Comparison of the Modified Transtibial Technique, Anteromedial Portal Technique and Outside-in Technique in ACL Reconstruction

To compare clinical and radiographic results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using modified transtibial technique (mTT), anteromedial (AM) portal technique and outside-in (OI) technique. From March 2007 to December 2012, ACL reconstruction was performed using the mTT, AM portal te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Knee Surgery and Related Research, 26(4) 2014, 26(4), , pp.241-248
Main Authors: Sohn, Oog Jin, Lee, Dong Chul, Park, Kang Hyun, Ahn, Hyo Sae
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Original
정형외과학
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3511-6145244f372734eaa8125062509f287cedf4697ec455724eb3c08924608a08a33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3511-6145244f372734eaa8125062509f287cedf4697ec455724eb3c08924608a08a33
container_end_page 248
container_issue 4
container_start_page 241
container_title Knee Surgery and Related Research, 26(4)
container_volume 26
creator Sohn, Oog Jin
Lee, Dong Chul
Park, Kang Hyun
Ahn, Hyo Sae
description To compare clinical and radiographic results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using modified transtibial technique (mTT), anteromedial (AM) portal technique and outside-in (OI) technique. From March 2007 to December 2012, ACL reconstruction was performed using the mTT, AM portal technique and OI technique in 20 patients each. Anteroposterior and rotational stability were assessed using the GNRB arthrometer and pivot-shift test. Femoral tunnel obliquity was measured on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, pivot-shift test were improved at final follow-up in all three groups. However, statistical difference was not shown. Side-to-side difference in GNRB arthrometer was average of 1.4 mm, 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm in mTT, AM and OI group, showing the signicant difference between mTT and AM/OI groups (p
doi_str_mv 10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.4.241
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1163094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1637549920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3511-6145244f372734eaa8125062509f287cedf4697ec455724eb3c08924608a08a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1rGzEQFSWlCWn-QA9Fxwa6rjT62r0UjGk-wCUluGcha7W16rXkSLuFXvLbI8dOcIQ0I828eaPhIfSJkolQDXxb55QmQCifgJwUw-k7dAbAeAVc0JPDnSiQp-gi57-kLEloLeQHdApCEKGIOkOPs7jZmuRzDDh2eFg5_DO2vvOuxYtkQh780pseL5xdBf8wuq94GgaX4sa1u_ivmIbjNDahxXfjkH3rKh-OEuUxnc3xvbOxsKbRDj6Gj-h9Z_rsLg7-HP2--rGY3VTzu-vb2XReWSYorSTlAjjvmALFuDOmpiCILKfpoFbWtR2XjXKWC6GAuyWzpG6AS1Kbshk7R5d73pA6vbZeR-Of_Z-o10lP7xe3mlLJSMML9vseux2XZUrrwpBMr7fJb0z6_1z5NhP8qvD80xxEzRsoBF8OBCmWyfOgNz5b1_cmuDhmXfoowZsGSIHCHmpTzDm57rUNJXqns97prHc6a5C6GE5L0efjD76WvKjKngCXvqTu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637549920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Modified Transtibial Technique, Anteromedial Portal Technique and Outside-in Technique in ACL Reconstruction</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Sohn, Oog Jin ; Lee, Dong Chul ; Park, Kang Hyun ; Ahn, Hyo Sae</creator><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Oog Jin ; Lee, Dong Chul ; Park, Kang Hyun ; Ahn, Hyo Sae</creatorcontrib><description>To compare clinical and radiographic results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using modified transtibial technique (mTT), anteromedial (AM) portal technique and outside-in (OI) technique. From March 2007 to December 2012, ACL reconstruction was performed using the mTT, AM portal technique and OI technique in 20 patients each. Anteroposterior and rotational stability were assessed using the GNRB arthrometer and pivot-shift test. Femoral tunnel obliquity was measured on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, pivot-shift test were improved at final follow-up in all three groups. However, statistical difference was not shown. Side-to-side difference in GNRB arthrometer was average of 1.4 mm, 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm in mTT, AM and OI group, showing the signicant difference between mTT and AM/OI groups (p&lt;0.001). The mean femoral tunnel obliquity was 56.4° in the mTT group, 39.4° in the AM group and 33.6° in the OI group, showing significant intergroup difference (p&lt;0.001). It showed the significant difference among three groups (p&lt;0.001). Clinical results were improved in all three groups. Femoral tunnel obliquity in AM and OI were more horizontal on the coronal plane. They are thought to have more benefits in oblique positioning of the grafted ACL in rotational stability; however, there was no significant difference among three techniques in pivot-shift test to assess the rotational stability in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-0726</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1225-1623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-2451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.4.241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25505707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Knee Society</publisher><subject>Original ; 정형외과학</subject><ispartof>Knee Surgery and Related Research, 2014, 26(4), , pp.241-248</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 KOREAN KNEE SOCIETY 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3511-6145244f372734eaa8125062509f287cedf4697ec455724eb3c08924608a08a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3511-6145244f372734eaa8125062509f287cedf4697ec455724eb3c08924608a08a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258492/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258492/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001931270$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Oog Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kang Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Hyo Sae</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Modified Transtibial Technique, Anteromedial Portal Technique and Outside-in Technique in ACL Reconstruction</title><title>Knee Surgery and Related Research, 26(4)</title><addtitle>Knee Surg Relat Res</addtitle><description>To compare clinical and radiographic results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using modified transtibial technique (mTT), anteromedial (AM) portal technique and outside-in (OI) technique. From March 2007 to December 2012, ACL reconstruction was performed using the mTT, AM portal technique and OI technique in 20 patients each. Anteroposterior and rotational stability were assessed using the GNRB arthrometer and pivot-shift test. Femoral tunnel obliquity was measured on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, pivot-shift test were improved at final follow-up in all three groups. However, statistical difference was not shown. Side-to-side difference in GNRB arthrometer was average of 1.4 mm, 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm in mTT, AM and OI group, showing the signicant difference between mTT and AM/OI groups (p&lt;0.001). The mean femoral tunnel obliquity was 56.4° in the mTT group, 39.4° in the AM group and 33.6° in the OI group, showing significant intergroup difference (p&lt;0.001). It showed the significant difference among three groups (p&lt;0.001). Clinical results were improved in all three groups. Femoral tunnel obliquity in AM and OI were more horizontal on the coronal plane. They are thought to have more benefits in oblique positioning of the grafted ACL in rotational stability; however, there was no significant difference among three techniques in pivot-shift test to assess the rotational stability in this study.</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>정형외과학</subject><issn>2234-0726</issn><issn>1225-1623</issn><issn>2234-2451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1rGzEQFSWlCWn-QA9Fxwa6rjT62r0UjGk-wCUluGcha7W16rXkSLuFXvLbI8dOcIQ0I828eaPhIfSJkolQDXxb55QmQCifgJwUw-k7dAbAeAVc0JPDnSiQp-gi57-kLEloLeQHdApCEKGIOkOPs7jZmuRzDDh2eFg5_DO2vvOuxYtkQh780pseL5xdBf8wuq94GgaX4sa1u_ivmIbjNDahxXfjkH3rKh-OEuUxnc3xvbOxsKbRDj6Gj-h9Z_rsLg7-HP2--rGY3VTzu-vb2XReWSYorSTlAjjvmALFuDOmpiCILKfpoFbWtR2XjXKWC6GAuyWzpG6AS1Kbshk7R5d73pA6vbZeR-Of_Z-o10lP7xe3mlLJSMML9vseux2XZUrrwpBMr7fJb0z6_1z5NhP8qvD80xxEzRsoBF8OBCmWyfOgNz5b1_cmuDhmXfoowZsGSIHCHmpTzDm57rUNJXqns97prHc6a5C6GE5L0efjD76WvKjKngCXvqTu</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Sohn, Oog Jin</creator><creator>Lee, Dong Chul</creator><creator>Park, Kang Hyun</creator><creator>Ahn, Hyo Sae</creator><general>The Korean Knee Society</general><general>대한슬관절학회</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Modified Transtibial Technique, Anteromedial Portal Technique and Outside-in Technique in ACL Reconstruction</title><author>Sohn, Oog Jin ; Lee, Dong Chul ; Park, Kang Hyun ; Ahn, Hyo Sae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3511-6145244f372734eaa8125062509f287cedf4697ec455724eb3c08924608a08a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>정형외과학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Oog Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kang Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Hyo Sae</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Knee Surgery and Related Research, 26(4)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sohn, Oog Jin</au><au>Lee, Dong Chul</au><au>Park, Kang Hyun</au><au>Ahn, Hyo Sae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Modified Transtibial Technique, Anteromedial Portal Technique and Outside-in Technique in ACL Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Knee Surgery and Related Research, 26(4)</jtitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Relat Res</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>241-248</pages><issn>2234-0726</issn><issn>1225-1623</issn><eissn>2234-2451</eissn><abstract>To compare clinical and radiographic results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using modified transtibial technique (mTT), anteromedial (AM) portal technique and outside-in (OI) technique. From March 2007 to December 2012, ACL reconstruction was performed using the mTT, AM portal technique and OI technique in 20 patients each. Anteroposterior and rotational stability were assessed using the GNRB arthrometer and pivot-shift test. Femoral tunnel obliquity was measured on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, pivot-shift test were improved at final follow-up in all three groups. However, statistical difference was not shown. Side-to-side difference in GNRB arthrometer was average of 1.4 mm, 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm in mTT, AM and OI group, showing the signicant difference between mTT and AM/OI groups (p&lt;0.001). The mean femoral tunnel obliquity was 56.4° in the mTT group, 39.4° in the AM group and 33.6° in the OI group, showing significant intergroup difference (p&lt;0.001). It showed the significant difference among three groups (p&lt;0.001). Clinical results were improved in all three groups. Femoral tunnel obliquity in AM and OI were more horizontal on the coronal plane. They are thought to have more benefits in oblique positioning of the grafted ACL in rotational stability; however, there was no significant difference among three techniques in pivot-shift test to assess the rotational stability in this study.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Knee Society</pub><pmid>25505707</pmid><doi>10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.4.241</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-0726
ispartof Knee Surgery and Related Research, 2014, 26(4), , pp.241-248
issn 2234-0726
1225-1623
2234-2451
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1163094
source PubMed Central Free; EZB Free E-Journals
subjects Original
정형외과학
title Comparison of the Modified Transtibial Technique, Anteromedial Portal Technique and Outside-in Technique in ACL Reconstruction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A45%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Modified%20Transtibial%20Technique,%20Anteromedial%20Portal%20Technique%20and%20Outside-in%20Technique%20in%20ACL%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Knee%20Surgery%20and%20Related%20Research,%2026(4)&rft.au=Sohn,%20Oog%20Jin&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=241-248&rft.issn=2234-0726&rft.eissn=2234-2451&rft_id=info:doi/10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.4.241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1637549920%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3511-6145244f372734eaa8125062509f287cedf4697ec455724eb3c08924608a08a33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637549920&rft_id=info:pmid/25505707&rfr_iscdi=true