Application of Tinel’s test combed with clinical neurosensory test distinguishes spontaneous healing of lingual nerve neuropathy after mandibular third molar extraction

• Published in: Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery 2023, 45(0), , pp.1-9
• Main Authors: Fujita, Shigeyuki, Tojyo, Itaru, Suzuki, Shigeru, Tajima, Fumihiro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical neurosensory testing; Dentistry; Lingual nerve disturbance; Mandibular third molar extraction; Medicine; Microneurosurgery; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Pain; Patients; Plastic Surgery; Reconstructive surgery; Spontaneous healing; Tinel’s test; 치의학
• ISSN: 2288-8101; 2288-8586; 2288-8586
• DOI: 10.1186/s40902-023-00389-3

Background Extraction of the mandibular third molar, the most frequent and important surgical procedure in the clinical practice of oral surgery, is associated with the risk of injury of the lingual nerve. Neuropathy of the lingual nerve poses diagnostic challenges regarding the transient or permanent nature of the injury. No consensus or criteria have been established regarding the diagnosis of lingual nerve neuropathy. We applied both Tinel’s test and clinical neurosensory testing together, which can be easily used at the bedside in the early stages of injury. Therefore, we propose a new method to differentiate between lesions with the ability to heal spontaneously and those that cannot heal without surgery. Results Thirty-three patients (29 women,  4 men; mean age, 35.5 years) were included in this study. For all patients, the median interval between nerve injury and initial examination was 1.6 months and that between nerve injury and the second examination before determining the need for surgical management was 4.5 months. The patients were assigned to either group A or B. The spontaneous healing group (group A, n  = 10) revealed a tendency for recovery within 6 months after tooth extraction. In this group, although there were individual differences in the degree of recovery, a remarkable tendency for recovery was observed based on clinical neurosensory testing in all cases. None of the patients were diagnosed with allodynia. In seven cases, the Tinel test result was negative at the first inspection, and in three cases, the result changed to negative at the second inspection. Conversely, in group B( n  = 23), no recovery trend was observed with regard to clinical neurosensory testing, and nine patients had allodynia. Further, the Tinel test result was positive for all patients in both examinations. Conclusions Our findings indicate that in case of transient lingual nerve paralysis, clinical neurosensory testing findings deteriorate immediately after tooth extraction and gradually recover, while Tinel’s test shows a negative result. Using Tinel’s test and clinical neurosensory testing together enabled early and easy identification of the severity of the lingual nerve disorder and of lesions that would heal spontaneously without surgical management.