Loading…
Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions
The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global environmental politics 2002-02, Vol.2 (1), p.12-18 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73 |
container_end_page | 18 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12 |
container_title | Global environmental politics |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | DeSombre, Elizabeth R. Barkin, J. Samuel |
description | The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported the US law, however, went almost entirely unnoticed. A closer examination ofthe three decisions suggests that the WTO willingly accepts the idea ofenvironmental restrictions to international trade applied unilaterally by countries. But it requires that the restrictions be fairly applied and nondiscriminatory, show signs of being effective, and be accompanied by efforts to deal with the environmental issue cooperatively. These are all requirements that environmentalists should find unobjectionable. As such, the cause of more effective international environmental management might better be served ifenvironmental activists and NGOs worked with the WTO rather than reacting automatically against it. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1162/152638002317261445 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_mit_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_mit_journals_10_1162_152638002317261445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60618011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhU1oINs0fyAnn9KTE41ky1Zvy7JJQwKB4pCjkOVxosWWVcm7sP31lXHJpSGH4Unw3jfDS5JLINcAnN5AQTmrCKEMSsohz4uTZAUF4xkhAr7Mb8qz2XGWfA1hRwhhpIRV8lDv_dRjSJVt09qrFn-k9RumL_XT95CutUY3KasxHbt0aw_Gj3ZAO6l-Mae_MEze6MmMNnxLTjvVB7z4p-fJ8-223vzMHp_u7jfrx0wzEEOmmqZUrGmx7FhT0rxqCiWwbXPNchAgGO06YKjLltD4KYALJTQBzlveiLZk58nVwnV-_L2PB8jBBI19ryyO-yA54VARgGiki1H7MQSPnXTeDMofJRA59yb_7y2G7paQR4f6PTE5_9qjPTh5kEzROMdZYzSKiQNx3KyRWsm3aYik64U0mEnuxr23sZXPV28_CMS17kBN5Mc-ikpSQiEiJBHyj3Efcf4Cm9CZCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60618011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>DeSombre, Elizabeth R. ; Barkin, J. Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>DeSombre, Elizabeth R. ; Barkin, J. Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported the US law, however, went almost entirely unnoticed. A closer examination ofthe three decisions suggests that the WTO willingly accepts the idea ofenvironmental restrictions to international trade applied unilaterally by countries. But it requires that the restrictions be fairly applied and nondiscriminatory, show signs of being effective, and be accompanied by efforts to deal with the environmental issue cooperatively. These are all requirements that environmentalists should find unobjectionable. As such, the cause of more effective international environmental management might better be served ifenvironmental activists and NGOs worked with the WTO rather than reacting automatically against it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-3800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/152638002317261445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Environmental Policy ; Environmental Protection ; Environmentalism ; Government Regulation ; International Economic Organizations ; International Law ; International Trade</subject><ispartof>Global environmental politics, 2002-02, Vol.2 (1), p.12-18</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/tprglenvp/v_3a2_3ay_3a2002_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a12-18.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeSombre, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkin, J. Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions</title><title>Global environmental politics</title><description>The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported the US law, however, went almost entirely unnoticed. A closer examination ofthe three decisions suggests that the WTO willingly accepts the idea ofenvironmental restrictions to international trade applied unilaterally by countries. But it requires that the restrictions be fairly applied and nondiscriminatory, show signs of being effective, and be accompanied by efforts to deal with the environmental issue cooperatively. These are all requirements that environmentalists should find unobjectionable. As such, the cause of more effective international environmental management might better be served ifenvironmental activists and NGOs worked with the WTO rather than reacting automatically against it.</description><subject>Environmental Policy</subject><subject>Environmental Protection</subject><subject>Environmentalism</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>International Economic Organizations</subject><subject>International Law</subject><subject>International Trade</subject><issn>1526-3800</issn><issn>1536-0091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhU1oINs0fyAnn9KTE41ky1Zvy7JJQwKB4pCjkOVxosWWVcm7sP31lXHJpSGH4Unw3jfDS5JLINcAnN5AQTmrCKEMSsohz4uTZAUF4xkhAr7Mb8qz2XGWfA1hRwhhpIRV8lDv_dRjSJVt09qrFn-k9RumL_XT95CutUY3KasxHbt0aw_Gj3ZAO6l-Mae_MEze6MmMNnxLTjvVB7z4p-fJ8-223vzMHp_u7jfrx0wzEEOmmqZUrGmx7FhT0rxqCiWwbXPNchAgGO06YKjLltD4KYALJTQBzlveiLZk58nVwnV-_L2PB8jBBI19ryyO-yA54VARgGiki1H7MQSPnXTeDMofJRA59yb_7y2G7paQR4f6PTE5_9qjPTh5kEzROMdZYzSKiQNx3KyRWsm3aYik64U0mEnuxr23sZXPV28_CMS17kBN5Mc-ikpSQiEiJBHyj3Efcf4Cm9CZCw</recordid><startdate>20020201</startdate><enddate>20020201</enddate><creator>DeSombre, Elizabeth R.</creator><creator>Barkin, J. Samuel</creator><general>MIT Press</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020201</creationdate><title>Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions</title><author>DeSombre, Elizabeth R. ; Barkin, J. Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Environmental Policy</topic><topic>Environmental Protection</topic><topic>Environmentalism</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>International Economic Organizations</topic><topic>International Law</topic><topic>International Trade</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeSombre, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkin, J. Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global environmental politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeSombre, Elizabeth R.</au><au>Barkin, J. Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions</atitle><jtitle>Global environmental politics</jtitle><date>2002-02-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>12-18</pages><issn>1526-3800</issn><eissn>1536-0091</eissn><abstract>The sea turtle has become an icon ofenvironmentalist opposition to the World Trade Organization. Two decisions by the WTO in 1998 against a United States law intended to force other countries to adopt more turtle-friendly rules attracted widespread attention. A third decision in 2001 which supported the US law, however, went almost entirely unnoticed. A closer examination ofthe three decisions suggests that the WTO willingly accepts the idea ofenvironmental restrictions to international trade applied unilaterally by countries. But it requires that the restrictions be fairly applied and nondiscriminatory, show signs of being effective, and be accompanied by efforts to deal with the environmental issue cooperatively. These are all requirements that environmentalists should find unobjectionable. As such, the cause of more effective international environmental management might better be served ifenvironmental activists and NGOs worked with the WTO rather than reacting automatically against it.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/152638002317261445</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-3800 |
ispartof | Global environmental politics, 2002-02, Vol.2 (1), p.12-18 |
issn | 1526-3800 1536-0091 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_mit_journals_10_1162_152638002317261445 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate) |
subjects | Environmental Policy Environmental Protection Environmentalism Government Regulation International Economic Organizations International Law International Trade |
title | Turtles and Trade: The WTO's Acceptance of Environmental Trade Restrictions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A29%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_mit_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Turtles%20and%20Trade:%20The%20WTO's%20Acceptance%20of%20Environmental%20Trade%20Restrictions&rft.jtitle=Global%20environmental%20politics&rft.au=DeSombre,%20Elizabeth%20R.&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=12-18&rft.issn=1526-3800&rft.eissn=1536-0091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/152638002317261445&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_mit_j%3E60618011%3C/proquest_mit_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319m-abb7a3bde7f3b7248b5a9edd4c34191932ff13ec7d029325169a9c0166d6b9d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60618011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |