Functional benefit after modification of radial forearm free flap for soft palate reconstruction

To compare the velopharyngeal function, swallowing and speech of the conventional and modified radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for soft palate reconstruction. Retrospective clinical study. Twenty-eight patients who underwent oropharyngeal reconstruction with RFFF were divided into two groups: 10 pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology 2008, 1(3), , pp.161-165
Main Authors: Kim, Jin-Hwan, Chu, Hyung-Ro, Kang, Jeong-Min, Bae, Woo-Jin, Oh, So-Jung, Rho, Young-Soo, Ahn, Hwoe-Young, Jung, Chul-Hoon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Original
Oropharyngeal cancer
Radial forearm free flap
Reconstruction
Soft palate
이비인후과학
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-69eb1cae7b9b94985318f327fd1d0a00ba0f343f3e333d186454b6c9041349883
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-69eb1cae7b9b94985318f327fd1d0a00ba0f343f3e333d186454b6c9041349883
container_end_page 165
container_issue 3
container_start_page 161
container_title Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology
container_volume 1
creator Kim, Jin-Hwan
Chu, Hyung-Ro
Kang, Jeong-Min
Bae, Woo-Jin
Oh, So-Jung
Rho, Young-Soo
Ahn, Hwoe-Young
Jung, Chul-Hoon
description To compare the velopharyngeal function, swallowing and speech of the conventional and modified radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for soft palate reconstruction. Retrospective clinical study. Twenty-eight patients who underwent oropharyngeal reconstruction with RFFF were divided into two groups: 10 patients had conventional folded RFFF and 18 patients underwent modified method. The average speech intelligibility score in modified RFFF group was 8.0+/-2.4, and 6.2+/-2.2 in conventional RFFF group (P
doi_str_mv 10.3342/ceo.2008.1.3.161
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1244392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ae6840b52dee4924a14c47b25c731348</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>733095204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-69eb1cae7b9b94985318f327fd1d0a00ba0f343f3e333d186454b6c9041349883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUktv1DAQjhCIbgt3Tsg3xCFh_EgcX5CqipaVKiGhcjYTZ1zcZuPFSZD49zi7K6Cn0cx8r8NXFG84VFIq8cFRrARAW_FKVrzhz4pNXusStIDnxYYb3ZSt5nBWnE_TA0BT16BeFmfcqEyvYVN8v15GN4c44sA6GsmHmaGfKbFd7IMPDtcni54l7EMG-ZgI0475RMT8gPv1wqboZ7bHAWdiiVwcpzktB91XxQuPw0SvT_Oi-Hb96e7qc3n75WZ7dXlbuhxkLhtDHXdIujOdUaatJW-9FNr3vAcE6BC8VNJLklL2vG1UrbrGGVBcZngrL4r3R90xefvogo0YDvM-2sdkL7_ebS0XSkkjMnZ7xPYRH-w-hR2m3wfC4RDTvcU0BzeQRWpaBV0teiJlhEKunNKdqJ2W2Xn1_XjU2i_djnpH45xweCL69DOGHznTLysazXUNWeDdSSDFnwtNs92FydEw4EhxmayWEkwtQGUkHJEuxWlK5P-6cLBrH2zug137YLmVNvchU97-n-4f4VQA-Qf77rGM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733095204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional benefit after modification of radial forearm free flap for soft palate reconstruction</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central（免费）</source><creator>Kim, Jin-Hwan ; Chu, Hyung-Ro ; Kang, Jeong-Min ; Bae, Woo-Jin ; Oh, So-Jung ; Rho, Young-Soo ; Ahn, Hwoe-Young ; Jung, Chul-Hoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Hwan ; Chu, Hyung-Ro ; Kang, Jeong-Min ; Bae, Woo-Jin ; Oh, So-Jung ; Rho, Young-Soo ; Ahn, Hwoe-Young ; Jung, Chul-Hoon</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the velopharyngeal function, swallowing and speech of the conventional and modified radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for soft palate reconstruction. Retrospective clinical study. Twenty-eight patients who underwent oropharyngeal reconstruction with RFFF were divided into two groups: 10 patients had conventional folded RFFF and 18 patients underwent modified method. The average speech intelligibility score in modified RFFF group was 8.0+/-2.4, and 6.2+/-2.2 in conventional RFFF group (P&lt;0.05). The nasalance was 27.4+/-7.8% in modified group and 38.6+/-2.7% in conventional group during no nasal passage reading and 43.6+/-7.3% in modified group, 55.2+/-7.6% in conventional group during high nasal passage reading (P&lt;0.05). The subjective swallowing functional score was 2.8 in modified group and 2.1 in conventional group. The speech assessment and nasalance demonstrate a more favorable outcome in modified group than conventional group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1976-8710</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2005-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3342/ceo.2008.1.3.161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19434250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery</publisher><subject>Original ; Oropharyngeal cancer ; Radial forearm free flap ; Reconstruction ; Soft palate ; 이비인후과학</subject><ispartof>Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 2008, 1(3), , pp.161-165</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-69eb1cae7b9b94985318f327fd1d0a00ba0f343f3e333d186454b6c9041349883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-69eb1cae7b9b94985318f327fd1d0a00ba0f343f3e333d186454b6c9041349883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671750/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671750/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19434250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001352100$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Hyung-Ro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jeong-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Woo-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, So-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rho, Young-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Hwoe-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Chul-Hoon</creatorcontrib><title>Functional benefit after modification of radial forearm free flap for soft palate reconstruction</title><title>Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>To compare the velopharyngeal function, swallowing and speech of the conventional and modified radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for soft palate reconstruction. Retrospective clinical study. Twenty-eight patients who underwent oropharyngeal reconstruction with RFFF were divided into two groups: 10 patients had conventional folded RFFF and 18 patients underwent modified method. The average speech intelligibility score in modified RFFF group was 8.0+/-2.4, and 6.2+/-2.2 in conventional RFFF group (P&lt;0.05). The nasalance was 27.4+/-7.8% in modified group and 38.6+/-2.7% in conventional group during no nasal passage reading and 43.6+/-7.3% in modified group, 55.2+/-7.6% in conventional group during high nasal passage reading (P&lt;0.05). The subjective swallowing functional score was 2.8 in modified group and 2.1 in conventional group. The speech assessment and nasalance demonstrate a more favorable outcome in modified group than conventional group.</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>Oropharyngeal cancer</subject><subject>Radial forearm free flap</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Soft palate</subject><subject>이비인후과학</subject><issn>1976-8710</issn><issn>2005-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUktv1DAQjhCIbgt3Tsg3xCFh_EgcX5CqipaVKiGhcjYTZ1zcZuPFSZD49zi7K6Cn0cx8r8NXFG84VFIq8cFRrARAW_FKVrzhz4pNXusStIDnxYYb3ZSt5nBWnE_TA0BT16BeFmfcqEyvYVN8v15GN4c44sA6GsmHmaGfKbFd7IMPDtcni54l7EMG-ZgI0475RMT8gPv1wqboZ7bHAWdiiVwcpzktB91XxQuPw0SvT_Oi-Hb96e7qc3n75WZ7dXlbuhxkLhtDHXdIujOdUaatJW-9FNr3vAcE6BC8VNJLklL2vG1UrbrGGVBcZngrL4r3R90xefvogo0YDvM-2sdkL7_ebS0XSkkjMnZ7xPYRH-w-hR2m3wfC4RDTvcU0BzeQRWpaBV0teiJlhEKunNKdqJ2W2Xn1_XjU2i_djnpH45xweCL69DOGHznTLysazXUNWeDdSSDFnwtNs92FydEw4EhxmayWEkwtQGUkHJEuxWlK5P-6cLBrH2zug137YLmVNvchU97-n-4f4VQA-Qf77rGM</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Kim, Jin-Hwan</creator><creator>Chu, Hyung-Ro</creator><creator>Kang, Jeong-Min</creator><creator>Bae, Woo-Jin</creator><creator>Oh, So-Jung</creator><creator>Rho, Young-Soo</creator><creator>Ahn, Hwoe-Young</creator><creator>Jung, Chul-Hoon</creator><general>Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery</general><general>대한이비인후과학회</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Functional benefit after modification of radial forearm free flap for soft palate reconstruction</title><author>Kim, Jin-Hwan ; Chu, Hyung-Ro ; Kang, Jeong-Min ; Bae, Woo-Jin ; Oh, So-Jung ; Rho, Young-Soo ; Ahn, Hwoe-Young ; Jung, Chul-Hoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-69eb1cae7b9b94985318f327fd1d0a00ba0f343f3e333d186454b6c9041349883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>Oropharyngeal cancer</topic><topic>Radial forearm free flap</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Soft palate</topic><topic>이비인후과학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Hyung-Ro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jeong-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Woo-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, So-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rho, Young-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Hwoe-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Chul-Hoon</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jin-Hwan</au><au>Chu, Hyung-Ro</au><au>Kang, Jeong-Min</au><au>Bae, Woo-Jin</au><au>Oh, So-Jung</au><au>Rho, Young-Soo</au><au>Ahn, Hwoe-Young</au><au>Jung, Chul-Hoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional benefit after modification of radial forearm free flap for soft palate reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>161-165</pages><issn>1976-8710</issn><eissn>2005-0720</eissn><abstract>To compare the velopharyngeal function, swallowing and speech of the conventional and modified radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for soft palate reconstruction. Retrospective clinical study. Twenty-eight patients who underwent oropharyngeal reconstruction with RFFF were divided into two groups: 10 patients had conventional folded RFFF and 18 patients underwent modified method. The average speech intelligibility score in modified RFFF group was 8.0+/-2.4, and 6.2+/-2.2 in conventional RFFF group (P&lt;0.05). The nasalance was 27.4+/-7.8% in modified group and 38.6+/-2.7% in conventional group during no nasal passage reading and 43.6+/-7.3% in modified group, 55.2+/-7.6% in conventional group during high nasal passage reading (P&lt;0.05). The subjective swallowing functional score was 2.8 in modified group and 2.1 in conventional group. The speech assessment and nasalance demonstrate a more favorable outcome in modified group than conventional group.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery</pub><pmid>19434250</pmid><doi>10.3342/ceo.2008.1.3.161</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1976-8710
ispartof Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 2008, 1(3), , pp.161-165
issn 1976-8710
2005-0720
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1244392
source NCBI_PubMed Central（免费）
subjects Original
Oropharyngeal cancer
Radial forearm free flap
Reconstruction
Soft palate
이비인후과학
title Functional benefit after modification of radial forearm free flap for soft palate reconstruction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A05%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20benefit%20after%20modification%20of%20radial%20forearm%20free%20flap%20for%20soft%20palate%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Kim,%20Jin-Hwan&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=161-165&rft.issn=1976-8710&rft.eissn=2005-0720&rft_id=info:doi/10.3342/ceo.2008.1.3.161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E733095204%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-69eb1cae7b9b94985318f327fd1d0a00ba0f343f3e333d186454b6c9041349883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733095204&rft_id=info:pmid/19434250&rfr_iscdi=true