Loading…
The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique
The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the autho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Korea observer 2014, 45(3), , pp.483-491 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 483 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 483 |
container_title | Korea observer |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Lie, John |
description | The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the author published a series of articles (e.g. Lie, 1992, 1993, 1997), his project did not generate much discussion or debate. One might have thought that his project died stillborn from the press. Hence, it is gratifying to know that some scholars have found his work to be of some interest. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_458934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660023207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-n282t-1d5c0dcb85b4fcff56b7517cd2285fd5083963bd00edd8fc447967d38f372ddf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0MtKw0AUgOFBFIzVdwi4cTMw94u7EKoWKoLE9ZDMpU0bZ2ou4OObVkFw5erffBzOOWcgI1wJSBGn5yBDiFBINdaX4GoYdghhzRjLAK62Pi9TtP4w5inkz8n5Y5efdlvHjb_Pi5gX05hg2bdj-zH5a3AR6m7wNz9dgLeHZVU-wfXL46os1jASRUaIHbfI2UbxhgUbAheN5FhaR4jiwXGkqBa0cQh551SwjEktpKMqUEmcC3QB7r7nxj6YvW1NqttTN8nse1O8VivDuNKU_dJDn-YNh9G8t4P1XVdHn6bBYCEFUkpw_A8qjq8iSM709g_dpamP882zwppyjjGmXz5RaOM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1619355111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Lie, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Lie, John</creatorcontrib><description>The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the author published a series of articles (e.g. Lie, 1992, 1993, 1997), his project did not generate much discussion or debate. One might have thought that his project died stillborn from the press. Hence, it is gratifying to know that some scholars have found his work to be of some interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-3919</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2586-3053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Seoul: Institute of Korean Studies</publisher><subject>Communication ; Concept Formation ; Conceptualization ; Determinism ; Discourse ; Discussion ; Dissertations & theses ; Economic theory ; Globalization ; Intellectuals ; Market ; Neoliberalism ; Polanyi, Karl (1886-1964) ; Political economy ; Politics ; Sociology ; Theses ; 정치외교학</subject><ispartof>Korea Observer, 2014, 45(3), , pp.483-491</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Korean Studies Autumn 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1619355111/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1619355111?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12844,12846,21386,21393,33222,33223,33610,33611,33984,33985,43732,43947,62660,62661,62663,62676,73967,73992,74239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001919601$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lie, John</creatorcontrib><title>The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique</title><title>Korea observer</title><description>The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the author published a series of articles (e.g. Lie, 1992, 1993, 1997), his project did not generate much discussion or debate. One might have thought that his project died stillborn from the press. Hence, it is gratifying to know that some scholars have found his work to be of some interest.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Determinism</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Discussion</subject><subject>Dissertations & theses</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Market</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Polanyi, Karl (1886-1964)</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Theses</subject><subject>정치외교학</subject><issn>0023-3919</issn><issn>2586-3053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0MtKw0AUgOFBFIzVdwi4cTMw94u7EKoWKoLE9ZDMpU0bZ2ou4OObVkFw5erffBzOOWcgI1wJSBGn5yBDiFBINdaX4GoYdghhzRjLAK62Pi9TtP4w5inkz8n5Y5efdlvHjb_Pi5gX05hg2bdj-zH5a3AR6m7wNz9dgLeHZVU-wfXL46os1jASRUaIHbfI2UbxhgUbAheN5FhaR4jiwXGkqBa0cQh551SwjEktpKMqUEmcC3QB7r7nxj6YvW1NqttTN8nse1O8VivDuNKU_dJDn-YNh9G8t4P1XVdHn6bBYCEFUkpw_A8qjq8iSM709g_dpamP882zwppyjjGmXz5RaOM</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Lie, John</creator><general>Institute of Korean Studies</general><general>한국학술연구원</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique</title><author>Lie, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n282t-1d5c0dcb85b4fcff56b7517cd2285fd5083963bd00edd8fc447967d38f372ddf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Determinism</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Discussion</topic><topic>Dissertations & theses</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Market</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Polanyi, Karl (1886-1964)</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Theses</topic><topic>정치외교학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lie, John</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Korea observer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lie, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique</atitle><jtitle>Korea observer</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>483-483</pages><issn>0023-3919</issn><eissn>2586-3053</eissn><abstract>The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the author published a series of articles (e.g. Lie, 1992, 1993, 1997), his project did not generate much discussion or debate. One might have thought that his project died stillborn from the press. Hence, it is gratifying to know that some scholars have found his work to be of some interest.</abstract><cop>Seoul</cop><pub>Institute of Korean Studies</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-3919 |
ispartof | Korea Observer, 2014, 45(3), , pp.483-491 |
issn | 0023-3919 2586-3053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_458934 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest One Literature |
subjects | Communication Concept Formation Conceptualization Determinism Discourse Discussion Dissertations & theses Economic theory Globalization Intellectuals Market Neoliberalism Polanyi, Karl (1886-1964) Political economy Politics Sociology Theses 정치외교학 |
title | The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A42%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Concept%20of%20Mode%20of%20Exchange:%20An%20Auto-Critique&rft.jtitle=Korea%20observer&rft.au=Lie,%20John&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=483-483&rft.issn=0023-3919&rft.eissn=2586-3053&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1660023207%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n282t-1d5c0dcb85b4fcff56b7517cd2285fd5083963bd00edd8fc447967d38f372ddf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1619355111&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |