Effects of anisotropic properties on bursting behavior of rectangular cup with a V-notch

• Published in: Journal of mechanical science and technology 2016, 30(9), , pp.4259-4267
• Main Authors: Kim, Jeong-Tai, Kim, Sang-Mok, Kang, Beom-Soo, Ku, Tae-Wan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Angles (geometry); Anisotropy; Axial stress; Bursting; Bursting pressure; Computer simulation; Containers; Control; Deep drawing; Deformation; Ductile fracture; Dynamical Systems; Engineering; Failure; Fracture mechanics; Industrial and Production Engineering; Lithium; Mathematical models; Mechanical Engineering; Mechanical properties; Numerical prediction; Rechargeable batteries; Storage batteries; Tensile tests; Vibration; 기계공학
• ISSN: 1738-494X; 1976-3824
• DOI: 10.1007/s12206-016-0838-6

Effects of mechanical anisotropic properties on bursting failure and its pressure of rectangular deep-drawn cup fabricated by using AA3005-H14 thin sheet are investigated to utilize for electrolyte container of lithium-ion secondary batteries. The V-notch shape with a depth of 0.1 mm and an angle of 20.0˚ is defined on the rectangular cup, which has a thickness of 0.20 mm on the major surface and that of 0.30 mm on the minor surface. With the measured mechanical properties by uni-axial tensile tests and the defined V-notch geometry, a series of numerical prediction models considering isotropic, planar and normal anisotropic characteristics, are built-up and the bursting simulations are performed. Thereafter, the bursting fracture behavior is investigated by adopting ductile fracture criterion proposed by Cockcroft and Latham. The results predicted for the planar and the normal anisotropic models show that the bursting fracture pressure is well matched to 0.400 MPa, and the isotropic and the planar anisotropic models present a bursting fracture height of about 4.95 mm and 4.92 mm, respectively. A series of experimental investigations are undertaken to verify the bursting deformation that had been predicted. The bursting pressure and its height during experimental verifications are shown to be in good agreement with each variation of about 5.88% and roughly 0.20% with respect to the numerical results obtained using the planar anisotropic model.