Loading…

Comparison of Singleplex Specific IgE Detection Immunoassays: ImmunoCAP Phadia 250 and Immulite 2000 3gAllergy

The identification of clinically meaningful specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) is important for the diagnosis and management of allergic diseases. Various in vitro sIgE detection methods are available worldwide. Depending on the number of antigens that can be tested simultaneously, there are two repre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of laboratory medicine 2018, 38(1), , pp.23-31
Main Authors: Park, Kyung Hee, Lee, Jongsun, Sim, Da Woon, Lee, Sang Chul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1bed89c82fb11a5bfcc79d260e918dcc5d0da85f0c004e69e090c48d8482e1c73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1bed89c82fb11a5bfcc79d260e918dcc5d0da85f0c004e69e090c48d8482e1c73
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Annals of laboratory medicine
container_volume 38
creator Park, Kyung Hee
Lee, Jongsun
Sim, Da Woon
Lee, Sang Chul
description The identification of clinically meaningful specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) is important for the diagnosis and management of allergic diseases. Various in vitro sIgE detection methods are available worldwide. Depending on the number of antigens that can be tested simultaneously, there are two representative methods: singleplex and multiplex. Singleplex sIgE detection is mainly provided by Thermo Fisher (ImmunoCAP) and Siemens (Immulite). This study aimed to compare the diagnostic agreement of two singleplex sIgE detection assays. Sera from 209 Korean patients with allergic disease were used to compare the ImmunoCAP and Immulite assays with respect to the following allergens: inhalant allergens (Dermatophagoides farinae, cat and dog dander, oak, rye grass, mugwort, Alternaria, German cockroach) and food allergens (hen's egg white, cow's milk, wheat, peanut, soybean, and shrimp). Data from 902 paired comparison tests were included for comparisons. Qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative comparisons were performed using statistical analyses. In qualitative comparisons, the positivity and negativity agreements ranged from 75% (wheat, shrimp) to 96% (Alternaria). Class consistency (classes 0-6) was well matched. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for all allergens except shrimp were over 0.7. In quantitative comparisons, all allergens excluding shrimp showed >0.7 intra-class correlation coefficients. The ImmunoCAP and Immulite systems showed similar performances. However, clinicians should consider fundamental methodological differences between the assays.
doi_str_mv 10.3343/alm.2018.38.1.23
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2238177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1956081594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1bed89c82fb11a5bfcc79d260e918dcc5d0da85f0c004e69e090c48d8482e1c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhiMEolXbOyfkIxw2jO18OByQVtsWVqrUqi1ny2tPUlMnDnYWsf--3g9WxQfPWPPMO9a8WfaBQs55wb8o1-cMqMi5yGnO-JvslDFezLigxdtjDtVJdhHjL0inAsoaeJ-dpLumgpan2bDw_aiCjX4gviUPdugcjg7_kocRtW2tJsvuilzihHqyCVr2_XrwKka1iV8Pr8X8jtw9KWMVYSUQNZhdwdkJCUtzCe_mzmHoNufZu1a5iBeHeJb9vL56XPyY3dx-Xy7mNzNdcJhmdIVGNFqwdkWpKlet1nVjWAXYUGG0Lg0YJcoWNECBVYPQgC6EEYVgSHXNz7LPe90htPJZW-mV3cXOy-cg5_ePS5kWJGi9Zb_t2XG96tFoHKagnByD7VXY7Dr_rwz2Ken8kWUNQAueBD4dBIL_vcY4yd5Gjc6pAf06StqUFaRtN0VCYY_q4GMM2B7HUJBbV2VyVW5dlVxIKtlW_ePr7x0b_nnIXwB7DJ2G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1956081594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Singleplex Specific IgE Detection Immunoassays: ImmunoCAP Phadia 250 and Immulite 2000 3gAllergy</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Park, Kyung Hee ; Lee, Jongsun ; Sim, Da Woon ; Lee, Sang Chul</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyung Hee ; Lee, Jongsun ; Sim, Da Woon ; Lee, Sang Chul</creatorcontrib><description>The identification of clinically meaningful specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) is important for the diagnosis and management of allergic diseases. Various in vitro sIgE detection methods are available worldwide. Depending on the number of antigens that can be tested simultaneously, there are two representative methods: singleplex and multiplex. Singleplex sIgE detection is mainly provided by Thermo Fisher (ImmunoCAP) and Siemens (Immulite). This study aimed to compare the diagnostic agreement of two singleplex sIgE detection assays. Sera from 209 Korean patients with allergic disease were used to compare the ImmunoCAP and Immulite assays with respect to the following allergens: inhalant allergens (Dermatophagoides farinae, cat and dog dander, oak, rye grass, mugwort, Alternaria, German cockroach) and food allergens (hen's egg white, cow's milk, wheat, peanut, soybean, and shrimp). Data from 902 paired comparison tests were included for comparisons. Qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative comparisons were performed using statistical analyses. In qualitative comparisons, the positivity and negativity agreements ranged from 75% (wheat, shrimp) to 96% (Alternaria). Class consistency (classes 0-6) was well matched. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for all allergens except shrimp were over 0.7. In quantitative comparisons, all allergens excluding shrimp showed &gt;0.7 intra-class correlation coefficients. The ImmunoCAP and Immulite systems showed similar performances. However, clinicians should consider fundamental methodological differences between the assays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-3806</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2234-3814</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-3814</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.1.23</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29071815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allergens - immunology ; Animals ; Artemisia - immunology ; Cats ; Dander - immunology ; Dogs ; Female ; Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - diagnosis ; Immunoassay - methods ; Immunoglobulin E - blood ; Male ; Original ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Skin Tests ; 병리학</subject><ispartof>Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 38(1), , pp.23-31</ispartof><rights>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</rights><rights>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2018 The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1bed89c82fb11a5bfcc79d260e918dcc5d0da85f0c004e69e090c48d8482e1c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1bed89c82fb11a5bfcc79d260e918dcc5d0da85f0c004e69e090c48d8482e1c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700143/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700143/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002302681$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyung Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jongsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Da Woon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Chul</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Singleplex Specific IgE Detection Immunoassays: ImmunoCAP Phadia 250 and Immulite 2000 3gAllergy</title><title>Annals of laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Lab Med</addtitle><description>The identification of clinically meaningful specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) is important for the diagnosis and management of allergic diseases. Various in vitro sIgE detection methods are available worldwide. Depending on the number of antigens that can be tested simultaneously, there are two representative methods: singleplex and multiplex. Singleplex sIgE detection is mainly provided by Thermo Fisher (ImmunoCAP) and Siemens (Immulite). This study aimed to compare the diagnostic agreement of two singleplex sIgE detection assays. Sera from 209 Korean patients with allergic disease were used to compare the ImmunoCAP and Immulite assays with respect to the following allergens: inhalant allergens (Dermatophagoides farinae, cat and dog dander, oak, rye grass, mugwort, Alternaria, German cockroach) and food allergens (hen's egg white, cow's milk, wheat, peanut, soybean, and shrimp). Data from 902 paired comparison tests were included for comparisons. Qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative comparisons were performed using statistical analyses. In qualitative comparisons, the positivity and negativity agreements ranged from 75% (wheat, shrimp) to 96% (Alternaria). Class consistency (classes 0-6) was well matched. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for all allergens except shrimp were over 0.7. In quantitative comparisons, all allergens excluding shrimp showed &gt;0.7 intra-class correlation coefficients. The ImmunoCAP and Immulite systems showed similar performances. However, clinicians should consider fundamental methodological differences between the assays.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergens - immunology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artemisia - immunology</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Dander - immunology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin E - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><subject>병리학</subject><issn>2234-3806</issn><issn>2234-3814</issn><issn>2234-3814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhiMEolXbOyfkIxw2jO18OByQVtsWVqrUqi1ny2tPUlMnDnYWsf--3g9WxQfPWPPMO9a8WfaBQs55wb8o1-cMqMi5yGnO-JvslDFezLigxdtjDtVJdhHjL0inAsoaeJ-dpLumgpan2bDw_aiCjX4gviUPdugcjg7_kocRtW2tJsvuilzihHqyCVr2_XrwKka1iV8Pr8X8jtw9KWMVYSUQNZhdwdkJCUtzCe_mzmHoNufZu1a5iBeHeJb9vL56XPyY3dx-Xy7mNzNdcJhmdIVGNFqwdkWpKlet1nVjWAXYUGG0Lg0YJcoWNECBVYPQgC6EEYVgSHXNz7LPe90htPJZW-mV3cXOy-cg5_ePS5kWJGi9Zb_t2XG96tFoHKagnByD7VXY7Dr_rwz2Ken8kWUNQAueBD4dBIL_vcY4yd5Gjc6pAf06StqUFaRtN0VCYY_q4GMM2B7HUJBbV2VyVW5dlVxIKtlW_ePr7x0b_nnIXwB7DJ2G</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Park, Kyung Hee</creator><creator>Lee, Jongsun</creator><creator>Sim, Da Woon</creator><creator>Lee, Sang Chul</creator><general>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</general><general>대한진단검사의학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Singleplex Specific IgE Detection Immunoassays: ImmunoCAP Phadia 250 and Immulite 2000 3gAllergy</title><author>Park, Kyung Hee ; Lee, Jongsun ; Sim, Da Woon ; Lee, Sang Chul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1bed89c82fb11a5bfcc79d260e918dcc5d0da85f0c004e69e090c48d8482e1c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergens - immunology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artemisia - immunology</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Dander - immunology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin E - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><topic>병리학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyung Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jongsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Da Woon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Chul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Annals of laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Kyung Hee</au><au>Lee, Jongsun</au><au>Sim, Da Woon</au><au>Lee, Sang Chul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Singleplex Specific IgE Detection Immunoassays: ImmunoCAP Phadia 250 and Immulite 2000 3gAllergy</atitle><jtitle>Annals of laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Lab Med</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>23-31</pages><issn>2234-3806</issn><issn>2234-3814</issn><eissn>2234-3814</eissn><abstract>The identification of clinically meaningful specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) is important for the diagnosis and management of allergic diseases. Various in vitro sIgE detection methods are available worldwide. Depending on the number of antigens that can be tested simultaneously, there are two representative methods: singleplex and multiplex. Singleplex sIgE detection is mainly provided by Thermo Fisher (ImmunoCAP) and Siemens (Immulite). This study aimed to compare the diagnostic agreement of two singleplex sIgE detection assays. Sera from 209 Korean patients with allergic disease were used to compare the ImmunoCAP and Immulite assays with respect to the following allergens: inhalant allergens (Dermatophagoides farinae, cat and dog dander, oak, rye grass, mugwort, Alternaria, German cockroach) and food allergens (hen's egg white, cow's milk, wheat, peanut, soybean, and shrimp). Data from 902 paired comparison tests were included for comparisons. Qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative comparisons were performed using statistical analyses. In qualitative comparisons, the positivity and negativity agreements ranged from 75% (wheat, shrimp) to 96% (Alternaria). Class consistency (classes 0-6) was well matched. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for all allergens except shrimp were over 0.7. In quantitative comparisons, all allergens excluding shrimp showed &gt;0.7 intra-class correlation coefficients. The ImmunoCAP and Immulite systems showed similar performances. However, clinicians should consider fundamental methodological differences between the assays.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine</pub><pmid>29071815</pmid><doi>10.3343/alm.2018.38.1.23</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-3806
ispartof Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 38(1), , pp.23-31
issn 2234-3806
2234-3814
2234-3814
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2238177
source PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Allergens - immunology
Animals
Artemisia - immunology
Cats
Dander - immunology
Dogs
Female
Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis
Humans
Hypersensitivity - diagnosis
Immunoassay - methods
Immunoglobulin E - blood
Male
Original
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Skin Tests
병리학
title Comparison of Singleplex Specific IgE Detection Immunoassays: ImmunoCAP Phadia 250 and Immulite 2000 3gAllergy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A25%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Singleplex%20Specific%20IgE%20Detection%20Immunoassays:%20ImmunoCAP%20Phadia%20250%20and%20Immulite%202000%203gAllergy&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Park,%20Kyung%20Hee&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=23-31&rft.issn=2234-3806&rft.eissn=2234-3814&rft_id=info:doi/10.3343/alm.2018.38.1.23&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1956081594%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1bed89c82fb11a5bfcc79d260e918dcc5d0da85f0c004e69e090c48d8482e1c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1956081594&rft_id=info:pmid/29071815&rfr_iscdi=true