A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator

The aim of this study was to design an intraoral environment simulator and to assess the accuracy of two intraoral scanners using the simulator. A box-shaped intraoral environment simulator was designed to simulate two specific intraoral environments. The cast was scanned 10 times by Identica Blue (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of advanced prosthodontics 2018, 10(1), 44, pp.58-64
Main Authors: Park, Hye-Nan, Lim, Young-Jun, Yi, Won-Jin, Han, Jung-Suk, Lee, Seung-Pyo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Original
치의학
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to design an intraoral environment simulator and to assess the accuracy of two intraoral scanners using the simulator. A box-shaped intraoral environment simulator was designed to simulate two specific intraoral environments. The cast was scanned 10 times by Identica Blue (MEDIT, Seoul, South Korea), TRIOS (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark), and CS3500 (Carestream Dental, Georgia, USA) scanners in the two simulated groups. The distances between the left and right canines (D3), first molars (D6), second molars (D7), and the left canine and left second molar (D37) were measured. The distance data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The differences in intraoral environments were not statistically significant ( >.05). Between intraoral scanners, statistically significant differences (
ISSN:2005-7806
2005-7814
DOI:10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.58