Loading…
Relationship Between Dual-Time Point FDG PET and Immunohistochemical Parameters in Preoperative Colorectal Cancer: Preliminary Study
Purpose The clinical availability of 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) dual-time point positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (DTPP) has been investigated in diverse oncologic fields. The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the relationship between various immunohistopat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2012, 46(1), , pp.48-56 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
The clinical availability of 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) dual-time point positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (DTPP) has been investigated in diverse oncologic fields. The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the relationship between various immunohistopathologic markers reflecting disease progression of colorectal cancer and parameters extracted from FDG DTPP in colorectal cancer patients.
Materials and Methods
Forty-seven patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer were analyzed in this preliminary study. FDG DTPP consisted of an early scan 1 h after FDG injection and a delayed scan 1.5 h after the early scan. Based on an analysis of FDG DTPP, we estimated the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of tumors on the early and delayed scans (SUV
early
and SUV
delayed
, respectively). The retention index (RI) was calculated as follows: (SUV
delayed
- SUV
early
) × 100/ SUV
early
. The clinicopathological findings (size and T and N stages) and immunohistochemical factors [glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1), hexokinase 2 (HK-2), p53, P504S, and β-catenin] were analyzed by visual analysis.
Results
The RIs calculated from the SUVs ranged from -1.8 to 73.4 (31.8 ± 15.5). The RIs were significantly higher in patients with high T stages (T3 and T4) than with low T stages (T1 and T2; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1869-3474 1869-3482 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13139-011-0120-x |