Loading…

Tissue elastance influences airway smooth muscle shortening: comparison of mechanical properties among different species

We have observed striking differences in the mechanical properties of airway smooth muscle preparations among different species. In this study, we provide a novel analysis on the influence of tissue elastance on smooth muscle shortening using previously published data from our laboratory. We have fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology 2002-09, Vol.80 (9), p.865-871
Main Authors: Saez, Anabelle M. Opazo, Schellenberg, R Robert, Ludwig, Mara S, Meiss, Richard A, Paré, Peter D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d837d9e51edfea56a5fd4527d4d021aa97cce26205690a33056524b510c50e013
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d837d9e51edfea56a5fd4527d4d021aa97cce26205690a33056524b510c50e013
container_end_page 871
container_issue 9
container_start_page 865
container_title Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology
container_volume 80
creator Saez, Anabelle M. Opazo
Schellenberg, R Robert
Ludwig, Mara S
Meiss, Richard A
Paré, Peter D
description We have observed striking differences in the mechanical properties of airway smooth muscle preparations among different species. In this study, we provide a novel analysis on the influence of tissue elastance on smooth muscle shortening using previously published data from our laboratory. We have found that isolated human airways exhibit substantial passive tension in contrast to airways from the dog and pig, which exhibit little passive tension (
doi_str_mv 10.1139/y02-112
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrcre</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrcresearch_primary_10_1139_y02_112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>256229121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d837d9e51edfea56a5fd4527d4d021aa97cce26205690a33056524b510c50e013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1r3DAQBmBRUpptWvIPisghhYIbjWT5I7cS-gWBXpKzUaRRVsGWHI1Nu_--CrsQKKQnjcTDy2iGsVMQnwFUf7ETsgKQr9gGpNBVq2s4YhshRFfVEuQxe0v0UK5Np7o37BhkrUTfwYb9uQlEK3IcDS0mWuQh-nHFUhE3If82O05TSsuWTyvZETltU14whnh_yW2aZpMDpciT5xParYnBmpHPOc2Yl_AUMqV4z13wHjPGhdOMtry_Y6-9GQnfH84Tdvvt683Vj-r61_efV1-uK6tasVSuU63rUQM6j0Y3RntXa9m62gkJxvSttSib8ummF0apcmpZ32kQVgsUoE7Y-T63tPS4Ii3DFMjiOJqIaaWhlU1XRtgVePYPfEhrjqW3QUpoRdOAKujjHtmciDL6Yc5hMnk3gBieNjGUTZRCFvnhELfeTeie3WH0BXzag5htRkKT7fY_aecv4wMaZufVX-EIoHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221706613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tissue elastance influences airway smooth muscle shortening: comparison of mechanical properties among different species</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks</source><creator>Saez, Anabelle M. Opazo ; Schellenberg, R Robert ; Ludwig, Mara S ; Meiss, Richard A ; Paré, Peter D</creator><creatorcontrib>Saez, Anabelle M. Opazo ; Schellenberg, R Robert ; Ludwig, Mara S ; Meiss, Richard A ; Paré, Peter D</creatorcontrib><description>We have observed striking differences in the mechanical properties of airway smooth muscle preparations among different species. In this study, we provide a novel analysis on the influence of tissue elastance on smooth muscle shortening using previously published data from our laboratory. We have found that isolated human airways exhibit substantial passive tension in contrast to airways from the dog and pig, which exhibit little passive tension (&lt;5% of maximal active force versus ~60% for human bronchi). In the dog and pig, airway preparations shorten up to 70% from L max (the length at which maximal active force occurs), whereas human airways shorten by only ~12% from L max . Isolated airways from the rabbit exhibit relatively low passive tension (~22% F max ) and shorten by 60% from L max . Morphologic evaluation of airway cross sections revealed that 25-35% of the airway wall is muscle in canine, porcine, and rabbit airways in contrast to ~9% in human airway preparations. We postulate that the large passive tension needed to stretch the muscle to L max reflects the high connective tissue content surrounding the smooth muscle, which limits shortening during smooth muscle contraction by imposing an elastic load, as well as by causing radial constraint.Key words: isometric force, isotonic shortening, elastance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1205-7541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/y02-112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12430981</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJPPA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bronchi - physiology ; Dogs ; Elasticity ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Smooth - physiology ; Muscles ; Rabbits ; Species Specificity ; Swine ; Throat ; Trachea - physiology</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology, 2002-09, Vol.80 (9), p.865-871</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Sep 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d837d9e51edfea56a5fd4527d4d021aa97cce26205690a33056524b510c50e013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d837d9e51edfea56a5fd4527d4d021aa97cce26205690a33056524b510c50e013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12430981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saez, Anabelle M. Opazo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellenberg, R Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Mara S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meiss, Richard A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paré, Peter D</creatorcontrib><title>Tissue elastance influences airway smooth muscle shortening: comparison of mechanical properties among different species</title><title>Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de physiologie et pharmacologie</addtitle><description>We have observed striking differences in the mechanical properties of airway smooth muscle preparations among different species. In this study, we provide a novel analysis on the influence of tissue elastance on smooth muscle shortening using previously published data from our laboratory. We have found that isolated human airways exhibit substantial passive tension in contrast to airways from the dog and pig, which exhibit little passive tension (&lt;5% of maximal active force versus ~60% for human bronchi). In the dog and pig, airway preparations shorten up to 70% from L max (the length at which maximal active force occurs), whereas human airways shorten by only ~12% from L max . Isolated airways from the rabbit exhibit relatively low passive tension (~22% F max ) and shorten by 60% from L max . Morphologic evaluation of airway cross sections revealed that 25-35% of the airway wall is muscle in canine, porcine, and rabbit airways in contrast to ~9% in human airway preparations. We postulate that the large passive tension needed to stretch the muscle to L max reflects the high connective tissue content surrounding the smooth muscle, which limits shortening during smooth muscle contraction by imposing an elastic load, as well as by causing radial constraint.Key words: isometric force, isotonic shortening, elastance.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bronchi - physiology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Smooth - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Throat</subject><subject>Trachea - physiology</subject><issn>0008-4212</issn><issn>1205-7541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U1r3DAQBmBRUpptWvIPisghhYIbjWT5I7cS-gWBXpKzUaRRVsGWHI1Nu_--CrsQKKQnjcTDy2iGsVMQnwFUf7ETsgKQr9gGpNBVq2s4YhshRFfVEuQxe0v0UK5Np7o37BhkrUTfwYb9uQlEK3IcDS0mWuQh-nHFUhE3If82O05TSsuWTyvZETltU14whnh_yW2aZpMDpciT5xParYnBmpHPOc2Yl_AUMqV4z13wHjPGhdOMtry_Y6-9GQnfH84Tdvvt683Vj-r61_efV1-uK6tasVSuU63rUQM6j0Y3RntXa9m62gkJxvSttSib8ummF0apcmpZ32kQVgsUoE7Y-T63tPS4Ii3DFMjiOJqIaaWhlU1XRtgVePYPfEhrjqW3QUpoRdOAKujjHtmciDL6Yc5hMnk3gBieNjGUTZRCFvnhELfeTeie3WH0BXzag5htRkKT7fY_aecv4wMaZufVX-EIoHA</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>Saez, Anabelle M. Opazo</creator><creator>Schellenberg, R Robert</creator><creator>Ludwig, Mara S</creator><creator>Meiss, Richard A</creator><creator>Paré, Peter D</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Tissue elastance influences airway smooth muscle shortening: comparison of mechanical properties among different species</title><author>Saez, Anabelle M. Opazo ; Schellenberg, R Robert ; Ludwig, Mara S ; Meiss, Richard A ; Paré, Peter D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d837d9e51edfea56a5fd4527d4d021aa97cce26205690a33056524b510c50e013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bronchi - physiology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Smooth - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Throat</topic><topic>Trachea - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saez, Anabelle M. Opazo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellenberg, R Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Mara S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meiss, Richard A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paré, Peter D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saez, Anabelle M. Opazo</au><au>Schellenberg, R Robert</au><au>Ludwig, Mara S</au><au>Meiss, Richard A</au><au>Paré, Peter D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tissue elastance influences airway smooth muscle shortening: comparison of mechanical properties among different species</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de physiologie et pharmacologie</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>865</spage><epage>871</epage><pages>865-871</pages><issn>0008-4212</issn><eissn>1205-7541</eissn><coden>CJPPA3</coden><abstract>We have observed striking differences in the mechanical properties of airway smooth muscle preparations among different species. In this study, we provide a novel analysis on the influence of tissue elastance on smooth muscle shortening using previously published data from our laboratory. We have found that isolated human airways exhibit substantial passive tension in contrast to airways from the dog and pig, which exhibit little passive tension (&lt;5% of maximal active force versus ~60% for human bronchi). In the dog and pig, airway preparations shorten up to 70% from L max (the length at which maximal active force occurs), whereas human airways shorten by only ~12% from L max . Isolated airways from the rabbit exhibit relatively low passive tension (~22% F max ) and shorten by 60% from L max . Morphologic evaluation of airway cross sections revealed that 25-35% of the airway wall is muscle in canine, porcine, and rabbit airways in contrast to ~9% in human airway preparations. We postulate that the large passive tension needed to stretch the muscle to L max reflects the high connective tissue content surrounding the smooth muscle, which limits shortening during smooth muscle contraction by imposing an elastic load, as well as by causing radial constraint.Key words: isometric force, isotonic shortening, elastance.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><pmid>12430981</pmid><doi>10.1139/y02-112</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4212
ispartof Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology, 2002-09, Vol.80 (9), p.865-871
issn 0008-4212
1205-7541
language eng
recordid cdi_nrcresearch_primary_10_1139_y02_112
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks
subjects Animals
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bronchi - physiology
Dogs
Elasticity
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Smooth - physiology
Muscles
Rabbits
Species Specificity
Swine
Throat
Trachea - physiology
title Tissue elastance influences airway smooth muscle shortening: comparison of mechanical properties among different species
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A12%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrcre&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tissue%20elastance%20influences%20airway%20smooth%20muscle%20shortening:%20comparison%20of%20mechanical%20properties%20among%20different%20species&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20physiology%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Saez,%20Anabelle%20M.%20Opazo&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=865&rft.epage=871&rft.pages=865-871&rft.issn=0008-4212&rft.eissn=1205-7541&rft.coden=CJPPA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/y02-112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrcre%3E256229121%3C/proquest_nrcre%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d837d9e51edfea56a5fd4527d4d021aa97cce26205690a33056524b510c50e013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221706613&rft_id=info:pmid/12430981&rfr_iscdi=true