Loading…

The Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores With Postoperative Improvements in Physical Function After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Objective Assess preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores and differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods After Institutional Re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurospine 2020, 17(2), , pp.398-406
Main Authors: Parrish, James M., Jenkins, Nathaniel W., Hrynewycz, Nadia M., Brundage, Thomas S., Singh, Kern
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-736c61e104a3e42af75de6afbc653820b49963a8567c55dda36ddab142f4e9013
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-736c61e104a3e42af75de6afbc653820b49963a8567c55dda36ddab142f4e9013
container_end_page 406
container_issue 2
container_start_page 398
container_title Neurospine
container_volume 17
creator Parrish, James M.
Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
Brundage, Thomas S.
Singh, Kern
description Objective Assess preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores and differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, a prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective spine surgeries of nontraumatic, degenerative pathology between 2015–2018. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision, single-level ACDF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative surveys were excluded. A preoperative PROMIS score cutoff of 35 divided patients into PROMIS-PF score categories (e.g., ≥ 35.0, < 35.0). Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated with chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression analyzed PROMIS-PF score improvement. Results Eighty-six patients were selected, the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups only differed in mean age (49.1 vs. 41.3, p = 0.002). Significant differences in PROMIS-PF scores were observed among high and low preoperative PROMIS-PF score subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.006), 12 weeks (p = 0.006), and 6 months (p = 0.014). Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores were significantly different between the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year (p = 0.038). A significant negative association was observed between preoperative PROMIS scores and magnitude of improvement at the 6-week postoperative time point (slope = -0.6291, p < 0.001). Conclusion Patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores demonstrated greater improvements at 6 weeks and 1 year. Clinicians should consider patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores to be in the unique position to potentially experience larger postoperative improvement magnitudes than patients with higher preoperative PROMIS-PF scores.
doi_str_mv 10.14245/ns.1938352.176
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nrf_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9519599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_817ae4da49c94b8b9c5bf819d5cfedab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9519599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-736c61e104a3e42af75de6afbc653820b49963a8567c55dda36ddab142f4e9013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkk1v1DAQhi0EotXSM1dfOew2jj8SX5CWhdJIRV1tF3G0HGfSmCZ2ZKeL9o_we2uyVVEvM9bMM6_GoxehjyRbEZYzfuniikhaUp6vSCHeoPOcl2IpuCRvX94lPUMXMdo6Y6zgjFLyHp3RPOOMMHKO_u47wDvo9WS9i50d8ReY_gA4vA3gRwipcQC83d3-qO7wnfEBIv5lpw5vfZz-A9UwBn-AAdwUsU3T3TFao3t89ejMP228bicIeO1StD7gDYTDDHy10YCZ_HDE2jWJj4n-gN61uo9w8ZwX6OfVt_3menlz-73arG-WhhXZtCyoMIIAyZimwHLdFrwBodvaCE7LPKuZlILqkovCcN40mooU6nS9loHMCF2gTyddF1r1YKzy2s753quHoNa7faUkJ5JLmdjqxDZe_1ZjsIMOx3lgLvhwr3SYrOlBlaTQwBrNpJGsLmtpeN2WRDbctJAWSFqfT1rjYz1AY9LZgu5fib7uONulnQ6qoLSU6XMLdHkSMMHHGKB9mSWZmt2hXFTP7lDJHfQJ5JqwJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores With Postoperative Improvements in Physical Function After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Parrish, James M. ; Jenkins, Nathaniel W. ; Hrynewycz, Nadia M. ; Brundage, Thomas S. ; Singh, Kern</creator><creatorcontrib>Parrish, James M. ; Jenkins, Nathaniel W. ; Hrynewycz, Nadia M. ; Brundage, Thomas S. ; Singh, Kern</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Assess preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores and differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, a prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective spine surgeries of nontraumatic, degenerative pathology between 2015–2018. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision, single-level ACDF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative surveys were excluded. A preoperative PROMIS score cutoff of 35 divided patients into PROMIS-PF score categories (e.g., ≥ 35.0, &lt; 35.0). Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated with chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression analyzed PROMIS-PF score improvement. Results Eighty-six patients were selected, the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups only differed in mean age (49.1 vs. 41.3, p = 0.002). Significant differences in PROMIS-PF scores were observed among high and low preoperative PROMIS-PF score subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.006), 12 weeks (p = 0.006), and 6 months (p = 0.014). Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores were significantly different between the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year (p = 0.038). A significant negative association was observed between preoperative PROMIS scores and magnitude of improvement at the 6-week postoperative time point (slope = -0.6291, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores demonstrated greater improvements at 6 weeks and 1 year. Clinicians should consider patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores to be in the unique position to potentially experience larger postoperative improvement magnitudes than patients with higher preoperative PROMIS-PF scores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2586-6583</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2586-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14245/ns.1938352.176</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32054141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society</publisher><subject>anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ; Original ; pain measurement ; patient-reported outcome measures ; patient-reported outcomes measurement information system ; spine ; 신경외과학</subject><ispartof>Neurospine, 2020, 17(2), , pp.398-406</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-736c61e104a3e42af75de6afbc653820b49963a8567c55dda36ddab142f4e9013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-736c61e104a3e42af75de6afbc653820b49963a8567c55dda36ddab142f4e9013</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6118-7273</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338965/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338965/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002603158$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parrish, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Nathaniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hrynewycz, Nadia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brundage, Thomas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Kern</creatorcontrib><title>The Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores With Postoperative Improvements in Physical Function After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion</title><title>Neurospine</title><description>Objective Assess preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores and differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, a prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective spine surgeries of nontraumatic, degenerative pathology between 2015–2018. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision, single-level ACDF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative surveys were excluded. A preoperative PROMIS score cutoff of 35 divided patients into PROMIS-PF score categories (e.g., ≥ 35.0, &lt; 35.0). Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated with chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression analyzed PROMIS-PF score improvement. Results Eighty-six patients were selected, the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups only differed in mean age (49.1 vs. 41.3, p = 0.002). Significant differences in PROMIS-PF scores were observed among high and low preoperative PROMIS-PF score subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.006), 12 weeks (p = 0.006), and 6 months (p = 0.014). Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores were significantly different between the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year (p = 0.038). A significant negative association was observed between preoperative PROMIS scores and magnitude of improvement at the 6-week postoperative time point (slope = -0.6291, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores demonstrated greater improvements at 6 weeks and 1 year. Clinicians should consider patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores to be in the unique position to potentially experience larger postoperative improvement magnitudes than patients with higher preoperative PROMIS-PF scores.</description><subject>anterior cervical discectomy and fusion</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>pain measurement</subject><subject>patient-reported outcome measures</subject><subject>patient-reported outcomes measurement information system</subject><subject>spine</subject><subject>신경외과학</subject><issn>2586-6583</issn><issn>2586-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkk1v1DAQhi0EotXSM1dfOew2jj8SX5CWhdJIRV1tF3G0HGfSmCZ2ZKeL9o_we2uyVVEvM9bMM6_GoxehjyRbEZYzfuniikhaUp6vSCHeoPOcl2IpuCRvX94lPUMXMdo6Y6zgjFLyHp3RPOOMMHKO_u47wDvo9WS9i50d8ReY_gA4vA3gRwipcQC83d3-qO7wnfEBIv5lpw5vfZz-A9UwBn-AAdwUsU3T3TFao3t89ejMP228bicIeO1StD7gDYTDDHy10YCZ_HDE2jWJj4n-gN61uo9w8ZwX6OfVt_3menlz-73arG-WhhXZtCyoMIIAyZimwHLdFrwBodvaCE7LPKuZlILqkovCcN40mooU6nS9loHMCF2gTyddF1r1YKzy2s753quHoNa7faUkJ5JLmdjqxDZe_1ZjsIMOx3lgLvhwr3SYrOlBlaTQwBrNpJGsLmtpeN2WRDbctJAWSFqfT1rjYz1AY9LZgu5fib7uONulnQ6qoLSU6XMLdHkSMMHHGKB9mSWZmt2hXFTP7lDJHfQJ5JqwJw</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Parrish, James M.</creator><creator>Jenkins, Nathaniel W.</creator><creator>Hrynewycz, Nadia M.</creator><creator>Brundage, Thomas S.</creator><creator>Singh, Kern</creator><general>Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society</general><general>대한척추신경외과학회</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-7273</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>The Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores With Postoperative Improvements in Physical Function After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion</title><author>Parrish, James M. ; Jenkins, Nathaniel W. ; Hrynewycz, Nadia M. ; Brundage, Thomas S. ; Singh, Kern</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-736c61e104a3e42af75de6afbc653820b49963a8567c55dda36ddab142f4e9013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>anterior cervical discectomy and fusion</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>pain measurement</topic><topic>patient-reported outcome measures</topic><topic>patient-reported outcomes measurement information system</topic><topic>spine</topic><topic>신경외과학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parrish, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Nathaniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hrynewycz, Nadia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brundage, Thomas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Kern</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Neurospine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parrish, James M.</au><au>Jenkins, Nathaniel W.</au><au>Hrynewycz, Nadia M.</au><au>Brundage, Thomas S.</au><au>Singh, Kern</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores With Postoperative Improvements in Physical Function After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion</atitle><jtitle>Neurospine</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>398</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>398-406</pages><issn>2586-6583</issn><eissn>2586-6591</eissn><abstract>Objective Assess preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores and differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, a prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective spine surgeries of nontraumatic, degenerative pathology between 2015–2018. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision, single-level ACDF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative surveys were excluded. A preoperative PROMIS score cutoff of 35 divided patients into PROMIS-PF score categories (e.g., ≥ 35.0, &lt; 35.0). Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated with chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression analyzed PROMIS-PF score improvement. Results Eighty-six patients were selected, the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups only differed in mean age (49.1 vs. 41.3, p = 0.002). Significant differences in PROMIS-PF scores were observed among high and low preoperative PROMIS-PF score subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.006), 12 weeks (p = 0.006), and 6 months (p = 0.014). Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores were significantly different between the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year (p = 0.038). A significant negative association was observed between preoperative PROMIS scores and magnitude of improvement at the 6-week postoperative time point (slope = -0.6291, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores demonstrated greater improvements at 6 weeks and 1 year. Clinicians should consider patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores to be in the unique position to potentially experience larger postoperative improvement magnitudes than patients with higher preoperative PROMIS-PF scores.</abstract><pub>Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society</pub><pmid>32054141</pmid><doi>10.14245/ns.1938352.176</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-7273</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2586-6583
ispartof Neurospine, 2020, 17(2), , pp.398-406
issn 2586-6583
2586-6591
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9519599
source PubMed Central
subjects anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Original
pain measurement
patient-reported outcome measures
patient-reported outcomes measurement information system
spine
신경외과학
title The Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores With Postoperative Improvements in Physical Function After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A09%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nrf_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Relationship%20Between%20Preoperative%20PROMIS%20Scores%20With%20Postoperative%20Improvements%20in%20Physical%20Function%20After%20Anterior%20Cervical%20Discectomy%20and%20Fusion&rft.jtitle=Neurospine&rft.au=Parrish,%20James%20M.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=398&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=398-406&rft.issn=2586-6583&rft.eissn=2586-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.14245/ns.1938352.176&rft_dat=%3Cnrf_doaj_%3Eoai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9519599%3C/nrf_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-736c61e104a3e42af75de6afbc653820b49963a8567c55dda36ddab142f4e9013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32054141&rfr_iscdi=true