Loading…

Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation

This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of advanced prosthodontics 2019, 11(6), 55, pp.350-357
Main Authors: Ko, Byeong-Dae, Son, KeunBaDa, Kang, Seok Hyon, Lee, Kyu-Bok
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-7b4ad9e62ae9a61c8b9920c12fdd75d4eee5ad61d4c172b84b9227507f173af53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-7b4ad9e62ae9a61c8b9920c12fdd75d4eee5ad61d4c172b84b9227507f173af53
container_end_page 357
container_issue 6
container_start_page 350
container_title The journal of advanced prosthodontics
container_volume 11
creator Ko, Byeong-Dae
Son, KeunBaDa
Kang, Seok Hyon
Lee, Kyu-Bok
description This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the 3 electronic torque driver types (W&H, SAESHIN, and NSK group) and 9 for each group. The screws were fastened at the implant fixture by three electronic torque drivers using the tightening torques recommended by the manufacturers of the drivers. After 10 minutes, the screws were again fastened at the implant fixture with equal torque. Then, the loosening torques were measured with an MGT12 torque gauge (MARK-10, Inc.). This measurement procedure was repeated 10 times under loosening torques of 15 Ncm, 25 Ncm, and 35 Ncm. In the statistical analysis, all values of loosening torque were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05) for comparative evaluation. There were significant inter-group differences at loosening torques of 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm ( .05). The SAESHIN driver showed the closest loosening torque at 35 Ncm. The most accurate loosening torques were SAESHIN at 35 Ncm, and NSK at 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm. Since the loosening torque may vary depending on the tightening torques and electronic torque drivers, periodic calibration of the electronic torque driver is recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.350
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_6304214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333600233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-7b4ad9e62ae9a61c8b9920c12fdd75d4eee5ad61d4c172b84b9227507f173af53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LAzEUDKJYqf4AL7JHPXTN1yZdD0IpfhQKgug5ZJMX3brd1GS34L83tbVoLvPIm5mXl0HonOCcYy6vF3qVU0zKnJBc5KzAB-iEYlyM5Jjww32NxQCdxbjA6XAucSGO0YCRcSmp5CdoNjGmD9p8Zd5ltnYOArRdBg2YLvi2Nlnnw2cPmQ31GkK8ySaZ8cuVDrpLFxmsddOn0ren6MjpJsLZDofo9f7uZfo4mj89zKaT-chwxrqRrLi2JQiqodSCmHFVlhQbQp21srAcAAptBbHcEEmrMa9KSmWBpSOSaVewIbra-rbBqQ9TK6_rH3zz6iOoyfPLTAmGOSU8cW-33FVfLcGatFrQjVqFeqnD14_yf6et35PPWomSMVzQZHC5Mwg-_ULs1LKOBppGt-D7qChjTGC8gSEiW6oJPsYAbj-GYLVJTKXE1CYxRYgSKiWWNBd_37dX_ObDvgErqpL1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333600233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><creator>Ko, Byeong-Dae ; Son, KeunBaDa ; Kang, Seok Hyon ; Lee, Kyu-Bok</creator><creatorcontrib>Ko, Byeong-Dae ; Son, KeunBaDa ; Kang, Seok Hyon ; Lee, Kyu-Bok</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the 3 electronic torque driver types (W&amp;H, SAESHIN, and NSK group) and 9 for each group. The screws were fastened at the implant fixture by three electronic torque drivers using the tightening torques recommended by the manufacturers of the drivers. After 10 minutes, the screws were again fastened at the implant fixture with equal torque. Then, the loosening torques were measured with an MGT12 torque gauge (MARK-10, Inc.). This measurement procedure was repeated 10 times under loosening torques of 15 Ncm, 25 Ncm, and 35 Ncm. In the statistical analysis, all values of loosening torque were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05) for comparative evaluation. There were significant inter-group differences at loosening torques of 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm ( &lt;.05). The accuracy of the NSK driver was the highest, followed by SAESHIN and W&amp;H. There was no significant difference between NSK and W&amp;H at 35 Ncm ( &gt;.05). The SAESHIN driver showed the closest loosening torque at 35 Ncm. The most accurate loosening torques were SAESHIN at 35 Ncm, and NSK at 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm. Since the loosening torque may vary depending on the tightening torques and electronic torque drivers, periodic calibration of the electronic torque driver is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2005-7806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2005-7814</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.350</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31897274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics</publisher><subject>Original ; 치의학</subject><ispartof>The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 2019, 11(6), 55, pp.350-357</ispartof><rights>2019 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics.</rights><rights>2019 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2019 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-7b4ad9e62ae9a61c8b9920c12fdd75d4eee5ad61d4c172b84b9227507f173af53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-7b4ad9e62ae9a61c8b9920c12fdd75d4eee5ad61d4c172b84b9227507f173af53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1838-7229 ; 0000-0003-1415-0053 ; 0000-0002-4305-6931 ; 0000-0002-3177-8005</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6933052/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6933052/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002532934$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ko, Byeong-Dae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, KeunBaDa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Seok Hyon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyu-Bok</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation</title><title>The journal of advanced prosthodontics</title><addtitle>J Adv Prosthodont</addtitle><description>This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the 3 electronic torque driver types (W&amp;H, SAESHIN, and NSK group) and 9 for each group. The screws were fastened at the implant fixture by three electronic torque drivers using the tightening torques recommended by the manufacturers of the drivers. After 10 minutes, the screws were again fastened at the implant fixture with equal torque. Then, the loosening torques were measured with an MGT12 torque gauge (MARK-10, Inc.). This measurement procedure was repeated 10 times under loosening torques of 15 Ncm, 25 Ncm, and 35 Ncm. In the statistical analysis, all values of loosening torque were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05) for comparative evaluation. There were significant inter-group differences at loosening torques of 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm ( &lt;.05). The accuracy of the NSK driver was the highest, followed by SAESHIN and W&amp;H. There was no significant difference between NSK and W&amp;H at 35 Ncm ( &gt;.05). The SAESHIN driver showed the closest loosening torque at 35 Ncm. The most accurate loosening torques were SAESHIN at 35 Ncm, and NSK at 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm. Since the loosening torque may vary depending on the tightening torques and electronic torque drivers, periodic calibration of the electronic torque driver is recommended.</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>치의학</subject><issn>2005-7806</issn><issn>2005-7814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1LAzEUDKJYqf4AL7JHPXTN1yZdD0IpfhQKgug5ZJMX3brd1GS34L83tbVoLvPIm5mXl0HonOCcYy6vF3qVU0zKnJBc5KzAB-iEYlyM5Jjww32NxQCdxbjA6XAucSGO0YCRcSmp5CdoNjGmD9p8Zd5ltnYOArRdBg2YLvi2Nlnnw2cPmQ31GkK8ySaZ8cuVDrpLFxmsddOn0ren6MjpJsLZDofo9f7uZfo4mj89zKaT-chwxrqRrLi2JQiqodSCmHFVlhQbQp21srAcAAptBbHcEEmrMa9KSmWBpSOSaVewIbra-rbBqQ9TK6_rH3zz6iOoyfPLTAmGOSU8cW-33FVfLcGatFrQjVqFeqnD14_yf6et35PPWomSMVzQZHC5Mwg-_ULs1LKOBppGt-D7qChjTGC8gSEiW6oJPsYAbj-GYLVJTKXE1CYxRYgSKiWWNBd_37dX_ObDvgErqpL1</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Ko, Byeong-Dae</creator><creator>Son, KeunBaDa</creator><creator>Kang, Seok Hyon</creator><creator>Lee, Kyu-Bok</creator><general>The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics</general><general>대한치과보철학회</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-7229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-0053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-6931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3177-8005</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation</title><author>Ko, Byeong-Dae ; Son, KeunBaDa ; Kang, Seok Hyon ; Lee, Kyu-Bok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-7b4ad9e62ae9a61c8b9920c12fdd75d4eee5ad61d4c172b84b9227507f173af53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>치의학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ko, Byeong-Dae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, KeunBaDa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Seok Hyon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyu-Bok</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>The journal of advanced prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ko, Byeong-Dae</au><au>Son, KeunBaDa</au><au>Kang, Seok Hyon</au><au>Lee, Kyu-Bok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation</atitle><jtitle>The journal of advanced prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Adv Prosthodont</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>350-357</pages><issn>2005-7806</issn><eissn>2005-7814</eissn><abstract>This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers. Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the 3 electronic torque driver types (W&amp;H, SAESHIN, and NSK group) and 9 for each group. The screws were fastened at the implant fixture by three electronic torque drivers using the tightening torques recommended by the manufacturers of the drivers. After 10 minutes, the screws were again fastened at the implant fixture with equal torque. Then, the loosening torques were measured with an MGT12 torque gauge (MARK-10, Inc.). This measurement procedure was repeated 10 times under loosening torques of 15 Ncm, 25 Ncm, and 35 Ncm. In the statistical analysis, all values of loosening torque were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05) for comparative evaluation. There were significant inter-group differences at loosening torques of 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm ( &lt;.05). The accuracy of the NSK driver was the highest, followed by SAESHIN and W&amp;H. There was no significant difference between NSK and W&amp;H at 35 Ncm ( &gt;.05). The SAESHIN driver showed the closest loosening torque at 35 Ncm. The most accurate loosening torques were SAESHIN at 35 Ncm, and NSK at 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm. Since the loosening torque may vary depending on the tightening torques and electronic torque drivers, periodic calibration of the electronic torque driver is recommended.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics</pub><pmid>31897274</pmid><doi>10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.350</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-7229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-0053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-6931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3177-8005</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2005-7806
ispartof The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 2019, 11(6), 55, pp.350-357
issn 2005-7806
2005-7814
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_6304214
source PMC (PubMed Central)
subjects Original
치의학
title Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A14%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20different%20electronic%20torque%20drivers:%20A%20comparative%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20advanced%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Ko,%20Byeong-Dae&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=350-357&rft.issn=2005-7806&rft.eissn=2005-7814&rft_id=info:doi/10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E2333600233%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-7b4ad9e62ae9a61c8b9920c12fdd75d4eee5ad61d4c172b84b9227507f173af53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333600233&rft_id=info:pmid/31897274&rfr_iscdi=true