Loading…

Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin sensor (NBM-200) and portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue) with an automated hematology analyzer (LH500) in blood donor screening

The Hb levels of prospective blood donors are usually determined using a finger prick test. A new noninvasive Hb device has the advantage of not causing any sampling pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the noninvasive Hb sensor and to compare its measurements with those o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of laboratory medicine 2013, 33(4), , pp.261-267
Main Authors: Kim, Moon Jung, Park, Quehn, Kim, Myung Hee, Shin, Jeong Won, Kim, Hyun Ok
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a3480514ebaac73d9e59f3b4c613d8f2e9e57c4df5651a623e7d2c98fe7b27c83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a3480514ebaac73d9e59f3b4c613d8f2e9e57c4df5651a623e7d2c98fe7b27c83
container_end_page 267
container_issue 4
container_start_page 261
container_title Annals of laboratory medicine
container_volume 33
creator Kim, Moon Jung
Park, Quehn
Kim, Myung Hee
Shin, Jeong Won
Kim, Hyun Ok
description The Hb levels of prospective blood donors are usually determined using a finger prick test. A new noninvasive Hb device has the advantage of not causing any sampling pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the noninvasive Hb sensor and to compare its measurements with those of a currently used portable hemoglobinometer. Hb was measured using a noninvasive Hb sensor (NBM-200; OrSense, Israel), a portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue; HemoCue AB, Sweden), and an automated hematology analyzer (LH500; Beckman Coulter, USA). The correlations between Hb measurements taken by the NBM-200 and HemoCue with those by an automated hematology analyzer were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Hb measurements were compared among 3 different Hb level groups. The mean Hb values of 506 blood donors were 14.1 g/dL by the NBM-200, 14.0 g/dL by the LH500, and 14.3 g/dL by the HemoCue. The correlation between the LH500 and the NBM-200 was substantial (ICC=0.69), while that between the LH500 and the HemoCue agreed almost perfectly (ICC=0.86). The possibility to judge to be eligible for donors who are ineligible to donate was substantial when using NBM-200. Even though the NBM-200 has the apparent advantage of noninvasiveness, its use in pre-screening should be given meticulous attention. Since pre-donation testing is crucial to protecting donors' health, complete evaluation of the instrument should be performed prior to use.
doi_str_mv 10.3343/alm.2013.33.4.261
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_142329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1398423811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a3480514ebaac73d9e59f3b4c613d8f2e9e57c4df5651a623e7d2c98fe7b27c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSH8AF-dgeEvy1XxekEgGpFEBC5WzNemcTU6-92LtB4XfxA_E2EIov45l5Zt45vFn2ktGlEFK8BtsvOWUiZUu55AV7kp1zLuRCVEw-Pf1pcZZdxviNpldQxmv6PDvjouJFXvDz7NfK9wMEE70jviPjDgloPQXQhzl33hm3h2j2SHbY-631jXEkoos-kKtPbz8uOKXXBFxLBh9GaOxj0Pc4YuLWqbKa8Jr8MOMuwQSm0fcwYjvDMHrrt4dUB3v4OfObdT5vTUqN9b4lrXdJLuqAmO7ZvsiedWAjXv6JF9nX9-_uVuvF5vOH29XNZqGl4OMChKxoziQ2ALoUbY153YlG6oKJtuo4pkKpZdvlRc6g4ALLluu66rBseKkrcZFdHfe60Kl7bZQH8xC3Xt0HdfPl7lYxyQWvE_rmiA5T02Or0Y0BrBqC6SEcHgb_7zizS2v2ShR1Jaj8pzUE_33COKreRI3WgkM_RcVEXSWpirGEsiOqg48xYHeSYVTN3lDJG2r2RsqUVMkbaebV4_tOE3-dIH4DydS4NA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1398423811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin sensor (NBM-200) and portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue) with an automated hematology analyzer (LH500) in blood donor screening</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kim, Moon Jung ; Park, Quehn ; Kim, Myung Hee ; Shin, Jeong Won ; Kim, Hyun Ok</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Moon Jung ; Park, Quehn ; Kim, Myung Hee ; Shin, Jeong Won ; Kim, Hyun Ok</creatorcontrib><description>The Hb levels of prospective blood donors are usually determined using a finger prick test. A new noninvasive Hb device has the advantage of not causing any sampling pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the noninvasive Hb sensor and to compare its measurements with those of a currently used portable hemoglobinometer. Hb was measured using a noninvasive Hb sensor (NBM-200; OrSense, Israel), a portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue; HemoCue AB, Sweden), and an automated hematology analyzer (LH500; Beckman Coulter, USA). The correlations between Hb measurements taken by the NBM-200 and HemoCue with those by an automated hematology analyzer were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Hb measurements were compared among 3 different Hb level groups. The mean Hb values of 506 blood donors were 14.1 g/dL by the NBM-200, 14.0 g/dL by the LH500, and 14.3 g/dL by the HemoCue. The correlation between the LH500 and the NBM-200 was substantial (ICC=0.69), while that between the LH500 and the HemoCue agreed almost perfectly (ICC=0.86). The possibility to judge to be eligible for donors who are ineligible to donate was substantial when using NBM-200. Even though the NBM-200 has the apparent advantage of noninvasiveness, its use in pre-screening should be given meticulous attention. Since pre-donation testing is crucial to protecting donors' health, complete evaluation of the instrument should be performed prior to use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-3814</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3343/alm.2013.33.4.261</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23826562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</publisher><subject>Automation ; Biosensing Techniques - instrumentation ; Blood Chemical Analysis - instrumentation ; Blood Donors ; Donor Selection - methods ; Female ; Hemoglobins - analysis ; Humans ; Male ; Original ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; 병리학</subject><ispartof>Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 2013, 33(4), , pp.261-267</ispartof><rights>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a3480514ebaac73d9e59f3b4c613d8f2e9e57c4df5651a623e7d2c98fe7b27c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a3480514ebaac73d9e59f3b4c613d8f2e9e57c4df5651a623e7d2c98fe7b27c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698304/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3698304/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001782074$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Moon Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Quehn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Myung Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jeong Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Ok</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin sensor (NBM-200) and portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue) with an automated hematology analyzer (LH500) in blood donor screening</title><title>Annals of laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Lab Med</addtitle><description>The Hb levels of prospective blood donors are usually determined using a finger prick test. A new noninvasive Hb device has the advantage of not causing any sampling pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the noninvasive Hb sensor and to compare its measurements with those of a currently used portable hemoglobinometer. Hb was measured using a noninvasive Hb sensor (NBM-200; OrSense, Israel), a portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue; HemoCue AB, Sweden), and an automated hematology analyzer (LH500; Beckman Coulter, USA). The correlations between Hb measurements taken by the NBM-200 and HemoCue with those by an automated hematology analyzer were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Hb measurements were compared among 3 different Hb level groups. The mean Hb values of 506 blood donors were 14.1 g/dL by the NBM-200, 14.0 g/dL by the LH500, and 14.3 g/dL by the HemoCue. The correlation between the LH500 and the NBM-200 was substantial (ICC=0.69), while that between the LH500 and the HemoCue agreed almost perfectly (ICC=0.86). The possibility to judge to be eligible for donors who are ineligible to donate was substantial when using NBM-200. Even though the NBM-200 has the apparent advantage of noninvasiveness, its use in pre-screening should be given meticulous attention. Since pre-donation testing is crucial to protecting donors' health, complete evaluation of the instrument should be performed prior to use.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biosensing Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Blood Chemical Analysis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Blood Donors</subject><subject>Donor Selection - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemoglobins - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>병리학</subject><issn>2234-3806</issn><issn>2234-3814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSH8AF-dgeEvy1XxekEgGpFEBC5WzNemcTU6-92LtB4XfxA_E2EIov45l5Zt45vFn2ktGlEFK8BtsvOWUiZUu55AV7kp1zLuRCVEw-Pf1pcZZdxviNpldQxmv6PDvjouJFXvDz7NfK9wMEE70jviPjDgloPQXQhzl33hm3h2j2SHbY-631jXEkoos-kKtPbz8uOKXXBFxLBh9GaOxj0Pc4YuLWqbKa8Jr8MOMuwQSm0fcwYjvDMHrrt4dUB3v4OfObdT5vTUqN9b4lrXdJLuqAmO7ZvsiedWAjXv6JF9nX9-_uVuvF5vOH29XNZqGl4OMChKxoziQ2ALoUbY153YlG6oKJtuo4pkKpZdvlRc6g4ALLluu66rBseKkrcZFdHfe60Kl7bZQH8xC3Xt0HdfPl7lYxyQWvE_rmiA5T02Or0Y0BrBqC6SEcHgb_7zizS2v2ShR1Jaj8pzUE_33COKreRI3WgkM_RcVEXSWpirGEsiOqg48xYHeSYVTN3lDJG2r2RsqUVMkbaebV4_tOE3-dIH4DydS4NA</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Kim, Moon Jung</creator><creator>Park, Quehn</creator><creator>Kim, Myung Hee</creator><creator>Shin, Jeong Won</creator><creator>Kim, Hyun Ok</creator><general>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</general><general>대한진단검사의학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin sensor (NBM-200) and portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue) with an automated hematology analyzer (LH500) in blood donor screening</title><author>Kim, Moon Jung ; Park, Quehn ; Kim, Myung Hee ; Shin, Jeong Won ; Kim, Hyun Ok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a3480514ebaac73d9e59f3b4c613d8f2e9e57c4df5651a623e7d2c98fe7b27c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biosensing Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Blood Chemical Analysis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Blood Donors</topic><topic>Donor Selection - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemoglobins - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>병리학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Moon Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Quehn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Myung Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jeong Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Ok</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Annals of laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Moon Jung</au><au>Park, Quehn</au><au>Kim, Myung Hee</au><au>Shin, Jeong Won</au><au>Kim, Hyun Ok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin sensor (NBM-200) and portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue) with an automated hematology analyzer (LH500) in blood donor screening</atitle><jtitle>Annals of laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Lab Med</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>261-267</pages><issn>2234-3806</issn><eissn>2234-3814</eissn><abstract>The Hb levels of prospective blood donors are usually determined using a finger prick test. A new noninvasive Hb device has the advantage of not causing any sampling pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the noninvasive Hb sensor and to compare its measurements with those of a currently used portable hemoglobinometer. Hb was measured using a noninvasive Hb sensor (NBM-200; OrSense, Israel), a portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue; HemoCue AB, Sweden), and an automated hematology analyzer (LH500; Beckman Coulter, USA). The correlations between Hb measurements taken by the NBM-200 and HemoCue with those by an automated hematology analyzer were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Hb measurements were compared among 3 different Hb level groups. The mean Hb values of 506 blood donors were 14.1 g/dL by the NBM-200, 14.0 g/dL by the LH500, and 14.3 g/dL by the HemoCue. The correlation between the LH500 and the NBM-200 was substantial (ICC=0.69), while that between the LH500 and the HemoCue agreed almost perfectly (ICC=0.86). The possibility to judge to be eligible for donors who are ineligible to donate was substantial when using NBM-200. Even though the NBM-200 has the apparent advantage of noninvasiveness, its use in pre-screening should be given meticulous attention. Since pre-donation testing is crucial to protecting donors' health, complete evaluation of the instrument should be performed prior to use.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</pub><pmid>23826562</pmid><doi>10.3343/alm.2013.33.4.261</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-3806
ispartof Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 2013, 33(4), , pp.261-267
issn 2234-3806
2234-3814
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_142329
source PubMed Central
subjects Automation
Biosensing Techniques - instrumentation
Blood Chemical Analysis - instrumentation
Blood Donors
Donor Selection - methods
Female
Hemoglobins - analysis
Humans
Male
Original
Sensitivity and Specificity
병리학
title Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin sensor (NBM-200) and portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue) with an automated hematology analyzer (LH500) in blood donor screening
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A20%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20accuracy%20of%20noninvasive%20hemoglobin%20sensor%20(NBM-200)%20and%20portable%20hemoglobinometer%20(HemoCue)%20with%20an%20automated%20hematology%20analyzer%20(LH500)%20in%20blood%20donor%20screening&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Kim,%20Moon%20Jung&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=261-267&rft.issn=2234-3806&rft.eissn=2234-3814&rft_id=info:doi/10.3343/alm.2013.33.4.261&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1398423811%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a3480514ebaac73d9e59f3b4c613d8f2e9e57c4df5651a623e7d2c98fe7b27c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1398423811&rft_id=info:pmid/23826562&rfr_iscdi=true