Loading…

Long-term results of radiofrequency and microwave ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Background : : Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) is effective for colorectal cancer liver metastases. We aimed to investigate the impact of different variables on survival. Methods : : Sixty-four patients (142 lesions) who underwent thermoablation between January 2007 and Jan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2023, 12(3), , pp.130-139
Main Authors: Erdemir, Ahmet Gürkan, Karahan, Sevilay, Ünal, Emre, Çiftçi, Türkmen Turan, Akıncı, Devrim, Yalçın, Şuayib, Akhan, Okan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background : : Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) is effective for colorectal cancer liver metastases. We aimed to investigate the impact of different variables on survival. Methods : : Sixty-four patients (142 lesions) who underwent thermoablation between January 2007 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The overall survival (OS) and liver progression-free survival (Li-PFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariable and multivariable Cox-regression were done to identify prognostic factors. Results : : No significant difference was found between median OS (59.39 months) and Li-PFS (41.22 months) of patients who received MWA (n = 33); and median OS (61.00 months) and Li-PFS (53.43 months) of patients who received RFA (n = 31) (OS: P = 0.697; Li-PFS: P = 0.122). The median OS and Li-PFS were significantly decreased with lung metastases and K-ras mutations (P < 0.001). There was no correlation between prior systemic chemotherapy (n = 25) and both outcome parameters (OS: P = 0.613; Li-PFS: P = 0.665). No significant difference was observed in patients with lesions less than 30 mm diameter (n = 44) whether they received prior systemic chemotherapy (n = 17) or not (n = 27) (OS: P = 0.27; Li-PFS: P = 0.42). Similarly, in patients with a lesion of 3-5 cm diameter (n = 20; eight of them had prior chemotherapy), there was no correlation for both outcomes (OS: P = 0.069; Li-PFS: P = 0.71). The most important prognostic factor was concomitant lung metastases (hazard ratio = 3.689, P = 0.002). Conclusion : : Concomitant lung metastasis and mutant K-ras were associated with shorter survival. Survival did not differ significantly regarding thermoablation technique or prior systemic chemotherapy. However, in the patient group with lung metastases, curative treatments had better survival than patients who received chemotherapy only. Additional therapeutic options should be considered in patients with concomitant lung metastasis.
ISSN:2636-0004
2636-0012
DOI:10.18528/ijgii230019