Loading…

Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones

To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Investigative and clinical urology 2016, 57(6), , pp.408-416
Main Authors: Kang, Dong Hyuk, Cho, Kang Su, Ham, Won Sik, Chung, Doo Yong, Kwon, Jong Kyou, Choi, Young Deuk, Lee, Joo Yong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453
container_end_page 416
container_issue 6
container_start_page 408
container_title Investigative and clinical urology
container_volume 57
creator Kang, Dong Hyuk
Cho, Kang Su
Ham, Won Sik
Chung, Doo Yong
Kwon, Jong Kyou
Choi, Young Deuk
Lee, Joo Yong
description To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4-20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography. After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (>10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002). Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone.
doi_str_mv 10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1279404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_264813d147fb49599f60c249bc2eb545</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1841131832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUstqGzEUHUpLE9J8QDdFy3bhqZ6j0aYQQh-GQKG40J3QaK5sxePRVNLE5Af63ZXtJG1A4oqr87gSp6reElxzQshHb-eaYtLUQtZNzXH7ojqnvGkWWPBfLx_PXLGz6jKlW4wLlknC2tfVGZUtl4rw8-rPzwgZohlQyjBmP66RNSPqABk0wtpkfwdoitB7m0NEruw0WwspuXlAYc427KC0hyHsD-S0CXaL9qawBp83IUc_pXvkRzQVreKQ0L700fzPNoyQ3lSvnBkSXD7Ui2r15fPq-tvi5vvX5fXVzcJypfKCSddi1lthmSxLCCyk6HqQxDhMnVNOMNFKRzEVCreAO8opUNcQTCwX7KL6cJIdo9Nb63Uw_ljXQW-jvvqxWmpCpeKYF-zyhO2DudVT9DsT74-EYyPEtTYxezuApg1vCesJl67jSijlGmwpV52l0Imj76eT1jR3O-ht-Yfy9meiz29Gvykz3WlBsJJKFYH3DwIx_J4hZb3zycIwmBHCnDRpSyYYaRktUHKC2hhSiuCebAjWh-Tokhx9SI4WUje6JKdw3v0_3xPjMSfsLzyrwc4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841131832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Kang, Dong Hyuk ; Cho, Kang Su ; Ham, Won Sik ; Chung, Doo Yong ; Kwon, Jong Kyou ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Lee, Joo Yong</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dong Hyuk ; Cho, Kang Su ; Ham, Won Sik ; Chung, Doo Yong ; Kwon, Jong Kyou ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Lee, Joo Yong</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4-20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography. After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (&gt;10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002). Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2466-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2466-054X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27847914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Urological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Lithotripsy - adverse effects ; Lithotripsy - methods ; Lithotripsy; Stents; Treatment outcome; Ureter; Urinary calculi ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Prognosis ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging ; Ureteral Calculi - pathology ; Ureteral Calculi - therapy ; 비뇨기과학</subject><ispartof>Investigative and Clinical Urology, 2016, 57(6), , pp.408-416</ispartof><rights>The Korean Urological Association, 2016 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109799/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109799/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002164853$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dong Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Kang Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ham, Won Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Doo Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Jong Kyou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joo Yong</creatorcontrib><title>Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones</title><title>Investigative and clinical urology</title><addtitle>Investig Clin Urol</addtitle><description>To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4-20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography. After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (&gt;10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002). Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - methods</subject><subject>Lithotripsy; Stents; Treatment outcome; Ureter; Urinary calculi</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - pathology</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - therapy</subject><subject>비뇨기과학</subject><issn>2466-0493</issn><issn>2466-054X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUstqGzEUHUpLE9J8QDdFy3bhqZ6j0aYQQh-GQKG40J3QaK5sxePRVNLE5Af63ZXtJG1A4oqr87gSp6reElxzQshHb-eaYtLUQtZNzXH7ojqnvGkWWPBfLx_PXLGz6jKlW4wLlknC2tfVGZUtl4rw8-rPzwgZohlQyjBmP66RNSPqABk0wtpkfwdoitB7m0NEruw0WwspuXlAYc427KC0hyHsD-S0CXaL9qawBp83IUc_pXvkRzQVreKQ0L700fzPNoyQ3lSvnBkSXD7Ui2r15fPq-tvi5vvX5fXVzcJypfKCSddi1lthmSxLCCyk6HqQxDhMnVNOMNFKRzEVCreAO8opUNcQTCwX7KL6cJIdo9Nb63Uw_ljXQW-jvvqxWmpCpeKYF-zyhO2DudVT9DsT74-EYyPEtTYxezuApg1vCesJl67jSijlGmwpV52l0Imj76eT1jR3O-ht-Yfy9meiz29Gvykz3WlBsJJKFYH3DwIx_J4hZb3zycIwmBHCnDRpSyYYaRktUHKC2hhSiuCebAjWh-Tokhx9SI4WUje6JKdw3v0_3xPjMSfsLzyrwc4</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Kang, Dong Hyuk</creator><creator>Cho, Kang Su</creator><creator>Ham, Won Sik</creator><creator>Chung, Doo Yong</creator><creator>Kwon, Jong Kyou</creator><creator>Choi, Young Deuk</creator><creator>Lee, Joo Yong</creator><general>The Korean Urological Association</general><general>Korean Urological Association</general><general>대한비뇨의학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones</title><author>Kang, Dong Hyuk ; Cho, Kang Su ; Ham, Won Sik ; Chung, Doo Yong ; Kwon, Jong Kyou ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Lee, Joo Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - methods</topic><topic>Lithotripsy; Stents; Treatment outcome; Ureter; Urinary calculi</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - pathology</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - therapy</topic><topic>비뇨기과학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dong Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Kang Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ham, Won Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Doo Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Jong Kyou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joo Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Investigative and clinical urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang, Dong Hyuk</au><au>Cho, Kang Su</au><au>Ham, Won Sik</au><au>Chung, Doo Yong</au><au>Kwon, Jong Kyou</au><au>Choi, Young Deuk</au><au>Lee, Joo Yong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones</atitle><jtitle>Investigative and clinical urology</jtitle><addtitle>Investig Clin Urol</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>408-416</pages><issn>2466-0493</issn><eissn>2466-054X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate ureteral stenting as a negative predictive factor influencing ureteral stone clearance and to estimate the probability of one-session success in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) patients with a ureteral stone. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,651 patients who underwent their first SWL. Among these patients, 680 had a ureteral stone measuring 4-20 mm and were thus eligible for our study. The 57 patients who underwent ureteral stenting during SWL were identified. Maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were determined by pre-SWL noncontrast computed tomography. After propensity score matching, 399 patients were extracted from the total patient cohort. There were no significant differences between stenting and stentless groups after matching, except for a higher one-session success rate in the stentless group (78.6% vs. 49.1%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, shorter MSL, lower MSD, higher SHI, and absence of a stent were positive predictors for one-session success in patients who underwent SWL. Using cutoff values of MSL and MSD obtained from receiver operator curve analysis, in patients with a lower MSD (≤784 HU), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (61.1%) than in those without (83.5%) (p=0.001). However, in patients with a higher MSL (&gt;10 mm), the success rate was lower in those with a stent (23.6%) than in those without (52.2%) (p=0.002). Ureteral stenting during SWL was a negative predictor of one-session success in patients with a ureteral stone.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Urological Association</pub><pmid>27847914</pmid><doi>10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2466-0493
ispartof Investigative and Clinical Urology, 2016, 57(6), , pp.408-416
issn 2466-0493
2466-054X
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1279404
source PubMed (Medline)
subjects Adult
Aged
Female
Humans
Lithotripsy - adverse effects
Lithotripsy - methods
Lithotripsy
Stents
Treatment outcome
Ureter
Urinary calculi
Male
Middle Aged
Original
Prognosis
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stents
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging
Ureteral Calculi - pathology
Ureteral Calculi - therapy
비뇨기과학
title Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T04%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ureteral%20stenting%20can%20be%20a%20negative%20predictor%20for%20successful%20outcome%20following%20shock%20wave%20lithotripsy%20in%20patients%20with%20ureteral%20stones&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20and%20clinical%20urology&rft.au=Kang,%20Dong%20Hyuk&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=408-416&rft.issn=2466-0493&rft.eissn=2466-054X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1841131832%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-37f803dc5c37c37550575bde71af02ff9f53587f2025908e0b242e2f6101c453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841131832&rft_id=info:pmid/27847914&rfr_iscdi=true