Loading…

The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique

The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the autho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Korea observer 2014, 45(3), , pp.483-491
Main Author: Lie, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 483
container_issue 3
container_start_page 483
container_title Korea observer
container_volume 45
creator Lie, John
description The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the author published a series of articles (e.g. Lie, 1992, 1993, 1997), his project did not generate much discussion or debate. One might have thought that his project died stillborn from the press. Hence, it is gratifying to know that some scholars have found his work to be of some interest.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_458934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660023207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-n282t-1d5c0dcb85b4fcff56b7517cd2285fd5083963bd00edd8fc447967d38f372ddf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0MtKw0AUgOFBFIzVdwi4cTMw94u7EKoWKoLE9ZDMpU0bZ2ou4OObVkFw5erffBzOOWcgI1wJSBGn5yBDiFBINdaX4GoYdghhzRjLAK62Pi9TtP4w5inkz8n5Y5efdlvHjb_Pi5gX05hg2bdj-zH5a3AR6m7wNz9dgLeHZVU-wfXL46os1jASRUaIHbfI2UbxhgUbAheN5FhaR4jiwXGkqBa0cQh551SwjEktpKMqUEmcC3QB7r7nxj6YvW1NqttTN8nse1O8VivDuNKU_dJDn-YNh9G8t4P1XVdHn6bBYCEFUkpw_A8qjq8iSM709g_dpamP882zwppyjjGmXz5RaOM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1619355111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Lie, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Lie, John</creatorcontrib><description>The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the author published a series of articles (e.g. Lie, 1992, 1993, 1997), his project did not generate much discussion or debate. One might have thought that his project died stillborn from the press. Hence, it is gratifying to know that some scholars have found his work to be of some interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-3919</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2586-3053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Seoul: Institute of Korean Studies</publisher><subject>Communication ; Concept Formation ; Conceptualization ; Determinism ; Discourse ; Discussion ; Dissertations &amp; theses ; Economic theory ; Globalization ; Intellectuals ; Market ; Neoliberalism ; Polanyi, Karl (1886-1964) ; Political economy ; Politics ; Sociology ; Theses ; 정치외교학</subject><ispartof>Korea Observer, 2014, 45(3), , pp.483-491</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Korean Studies Autumn 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1619355111/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1619355111?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12844,12846,21386,21393,33222,33223,33610,33611,33984,33985,43732,43947,62660,62661,62663,62676,73967,73992,74239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001919601$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lie, John</creatorcontrib><title>The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique</title><title>Korea observer</title><description>The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the author published a series of articles (e.g. Lie, 1992, 1993, 1997), his project did not generate much discussion or debate. One might have thought that his project died stillborn from the press. Hence, it is gratifying to know that some scholars have found his work to be of some interest.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Determinism</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Discussion</subject><subject>Dissertations &amp; theses</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Market</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Polanyi, Karl (1886-1964)</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Theses</subject><subject>정치외교학</subject><issn>0023-3919</issn><issn>2586-3053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0MtKw0AUgOFBFIzVdwi4cTMw94u7EKoWKoLE9ZDMpU0bZ2ou4OObVkFw5erffBzOOWcgI1wJSBGn5yBDiFBINdaX4GoYdghhzRjLAK62Pi9TtP4w5inkz8n5Y5efdlvHjb_Pi5gX05hg2bdj-zH5a3AR6m7wNz9dgLeHZVU-wfXL46os1jASRUaIHbfI2UbxhgUbAheN5FhaR4jiwXGkqBa0cQh551SwjEktpKMqUEmcC3QB7r7nxj6YvW1NqttTN8nse1O8VivDuNKU_dJDn-YNh9G8t4P1XVdHn6bBYCEFUkpw_A8qjq8iSM709g_dpamP882zwppyjjGmXz5RaOM</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Lie, John</creator><general>Institute of Korean Studies</general><general>한국학술연구원</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique</title><author>Lie, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n282t-1d5c0dcb85b4fcff56b7517cd2285fd5083963bd00edd8fc447967d38f372ddf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Determinism</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Discussion</topic><topic>Dissertations &amp; theses</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Market</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Polanyi, Karl (1886-1964)</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Theses</topic><topic>정치외교학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lie, John</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East &amp; South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Korea observer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lie, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique</atitle><jtitle>Korea observer</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>483-483</pages><issn>0023-3919</issn><eissn>2586-3053</eissn><abstract>The authors PhD dissertation, "Visualizing the Invisible Hand: From Market to Mode of Exchange," sought at once to criticize the neoclassical conceptualization of the market and to propose an alternative framework for the study of "market" exchange (Lie, 1988). Although the author published a series of articles (e.g. Lie, 1992, 1993, 1997), his project did not generate much discussion or debate. One might have thought that his project died stillborn from the press. Hence, it is gratifying to know that some scholars have found his work to be of some interest.</abstract><cop>Seoul</cop><pub>Institute of Korean Studies</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-3919
ispartof Korea Observer, 2014, 45(3), , pp.483-491
issn 0023-3919
2586-3053
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_458934
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest One Literature
subjects Communication
Concept Formation
Conceptualization
Determinism
Discourse
Discussion
Dissertations & theses
Economic theory
Globalization
Intellectuals
Market
Neoliberalism
Polanyi, Karl (1886-1964)
Political economy
Politics
Sociology
Theses
정치외교학
title The Concept of Mode of Exchange: An Auto-Critique
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A42%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Concept%20of%20Mode%20of%20Exchange:%20An%20Auto-Critique&rft.jtitle=Korea%20observer&rft.au=Lie,%20John&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=483-483&rft.issn=0023-3919&rft.eissn=2586-3053&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E1660023207%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n282t-1d5c0dcb85b4fcff56b7517cd2285fd5083963bd00edd8fc447967d38f372ddf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1619355111&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true