Degludec is superior to glargine in terms of daily glycemic variability in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus

[Abstract. ] To investigate the differences in glycemic variability between the long-acting insulins glargine and degludec using continuous glucose monitoring, we conducted an open-label, multicenter, prospective, observational study that enrolled 21 participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus curren...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ENDOCRINE JOURNAL 2016, Vol.63 (1), p.53-60
Main Authors: Chiho Yamamoto, Hideaki Miyoshi, Yutaka Fujiwara, Reina Kameda, Mei Ichiyama, Hiroshi Nomoto, Hiraku Kameda, Akinobu Nakamura, Tatsuya Atsumi
Format: Article
Language:Japanese
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Abstract. ] To investigate the differences in glycemic variability between the long-acting insulins glargine and degludec using continuous glucose monitoring, we conducted an open-label, multicenter, prospective, observational study that enrolled 21 participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus currently receiving basal-bolus insulin therapy with glargine. To avoid the potential influence of diet and exercise on glycemic control, all participants were housed and monitored within the hospital for the duration of the study. Once glycemic control was achieved with glargine, glycemic variability was evaluated using continuous glucose monitoring for 3 days. Glargine was then replaced by degludec and glycemic variability again assessed via continuous glucose monitoring. The primary outcome measure of mean amplitude of glycemic excursions was significantly reduced with degludec (p = 0.028), as was area under the curve for daily blood glucose level
ISSN:0918-8959