Loading…
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes
Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. T...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer research and treatment 2016, 48(1), , pp.225-231 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543 |
container_end_page | 231 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 225 |
container_title | Cancer research and treatment |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Kim, Yong Sok Kim, Min Jung Park, Sung Chan Sohn, Dae Kyung Kim, Dae Yong Chang, Hee Jin Nam, Byung-Ho Oh, Jae Hwan |
description | Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.
Thirty-three patients with cT3N0-2 rectal cancer after preoperative CRT who underwent robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) between March 2010 and January 2012 were matched with 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR). Perioperative clinical outcomes and pathological data were compared between the two groups.
Patient characteristics did not differ significantly different between groups. The mean operation time was 441 minutes (R-LAR) versus 277 minutes (L-LAR, p < 0.001). The open conversion rate was 6.1% in the R-LAR group and 0% in the L-LAR group (p=0.11). There were no significant differences in the time to flatus passage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. In pathological review, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.3 in R-LAR and 21.6 in L-LAR (p=0.82). Involvement of circumferential resection margin was positive in 16.1% and 6.7%, respectively (p=0.42). Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality was complete in 97.0% in R-LAR and 91.0% in L-LAR (p=0.41).
In our study, short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after CRT were similar to those of laparoscopic surgery in respect to bowel function recovery, morbidity, and TME quality. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to evaluate the functional results and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4143/crt.2014.365 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_254316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760908524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUuP0zAQgC0EYsvCjTPykQMpfsWxOSCtKh4rFS1qC1fLcSabsEmdtZ2V-gP437hbWODikWY-z4zmQ-glJUtBBX_rQloyQsWSy_IRWjBCykKzUj5GC1pqVTCt1Rl6FuMPQqTgFX2KzlhZVZrLaoF-bnztU-_wdwhxjnhtJxt8dH7Kue0criEccOsD3oBLdsAru3cQsG1Tfr8G8BMEm_o7wKsORh9s0_vU5dx0eJfhCMUXm1wHDd6muTlg3-Jt50MqdhBGfDUn50eIz9GT1g4RXvyO5-jbxw-71ediffXpcnWxLpxQPBVMgJW6VrrinNWCQcNs2XLQLXHCascpt7Wk0tY1KNVIqFpBKiqFKrmSpeDn6PWp7z605sb1xtv-Pl57cxPMxWZ3aVjmqMzo-xM6zfUIjYN9CnYwU-hHGw73H_-v7Psut7kzosoKFPs7awr-doaYzNhHB8Ng9-DnaGgliSaqZMe13pxQl08fA7QPYygxR8kmSzZHySZLzvirf1d7gP9Y5b8AdcWlYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760908524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kim, Yong Sok ; Kim, Min Jung ; Park, Sung Chan ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Kim, Dae Yong ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Nam, Byung-Ho ; Oh, Jae Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Sok ; Kim, Min Jung ; Park, Sung Chan ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Kim, Dae Yong ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Nam, Byung-Ho ; Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.
Thirty-three patients with cT3N0-2 rectal cancer after preoperative CRT who underwent robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) between March 2010 and January 2012 were matched with 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR). Perioperative clinical outcomes and pathological data were compared between the two groups.
Patient characteristics did not differ significantly different between groups. The mean operation time was 441 minutes (R-LAR) versus 277 minutes (L-LAR, p < 0.001). The open conversion rate was 6.1% in the R-LAR group and 0% in the L-LAR group (p=0.11). There were no significant differences in the time to flatus passage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. In pathological review, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.3 in R-LAR and 21.6 in L-LAR (p=0.82). Involvement of circumferential resection margin was positive in 16.1% and 6.7%, respectively (p=0.42). Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality was complete in 97.0% in R-LAR and 91.0% in L-LAR (p=0.41).
In our study, short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after CRT were similar to those of laparoscopic surgery in respect to bowel function recovery, morbidity, and TME quality. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to evaluate the functional results and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1598-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2005-9256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.365</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25779367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): Korean Cancer Association</publisher><subject>Chemoradiotherapy ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Recovery of Function ; Rectal Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Treatment Outcome ; 의약학</subject><ispartof>Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 48(1), , pp.225-231</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the Korean Cancer Association 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720082/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720082/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25779367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002074127$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Sok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Byung-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes</title><title>Cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.
Thirty-three patients with cT3N0-2 rectal cancer after preoperative CRT who underwent robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) between March 2010 and January 2012 were matched with 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR). Perioperative clinical outcomes and pathological data were compared between the two groups.
Patient characteristics did not differ significantly different between groups. The mean operation time was 441 minutes (R-LAR) versus 277 minutes (L-LAR, p < 0.001). The open conversion rate was 6.1% in the R-LAR group and 0% in the L-LAR group (p=0.11). There were no significant differences in the time to flatus passage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. In pathological review, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.3 in R-LAR and 21.6 in L-LAR (p=0.82). Involvement of circumferential resection margin was positive in 16.1% and 6.7%, respectively (p=0.42). Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality was complete in 97.0% in R-LAR and 91.0% in L-LAR (p=0.41).
In our study, short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after CRT were similar to those of laparoscopic surgery in respect to bowel function recovery, morbidity, and TME quality. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to evaluate the functional results and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.</description><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>의약학</subject><issn>1598-2998</issn><issn>2005-9256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUuP0zAQgC0EYsvCjTPykQMpfsWxOSCtKh4rFS1qC1fLcSabsEmdtZ2V-gP437hbWODikWY-z4zmQ-glJUtBBX_rQloyQsWSy_IRWjBCykKzUj5GC1pqVTCt1Rl6FuMPQqTgFX2KzlhZVZrLaoF-bnztU-_wdwhxjnhtJxt8dH7Kue0criEccOsD3oBLdsAru3cQsG1Tfr8G8BMEm_o7wKsORh9s0_vU5dx0eJfhCMUXm1wHDd6muTlg3-Jt50MqdhBGfDUn50eIz9GT1g4RXvyO5-jbxw-71ediffXpcnWxLpxQPBVMgJW6VrrinNWCQcNs2XLQLXHCascpt7Wk0tY1KNVIqFpBKiqFKrmSpeDn6PWp7z605sb1xtv-Pl57cxPMxWZ3aVjmqMzo-xM6zfUIjYN9CnYwU-hHGw73H_-v7Psut7kzosoKFPs7awr-doaYzNhHB8Ng9-DnaGgliSaqZMe13pxQl08fA7QPYygxR8kmSzZHySZLzvirf1d7gP9Y5b8AdcWlYA</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Kim, Yong Sok</creator><creator>Kim, Min Jung</creator><creator>Park, Sung Chan</creator><creator>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creator><creator>Kim, Dae Yong</creator><creator>Chang, Hee Jin</creator><creator>Nam, Byung-Ho</creator><creator>Oh, Jae Hwan</creator><general>Korean Cancer Association</general><general>대한암학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes</title><author>Kim, Yong Sok ; Kim, Min Jung ; Park, Sung Chan ; Sohn, Dae Kyung ; Kim, Dae Yong ; Chang, Hee Jin ; Nam, Byung-Ho ; Oh, Jae Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>의약학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Sok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Dae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Byung-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jae Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Yong Sok</au><au>Kim, Min Jung</au><au>Park, Sung Chan</au><au>Sohn, Dae Kyung</au><au>Kim, Dae Yong</au><au>Chang, Hee Jin</au><au>Nam, Byung-Ho</au><au>Oh, Jae Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Cancer research and treatment</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>225-231</pages><issn>1598-2998</issn><eissn>2005-9256</eissn><abstract>Robotic surgery is expected to have advantages over laparoscopic surgery; however, there are limited data regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.
Thirty-three patients with cT3N0-2 rectal cancer after preoperative CRT who underwent robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) between March 2010 and January 2012 were matched with 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR). Perioperative clinical outcomes and pathological data were compared between the two groups.
Patient characteristics did not differ significantly different between groups. The mean operation time was 441 minutes (R-LAR) versus 277 minutes (L-LAR, p < 0.001). The open conversion rate was 6.1% in the R-LAR group and 0% in the L-LAR group (p=0.11). There were no significant differences in the time to flatus passage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. In pathological review, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.3 in R-LAR and 21.6 in L-LAR (p=0.82). Involvement of circumferential resection margin was positive in 16.1% and 6.7%, respectively (p=0.42). Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality was complete in 97.0% in R-LAR and 91.0% in L-LAR (p=0.41).
In our study, short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer after CRT were similar to those of laparoscopic surgery in respect to bowel function recovery, morbidity, and TME quality. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to evaluate the functional results and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>Korean Cancer Association</pub><pmid>25779367</pmid><doi>10.4143/crt.2014.365</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1598-2998 |
ispartof | Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 48(1), , pp.225-231 |
issn | 1598-2998 2005-9256 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_254316 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Chemoradiotherapy Female Humans Laparoscopy Male Middle Aged Original Recovery of Function Rectal Neoplasms - physiopathology Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Rectal Neoplasms - therapy Robotic Surgical Procedures Treatment Outcome 의약학 |
title | Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T04%3A50%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20Versus%20Laparoscopic%20Surgery%20for%20Rectal%20Cancer%20after%20Preoperative%20Chemoradiotherapy:%20Case-Matched%20Study%20of%20Short-Term%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Kim,%20Yong%20Sok&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=225-231&rft.issn=1598-2998&rft.eissn=2005-9256&rft_id=info:doi/10.4143/crt.2014.365&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1760908524%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-24ea69b897332b42ed2a5f3e9f0c4a9c313ab616abbe88d6e7f40716485386543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760908524&rft_id=info:pmid/25779367&rfr_iscdi=true |