Loading…

Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish

The traditional view of the null subject as pro identified by Agr (the φ-features of I) cannot be maintained in a theory where Agr is uninterpretable. Two hypotheses are compared with regard to the predictions they make for Finnish null subject constructions: (A) Agr is interpretable in null subject...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistic inquiry 2005-10, Vol.36 (4), p.533-564
Main Author: Holmberg, Anders
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a530t-f2b5f6d635088185d0dee886ae0e507e51440d4c7dda01978e07c711c6d7c6313
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a530t-f2b5f6d635088185d0dee886ae0e507e51440d4c7dda01978e07c711c6d7c6313
container_end_page 564
container_issue 4
container_start_page 533
container_title Linguistic inquiry
container_volume 36
creator Holmberg, Anders
description The traditional view of the null subject as pro identified by Agr (the φ-features of I) cannot be maintained in a theory where Agr is uninterpretable. Two hypotheses are compared with regard to the predictions they make for Finnish null subject constructions: (A) Agr is interpretable in null subject languages, and pro is therefore redundant; (B) null subjects are specified but unpronounced pronouns that assign values to the uninterpretable features of Agr. Since Finnish observes the Extended Projection Principle and has an expletive pronoun, Hypothesis A predicts that null subjects should cooccur with expletives. The prediction is false, favoring B over A. A typology of null subjects is proposed: Null bound pronouns and null generic pronouns in partial null subject languages, including Finnish, are D-less φPs, and so are null subjects in consistent null subject languages with Agr, such as Spanish and Greek. Null 1st and 2nd person subjects in Finnish are DPs that are deleted. Null pronouns in languages without Agr, such as Chinese and Japanese, are the only true instances of pro, a minimally specified null noun.
doi_str_mv 10.1162/002438905774464322
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_mit_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_mit_journals_10_1162_002438905774464322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4179340</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4179340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a530t-f2b5f6d635088185d0dee886ae0e507e51440d4c7dda01978e07c711c6d7c6313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLHEEURouQQCaT_AHJojdmldZ7690rCeKoMKCgWRdl9e1YQz_Gqh7B_Hp7HDFCJKnN3Zzv1H0wtodwgKj5IQCXwlagjJFSS8H5OzZDJaCsUMF7NtsC5UTwj-xTzisAqKQ2M_b9PBfXt5So8MUyjmNLxWUajoqT-1hTH6ho0tAVi9j3Md9-Zh8a32b68lzn7Ofi5Pr4rFxenJ4f_1iWfvpxLBt-oxpda6HAWrSqhprIWu0JSIEhhVJCLYOpaw9YGUtggkEMujZBCxRz9m3nXafhbkN5dF3MgdrW9zRssrNKc6m5_S8ojDEKn4x8B4Y05JyocesUO58eHILbbtD9vcEptP9s9zn4tkm-DzH_SRrOq2nIiZMvXawojN0mk1sNm9RPS3JobaWEu9peY3sMUBKUmN6cHexiXRxf4f_qZ_FGoI39r3uho3QC0GjtOHCcHA6s-x3Xb4u-7kSrPA7pZSCJphISxCPxE6ft</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37775131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Holmberg, Anders</creator><creatorcontrib>Holmberg, Anders</creatorcontrib><description>The traditional view of the null subject as pro identified by Agr (the φ-features of I) cannot be maintained in a theory where Agr is uninterpretable. Two hypotheses are compared with regard to the predictions they make for Finnish null subject constructions: (A) Agr is interpretable in null subject languages, and pro is therefore redundant; (B) null subjects are specified but unpronounced pronouns that assign values to the uninterpretable features of Agr. Since Finnish observes the Extended Projection Principle and has an expletive pronoun, Hypothesis A predicts that null subjects should cooccur with expletives. The prediction is false, favoring B over A. A typology of null subjects is proposed: Null bound pronouns and null generic pronouns in partial null subject languages, including Finnish, are D-less φPs, and so are null subjects in consistent null subject languages with Agr, such as Spanish and Greek. Null 1st and 2nd person subjects in Finnish are DPs that are deleted. Null pronouns in languages without Agr, such as Chinese and Japanese, are the only true instances of pro, a minimally specified null noun.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/002438905774464322</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LIINBL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: The MIT Press</publisher><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories ; empty category ; expletive ; Expletives ; Grammatical clauses ; Language use ; Linguistics ; Null condition ; Null hypothesis ; null subject ; Pronoun ; Pronouns ; Sentences ; Subject pronouns ; Syntax ; Verbs ; φ-feature</subject><ispartof>Linguistic inquiry, 2005-10, Vol.36 (4), p.533-564</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The Massachusetts Institute of Technology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2005 The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a530t-f2b5f6d635088185d0dee886ae0e507e51440d4c7dda01978e07c711c6d7c6313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a530t-f2b5f6d635088185d0dee886ae0e507e51440d4c7dda01978e07c711c6d7c6313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4179340$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4179340$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31270,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17229635$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holmberg, Anders</creatorcontrib><title>Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish</title><title>Linguistic inquiry</title><description>The traditional view of the null subject as pro identified by Agr (the φ-features of I) cannot be maintained in a theory where Agr is uninterpretable. Two hypotheses are compared with regard to the predictions they make for Finnish null subject constructions: (A) Agr is interpretable in null subject languages, and pro is therefore redundant; (B) null subjects are specified but unpronounced pronouns that assign values to the uninterpretable features of Agr. Since Finnish observes the Extended Projection Principle and has an expletive pronoun, Hypothesis A predicts that null subjects should cooccur with expletives. The prediction is false, favoring B over A. A typology of null subjects is proposed: Null bound pronouns and null generic pronouns in partial null subject languages, including Finnish, are D-less φPs, and so are null subjects in consistent null subject languages with Agr, such as Spanish and Greek. Null 1st and 2nd person subjects in Finnish are DPs that are deleted. Null pronouns in languages without Agr, such as Chinese and Japanese, are the only true instances of pro, a minimally specified null noun.</description><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories</subject><subject>empty category</subject><subject>expletive</subject><subject>Expletives</subject><subject>Grammatical clauses</subject><subject>Language use</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Null condition</subject><subject>Null hypothesis</subject><subject>null subject</subject><subject>Pronoun</subject><subject>Pronouns</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Subject pronouns</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>φ-feature</subject><issn>0024-3892</issn><issn>1530-9150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLHEEURouQQCaT_AHJojdmldZ7690rCeKoMKCgWRdl9e1YQz_Gqh7B_Hp7HDFCJKnN3Zzv1H0wtodwgKj5IQCXwlagjJFSS8H5OzZDJaCsUMF7NtsC5UTwj-xTzisAqKQ2M_b9PBfXt5So8MUyjmNLxWUajoqT-1hTH6ho0tAVi9j3Md9-Zh8a32b68lzn7Ofi5Pr4rFxenJ4f_1iWfvpxLBt-oxpda6HAWrSqhprIWu0JSIEhhVJCLYOpaw9YGUtggkEMujZBCxRz9m3nXafhbkN5dF3MgdrW9zRssrNKc6m5_S8ojDEKn4x8B4Y05JyocesUO58eHILbbtD9vcEptP9s9zn4tkm-DzH_SRrOq2nIiZMvXawojN0mk1sNm9RPS3JobaWEu9peY3sMUBKUmN6cHexiXRxf4f_qZ_FGoI39r3uho3QC0GjtOHCcHA6s-x3Xb4u-7kSrPA7pZSCJphISxCPxE6ft</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Holmberg, Anders</creator><general>The MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish</title><author>Holmberg, Anders</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a530t-f2b5f6d635088185d0dee886ae0e507e51440d4c7dda01978e07c711c6d7c6313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Descriptive studies and applied theories</topic><topic>empty category</topic><topic>expletive</topic><topic>Expletives</topic><topic>Grammatical clauses</topic><topic>Language use</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Null condition</topic><topic>Null hypothesis</topic><topic>null subject</topic><topic>Pronoun</topic><topic>Pronouns</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Subject pronouns</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>φ-feature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holmberg, Anders</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistic inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holmberg, Anders</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish</atitle><jtitle>Linguistic inquiry</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>533-564</pages><issn>0024-3892</issn><eissn>1530-9150</eissn><coden>LIINBL</coden><abstract>The traditional view of the null subject as pro identified by Agr (the φ-features of I) cannot be maintained in a theory where Agr is uninterpretable. Two hypotheses are compared with regard to the predictions they make for Finnish null subject constructions: (A) Agr is interpretable in null subject languages, and pro is therefore redundant; (B) null subjects are specified but unpronounced pronouns that assign values to the uninterpretable features of Agr. Since Finnish observes the Extended Projection Principle and has an expletive pronoun, Hypothesis A predicts that null subjects should cooccur with expletives. The prediction is false, favoring B over A. A typology of null subjects is proposed: Null bound pronouns and null generic pronouns in partial null subject languages, including Finnish, are D-less φPs, and so are null subjects in consistent null subject languages with Agr, such as Spanish and Greek. Null 1st and 2nd person subjects in Finnish are DPs that are deleted. Null pronouns in languages without Agr, such as Chinese and Japanese, are the only true instances of pro, a minimally specified null noun.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>The MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/002438905774464322</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3892
ispartof Linguistic inquiry, 2005-10, Vol.36 (4), p.533-564
issn 0024-3892
1530-9150
language eng
recordid cdi_mit_journals_10_1162_002438905774464322
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Descriptive studies and applied theories
empty category
expletive
Expletives
Grammatical clauses
Language use
Linguistics
Null condition
Null hypothesis
null subject
Pronoun
Pronouns
Sentences
Subject pronouns
Syntax
Verbs
φ-feature
title Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A35%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_mit_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20a%20Little%20Pro?%20Evidence%20from%20Finnish&rft.jtitle=Linguistic%20inquiry&rft.au=Holmberg,%20Anders&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=533-564&rft.issn=0024-3892&rft.eissn=1530-9150&rft.coden=LIINBL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/002438905774464322&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_mit_j%3E4179340%3C/jstor_mit_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a530t-f2b5f6d635088185d0dee886ae0e507e51440d4c7dda01978e07c711c6d7c6313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37775131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4179340&rfr_iscdi=true