-long extra-medium AGPs were shown to be compatible with Mtwo, K3, and ProDesign Logic instruments with taper 0.06 and tip sizes 25 and 30, while the Dentsply fine and fine medium cones were compatible with Mtwo, RaCe, and K3 instruments with conicity of 0.04 and tip sizes 35 and 40. Conclusions: Both the Odous de Deus and Dentsply commercial brands included 2 AGP models with tip (D3) and taper compatibility with Mtwo, RaCe, K3, and/or Prodesign Logic instruments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-7658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-7666</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics, 2023, Vol.48 (48), p.22.1-22.8</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Julia Niero Zanatta Streck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabrina Arcaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renan Antonio Ceretta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josiane de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patricia Maria Poli Kopper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anarela Vassen Bernardi</creatorcontrib><title>Tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points with rotary and reciprocating instruments</title><title>Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</title><addtitle>RDE : Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</addtitle><description>Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points (AGPs) with various rotary and reciprocating instruments. Materials and Methods: Using a profile analyzer, tip and taper measurements were taken of 10 AGPs of each of the 14 models available from Odous de Deus and the 4 models available from Dentsply-Maillefer. Diameter measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals, from 3 mm from the tip (D3) to 16 mm. Results: Based on the mean values obtained, 3-dimensional (3D) models of the AGPs were drawn in Autodesk Fusion 360 and superimposed on 3D models of each instrument selected (Mtwo, Reciproc, RaCe, K3, and ProDesign Logic) to determine the compatibility between the instrument and the AGP. Data corresponding to the tips and tapers of the various AGPs, as well as the tip and taper differences between the AGPs and the instruments, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The tapers of the AGPs were subject to the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association No. 57 standard. The Odous de Deus extra-long medium and extra-long extra-medium AGPs were shown to be compatible with Mtwo, K3, and ProDesign Logic instruments with taper 0.06 and tip sizes 25 and 30, while the Dentsply fine and fine medium cones were compatible with Mtwo, RaCe, and K3 instruments with conicity of 0.04 and tip sizes 35 and 40. Conclusions: Both the Odous de Deus and Dentsply commercial brands included 2 AGP models with tip (D3) and taper compatibility with Mtwo, RaCe, K3, and/or Prodesign Logic instruments.</description><issn>2234-7658</issn><issn>2234-7666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjE2LAjEQRIMoKOp_6MseB4Yk87HHZVFED3vxLjFmtHEmCekW8d8bQTzvoaiCeryRmEmpdNHUdT3-7KqdiiURHkutm6pVjZyJbo8RjD8Bm-gS2DBEw3jEHvkBoQNjrSMK6QHnG7MpMmQvBmJAzwR35AukwCb_L0lyFmMKNiv8GdATp9vgMrkQk8705Jbvnouv9Wr_uymuSIwHf6L-sP3Z_clSKiW1zinr6lv9l3sC_6lIpw</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Julia Niero Zanatta Streck</creator><creator>Sabrina Arcaro</creator><creator>Renan Antonio Ceretta</creator><creator>Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi</creator><creator>Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia</creator><creator>Josiane de Almeida</creator><creator>Patricia Maria Poli Kopper</creator><creator>Anarela Vassen Bernardi</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points with rotary and reciprocating instruments</title><author>Julia Niero Zanatta Streck ; Sabrina Arcaro ; Renan Antonio Ceretta ; Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi ; Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia ; Josiane de Almeida ; Patricia Maria Poli Kopper ; Anarela Vassen Bernardi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2023324432406593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Julia Niero Zanatta Streck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabrina Arcaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renan Antonio Ceretta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josiane de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patricia Maria Poli Kopper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anarela Vassen Bernardi</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Julia Niero Zanatta Streck</au><au>Sabrina Arcaro</au><au>Renan Antonio Ceretta</au><au>Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi</au><au>Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia</au><au>Josiane de Almeida</au><au>Patricia Maria Poli Kopper</au><au>Anarela Vassen Bernardi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points with rotary and reciprocating instruments</atitle><jtitle>Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>RDE : Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</addtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>48</issue><spage>22.1</spage><epage>22.8</epage><pages>22.1-22.8</pages><issn>2234-7658</issn><eissn>2234-7666</eissn><abstract>Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points (AGPs) with various rotary and reciprocating instruments. Materials and Methods: Using a profile analyzer, tip and taper measurements were taken of 10 AGPs of each of the 14 models available from Odous de Deus and the 4 models available from Dentsply-Maillefer. Diameter measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals, from 3 mm from the tip (D3) to 16 mm. Results: Based on the mean values obtained, 3-dimensional (3D) models of the AGPs were drawn in Autodesk Fusion 360 and superimposed on 3D models of each instrument selected (Mtwo, Reciproc, RaCe, K3, and ProDesign Logic) to determine the compatibility between the instrument and the AGP. Data corresponding to the tips and tapers of the various AGPs, as well as the tip and taper differences between the AGPs and the instruments, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The tapers of the AGPs were subject to the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association No. 57 standard. The Odous de Deus extra-long medium and extra-long extra-medium AGPs were shown to be compatible with Mtwo, K3, and ProDesign Logic instruments with taper 0.06 and tip sizes 25 and 30, while the Dentsply fine and fine medium cones were compatible with Mtwo, RaCe, and K3 instruments with conicity of 0.04 and tip sizes 35 and 40. Conclusions: Both the Odous de Deus and Dentsply commercial brands included 2 AGP models with tip (D3) and taper compatibility with Mtwo, RaCe, K3, and/or Prodesign Logic instruments.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-7658
ispartof Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2023, Vol.48 (48), p.22.1-22.8
issn 2234-7658
2234-7666
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202332443240659
source PubMed Central
title Tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points with rotary and reciprocating instruments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A37%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tip%20and%20taper%20compatibility%20of%20accessory%20gutta-percha%20points%20with%20rotary%20and%20reciprocating%20instruments&rft.jtitle=Restorative%20dentistry%20&%20endodontics&rft.au=Julia%20Niero%20Zanatta%20Streck&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=48&rft.spage=22.1&rft.epage=22.8&rft.pages=22.1-22.8&rft.issn=2234-7658&rft.eissn=2234-7666&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO202332443240659%3C/kisti%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2023324432406593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true