Loading…

Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions

The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global environmental politics 2002-02, Vol.2 (1), p.12-18
Main Authors: DeSombre, Elizabeth R., Barkin, J. Samuel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12
container_title Global environmental politics
container_volume 2
creator DeSombre, Elizabeth R.
Barkin, J. Samuel
description The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported the US law, however, went almost entirely unnoticed. A closer examination ofthe three decisions suggests that the WTO willingly accepts the idea ofenvironmental restrictions to international trade applied unilaterally by countries. But it requires that the restrictions be fairly applied and nondiscriminatory, show signs of being effective, and be accompanied by efforts to deal with the environmental issue cooperatively. These are all requirements that environmentalists should find unobjectionable. As such, the cause of more effective international environmental management might better be served ifenvironmental activists and NGOs worked with the WTO rather than reacting automatically against it.
doi_str_mv 10.1162/152638002317261445
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_mit_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_mit_journals_10_1162_152638002317261445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60618011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhU1oINs0fyAnn9KTE41ky1Zvy7JJQwKB4pCjkOVxosWWVcm7sP31lXHJpSGH4Unw3jfDS5JLINcAnN5AQTmrCKEMSsohz4uTZAUF4xkhAr7Mb8qz2XGWfA1hRwhhpIRV8lDv_dRjSJVt09qrFn-k9RumL_XT95CutUY3KasxHbt0aw_Gj3ZAO6l-Mae_MEze6MmMNnxLTjvVB7z4p-fJ8-223vzMHp_u7jfrx0wzEEOmmqZUrGmx7FhT0rxqCiWwbXPNchAgGO06YKjLltD4KYALJTQBzlveiLZk58nVwnV-_L2PB8jBBI19ryyO-yA54VARgGiki1H7MQSPnXTeDMofJRA59yb_7y2G7paQR4f6PTE5_9qjPTh5kEzROMdZYzSKiQNx3KyRWsm3aYik64U0mEnuxr23sZXPV28_CMS17kBN5Mc-ikpSQiEiJBHyj3Efcf4Cm9CZCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60618011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>DeSombre, Elizabeth R. ; Barkin, J. Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>DeSombre, Elizabeth R. ; Barkin, J. Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported the US law, however, went almost entirely unnoticed. A closer examination ofthe three decisions suggests that the WTO willingly accepts the idea ofenvironmental restrictions to international trade applied unilaterally by countries. But it requires that the restrictions be fairly applied and nondiscriminatory, show signs of being effective, and be accompanied by efforts to deal with the environmental issue cooperatively. These are all requirements that environmentalists should find unobjectionable. As such, the cause of more effective international environmental management might better be served ifenvironmental activists and NGOs worked with the WTO rather than reacting automatically against it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-3800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/152638002317261445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Environmental Policy ; Environmental Protection ; Environmentalism ; Government Regulation ; International Economic Organizations ; International Law ; International Trade</subject><ispartof>Global environmental politics, 2002-02, Vol.2 (1), p.12-18</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/tprglenvp/v_3a2_3ay_3a2002_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a12-18.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeSombre, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkin, J. Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions</title><title>Global environmental politics</title><description>The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported the US law, however, went almost entirely unnoticed. A closer examination ofthe three decisions suggests that the WTO willingly accepts the idea ofenvironmental restrictions to international trade applied unilaterally by countries. But it requires that the restrictions be fairly applied and nondiscriminatory, show signs of being effective, and be accompanied by efforts to deal with the environmental issue cooperatively. These are all requirements that environmentalists should find unobjectionable. As such, the cause of more effective international environmental management might better be served ifenvironmental activists and NGOs worked with the WTO rather than reacting automatically against it.</description><subject>Environmental Policy</subject><subject>Environmental Protection</subject><subject>Environmentalism</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>International Economic Organizations</subject><subject>International Law</subject><subject>International Trade</subject><issn>1526-3800</issn><issn>1536-0091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhU1oINs0fyAnn9KTE41ky1Zvy7JJQwKB4pCjkOVxosWWVcm7sP31lXHJpSGH4Unw3jfDS5JLINcAnN5AQTmrCKEMSsohz4uTZAUF4xkhAr7Mb8qz2XGWfA1hRwhhpIRV8lDv_dRjSJVt09qrFn-k9RumL_XT95CutUY3KasxHbt0aw_Gj3ZAO6l-Mae_MEze6MmMNnxLTjvVB7z4p-fJ8-223vzMHp_u7jfrx0wzEEOmmqZUrGmx7FhT0rxqCiWwbXPNchAgGO06YKjLltD4KYALJTQBzlveiLZk58nVwnV-_L2PB8jBBI19ryyO-yA54VARgGiki1H7MQSPnXTeDMofJRA59yb_7y2G7paQR4f6PTE5_9qjPTh5kEzROMdZYzSKiQNx3KyRWsm3aYik64U0mEnuxr23sZXPV28_CMS17kBN5Mc-ikpSQiEiJBHyj3Efcf4Cm9CZCw</recordid><startdate>20020201</startdate><enddate>20020201</enddate><creator>DeSombre, Elizabeth R.</creator><creator>Barkin, J. Samuel</creator><general>MIT Press</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020201</creationdate><title>Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions</title><author>DeSombre, Elizabeth R. ; Barkin, J. Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Environmental Policy</topic><topic>Environmental Protection</topic><topic>Environmentalism</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>International Economic Organizations</topic><topic>International Law</topic><topic>International Trade</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeSombre, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkin, J. Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global environmental politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeSombre, Elizabeth R.</au><au>Barkin, J. Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions</atitle><jtitle>Global environmental politics</jtitle><date>2002-02-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>12-18</pages><issn>1526-3800</issn><eissn>1536-0091</eissn><abstract>The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported the US law, however, went almost entirely unnoticed. A closer examination ofthe three decisions suggests that the WTO willingly accepts the idea ofenvironmental restrictions to international trade applied unilaterally by countries. But it requires that the restrictions be fairly applied and nondiscriminatory, show signs of being effective, and be accompanied by efforts to deal with the environmental issue cooperatively. These are all requirements that environmentalists should find unobjectionable. As such, the cause of more effective international environmental management might better be served ifenvironmental activists and NGOs worked with the WTO rather than reacting automatically against it.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/152638002317261445</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-3800
ispartof Global environmental politics, 2002-02, Vol.2 (1), p.12-18
issn 1526-3800
1536-0091
language eng
recordid cdi_mit_journals_10_1162_152638002317261445
source EconLit s plnými texty; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Environmental Policy
Environmental Protection
Environmentalism
Government Regulation
International Economic Organizations
International Law
International Trade
title Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A29%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_mit_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Turtles%20and%20Trade:%20The%20WTO's%20Acceptance%20of%20Environmental%20Trade%20Restrictions&rft.jtitle=Global%20environmental%20politics&rft.au=DeSombre,%20Elizabeth%20R.&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=12-18&rft.issn=1526-3800&rft.eissn=1536-0091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/152638002317261445&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_mit_j%3E60618011%3C/proquest_mit_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60618011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true