Loading…

Can a Point-of-Care Troponin I Assay be as Good as a Central Laboratory Assay? A MIDAS Investigation

We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Alere Triage Cardio3 Tropinin I (TnI) assay (Alere, Inc., USA) and the PathFast cTnI-II (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience Corporation, Japan) against the central laboratory assay Singulex Erenna TnI assay (Singulex, USA). Using the Markers in the Diagno...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of laboratory medicine 2016, 36(5), , pp.405-412
Main Authors: Peacock, W Frank, Diercks, Deborah, Birkhahn, Robert, Singer, Adam J, Hollander, Judd E, Nowak, Richard, Safdar, Basmah, Miller, Chadwick D, Peberdy, Mary, Counselman, Francis, Chandra, Abhinav, Kosowsky, Joshua, Neuenschwander, James, Schrock, Jon, Lee-Lewandrowski, Elizabeth, Arnold, William, Nagurney, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d234de68a0cb4a51d02a77ee252ad9dc0fc71db781828ccb8f44b6620b720d723
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d234de68a0cb4a51d02a77ee252ad9dc0fc71db781828ccb8f44b6620b720d723
container_end_page 412
container_issue 5
container_start_page 405
container_title Annals of laboratory medicine
container_volume 36
creator Peacock, W Frank
Diercks, Deborah
Birkhahn, Robert
Singer, Adam J
Hollander, Judd E
Nowak, Richard
Safdar, Basmah
Miller, Chadwick D
Peberdy, Mary
Counselman, Francis
Chandra, Abhinav
Kosowsky, Joshua
Neuenschwander, James
Schrock, Jon
Lee-Lewandrowski, Elizabeth
Arnold, William
Nagurney, John
description We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Alere Triage Cardio3 Tropinin I (TnI) assay (Alere, Inc., USA) and the PathFast cTnI-II (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience Corporation, Japan) against the central laboratory assay Singulex Erenna TnI assay (Singulex, USA). Using the Markers in the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes (MIDAS) study population, we evaluated the ability of three different assays to identify patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The MIDAS dataset, described elsewhere, is a prospective multicenter dataset of emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a planned objective myocardial perfusion evaluation. Myocardial infarction (MI) was diagnosed by central adjudication. The C-statistic with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for diagnosing MI by using a common population (n=241) was 0.95 (0.91-0.99), 0.95 (0.91-0.99), and 0.93 (0.89-0.97) for the Triage, Singulex, and PathFast assays, respectively. Of samples with detectable troponin, the absolute values had high Pearson (R(P)) and Spearman (R(S)) correlations and were R(P)=0.94 and R(S)=0.94 for Triage vs Singulex, R(P)=0.93 and R(S)=0.85 for Triage vs PathFast, and R(P)=0.89 and R(S)=0.73 for PathFast vs Singulex. In a single comparative population of ED patients with suspected ACS, the Triage Cardio3 TnI, PathFast, and Singulex TnI assays provided similar diagnostic performance for MI.
doi_str_mv 10.3343/alm.2016.36.5.405
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_142206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1801860213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d234de68a0cb4a51d02a77ee252ad9dc0fc71db781828ccb8f44b6620b720d723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtv1DAUhS0EolXpD2CDvGST4FcczwYUBVoiDWoFw9q6sZ1imrEHO1Np_n0zDYyKN8fSPec-9CH0lpKSc8E_wLgtGaGy5LKsSkGqF-icMS4Krqh4efoTeYYuc_5N5icJZSvyGp2xmteiJuIc2RYCBnwbfZiKOBQtJIc3Ke5i8AF3uMkZDrh3GDK-jtEeFXDrwpRgxGvoY4IppsNi_IQb_K373PzAXXhwefJ3MPkY3qBXA4zZXf7VC_Tz6sum_Vqsb667tlkXRnA2FXbe2DqpgJheQEUtYVDXzrGKgV1ZQwZTU9vXiiqmjOnVIEQvJSN9zYitGb9A75e-IQ363ngdwT_pXdT3STffN52mgjEiZ-vHxbrb91tnzXKQ3iW_hXR4Cv5fCf7X3OZBi5UgQj2btUvxz36-VW99Nm4cIbi4z5oqQpUkjPLZSherSTHn5IbTGEr0kaWeWeojS82lrvTMcs68e77fKfGPHH8EoMOZRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1801860213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a Point-of-Care Troponin I Assay be as Good as a Central Laboratory Assay? A MIDAS Investigation</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Peacock, W Frank ; Diercks, Deborah ; Birkhahn, Robert ; Singer, Adam J ; Hollander, Judd E ; Nowak, Richard ; Safdar, Basmah ; Miller, Chadwick D ; Peberdy, Mary ; Counselman, Francis ; Chandra, Abhinav ; Kosowsky, Joshua ; Neuenschwander, James ; Schrock, Jon ; Lee-Lewandrowski, Elizabeth ; Arnold, William ; Nagurney, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Peacock, W Frank ; Diercks, Deborah ; Birkhahn, Robert ; Singer, Adam J ; Hollander, Judd E ; Nowak, Richard ; Safdar, Basmah ; Miller, Chadwick D ; Peberdy, Mary ; Counselman, Francis ; Chandra, Abhinav ; Kosowsky, Joshua ; Neuenschwander, James ; Schrock, Jon ; Lee-Lewandrowski, Elizabeth ; Arnold, William ; Nagurney, John</creatorcontrib><description>We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Alere Triage Cardio3 Tropinin I (TnI) assay (Alere, Inc., USA) and the PathFast cTnI-II (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience Corporation, Japan) against the central laboratory assay Singulex Erenna TnI assay (Singulex, USA). Using the Markers in the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes (MIDAS) study population, we evaluated the ability of three different assays to identify patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The MIDAS dataset, described elsewhere, is a prospective multicenter dataset of emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a planned objective myocardial perfusion evaluation. Myocardial infarction (MI) was diagnosed by central adjudication. The C-statistic with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for diagnosing MI by using a common population (n=241) was 0.95 (0.91-0.99), 0.95 (0.91-0.99), and 0.93 (0.89-0.97) for the Triage, Singulex, and PathFast assays, respectively. Of samples with detectable troponin, the absolute values had high Pearson (R(P)) and Spearman (R(S)) correlations and were R(P)=0.94 and R(S)=0.94 for Triage vs Singulex, R(P)=0.93 and R(S)=0.85 for Triage vs PathFast, and R(P)=0.89 and R(S)=0.73 for PathFast vs Singulex. In a single comparative population of ED patients with suspected ACS, the Triage Cardio3 TnI, PathFast, and Singulex TnI assays provided similar diagnostic performance for MI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-3814</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.5.405</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27374704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</publisher><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Laboratories - standards ; Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis ; Original ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Prospective Studies ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Troponin I - analysis ; 병리학</subject><ispartof>Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 2016, 36(5), , pp.405-412</ispartof><rights>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d234de68a0cb4a51d02a77ee252ad9dc0fc71db781828ccb8f44b6620b720d723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d234de68a0cb4a51d02a77ee252ad9dc0fc71db781828ccb8f44b6620b720d723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940482/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940482/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27374704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002139272$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peacock, W Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diercks, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkhahn, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Adam J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollander, Judd E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safdar, Basmah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Chadwick D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peberdy, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counselman, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra, Abhinav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosowsky, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuenschwander, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrock, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee-Lewandrowski, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagurney, John</creatorcontrib><title>Can a Point-of-Care Troponin I Assay be as Good as a Central Laboratory Assay? A MIDAS Investigation</title><title>Annals of laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Lab Med</addtitle><description>We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Alere Triage Cardio3 Tropinin I (TnI) assay (Alere, Inc., USA) and the PathFast cTnI-II (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience Corporation, Japan) against the central laboratory assay Singulex Erenna TnI assay (Singulex, USA). Using the Markers in the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes (MIDAS) study population, we evaluated the ability of three different assays to identify patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The MIDAS dataset, described elsewhere, is a prospective multicenter dataset of emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a planned objective myocardial perfusion evaluation. Myocardial infarction (MI) was diagnosed by central adjudication. The C-statistic with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for diagnosing MI by using a common population (n=241) was 0.95 (0.91-0.99), 0.95 (0.91-0.99), and 0.93 (0.89-0.97) for the Triage, Singulex, and PathFast assays, respectively. Of samples with detectable troponin, the absolute values had high Pearson (R(P)) and Spearman (R(S)) correlations and were R(P)=0.94 and R(S)=0.94 for Triage vs Singulex, R(P)=0.93 and R(S)=0.85 for Triage vs PathFast, and R(P)=0.89 and R(S)=0.73 for PathFast vs Singulex. In a single comparative population of ED patients with suspected ACS, the Triage Cardio3 TnI, PathFast, and Singulex TnI assays provided similar diagnostic performance for MI.</description><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories - standards</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Troponin I - analysis</subject><subject>병리학</subject><issn>2234-3806</issn><issn>2234-3814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtv1DAUhS0EolXpD2CDvGST4FcczwYUBVoiDWoFw9q6sZ1imrEHO1Np_n0zDYyKN8fSPec-9CH0lpKSc8E_wLgtGaGy5LKsSkGqF-icMS4Krqh4efoTeYYuc_5N5icJZSvyGp2xmteiJuIc2RYCBnwbfZiKOBQtJIc3Ke5i8AF3uMkZDrh3GDK-jtEeFXDrwpRgxGvoY4IppsNi_IQb_K373PzAXXhwefJ3MPkY3qBXA4zZXf7VC_Tz6sum_Vqsb667tlkXRnA2FXbe2DqpgJheQEUtYVDXzrGKgV1ZQwZTU9vXiiqmjOnVIEQvJSN9zYitGb9A75e-IQ363ngdwT_pXdT3STffN52mgjEiZ-vHxbrb91tnzXKQ3iW_hXR4Cv5fCf7X3OZBi5UgQj2btUvxz36-VW99Nm4cIbi4z5oqQpUkjPLZSherSTHn5IbTGEr0kaWeWeojS82lrvTMcs68e77fKfGPHH8EoMOZRg</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Peacock, W Frank</creator><creator>Diercks, Deborah</creator><creator>Birkhahn, Robert</creator><creator>Singer, Adam J</creator><creator>Hollander, Judd E</creator><creator>Nowak, Richard</creator><creator>Safdar, Basmah</creator><creator>Miller, Chadwick D</creator><creator>Peberdy, Mary</creator><creator>Counselman, Francis</creator><creator>Chandra, Abhinav</creator><creator>Kosowsky, Joshua</creator><creator>Neuenschwander, James</creator><creator>Schrock, Jon</creator><creator>Lee-Lewandrowski, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Arnold, William</creator><creator>Nagurney, John</creator><general>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</general><general>대한진단검사의학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Can a Point-of-Care Troponin I Assay be as Good as a Central Laboratory Assay? A MIDAS Investigation</title><author>Peacock, W Frank ; Diercks, Deborah ; Birkhahn, Robert ; Singer, Adam J ; Hollander, Judd E ; Nowak, Richard ; Safdar, Basmah ; Miller, Chadwick D ; Peberdy, Mary ; Counselman, Francis ; Chandra, Abhinav ; Kosowsky, Joshua ; Neuenschwander, James ; Schrock, Jon ; Lee-Lewandrowski, Elizabeth ; Arnold, William ; Nagurney, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d234de68a0cb4a51d02a77ee252ad9dc0fc71db781828ccb8f44b6620b720d723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories - standards</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Troponin I - analysis</topic><topic>병리학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peacock, W Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diercks, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkhahn, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Adam J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollander, Judd E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safdar, Basmah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Chadwick D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peberdy, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counselman, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra, Abhinav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosowsky, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuenschwander, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrock, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee-Lewandrowski, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagurney, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Annals of laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peacock, W Frank</au><au>Diercks, Deborah</au><au>Birkhahn, Robert</au><au>Singer, Adam J</au><au>Hollander, Judd E</au><au>Nowak, Richard</au><au>Safdar, Basmah</au><au>Miller, Chadwick D</au><au>Peberdy, Mary</au><au>Counselman, Francis</au><au>Chandra, Abhinav</au><au>Kosowsky, Joshua</au><au>Neuenschwander, James</au><au>Schrock, Jon</au><au>Lee-Lewandrowski, Elizabeth</au><au>Arnold, William</au><au>Nagurney, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a Point-of-Care Troponin I Assay be as Good as a Central Laboratory Assay? A MIDAS Investigation</atitle><jtitle>Annals of laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Lab Med</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>405-412</pages><issn>2234-3806</issn><eissn>2234-3814</eissn><abstract>We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Alere Triage Cardio3 Tropinin I (TnI) assay (Alere, Inc., USA) and the PathFast cTnI-II (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience Corporation, Japan) against the central laboratory assay Singulex Erenna TnI assay (Singulex, USA). Using the Markers in the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes (MIDAS) study population, we evaluated the ability of three different assays to identify patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The MIDAS dataset, described elsewhere, is a prospective multicenter dataset of emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a planned objective myocardial perfusion evaluation. Myocardial infarction (MI) was diagnosed by central adjudication. The C-statistic with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for diagnosing MI by using a common population (n=241) was 0.95 (0.91-0.99), 0.95 (0.91-0.99), and 0.93 (0.89-0.97) for the Triage, Singulex, and PathFast assays, respectively. Of samples with detectable troponin, the absolute values had high Pearson (R(P)) and Spearman (R(S)) correlations and were R(P)=0.94 and R(S)=0.94 for Triage vs Singulex, R(P)=0.93 and R(S)=0.85 for Triage vs PathFast, and R(P)=0.89 and R(S)=0.73 for PathFast vs Singulex. In a single comparative population of ED patients with suspected ACS, the Triage Cardio3 TnI, PathFast, and Singulex TnI assays provided similar diagnostic performance for MI.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</pub><pmid>27374704</pmid><doi>10.3343/alm.2016.36.5.405</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-3806
ispartof Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 2016, 36(5), , pp.405-412
issn 2234-3806
2234-3814
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_142206
source PubMed Central
subjects Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis
Biomarkers - analysis
Emergency Service, Hospital
Humans
Laboratories - standards
Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis
Original
Point-of-Care Systems
Prospective Studies
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Sensitivity and Specificity
Troponin I - analysis
병리학
title Can a Point-of-Care Troponin I Assay be as Good as a Central Laboratory Assay? A MIDAS Investigation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A43%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20Point-of-Care%20Troponin%20I%20Assay%20be%20as%20Good%20as%20a%20Central%20Laboratory%20Assay?%20A%20MIDAS%20Investigation&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Peacock,%20W%20Frank&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=405-412&rft.issn=2234-3806&rft.eissn=2234-3814&rft_id=info:doi/10.3343/alm.2016.36.5.405&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1801860213%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d234de68a0cb4a51d02a77ee252ad9dc0fc71db781828ccb8f44b6620b720d723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1801860213&rft_id=info:pmid/27374704&rfr_iscdi=true