Loading…
Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Investigative and clinical urology 2016, 57(6), , pp.408-416 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453 |
container_end_page | 416 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 408 |
container_title | Investigative and clinical urology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Kang, Dong Hyuk Cho, Kang Su Ham, Won Sik Chung, Doo Yong Kwon, Jong Kyou Choi, Young Deuk Lee, Joo Yong |
description | To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4-20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography.
After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (>10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002).
Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1279404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_264813d147fb49599f60c249bc2eb545</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1841131832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUstqGzEUHUpLE9J8QDdFy3bhqZ6j0aYQQh-GQKG40J3QaK5sxePRVNLE5Af63ZXtJG1A4oqr87gSp6reElxzQshHb-eaYtLUQtZNzXH7ojqnvGkWWPBfLx_PXLGz6jKlW4wLlknC2tfVGZUtl4rw8-rPzwgZohlQyjBmP66RNSPqABk0wtpkfwdoitB7m0NEruw0WwspuXlAYc427KC0hyHsD-S0CXaL9qawBp83IUc_pXvkRzQVreKQ0L700fzPNoyQ3lSvnBkSXD7Ui2r15fPq-tvi5vvX5fXVzcJypfKCSddi1lthmSxLCCyk6HqQxDhMnVNOMNFKRzEVCreAO8opUNcQTCwX7KL6cJIdo9Nb63Uw_ljXQW-jvvqxWmpCpeKYF-zyhO2DudVT9DsT74-EYyPEtTYxezuApg1vCesJl67jSijlGmwpV52l0Imj76eT1jR3O-ht-Yfy9meiz29Gvykz3WlBsJJKFYH3DwIx_J4hZb3zycIwmBHCnDRpSyYYaRktUHKC2hhSiuCebAjWh-Tokhx9SI4WUje6JKdw3v0_3xPjMSfsLzyrwc4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841131832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Kang, Dong Hyuk ; Cho, Kang Su ; Ham, Won Sik ; Chung, Doo Yong ; Kwon, Jong Kyou ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Lee, Joo Yong</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dong Hyuk ; Cho, Kang Su ; Ham, Won Sik ; Chung, Doo Yong ; Kwon, Jong Kyou ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Lee, Joo Yong</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4-20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography.
After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (>10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002).
Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2466-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2466-054X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27847914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Urological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Lithotripsy - adverse effects ; Lithotripsy - methods ; Lithotripsy; Stents; Treatment outcome; Ureter; Urinary calculi ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Prognosis ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging ; Ureteral Calculi - pathology ; Ureteral Calculi - therapy ; 비뇨기과학</subject><ispartof>Investigative and Clinical Urology, 2016, 57(6), , pp.408-416</ispartof><rights>The Korean Urological Association, 2016 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109799/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109799/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002164853$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dong Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Kang Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ham, Won Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Doo Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Jong Kyou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joo Yong</creatorcontrib><title>Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones</title><title>Investigative and clinical urology</title><addtitle>Investig Clin Urol</addtitle><description>To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4-20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography.
After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (>10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002).
Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - methods</subject><subject>Lithotripsy; Stents; Treatment outcome; Ureter; Urinary calculi</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - pathology</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - therapy</subject><subject>비뇨기과학</subject><issn>2466-0493</issn><issn>2466-054X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUstqGzEUHUpLE9J8QDdFy3bhqZ6j0aYQQh-GQKG40J3QaK5sxePRVNLE5Af63ZXtJG1A4oqr87gSp6reElxzQshHb-eaYtLUQtZNzXH7ojqnvGkWWPBfLx_PXLGz6jKlW4wLlknC2tfVGZUtl4rw8-rPzwgZohlQyjBmP66RNSPqABk0wtpkfwdoitB7m0NEruw0WwspuXlAYc427KC0hyHsD-S0CXaL9qawBp83IUc_pXvkRzQVreKQ0L700fzPNoyQ3lSvnBkSXD7Ui2r15fPq-tvi5vvX5fXVzcJypfKCSddi1lthmSxLCCyk6HqQxDhMnVNOMNFKRzEVCreAO8opUNcQTCwX7KL6cJIdo9Nb63Uw_ljXQW-jvvqxWmpCpeKYF-zyhO2DudVT9DsT74-EYyPEtTYxezuApg1vCesJl67jSijlGmwpV52l0Imj76eT1jR3O-ht-Yfy9meiz29Gvykz3WlBsJJKFYH3DwIx_J4hZb3zycIwmBHCnDRpSyYYaRktUHKC2hhSiuCebAjWh-Tokhx9SI4WUje6JKdw3v0_3xPjMSfsLzyrwc4</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Kang, Dong Hyuk</creator><creator>Cho, Kang Su</creator><creator>Ham, Won Sik</creator><creator>Chung, Doo Yong</creator><creator>Kwon, Jong Kyou</creator><creator>Choi, Young Deuk</creator><creator>Lee, Joo Yong</creator><general>The Korean Urological Association</general><general>Korean Urological Association</general><general>대한비뇨의학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones</title><author>Kang, Dong Hyuk ; Cho, Kang Su ; Ham, Won Sik ; Chung, Doo Yong ; Kwon, Jong Kyou ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Lee, Joo Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - methods</topic><topic>Lithotripsy; Stents; Treatment outcome; Ureter; Urinary calculi</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - pathology</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - therapy</topic><topic>비뇨기과학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dong Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Kang Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ham, Won Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Doo Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Jong Kyou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joo Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Investigative and clinical urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang, Dong Hyuk</au><au>Cho, Kang Su</au><au>Ham, Won Sik</au><au>Chung, Doo Yong</au><au>Kwon, Jong Kyou</au><au>Choi, Young Deuk</au><au>Lee, Joo Yong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones</atitle><jtitle>Investigative and clinical urology</jtitle><addtitle>Investig Clin Urol</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>408-416</pages><issn>2466-0493</issn><eissn>2466-054X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4-20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography.
After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (>10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002).
Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Urological Association</pub><pmid>27847914</pmid><doi>10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2466-0493 |
ispartof | Investigative and Clinical Urology, 2016, 57(6), , pp.408-416 |
issn | 2466-0493 2466-054X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1279404 |
source | PubMed (Medline) |
subjects | Adult Aged Female Humans Lithotripsy - adverse effects Lithotripsy - methods Lithotripsy Stents Treatment outcome Ureter Urinary calculi Male Middle Aged Original Prognosis Propensity Score Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Stents Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging Ureteral Calculi - pathology Ureteral Calculi - therapy 비뇨기과학 |
title | Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T04%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ureteral%20stenting%20can%20be%20a%20negative%20predictor%20for%20successful%20outcome%20following%20shock%20wave%20lithotripsy%20in%20patients%20with%20ureteral%20stones&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20and%20clinical%20urology&rft.au=Kang,%20Dong%20Hyuk&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=408-416&rft.issn=2466-0493&rft.eissn=2466-054X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1841131832%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841131832&rft_id=info:pmid/27847914&rfr_iscdi=true |