Loading…

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes

Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer research and treatment 2016, 48(1), , pp.225-231
Main Authors: Kim, Yong Sok, Kim, Min Jung, Park, Sung Chan, Sohn, Dae Kyung, Kim, Dae Yong, Chang, Hee Jin, Nam, Byung-Ho, Oh, Jae Hwan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543
container_end_page 231
container_issue 1
container_start_page 225
container_title Cancer research and treatment
container_volume 48
creator Kim, Yong Sok
Kim, Min Jung
Park, Sung Chan
Sohn, Dae Kyung
Kim, Dae Yong
Chang, Hee Jin
Nam, Byung-Ho
Oh, Jae Hwan
description Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. Thirty-three patients with cT3N0-2 rectal cancer after preoperative CRT who underwent robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) between March 2010 and January 2012 were matched with 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR). Perioperative clinical outcomes and pathological data were compared between the two groups. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly different between groups. The mean operation time was 441 minutes (R-LAR) versus 277 minutes (L-LAR, p < 0.001). The open conversion rate was 6.1% in the R-LAR group and 0% in the L-LAR group (p=0.11). There were no significant differences in the time to flatus passage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. In pathological review, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.3 in R-LAR and 21.6 in L-LAR (p=0.82). Involvement of circumferential resection margin was positive in 16.1% and 6.7%, respectively (p=0.42). Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality was complete in 97.0% in R-LAR and 91.0% in L-LAR (p=0.41). In our study, short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after CRT were similar to those of laparoscopic surgery in respect to bowel function recovery, morbidity, and TME quality. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to evaluate the functional results and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.4143/crt.2014.365
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_254316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760908524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUuP0zAQgC0EYsvCjTPykQMpfsWxOSCtKh4rFS1qC1fLcSabsEmdtZ2V-gP437hbWODikWY-z4zmQ-glJUtBBX_rQloyQsWSy_IRWjBCykKzUj5GC1pqVTCt1Rl6FuMPQqTgFX2KzlhZVZrLaoF-bnztU-_wdwhxjnhtJxt8dH7Kue0criEccOsD3oBLdsAru3cQsG1Tfr8G8BMEm_o7wKsORh9s0_vU5dx0eJfhCMUXm1wHDd6muTlg3-Jt50MqdhBGfDUn50eIz9GT1g4RXvyO5-jbxw-71ediffXpcnWxLpxQPBVMgJW6VrrinNWCQcNs2XLQLXHCascpt7Wk0tY1KNVIqFpBKiqFKrmSpeDn6PWp7z605sb1xtv-Pl57cxPMxWZ3aVjmqMzo-xM6zfUIjYN9CnYwU-hHGw73H_-v7Psut7kzosoKFPs7awr-doaYzNhHB8Ng9-DnaGgliSaqZMe13pxQl08fA7QPYygxR8kmSzZHySZLzvirf1d7gP9Y5b8AdcWlYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760908524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kim, Yong Sok ; Kim, Min Jung ; Park, Sung Chan ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Kim, Dae Yong ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Nam, Byung-Ho ; Oh, Jae Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Sok ; Kim, Min Jung ; Park, Sung Chan ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Kim, Dae Yong ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Nam, Byung-Ho ; Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. Thirty-three patients with cT3N0-2 rectal cancer after preoperative CRT who underwent robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) between March 2010 and January 2012 were matched with 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR). Perioperative clinical outcomes and pathological data were compared between the two groups. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly different between groups. The mean operation time was 441 minutes (R-LAR) versus 277 minutes (L-LAR, p &lt; 0.001). The open conversion rate was 6.1% in the R-LAR group and 0% in the L-LAR group (p=0.11). There were no significant differences in the time to flatus passage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. In pathological review, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.3 in R-LAR and 21.6 in L-LAR (p=0.82). Involvement of circumferential resection margin was positive in 16.1% and 6.7%, respectively (p=0.42). Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality was complete in 97.0% in R-LAR and 91.0% in L-LAR (p=0.41). In our study, short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after CRT were similar to those of laparoscopic surgery in respect to bowel function recovery, morbidity, and TME quality. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to evaluate the functional results and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1598-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2005-9256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.365</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25779367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): Korean Cancer Association</publisher><subject>Chemoradiotherapy ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Recovery of Function ; Rectal Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Treatment Outcome ; 의약학</subject><ispartof>Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 48(1), , pp.225-231</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the Korean Cancer Association 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720082/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720082/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25779367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002074127$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Sok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Byung-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes</title><title>Cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. Thirty-three patients with cT3N0-2 rectal cancer after preoperative CRT who underwent robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) between March 2010 and January 2012 were matched with 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR). Perioperative clinical outcomes and pathological data were compared between the two groups. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly different between groups. The mean operation time was 441 minutes (R-LAR) versus 277 minutes (L-LAR, p &lt; 0.001). The open conversion rate was 6.1% in the R-LAR group and 0% in the L-LAR group (p=0.11). There were no significant differences in the time to flatus passage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. In pathological review, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.3 in R-LAR and 21.6 in L-LAR (p=0.82). Involvement of circumferential resection margin was positive in 16.1% and 6.7%, respectively (p=0.42). Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality was complete in 97.0% in R-LAR and 91.0% in L-LAR (p=0.41). In our study, short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after CRT were similar to those of laparoscopic surgery in respect to bowel function recovery, morbidity, and TME quality. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to evaluate the functional results and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.</description><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>의약학</subject><issn>1598-2998</issn><issn>2005-9256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUuP0zAQgC0EYsvCjTPykQMpfsWxOSCtKh4rFS1qC1fLcSabsEmdtZ2V-gP437hbWODikWY-z4zmQ-glJUtBBX_rQloyQsWSy_IRWjBCykKzUj5GC1pqVTCt1Rl6FuMPQqTgFX2KzlhZVZrLaoF-bnztU-_wdwhxjnhtJxt8dH7Kue0criEccOsD3oBLdsAru3cQsG1Tfr8G8BMEm_o7wKsORh9s0_vU5dx0eJfhCMUXm1wHDd6muTlg3-Jt50MqdhBGfDUn50eIz9GT1g4RXvyO5-jbxw-71ediffXpcnWxLpxQPBVMgJW6VrrinNWCQcNs2XLQLXHCascpt7Wk0tY1KNVIqFpBKiqFKrmSpeDn6PWp7z605sb1xtv-Pl57cxPMxWZ3aVjmqMzo-xM6zfUIjYN9CnYwU-hHGw73H_-v7Psut7kzosoKFPs7awr-doaYzNhHB8Ng9-DnaGgliSaqZMe13pxQl08fA7QPYygxR8kmSzZHySZLzvirf1d7gP9Y5b8AdcWlYA</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Kim, Yong Sok</creator><creator>Kim, Min Jung</creator><creator>Park, Sung Chan</creator><creator>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creator><creator>Kim, Dae Yong</creator><creator>Chang, Hee Jin</creator><creator>Nam, Byung-Ho</creator><creator>Oh, Jae Hwan</creator><general>Korean Cancer Association</general><general>대한암학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes</title><author>Kim, Yong Sok ; Kim, Min Jung ; Park, Sung Chan ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Kim, Dae Yong ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Nam, Byung-Ho ; Oh, Jae Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>의약학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Sok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Byung-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Yong Sok</au><au>Kim, Min Jung</au><au>Park, Sung Chan</au><au>Sohn, Dae Kyung</au><au>Kim, Dae Yong</au><au>Chang, Hee Jin</au><au>Nam, Byung-Ho</au><au>Oh, Jae Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Cancer research and treatment</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>225-231</pages><issn>1598-2998</issn><eissn>2005-9256</eissn><abstract>Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. Thirty-three patients with cT3N0-2 rectal cancer after preoperative CRT who underwent robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) between March 2010 and January 2012 were matched with 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR). Perioperative clinical outcomes and pathological data were compared between the two groups. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly different between groups. The mean operation time was 441 minutes (R-LAR) versus 277 minutes (L-LAR, p &lt; 0.001). The open conversion rate was 6.1% in the R-LAR group and 0% in the L-LAR group (p=0.11). There were no significant differences in the time to flatus passage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. In pathological review, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.3 in R-LAR and 21.6 in L-LAR (p=0.82). Involvement of circumferential resection margin was positive in 16.1% and 6.7%, respectively (p=0.42). Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality was complete in 97.0% in R-LAR and 91.0% in L-LAR (p=0.41). In our study, short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after CRT were similar to those of laparoscopic surgery in respect to bowel function recovery, morbidity, and TME quality. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to evaluate the functional results and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>Korean Cancer Association</pub><pmid>25779367</pmid><doi>10.4143/crt.2014.365</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1598-2998
ispartof Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 48(1), , pp.225-231
issn 1598-2998
2005-9256
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_254316
source PubMed Central
subjects Chemoradiotherapy
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy
Male
Middle Aged
Original
Recovery of Function
Rectal Neoplasms - physiopathology
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Rectal Neoplasms - therapy
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Treatment Outcome
의약학
title Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T04%3A50%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20Versus%20Laparoscopic%20Surgery%20for%20Rectal%20Cancer%20after%20Preoperative%20Chemoradiotherapy:%20Case-Matched%20Study%20of%20Short-Term%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Kim,%20Yong%20Sok&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=225-231&rft.issn=1598-2998&rft.eissn=2005-9256&rft_id=info:doi/10.4143/crt.2014.365&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1760908524%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760908524&rft_id=info:pmid/25779367&rfr_iscdi=true