Loading…
Assessment of holographic microscopy for quantifying marine particle size and concentration
Holographic microscopy has emerged as a tool for in situ imaging of microscopic organisms and other particles in the marine environment: appealing because of the relatively larger sampling volume and simpler optical configuration compared to other imaging systems. However, its quantitative capabilit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Limnology and oceanography, methods methods, 2020-08, Vol.18 (9) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Limnology and oceanography, methods |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Walcutt, Noah L. Knörlein, Benjamin Cetinic, Ivona Ljubesic, Zrinka Bosak, Suncica Sgouros, Tom Montalbano, Amanda L. Neeley, Aimee Menden-Deuer, Susanne Omand, Melissa M. |
description | Holographic microscopy has emerged as a tool for in situ imaging of microscopic organisms and other particles in the marine environment: appealing because of the relatively larger sampling volume and simpler optical configuration compared to other imaging systems. However, its quantitative capabilities have so far remained uncertain, in part because hologram reconstruction and image recognition have required manual operation. Here, we assess the quantitative skill of our automated hologram processing pipeline (CCV Pipeline), to evaluate the size and concentration measurements of environmental and cultured assemblages of marine plankton particles, and microspheres. Over 1 million particles, ranging from 10 to 200 μm in equivalent spherical diameter, imaged by the 4‐Deep HoloSea digital inline holographic microscope (DIHM) are analyzed. These measurements were collected in parallel with a FlowCam (FC), Imaging FlowCytobot (IFCB), and manual microscope identification. Once corrections for particle location and nonuniform illumination were developed and applied, the DIHM showed an underestimate in ESD of about 3% to 10%, but successfully reproduced the size spectral slope from environmental samples, and the size distribution of cultures (Dunaliella tertiolecta, Heterosigma akashiwo, and Prorocentrum micans) and microspheres. DIHM concentrations (order 1 to 1000 particles ml(exp −1)) showed a linear agreement (r(exp 2) = 0.73) with the other instruments, but individual comparisons at times had large uncertainty. Overall, we found the DIHM and the CCV Pipeline required extensive manual correction, but once corrected, provided concentration and size estimates comparable to the other imaging systems assessed in this study. Holographic cameras are mechanically simple, autonomous, can operate at very high pressures, and provide a larger sampling volume than comparable lens‐based tools. Thus, we anticipate that these characterization efforts will be rewarded with novel discovery in new oceanic environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lom3.10379 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nasa</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20205006046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20205006046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_202050060463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjDsOwjAQBS0EEuHTUFPsBQDnT0qEQByAjiJaGScxSrzBG4pwelJQ0FG9kd5ohFj5cutLGexqasKBwjQbCc-PI38T7-Nk_MNTMWN-DG4Wpaknbgdmzdxo2wEVUFFNpcO2MgoaoxyxoraHghw8X2g7U_TGltCgM1ZDi64zqtbA5q0B7R0UWTWkHHaG7EJMCqxZL787F-vz6Xq8bCwy5oPFeSADGUuZyCgJ_9wf8pVDJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of holographic microscopy for quantifying marine particle size and concentration</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Walcutt, Noah L. ; Knörlein, Benjamin ; Cetinic, Ivona ; Ljubesic, Zrinka ; Bosak, Suncica ; Sgouros, Tom ; Montalbano, Amanda L. ; Neeley, Aimee ; Menden-Deuer, Susanne ; Omand, Melissa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walcutt, Noah L. ; Knörlein, Benjamin ; Cetinic, Ivona ; Ljubesic, Zrinka ; Bosak, Suncica ; Sgouros, Tom ; Montalbano, Amanda L. ; Neeley, Aimee ; Menden-Deuer, Susanne ; Omand, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><description>Holographic microscopy has emerged as a tool for in situ imaging of microscopic organisms and other particles in the marine environment: appealing because of the relatively larger sampling volume and simpler optical configuration compared to other imaging systems. However, its quantitative capabilities have so far remained uncertain, in part because hologram reconstruction and image recognition have required manual operation. Here, we assess the quantitative skill of our automated hologram processing pipeline (CCV Pipeline), to evaluate the size and concentration measurements of environmental and cultured assemblages of marine plankton particles, and microspheres. Over 1 million particles, ranging from 10 to 200 μm in equivalent spherical diameter, imaged by the 4‐Deep HoloSea digital inline holographic microscope (DIHM) are analyzed. These measurements were collected in parallel with a FlowCam (FC), Imaging FlowCytobot (IFCB), and manual microscope identification. Once corrections for particle location and nonuniform illumination were developed and applied, the DIHM showed an underestimate in ESD of about 3% to 10%, but successfully reproduced the size spectral slope from environmental samples, and the size distribution of cultures (Dunaliella tertiolecta, Heterosigma akashiwo, and Prorocentrum micans) and microspheres. DIHM concentrations (order 1 to 1000 particles ml(exp −1)) showed a linear agreement (r(exp 2) = 0.73) with the other instruments, but individual comparisons at times had large uncertainty. Overall, we found the DIHM and the CCV Pipeline required extensive manual correction, but once corrected, provided concentration and size estimates comparable to the other imaging systems assessed in this study. Holographic cameras are mechanically simple, autonomous, can operate at very high pressures, and provide a larger sampling volume than comparable lens‐based tools. Thus, we anticipate that these characterization efforts will be rewarded with novel discovery in new oceanic environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-5856</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-5856</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lom3.10379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Goddard Space Flight Center: Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography / Wiley</publisher><subject>Geosciences (General) ; Oceanography</subject><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, methods, 2020-08, Vol.18 (9)</ispartof><rights>Copyright Determination: MAY_INCLUDE_COPYRIGHT_MATERIAL</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8434-4251 ; 0000-0001-5701-0953 ; 0000-0001-7301-9894 ; 0000-0002-1363-3136</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walcutt, Noah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knörlein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cetinic, Ivona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljubesic, Zrinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosak, Suncica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sgouros, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montalbano, Amanda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neeley, Aimee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menden-Deuer, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omand, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of holographic microscopy for quantifying marine particle size and concentration</title><title>Limnology and oceanography, methods</title><description>Holographic microscopy has emerged as a tool for in situ imaging of microscopic organisms and other particles in the marine environment: appealing because of the relatively larger sampling volume and simpler optical configuration compared to other imaging systems. However, its quantitative capabilities have so far remained uncertain, in part because hologram reconstruction and image recognition have required manual operation. Here, we assess the quantitative skill of our automated hologram processing pipeline (CCV Pipeline), to evaluate the size and concentration measurements of environmental and cultured assemblages of marine plankton particles, and microspheres. Over 1 million particles, ranging from 10 to 200 μm in equivalent spherical diameter, imaged by the 4‐Deep HoloSea digital inline holographic microscope (DIHM) are analyzed. These measurements were collected in parallel with a FlowCam (FC), Imaging FlowCytobot (IFCB), and manual microscope identification. Once corrections for particle location and nonuniform illumination were developed and applied, the DIHM showed an underestimate in ESD of about 3% to 10%, but successfully reproduced the size spectral slope from environmental samples, and the size distribution of cultures (Dunaliella tertiolecta, Heterosigma akashiwo, and Prorocentrum micans) and microspheres. DIHM concentrations (order 1 to 1000 particles ml(exp −1)) showed a linear agreement (r(exp 2) = 0.73) with the other instruments, but individual comparisons at times had large uncertainty. Overall, we found the DIHM and the CCV Pipeline required extensive manual correction, but once corrected, provided concentration and size estimates comparable to the other imaging systems assessed in this study. Holographic cameras are mechanically simple, autonomous, can operate at very high pressures, and provide a larger sampling volume than comparable lens‐based tools. Thus, we anticipate that these characterization efforts will be rewarded with novel discovery in new oceanic environments.</description><subject>Geosciences (General)</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><issn>1541-5856</issn><issn>1541-5856</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjDsOwjAQBS0EEuHTUFPsBQDnT0qEQByAjiJaGScxSrzBG4pwelJQ0FG9kd5ohFj5cutLGexqasKBwjQbCc-PI38T7-Nk_MNTMWN-DG4Wpaknbgdmzdxo2wEVUFFNpcO2MgoaoxyxoraHghw8X2g7U_TGltCgM1ZDi64zqtbA5q0B7R0UWTWkHHaG7EJMCqxZL787F-vz6Xq8bCwy5oPFeSADGUuZyCgJ_9wf8pVDJw</recordid><startdate>20200805</startdate><enddate>20200805</enddate><creator>Walcutt, Noah L.</creator><creator>Knörlein, Benjamin</creator><creator>Cetinic, Ivona</creator><creator>Ljubesic, Zrinka</creator><creator>Bosak, Suncica</creator><creator>Sgouros, Tom</creator><creator>Montalbano, Amanda L.</creator><creator>Neeley, Aimee</creator><creator>Menden-Deuer, Susanne</creator><creator>Omand, Melissa M.</creator><general>Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography / Wiley</general><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8434-4251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5701-0953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7301-9894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1363-3136</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200805</creationdate><title>Assessment of holographic microscopy for quantifying marine particle size and concentration</title><author>Walcutt, Noah L. ; Knörlein, Benjamin ; Cetinic, Ivona ; Ljubesic, Zrinka ; Bosak, Suncica ; Sgouros, Tom ; Montalbano, Amanda L. ; Neeley, Aimee ; Menden-Deuer, Susanne ; Omand, Melissa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_202050060463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Geosciences (General)</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walcutt, Noah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knörlein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cetinic, Ivona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljubesic, Zrinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosak, Suncica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sgouros, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montalbano, Amanda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neeley, Aimee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menden-Deuer, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omand, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography, methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walcutt, Noah L.</au><au>Knörlein, Benjamin</au><au>Cetinic, Ivona</au><au>Ljubesic, Zrinka</au><au>Bosak, Suncica</au><au>Sgouros, Tom</au><au>Montalbano, Amanda L.</au><au>Neeley, Aimee</au><au>Menden-Deuer, Susanne</au><au>Omand, Melissa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of holographic microscopy for quantifying marine particle size and concentration</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography, methods</jtitle><date>2020-08-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>9</issue><issn>1541-5856</issn><eissn>1541-5856</eissn><abstract>Holographic microscopy has emerged as a tool for in situ imaging of microscopic organisms and other particles in the marine environment: appealing because of the relatively larger sampling volume and simpler optical configuration compared to other imaging systems. However, its quantitative capabilities have so far remained uncertain, in part because hologram reconstruction and image recognition have required manual operation. Here, we assess the quantitative skill of our automated hologram processing pipeline (CCV Pipeline), to evaluate the size and concentration measurements of environmental and cultured assemblages of marine plankton particles, and microspheres. Over 1 million particles, ranging from 10 to 200 μm in equivalent spherical diameter, imaged by the 4‐Deep HoloSea digital inline holographic microscope (DIHM) are analyzed. These measurements were collected in parallel with a FlowCam (FC), Imaging FlowCytobot (IFCB), and manual microscope identification. Once corrections for particle location and nonuniform illumination were developed and applied, the DIHM showed an underestimate in ESD of about 3% to 10%, but successfully reproduced the size spectral slope from environmental samples, and the size distribution of cultures (Dunaliella tertiolecta, Heterosigma akashiwo, and Prorocentrum micans) and microspheres. DIHM concentrations (order 1 to 1000 particles ml(exp −1)) showed a linear agreement (r(exp 2) = 0.73) with the other instruments, but individual comparisons at times had large uncertainty. Overall, we found the DIHM and the CCV Pipeline required extensive manual correction, but once corrected, provided concentration and size estimates comparable to the other imaging systems assessed in this study. Holographic cameras are mechanically simple, autonomous, can operate at very high pressures, and provide a larger sampling volume than comparable lens‐based tools. Thus, we anticipate that these characterization efforts will be rewarded with novel discovery in new oceanic environments.</abstract><cop>Goddard Space Flight Center</cop><pub>Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography / Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/lom3.10379</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8434-4251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5701-0953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7301-9894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1363-3136</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-5856 |
ispartof | Limnology and oceanography, methods, 2020-08, Vol.18 (9) |
issn | 1541-5856 1541-5856 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nasa_ntrs_20205006046 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Geosciences (General) Oceanography |
title | Assessment of holographic microscopy for quantifying marine particle size and concentration |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A51%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20holographic%20microscopy%20for%20quantifying%20marine%20particle%20size%20and%20concentration&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography,%20methods&rft.au=Walcutt,%20Noah%20L.&rft.date=2020-08-05&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.issn=1541-5856&rft.eissn=1541-5856&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lom3.10379&rft_dat=%3Cnasa%3E20205006046%3C/nasa%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_202050060463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |