Loading…
Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study
To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection. In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen > 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core...
Saved in:
Published in: | Korean journal of radiology 2014, 15(3), , pp.346-355 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623 |
container_end_page | 355 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 346 |
container_title | Korean journal of radiology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Woo, Sungmin Kim, Sang Youn Cho, Jeong Yeon Kim, Seung Hyup |
description | To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection.
In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen > 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core biopsy followed by targeted biopsy at hypoechoic areas on grey-scale ultrasound. Prior to biopsy, SWE was performed by placing two circular 5 mm-sized regions of interest (ROIs) along the estimated biopsy tract in each sector and one ROI for hypoechoic lesions. SWE parameters, S (mean stiffness) and R (mean stiffness ratio), were calculated and compared regarding different histopathologic tissues and their accuracy for diagnosing prostate cancer was analyzed. SWE parameters were correlated with Gleason score and were compared between indolent (< 8) and aggressive (≥ 8) tissues in prostate cancer patients.
Prostate cancer was detected in 7.5% of 1058 cores in 29.9% of 87 patients. Seven (43.8%) of 16 hypoechoic lesions were confirmed as prostate cancer. SWE parameters were significantly different among the histopathologic entities (p < 0.001). Prostate cancer was stiffer than benign tissues (p ≤ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve area for diagnosing cancer were 43%, 80.8%, and 0.599, respectively, for a cutoff of S > 43.9 kPa and 60.8%, 66.4%, and 0.653, respectively, for R > 3. Both, S and R showed a significant correlation with Gleason score (r ≥ 0.296, p ≤ 0.008) and were significantly different between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (p ≤ 0.006).
Shear wave elastographic parameters are significantly different between prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue and correlate with Gleason score. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.3.346 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_715421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2728275244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFH8AFWeLCJak9thObA1JVUajUCgnK2XKdSTe72XixnaL997hdKNDTyPb3xjPvEfKas1oIqU_Wq1gD47Lmqha1kM0zsgDGVKWFYM_JggOYqjFgDslRSivGwDAtX5BDkFoKEGZBrr4t0UX6090hxdGlHG6j2y53tA-RdpjR5yFMNPR0G0PKLiP1bvIY31NXrnAcNsPk4o6mPHe7l-Sgd2PCV7_rMfl-_vH67HN1-eXTxdnpZeUVNLnqHEKHbc-EUYis9cL7vrnpykG1jDUAsnGt0n3jO-NNx3wrtWe6MRoBGxDH5N2-7xR7u_aDDW54qLfBrqM9_Xp9YVuuJPCCftij2_lmg53HKUc32m0cNmXsB-H_L9OwLG3urGQgmBJ__yoG_JgxZbsZksdxdBOGOVleVmrBcGUK-vYJugpznIoTFlrQ0CqQslB8T_niaIrYPw7Dmb3P1ZZc7X2upbcVtuRaNG_-3eJR8SdI8QtNS5-G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728275244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Woo, Sungmin ; Kim, Sang Youn ; Cho, Jeong Yeon ; Kim, Seung Hyup</creator><creatorcontrib>Woo, Sungmin ; Kim, Sang Youn ; Cho, Jeong Yeon ; Kim, Seung Hyup</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection.
In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen > 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core biopsy followed by targeted biopsy at hypoechoic areas on grey-scale ultrasound. Prior to biopsy, SWE was performed by placing two circular 5 mm-sized regions of interest (ROIs) along the estimated biopsy tract in each sector and one ROI for hypoechoic lesions. SWE parameters, S (mean stiffness) and R (mean stiffness ratio), were calculated and compared regarding different histopathologic tissues and their accuracy for diagnosing prostate cancer was analyzed. SWE parameters were correlated with Gleason score and were compared between indolent (< 8) and aggressive (≥ 8) tissues in prostate cancer patients.
Prostate cancer was detected in 7.5% of 1058 cores in 29.9% of 87 patients. Seven (43.8%) of 16 hypoechoic lesions were confirmed as prostate cancer. SWE parameters were significantly different among the histopathologic entities (p < 0.001). Prostate cancer was stiffer than benign tissues (p ≤ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve area for diagnosing cancer were 43%, 80.8%, and 0.599, respectively, for a cutoff of S > 43.9 kPa and 60.8%, 66.4%, and 0.653, respectively, for R > 3. Both, S and R showed a significant correlation with Gleason score (r ≥ 0.296, p ≤ 0.008) and were significantly different between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (p ≤ 0.006).
Shear wave elastographic parameters are significantly different between prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue and correlate with Gleason score.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1229-6929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2005-8330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.3.346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24843239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Society of Radiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Genitourinary Imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Pathology ; Patients ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Software ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods ; 방사선과학</subject><ispartof>Korean Journal of Radiology, 2014, 15(3), , pp.346-355</ispartof><rights>2014. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Radiology 2014</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728275244/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728275244?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24843239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001880376$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woo, Sungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Youn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seung Hyup</creatorcontrib><title>Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study</title><title>Korean journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Korean J Radiol</addtitle><description>To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection.
In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen > 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core biopsy followed by targeted biopsy at hypoechoic areas on grey-scale ultrasound. Prior to biopsy, SWE was performed by placing two circular 5 mm-sized regions of interest (ROIs) along the estimated biopsy tract in each sector and one ROI for hypoechoic lesions. SWE parameters, S (mean stiffness) and R (mean stiffness ratio), were calculated and compared regarding different histopathologic tissues and their accuracy for diagnosing prostate cancer was analyzed. SWE parameters were correlated with Gleason score and were compared between indolent (< 8) and aggressive (≥ 8) tissues in prostate cancer patients.
Prostate cancer was detected in 7.5% of 1058 cores in 29.9% of 87 patients. Seven (43.8%) of 16 hypoechoic lesions were confirmed as prostate cancer. SWE parameters were significantly different among the histopathologic entities (p < 0.001). Prostate cancer was stiffer than benign tissues (p ≤ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve area for diagnosing cancer were 43%, 80.8%, and 0.599, respectively, for a cutoff of S > 43.9 kPa and 60.8%, 66.4%, and 0.653, respectively, for R > 3. Both, S and R showed a significant correlation with Gleason score (r ≥ 0.296, p ≤ 0.008) and were significantly different between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (p ≤ 0.006).
Shear wave elastographic parameters are significantly different between prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue and correlate with Gleason score.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Genitourinary Imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>방사선과학</subject><issn>1229-6929</issn><issn>2005-8330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFH8AFWeLCJak9thObA1JVUajUCgnK2XKdSTe72XixnaL997hdKNDTyPb3xjPvEfKas1oIqU_Wq1gD47Lmqha1kM0zsgDGVKWFYM_JggOYqjFgDslRSivGwDAtX5BDkFoKEGZBrr4t0UX6090hxdGlHG6j2y53tA-RdpjR5yFMNPR0G0PKLiP1bvIY31NXrnAcNsPk4o6mPHe7l-Sgd2PCV7_rMfl-_vH67HN1-eXTxdnpZeUVNLnqHEKHbc-EUYis9cL7vrnpykG1jDUAsnGt0n3jO-NNx3wrtWe6MRoBGxDH5N2-7xR7u_aDDW54qLfBrqM9_Xp9YVuuJPCCftij2_lmg53HKUc32m0cNmXsB-H_L9OwLG3urGQgmBJ__yoG_JgxZbsZksdxdBOGOVleVmrBcGUK-vYJugpznIoTFlrQ0CqQslB8T_niaIrYPw7Dmb3P1ZZc7X2upbcVtuRaNG_-3eJR8SdI8QtNS5-G</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Woo, Sungmin</creator><creator>Kim, Sang Youn</creator><creator>Cho, Jeong Yeon</creator><creator>Kim, Seung Hyup</creator><general>The Korean Society of Radiology</general><general>대한영상의학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study</title><author>Woo, Sungmin ; Kim, Sang Youn ; Cho, Jeong Yeon ; Kim, Seung Hyup</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Genitourinary Imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>방사선과학</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woo, Sungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Youn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seung Hyup</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Korean journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woo, Sungmin</au><au>Kim, Sang Youn</au><au>Cho, Jeong Yeon</au><au>Kim, Seung Hyup</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study</atitle><jtitle>Korean journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Korean J Radiol</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>346-355</pages><issn>1229-6929</issn><eissn>2005-8330</eissn><abstract>To assess the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for prostate cancer detection.
In this retrospective study, 87 patients with the suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen > 4 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination) underwent a protocol-based systematic 12-core biopsy followed by targeted biopsy at hypoechoic areas on grey-scale ultrasound. Prior to biopsy, SWE was performed by placing two circular 5 mm-sized regions of interest (ROIs) along the estimated biopsy tract in each sector and one ROI for hypoechoic lesions. SWE parameters, S (mean stiffness) and R (mean stiffness ratio), were calculated and compared regarding different histopathologic tissues and their accuracy for diagnosing prostate cancer was analyzed. SWE parameters were correlated with Gleason score and were compared between indolent (< 8) and aggressive (≥ 8) tissues in prostate cancer patients.
Prostate cancer was detected in 7.5% of 1058 cores in 29.9% of 87 patients. Seven (43.8%) of 16 hypoechoic lesions were confirmed as prostate cancer. SWE parameters were significantly different among the histopathologic entities (p < 0.001). Prostate cancer was stiffer than benign tissues (p ≤ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve area for diagnosing cancer were 43%, 80.8%, and 0.599, respectively, for a cutoff of S > 43.9 kPa and 60.8%, 66.4%, and 0.653, respectively, for R > 3. Both, S and R showed a significant correlation with Gleason score (r ≥ 0.296, p ≤ 0.008) and were significantly different between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (p ≤ 0.006).
Shear wave elastographic parameters are significantly different between prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue and correlate with Gleason score.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Society of Radiology</pub><pmid>24843239</pmid><doi>10.3348/kjr.2014.15.3.346</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1229-6929 |
ispartof | Korean Journal of Radiology, 2014, 15(3), , pp.346-355 |
issn | 1229-6929 2005-8330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_715421 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biopsy Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods Genitourinary Imaging Humans Male Medical screening Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Pathology Patients Prostate - diagnostic imaging Prostate - pathology Prostate cancer Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Retrospective Studies ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Software Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods 방사선과학 |
title | Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A58%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shear%20wave%20elastography%20for%20detection%20of%20prostate%20cancer:%20a%20preliminary%20study&rft.jtitle=Korean%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Woo,%20Sungmin&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=346-355&rft.issn=1229-6929&rft.eissn=2005-8330&rft_id=info:doi/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.3.346&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E2728275244%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dae2de7f0395ee07c3ccf6bd5ee570062246a758f6cd9c9d0c748c08698e2e623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728275244&rft_id=info:pmid/24843239&rfr_iscdi=true |