Loading…

Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study

To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection. In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen > 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Korean journal of radiology 2014, 15(3), , pp.346-355
Main Authors: Woo, Sungmin, Kim, Sang Youn, Cho, Jeong Yeon, Kim, Seung Hyup
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623
container_end_page 355
container_issue 3
container_start_page 346
container_title Korean journal of radiology
container_volume 15
creator Woo, Sungmin
Kim, Sang Youn
Cho, Jeong Yeon
Kim, Seung Hyup
description To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection. In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen > 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core biopsy followed by targeted biopsy at hypoechoic areas on grey-scale ultrasound. Prior to biopsy, SWE was performed by placing two circular 5 mm-sized regions of interest (ROIs) along the estimated biopsy tract in each sector and one ROI for hypoechoic lesions. SWE parameters, S (mean stiffness) and R (mean stiffness ratio), were calculated and compared regarding different histopathologic tissues and their accuracy for diagnosing prostate cancer was analyzed. SWE parameters were correlated with Gleason score and were compared between indolent (< 8) and aggressive (≥ 8) tissues in prostate cancer patients. Prostate cancer was detected in 7.5% of 1058 cores in 29.9% of 87 patients. Seven (43.8%) of 16 hypoechoic lesions were confirmed as prostate cancer. SWE parameters were significantly different among the histopathologic entities (p < 0.001). Prostate cancer was stiffer than benign tissues (p ≤ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve area for diagnosing cancer were 43%, 80.8%, and 0.599, respectively, for a cutoff of S > 43.9 kPa and 60.8%, 66.4%, and 0.653, respectively, for R > 3. Both, S and R showed a significant correlation with Gleason score (r ≥ 0.296, p ≤ 0.008) and were significantly different between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (p ≤ 0.006). Shear wave elastographic parameters are significantly different between prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue and correlate with Gleason score.
doi_str_mv 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.3.346
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_715421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2728275244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFH8AFWeLCJak9thObA1JVUajUCgnK2XKdSTe72XixnaL997hdKNDTyPb3xjPvEfKas1oIqU_Wq1gD47Lmqha1kM0zsgDGVKWFYM_JggOYqjFgDslRSivGwDAtX5BDkFoKEGZBrr4t0UX6090hxdGlHG6j2y53tA-RdpjR5yFMNPR0G0PKLiP1bvIY31NXrnAcNsPk4o6mPHe7l-Sgd2PCV7_rMfl-_vH67HN1-eXTxdnpZeUVNLnqHEKHbc-EUYis9cL7vrnpykG1jDUAsnGt0n3jO-NNx3wrtWe6MRoBGxDH5N2-7xR7u_aDDW54qLfBrqM9_Xp9YVuuJPCCftij2_lmg53HKUc32m0cNmXsB-H_L9OwLG3urGQgmBJ__yoG_JgxZbsZksdxdBOGOVleVmrBcGUK-vYJugpznIoTFlrQ0CqQslB8T_niaIrYPw7Dmb3P1ZZc7X2upbcVtuRaNG_-3eJR8SdI8QtNS5-G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728275244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Woo, Sungmin ; Kim, Sang Youn ; Cho, Jeong Yeon ; Kim, Seung Hyup</creator><creatorcontrib>Woo, Sungmin ; Kim, Sang Youn ; Cho, Jeong Yeon ; Kim, Seung Hyup</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection. In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen &gt; 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core biopsy followed by targeted biopsy at hypoechoic areas on grey-scale ultrasound. Prior to biopsy, SWE was performed by placing two circular 5 mm-sized regions of interest (ROIs) along the estimated biopsy tract in each sector and one ROI for hypoechoic lesions. SWE parameters, S (mean stiffness) and R (mean stiffness ratio), were calculated and compared regarding different histopathologic tissues and their accuracy for diagnosing prostate cancer was analyzed. SWE parameters were correlated with Gleason score and were compared between indolent (&lt; 8) and aggressive (≥ 8) tissues in prostate cancer patients. Prostate cancer was detected in 7.5% of 1058 cores in 29.9% of 87 patients. Seven (43.8%) of 16 hypoechoic lesions were confirmed as prostate cancer. SWE parameters were significantly different among the histopathologic entities (p &lt; 0.001). Prostate cancer was stiffer than benign tissues (p ≤ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve area for diagnosing cancer were 43%, 80.8%, and 0.599, respectively, for a cutoff of S &gt; 43.9 kPa and 60.8%, 66.4%, and 0.653, respectively, for R &gt; 3. Both, S and R showed a significant correlation with Gleason score (r ≥ 0.296, p ≤ 0.008) and were significantly different between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (p ≤ 0.006). Shear wave elastographic parameters are significantly different between prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue and correlate with Gleason score.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1229-6929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2005-8330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.3.346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24843239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Society of Radiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Genitourinary Imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Pathology ; Patients ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Software ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods ; 방사선과학</subject><ispartof>Korean Journal of Radiology, 2014, 15(3), , pp.346-355</ispartof><rights>2014. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Radiology 2014</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728275244/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728275244?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24843239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001880376$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woo, Sungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Youn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seung Hyup</creatorcontrib><title>Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study</title><title>Korean journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Korean J Radiol</addtitle><description>To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection. In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen &gt; 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core biopsy followed by targeted biopsy at hypoechoic areas on grey-scale ultrasound. Prior to biopsy, SWE was performed by placing two circular 5 mm-sized regions of interest (ROIs) along the estimated biopsy tract in each sector and one ROI for hypoechoic lesions. SWE parameters, S (mean stiffness) and R (mean stiffness ratio), were calculated and compared regarding different histopathologic tissues and their accuracy for diagnosing prostate cancer was analyzed. SWE parameters were correlated with Gleason score and were compared between indolent (&lt; 8) and aggressive (≥ 8) tissues in prostate cancer patients. Prostate cancer was detected in 7.5% of 1058 cores in 29.9% of 87 patients. Seven (43.8%) of 16 hypoechoic lesions were confirmed as prostate cancer. SWE parameters were significantly different among the histopathologic entities (p &lt; 0.001). Prostate cancer was stiffer than benign tissues (p ≤ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve area for diagnosing cancer were 43%, 80.8%, and 0.599, respectively, for a cutoff of S &gt; 43.9 kPa and 60.8%, 66.4%, and 0.653, respectively, for R &gt; 3. Both, S and R showed a significant correlation with Gleason score (r ≥ 0.296, p ≤ 0.008) and were significantly different between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (p ≤ 0.006). Shear wave elastographic parameters are significantly different between prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue and correlate with Gleason score.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Genitourinary Imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>방사선과학</subject><issn>1229-6929</issn><issn>2005-8330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFH8AFWeLCJak9thObA1JVUajUCgnK2XKdSTe72XixnaL997hdKNDTyPb3xjPvEfKas1oIqU_Wq1gD47Lmqha1kM0zsgDGVKWFYM_JggOYqjFgDslRSivGwDAtX5BDkFoKEGZBrr4t0UX6090hxdGlHG6j2y53tA-RdpjR5yFMNPR0G0PKLiP1bvIY31NXrnAcNsPk4o6mPHe7l-Sgd2PCV7_rMfl-_vH67HN1-eXTxdnpZeUVNLnqHEKHbc-EUYis9cL7vrnpykG1jDUAsnGt0n3jO-NNx3wrtWe6MRoBGxDH5N2-7xR7u_aDDW54qLfBrqM9_Xp9YVuuJPCCftij2_lmg53HKUc32m0cNmXsB-H_L9OwLG3urGQgmBJ__yoG_JgxZbsZksdxdBOGOVleVmrBcGUK-vYJugpznIoTFlrQ0CqQslB8T_niaIrYPw7Dmb3P1ZZc7X2upbcVtuRaNG_-3eJR8SdI8QtNS5-G</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Woo, Sungmin</creator><creator>Kim, Sang Youn</creator><creator>Cho, Jeong Yeon</creator><creator>Kim, Seung Hyup</creator><general>The Korean Society of Radiology</general><general>대한영상의학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study</title><author>Woo, Sungmin ; Kim, Sang Youn ; Cho, Jeong Yeon ; Kim, Seung Hyup</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Genitourinary Imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>방사선과학</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woo, Sungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Youn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seung Hyup</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Korean journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woo, Sungmin</au><au>Kim, Sang Youn</au><au>Cho, Jeong Yeon</au><au>Kim, Seung Hyup</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study</atitle><jtitle>Korean journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Korean J Radiol</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>346-355</pages><issn>1229-6929</issn><eissn>2005-8330</eissn><abstract>To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection. In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen &gt; 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core biopsy followed by targeted biopsy at hypoechoic areas on grey-scale ultrasound. Prior to biopsy, SWE was performed by placing two circular 5 mm-sized regions of interest (ROIs) along the estimated biopsy tract in each sector and one ROI for hypoechoic lesions. SWE parameters, S (mean stiffness) and R (mean stiffness ratio), were calculated and compared regarding different histopathologic tissues and their accuracy for diagnosing prostate cancer was analyzed. SWE parameters were correlated with Gleason score and were compared between indolent (&lt; 8) and aggressive (≥ 8) tissues in prostate cancer patients. Prostate cancer was detected in 7.5% of 1058 cores in 29.9% of 87 patients. Seven (43.8%) of 16 hypoechoic lesions were confirmed as prostate cancer. SWE parameters were significantly different among the histopathologic entities (p &lt; 0.001). Prostate cancer was stiffer than benign tissues (p ≤ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve area for diagnosing cancer were 43%, 80.8%, and 0.599, respectively, for a cutoff of S &gt; 43.9 kPa and 60.8%, 66.4%, and 0.653, respectively, for R &gt; 3. Both, S and R showed a significant correlation with Gleason score (r ≥ 0.296, p ≤ 0.008) and were significantly different between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (p ≤ 0.006). Shear wave elastographic parameters are significantly different between prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue and correlate with Gleason score.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Society of Radiology</pub><pmid>24843239</pmid><doi>10.3348/kjr.2014.15.3.346</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1229-6929
ispartof Korean Journal of Radiology, 2014, 15(3), , pp.346-355
issn 1229-6929
2005-8330
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_715421
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods
Genitourinary Imaging
Humans
Male
Medical screening
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Pathology
Patients
Prostate - diagnostic imaging
Prostate - pathology
Prostate cancer
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods
방사선과학
title Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A58%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shear%20wave%20elastography%20for%20detection%20of%20prostate%20cancer:%20a%20preliminary%20study&rft.jtitle=Korean%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Woo,%20Sungmin&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=346-355&rft.issn=1229-6929&rft.eissn=2005-8330&rft_id=info:doi/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.3.346&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E2728275244%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728275244&rft_id=info:pmid/24843239&rfr_iscdi=true