Loading…

Safety and durable patency of tunneled hemodialysis catheter inserted without fluoroscopy

A tunneled hemodialysis (HD) catheter is preferred due to its lower incidence of infection and malfunction than non-tunneled ones. For safer insertion, fluoroscopic guidance is desirable. However, if the patient is unstable, transfer to the fluoroscopy may be impossible or inappropriate. From June 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Kidney research and clinical practice 2023, 42(6), , pp.723-730
Main Authors: Kim, Do Hyoung, Youn, Sojung, Ban, Tae Hyun, Choi, Bum Soon, Kim, Byung Soo, Park, Cheol Whee, Yang, Chul Woo, Park, Hoon Suk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 730
container_issue 6
container_start_page 723
container_title Kidney research and clinical practice
container_volume 42
creator Kim, Do Hyoung
Youn, Sojung
Ban, Tae Hyun
Choi, Bum Soon
Kim, Byung Soo
Park, Cheol Whee
Yang, Chul Woo
Park, Hoon Suk
description A tunneled hemodialysis (HD) catheter is preferred due to its lower incidence of infection and malfunction than non-tunneled ones. For safer insertion, fluoroscopic guidance is desirable. However, if the patient is unstable, transfer to the fluoroscopy may be impossible or inappropriate. From June 2019 to September 2022, 81 tunneled HD catheter insertion cases performed under ultrasound guidance without fluoroscopy and 474 cases with fluoroscopy in our institutional HD catheter cohort were retrospectively compared. Immediate complications, later catheter-associated problems, including infections and catheter dysfunction, were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.20 and p = 0.37, respectively). The patency of tunneled catheters inserted without fluoroscopy was comparable to the patency of tunneled catheters inserted with fluoroscopic guidance (p = 0.90). Tunneled HD catheter insertion without fluoroscopy can be performed safely and has durable patency compared to the insertion with fluoroscopy. Therefore, this method can be considered for the selected unstable patients (e.g., ventilator care) in the intensive care unit.
doi_str_mv 10.23876/j.krcp.22.282
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10333175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_232f1ce951fe41a8bab1829307a9ad8e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2874260300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-4a232bf7040e39b5601847d2437b2105146e8fae04e4ef3435da1711aa3280733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kUFr3DAQhU1oSUKaa47Fx1LYraSRLfkYQtMuBAJteshJjKVR1rtey5Vkgv99zW6aubxh5ps3A1MUN5ytBWhVf9ut99GOayHWQouz4lIIzlcNl-zDew7iorhOaceWqLVsoD4vLkCpRmtZXxbPv9FTnkscXOmmiG1P5YiZBjuXwZd5GgbqyZVbOgTXYT-nLpUW85YyxbIbEsW8tF-7vA1TLn0_hRiSDeP8qfjosU90_aZXxZ_77093P1cPjz82d7cPKwsNzyuJAkTrFZOMoGmrmnEtlRMSVCs4q7isSXskJkmSBwmVQ644RwShmQK4Kr6efIfozd52JmB31Jdg9tHc_nraGM4AgKtqgTcn2AXcmTF2B4zzceJYCPHFYMyd7cksZ3luqam4J8lRt9hyLRpgCht0mhavLyevMYa_E6VsDl2y1Pc4UJiSEVpJUTNgbEE_v6FTeyD3vvj_H-AfXPmKEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2874260300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and durable patency of tunneled hemodialysis catheter inserted without fluoroscopy</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kim, Do Hyoung ; Youn, Sojung ; Ban, Tae Hyun ; Choi, Bum Soon ; Kim, Byung Soo ; Park, Cheol Whee ; Yang, Chul Woo ; Park, Hoon Suk</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Do Hyoung ; Youn, Sojung ; Ban, Tae Hyun ; Choi, Bum Soon ; Kim, Byung Soo ; Park, Cheol Whee ; Yang, Chul Woo ; Park, Hoon Suk</creatorcontrib><description>A tunneled hemodialysis (HD) catheter is preferred due to its lower incidence of infection and malfunction than non-tunneled ones. For safer insertion, fluoroscopic guidance is desirable. However, if the patient is unstable, transfer to the fluoroscopy may be impossible or inappropriate. From June 2019 to September 2022, 81 tunneled HD catheter insertion cases performed under ultrasound guidance without fluoroscopy and 474 cases with fluoroscopy in our institutional HD catheter cohort were retrospectively compared. Immediate complications, later catheter-associated problems, including infections and catheter dysfunction, were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.20 and p = 0.37, respectively). The patency of tunneled catheters inserted without fluoroscopy was comparable to the patency of tunneled catheters inserted with fluoroscopic guidance (p = 0.90). Tunneled HD catheter insertion without fluoroscopy can be performed safely and has durable patency compared to the insertion with fluoroscopy. Therefore, this method can be considered for the selected unstable patients (e.g., ventilator care) in the intensive care unit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2211-9132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-9140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.22.282</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37798846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Society of Nephrology</publisher><subject>catheters ; fluoroscopy ; intensive care units ; renal dialysis ; ultrasonography ; 내과학</subject><ispartof>Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, 2023, 42(6), , pp.723-730</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003022754$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Do Hyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Sojung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ban, Tae Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Bum Soon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Byung Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Cheol Whee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chul Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hoon Suk</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and durable patency of tunneled hemodialysis catheter inserted without fluoroscopy</title><title>Kidney research and clinical practice</title><addtitle>Kidney Res Clin Pract</addtitle><description>A tunneled hemodialysis (HD) catheter is preferred due to its lower incidence of infection and malfunction than non-tunneled ones. For safer insertion, fluoroscopic guidance is desirable. However, if the patient is unstable, transfer to the fluoroscopy may be impossible or inappropriate. From June 2019 to September 2022, 81 tunneled HD catheter insertion cases performed under ultrasound guidance without fluoroscopy and 474 cases with fluoroscopy in our institutional HD catheter cohort were retrospectively compared. Immediate complications, later catheter-associated problems, including infections and catheter dysfunction, were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.20 and p = 0.37, respectively). The patency of tunneled catheters inserted without fluoroscopy was comparable to the patency of tunneled catheters inserted with fluoroscopic guidance (p = 0.90). Tunneled HD catheter insertion without fluoroscopy can be performed safely and has durable patency compared to the insertion with fluoroscopy. Therefore, this method can be considered for the selected unstable patients (e.g., ventilator care) in the intensive care unit.</description><subject>catheters</subject><subject>fluoroscopy</subject><subject>intensive care units</subject><subject>renal dialysis</subject><subject>ultrasonography</subject><subject>내과학</subject><issn>2211-9132</issn><issn>2211-9140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kUFr3DAQhU1oSUKaa47Fx1LYraSRLfkYQtMuBAJteshJjKVR1rtey5Vkgv99zW6aubxh5ps3A1MUN5ytBWhVf9ut99GOayHWQouz4lIIzlcNl-zDew7iorhOaceWqLVsoD4vLkCpRmtZXxbPv9FTnkscXOmmiG1P5YiZBjuXwZd5GgbqyZVbOgTXYT-nLpUW85YyxbIbEsW8tF-7vA1TLn0_hRiSDeP8qfjosU90_aZXxZ_77093P1cPjz82d7cPKwsNzyuJAkTrFZOMoGmrmnEtlRMSVCs4q7isSXskJkmSBwmVQ644RwShmQK4Kr6efIfozd52JmB31Jdg9tHc_nraGM4AgKtqgTcn2AXcmTF2B4zzceJYCPHFYMyd7cksZ3luqam4J8lRt9hyLRpgCht0mhavLyevMYa_E6VsDl2y1Pc4UJiSEVpJUTNgbEE_v6FTeyD3vvj_H-AfXPmKEw</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Kim, Do Hyoung</creator><creator>Youn, Sojung</creator><creator>Ban, Tae Hyun</creator><creator>Choi, Bum Soon</creator><creator>Kim, Byung Soo</creator><creator>Park, Cheol Whee</creator><creator>Yang, Chul Woo</creator><creator>Park, Hoon Suk</creator><general>The Korean Society of Nephrology</general><general>대한신장학회</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Safety and durable patency of tunneled hemodialysis catheter inserted without fluoroscopy</title><author>Kim, Do Hyoung ; Youn, Sojung ; Ban, Tae Hyun ; Choi, Bum Soon ; Kim, Byung Soo ; Park, Cheol Whee ; Yang, Chul Woo ; Park, Hoon Suk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-4a232bf7040e39b5601847d2437b2105146e8fae04e4ef3435da1711aa3280733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>catheters</topic><topic>fluoroscopy</topic><topic>intensive care units</topic><topic>renal dialysis</topic><topic>ultrasonography</topic><topic>내과학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Do Hyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Sojung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ban, Tae Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Bum Soon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Byung Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Cheol Whee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chul Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hoon Suk</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Kidney research and clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Do Hyoung</au><au>Youn, Sojung</au><au>Ban, Tae Hyun</au><au>Choi, Bum Soon</au><au>Kim, Byung Soo</au><au>Park, Cheol Whee</au><au>Yang, Chul Woo</au><au>Park, Hoon Suk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and durable patency of tunneled hemodialysis catheter inserted without fluoroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Kidney research and clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Res Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>723</spage><epage>730</epage><pages>723-730</pages><issn>2211-9132</issn><eissn>2211-9140</eissn><abstract>A tunneled hemodialysis (HD) catheter is preferred due to its lower incidence of infection and malfunction than non-tunneled ones. For safer insertion, fluoroscopic guidance is desirable. However, if the patient is unstable, transfer to the fluoroscopy may be impossible or inappropriate. From June 2019 to September 2022, 81 tunneled HD catheter insertion cases performed under ultrasound guidance without fluoroscopy and 474 cases with fluoroscopy in our institutional HD catheter cohort were retrospectively compared. Immediate complications, later catheter-associated problems, including infections and catheter dysfunction, were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.20 and p = 0.37, respectively). The patency of tunneled catheters inserted without fluoroscopy was comparable to the patency of tunneled catheters inserted with fluoroscopic guidance (p = 0.90). Tunneled HD catheter insertion without fluoroscopy can be performed safely and has durable patency compared to the insertion with fluoroscopy. Therefore, this method can be considered for the selected unstable patients (e.g., ventilator care) in the intensive care unit.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Society of Nephrology</pub><pmid>37798846</pmid><doi>10.23876/j.krcp.22.282</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2211-9132
ispartof Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, 2023, 42(6), , pp.723-730
issn 2211-9132
2211-9140
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10333175
source PubMed Central
subjects catheters
fluoroscopy
intensive care units
renal dialysis
ultrasonography
내과학
title Safety and durable patency of tunneled hemodialysis catheter inserted without fluoroscopy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A04%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20durable%20patency%20of%20tunneled%20hemodialysis%20catheter%20inserted%20without%20fluoroscopy&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20research%20and%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Kim,%20Do%20Hyoung&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=730&rft.pages=723-730&rft.issn=2211-9132&rft.eissn=2211-9140&rft_id=info:doi/10.23876/j.krcp.22.282&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E2874260300%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-4a232bf7040e39b5601847d2437b2105146e8fae04e4ef3435da1711aa3280733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2874260300&rft_id=info:pmid/37798846&rfr_iscdi=true