Loading…
The 21-Item and 12-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Psychometric Evaluation in a Korean Population
PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 in a Korean population.MethodsThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scales were translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation technique, and the content validity was assessed b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Asian nursing research 2019, 13(1), , pp.30-37 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-19f4a7e8a4b2977fbcadf49ce0d5fb8ab5c1e7ac2cb803ad791482db18b274173 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-19f4a7e8a4b2977fbcadf49ce0d5fb8ab5c1e7ac2cb803ad791482db18b274173 |
container_end_page | 37 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | Asian nursing research |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Lee, Eun-Hyun Moon, Seung Hei Cho, Myung Sun Park, Eun Suk Kim, Soon Young Han, Jin Sil Cheio, Jung Hee |
description | PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 in a Korean population.MethodsThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scales were translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation technique, and the content validity was assessed by an expert panel. Participants were recruited from six community health centers (n = 431) and two community mental health centers (n = 50). A field test of the psychometric properties of the instruments was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis with bootstrap maximum likelihood estimation involving 1,000 samples, Pearson's analysis, t test, and Cronbach's α coefficient.ResultsConfirmatory factor analysis of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 supported both three-factor and second-order three-factor models. The Scales 21 and 12 satisfied convergent validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Perceived Stress Scale-10 and discriminant validity with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The scores for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 were higher for the psychiatric group than for the nonpsychiatric group, confirming the presence of known-groups validity. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 exhibited moderate-to-strong correlations with the Negative Affect. Cronbach's α coefficients for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 were .93 and .90, respectively.ConclusionThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 appear to be acceptable, reliable, and valid instruments. However, the shorter Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 12 may be more feasible to use in a busy practice and also be less burdensome to respondents. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_4397285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_692788a347eb4146b9116cc80ac40a0c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2186117731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-19f4a7e8a4b2977fbcadf49ce0d5fb8ab5c1e7ac2cb803ad791482db18b274173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kUFv1DAQhS0EEkvhB3CzxIlDUo_tjR1uq1Jg1UpUdOFqTRynTZqNF9uLuv8eZ4M4zejpmzd6eoS8B1YCg-pyKHEKJWegS4CSseoFWXFWi0JJzV-SFdSqKkCAek3exDhkADiIFXnePTrKodgmt6c4tRT4sv9yIfZ-itR3NGXmszsEF2eJbqbn3qUTvU-zQu8tji5-onfxZB_93qXQW3r9B8cjphnvJ4r0xgeHE73zh-N4lt-SVx2O0b37Ny_Izy_Xu6tvxe33r9urzW1h10KnAupOonIaZcNrpbrGYtvJ2jrWrrtGY7O24BRabhvNBLaqhhy4bUA3XElQ4oJ8XHyn0Jkn2xuP_Xk-ePMUzObHbmukqBXX68xuF7b1OJhD6PcYTueDs-DDg8GQejs6U9VcaY1CKtdIkFVTA1TWaoZWMmQ2e31YvA7B_z66mMzgj2HKUQ0HXQEoJSBTsFA2-BiD6_5_BWbmYs1gcrFmLtYAmNyb-AuXq5Yv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2186117731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 21-Item and 12-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Psychometric Evaluation in a Korean Population</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Lee, Eun-Hyun ; Moon, Seung Hei ; Cho, Myung Sun ; Park, Eun Suk ; Kim, Soon Young ; Han, Jin Sil ; Cheio, Jung Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun-Hyun ; Moon, Seung Hei ; Cho, Myung Sun ; Park, Eun Suk ; Kim, Soon Young ; Han, Jin Sil ; Cheio, Jung Hee</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 in a Korean population.MethodsThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scales were translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation technique, and the content validity was assessed by an expert panel. Participants were recruited from six community health centers (n = 431) and two community mental health centers (n = 50). A field test of the psychometric properties of the instruments was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis with bootstrap maximum likelihood estimation involving 1,000 samples, Pearson's analysis, t test, and Cronbach's α coefficient.ResultsConfirmatory factor analysis of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 supported both three-factor and second-order three-factor models. The Scales 21 and 12 satisfied convergent validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Perceived Stress Scale-10 and discriminant validity with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The scores for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 were higher for the psychiatric group than for the nonpsychiatric group, confirming the presence of known-groups validity. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 exhibited moderate-to-strong correlations with the Negative Affect. Cronbach's α coefficients for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 were .93 and .90, respectively.ConclusionThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 appear to be acceptable, reliable, and valid instruments. However, the shorter Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 12 may be more feasible to use in a busy practice and also be less burdensome to respondents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1976-1317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2093-7482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Seoul: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Health facilities ; Medical personnel ; Mental depression ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Stress ; Validation studies ; Validity ; 간호학</subject><ispartof>Asian Nursing Research, 2019, 13(1), , pp.30-37</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-19f4a7e8a4b2977fbcadf49ce0d5fb8ab5c1e7ac2cb803ad791482db18b274173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-19f4a7e8a4b2977fbcadf49ce0d5fb8ab5c1e7ac2cb803ad791482db18b274173</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7188-3857</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2186117731/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2186117731?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002438313$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Seung Hei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Myung Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Eun Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soon Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jin Sil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheio, Jung Hee</creatorcontrib><title>The 21-Item and 12-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Psychometric Evaluation in a Korean Population</title><title>Asian nursing research</title><description>PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 in a Korean population.MethodsThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scales were translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation technique, and the content validity was assessed by an expert panel. Participants were recruited from six community health centers (n = 431) and two community mental health centers (n = 50). A field test of the psychometric properties of the instruments was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis with bootstrap maximum likelihood estimation involving 1,000 samples, Pearson's analysis, t test, and Cronbach's α coefficient.ResultsConfirmatory factor analysis of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 supported both three-factor and second-order three-factor models. The Scales 21 and 12 satisfied convergent validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Perceived Stress Scale-10 and discriminant validity with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The scores for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 were higher for the psychiatric group than for the nonpsychiatric group, confirming the presence of known-groups validity. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 exhibited moderate-to-strong correlations with the Negative Affect. Cronbach's α coefficients for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 were .93 and .90, respectively.ConclusionThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 appear to be acceptable, reliable, and valid instruments. However, the shorter Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 12 may be more feasible to use in a busy practice and also be less burdensome to respondents.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>간호학</subject><issn>1976-1317</issn><issn>2093-7482</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kUFv1DAQhS0EEkvhB3CzxIlDUo_tjR1uq1Jg1UpUdOFqTRynTZqNF9uLuv8eZ4M4zejpmzd6eoS8B1YCg-pyKHEKJWegS4CSseoFWXFWi0JJzV-SFdSqKkCAek3exDhkADiIFXnePTrKodgmt6c4tRT4sv9yIfZ-itR3NGXmszsEF2eJbqbn3qUTvU-zQu8tji5-onfxZB_93qXQW3r9B8cjphnvJ4r0xgeHE73zh-N4lt-SVx2O0b37Ny_Izy_Xu6tvxe33r9urzW1h10KnAupOonIaZcNrpbrGYtvJ2jrWrrtGY7O24BRabhvNBLaqhhy4bUA3XElQ4oJ8XHyn0Jkn2xuP_Xk-ePMUzObHbmukqBXX68xuF7b1OJhD6PcYTueDs-DDg8GQejs6U9VcaY1CKtdIkFVTA1TWaoZWMmQ2e31YvA7B_z66mMzgj2HKUQ0HXQEoJSBTsFA2-BiD6_5_BWbmYs1gcrFmLtYAmNyb-AuXq5Yv</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Lee, Eun-Hyun</creator><creator>Moon, Seung Hei</creator><creator>Cho, Myung Sun</creator><creator>Park, Eun Suk</creator><creator>Kim, Soon Young</creator><creator>Han, Jin Sil</creator><creator>Cheio, Jung Hee</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>한국간호과학회</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-3857</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>The 21-Item and 12-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Psychometric Evaluation in a Korean Population</title><author>Lee, Eun-Hyun ; Moon, Seung Hei ; Cho, Myung Sun ; Park, Eun Suk ; Kim, Soon Young ; Han, Jin Sil ; Cheio, Jung Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-19f4a7e8a4b2977fbcadf49ce0d5fb8ab5c1e7ac2cb803ad791482db18b274173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>간호학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Seung Hei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Myung Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Eun Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soon Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jin Sil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheio, Jung Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Asian nursing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Eun-Hyun</au><au>Moon, Seung Hei</au><au>Cho, Myung Sun</au><au>Park, Eun Suk</au><au>Kim, Soon Young</au><au>Han, Jin Sil</au><au>Cheio, Jung Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 21-Item and 12-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Psychometric Evaluation in a Korean Population</atitle><jtitle>Asian nursing research</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>30-37</pages><issn>1976-1317</issn><eissn>2093-7482</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 in a Korean population.MethodsThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scales were translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation technique, and the content validity was assessed by an expert panel. Participants were recruited from six community health centers (n = 431) and two community mental health centers (n = 50). A field test of the psychometric properties of the instruments was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis with bootstrap maximum likelihood estimation involving 1,000 samples, Pearson's analysis, t test, and Cronbach's α coefficient.ResultsConfirmatory factor analysis of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 supported both three-factor and second-order three-factor models. The Scales 21 and 12 satisfied convergent validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Perceived Stress Scale-10 and discriminant validity with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The scores for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 were higher for the psychiatric group than for the nonpsychiatric group, confirming the presence of known-groups validity. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 exhibited moderate-to-strong correlations with the Negative Affect. Cronbach's α coefficients for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 were .93 and .90, respectively.ConclusionThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 and 12 appear to be acceptable, reliable, and valid instruments. However, the shorter Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 12 may be more feasible to use in a busy practice and also be less burdensome to respondents.</abstract><cop>Seoul</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-3857</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1976-1317 |
ispartof | Asian Nursing Research, 2019, 13(1), , pp.30-37 |
issn | 1976-1317 2093-7482 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_4397285 |
source | ScienceDirect; ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Anxiety Health facilities Medical personnel Mental depression Mental disorders Mental health Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Stress Validation studies Validity 간호학 |
title | The 21-Item and 12-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Psychometric Evaluation in a Korean Population |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A03%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%2021-Item%20and%2012-Item%20Versions%20of%20the%20Depression%20Anxiety%20Stress%20Scales:%20Psychometric%20Evaluation%20in%20a%20Korean%20Population&rft.jtitle=Asian%20nursing%20research&rft.au=Lee,%20Eun-Hyun&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=30-37&rft.issn=1976-1317&rft.eissn=2093-7482&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E2186117731%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-19f4a7e8a4b2977fbcadf49ce0d5fb8ab5c1e7ac2cb803ad791482db18b274173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2186117731&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |