MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy: What Radiologists Should Know

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy, the current gold standard for the detection of prostate cancer, suffers from low sensitivity for clinically significant cancer. The use of diagnostic multiparametric MRI has increased the relevance of targeted biopsy techniques such as MRI-TRUS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Korean journal of radiology 2020, 21(9), , pp.1087-1094
Main Authors: Das, Chandan J, Netaji, Arjunlokesh, Razik, Abdul, Verma, Sadhna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Biopsy
Genitourinary Imaging
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy - methods
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound, High-Intensity Focused, Transrectal - methods
Work stations
방사선과학
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-70be95c4613fcc84a0fa3ab467b9c7f0e437614279a279014acf236dfaaa94193
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-70be95c4613fcc84a0fa3ab467b9c7f0e437614279a279014acf236dfaaa94193
container_end_page 1094
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1087
container_title Korean journal of radiology
container_volume 21
creator Das, Chandan J
Netaji, Arjunlokesh
Razik, Abdul
Verma, Sadhna
description Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy, the current gold standard for the detection of prostate cancer, suffers from low sensitivity for clinically significant cancer. The use of diagnostic multiparametric MRI has increased the relevance of targeted biopsy techniques such as MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy and direct (in-bore) MRI-guided biopsy, which have higher detection rate for clinically significant cancer. Although primarily used in patients who remain at high clinical suspicion for prostate cancer despite a negative systematic biopsy, with the increasing use of upfront diagnostic MRI, these biopsies are expected to replace routine systematic biopsies. This pictorial essay aims to enhance our understanding of the concepts of these biopsy techniques so that they can be performed safely and provide maximum diagnostic yield.
doi_str_mv 10.3348/kjr.2019.0817
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9553285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2728159804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-70be95c4613fcc84a0fa3ab467b9c7f0e437614279a279014acf236dfaaa94193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9P2zAUxy00NEq3I9cp0i7skM6_EsdDQurQgGqdQKWIo_XqOG3aNC52wsR_j9NCxXaw3sEff_3e-yB0QvCAMZ59Xy3dgGIiBzgj4gD1KMZJnDGGP6AeoVTGqaTyCB17v8SYSpzxj-iI0VSShPMeOvszGcVTcHPTmDy6ddY30JjoZ2k3_vlH9LCAJppAXtrKzkvf-OhuYdsqj37X9u8ndFhA5c3n19pH95e_phfX8fjmanQxHMeac9nEAs-MTDRPCSu0zjjgAhjMeCpmUosCG85ESjgVEsLBhIMuKEvzAgAkJ5L10bddbu0KtdKlslBu69yqlVPDyXSkZJIwmiWBPd-xm3a2Nrk2deOgUhtXrsE9b1_-e1OXi5DzpAQTJCUiBJy-Bjj72BrfqHXptakqqI1tvaKcJqFJybu_vv6HLm3r6rAKRQXNSCIzzAMV7ygdluudKfbNEKw6hSooVJ1C1SkM_Jf3E-zpN2fsBRbdlc0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728159804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy: What Radiologists Should Know</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Das, Chandan J ; Netaji, Arjunlokesh ; Razik, Abdul ; Verma, Sadhna</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Chandan J ; Netaji, Arjunlokesh ; Razik, Abdul ; Verma, Sadhna</creatorcontrib><description>Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy, the current gold standard for the detection of prostate cancer, suffers from low sensitivity for clinically significant cancer. The use of diagnostic multiparametric MRI has increased the relevance of targeted biopsy techniques such as MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy and direct (in-bore) MRI-guided biopsy, which have higher detection rate for clinically significant cancer. Although primarily used in patients who remain at high clinical suspicion for prostate cancer despite a negative systematic biopsy, with the increasing use of upfront diagnostic MRI, these biopsies are expected to replace routine systematic biopsies. This pictorial essay aims to enhance our understanding of the concepts of these biopsy techniques so that they can be performed safely and provide maximum diagnostic yield.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1229-6929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2005-8330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0817</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32691544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Society of Radiology</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biopsy ; Genitourinary Imaging ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy - methods ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound, High-Intensity Focused, Transrectal - methods ; Work stations ; 방사선과학</subject><ispartof>Korean Journal of Radiology, 2020, 21(9), , pp.1087-1094</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society of Radiology.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society of Radiology 2020 The Korean Society of Radiology</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-70be95c4613fcc84a0fa3ab467b9c7f0e437614279a279014acf236dfaaa94193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-70be95c4613fcc84a0fa3ab467b9c7f0e437614279a279014acf236dfaaa94193</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6505-5940 ; 0000-0001-6692-0924 ; 0000-0002-3459-9467 ; 0000-0002-4720-2131</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728159804/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728159804?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32691544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002615019$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Chandan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netaji, Arjunlokesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razik, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Sadhna</creatorcontrib><title>MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy: What Radiologists Should Know</title><title>Korean journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Korean J Radiol</addtitle><description>Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy, the current gold standard for the detection of prostate cancer, suffers from low sensitivity for clinically significant cancer. The use of diagnostic multiparametric MRI has increased the relevance of targeted biopsy techniques such as MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy and direct (in-bore) MRI-guided biopsy, which have higher detection rate for clinically significant cancer. Although primarily used in patients who remain at high clinical suspicion for prostate cancer despite a negative systematic biopsy, with the increasing use of upfront diagnostic MRI, these biopsies are expected to replace routine systematic biopsies. This pictorial essay aims to enhance our understanding of the concepts of these biopsy techniques so that they can be performed safely and provide maximum diagnostic yield.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Genitourinary Imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound, High-Intensity Focused, Transrectal - methods</subject><subject>Work stations</subject><subject>방사선과학</subject><issn>1229-6929</issn><issn>2005-8330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9P2zAUxy00NEq3I9cp0i7skM6_EsdDQurQgGqdQKWIo_XqOG3aNC52wsR_j9NCxXaw3sEff_3e-yB0QvCAMZ59Xy3dgGIiBzgj4gD1KMZJnDGGP6AeoVTGqaTyCB17v8SYSpzxj-iI0VSShPMeOvszGcVTcHPTmDy6ddY30JjoZ2k3_vlH9LCAJppAXtrKzkvf-OhuYdsqj37X9u8ndFhA5c3n19pH95e_phfX8fjmanQxHMeac9nEAs-MTDRPCSu0zjjgAhjMeCpmUosCG85ESjgVEsLBhIMuKEvzAgAkJ5L10bddbu0KtdKlslBu69yqlVPDyXSkZJIwmiWBPd-xm3a2Nrk2deOgUhtXrsE9b1_-e1OXi5DzpAQTJCUiBJy-Bjj72BrfqHXptakqqI1tvaKcJqFJybu_vv6HLm3r6rAKRQXNSCIzzAMV7ygdluudKfbNEKw6hSooVJ1C1SkM_Jf3E-zpN2fsBRbdlc0</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Das, Chandan J</creator><creator>Netaji, Arjunlokesh</creator><creator>Razik, Abdul</creator><creator>Verma, Sadhna</creator><general>The Korean Society of Radiology</general><general>대한영상의학회</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6505-5940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6692-0924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-9467</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4720-2131</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy: What Radiologists Should Know</title><author>Das, Chandan J ; Netaji, Arjunlokesh ; Razik, Abdul ; Verma, Sadhna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-70be95c4613fcc84a0fa3ab467b9c7f0e437614279a279014acf236dfaaa94193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Genitourinary Imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound, High-Intensity Focused, Transrectal - methods</topic><topic>Work stations</topic><topic>방사선과학</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Chandan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netaji, Arjunlokesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razik, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Sadhna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Korean journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Chandan J</au><au>Netaji, Arjunlokesh</au><au>Razik, Abdul</au><au>Verma, Sadhna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy: What Radiologists Should Know</atitle><jtitle>Korean journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Korean J Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1094</epage><pages>1087-1094</pages><issn>1229-6929</issn><eissn>2005-8330</eissn><abstract>Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy, the current gold standard for the detection of prostate cancer, suffers from low sensitivity for clinically significant cancer. The use of diagnostic multiparametric MRI has increased the relevance of targeted biopsy techniques such as MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy and direct (in-bore) MRI-guided biopsy, which have higher detection rate for clinically significant cancer. Although primarily used in patients who remain at high clinical suspicion for prostate cancer despite a negative systematic biopsy, with the increasing use of upfront diagnostic MRI, these biopsies are expected to replace routine systematic biopsies. This pictorial essay aims to enhance our understanding of the concepts of these biopsy techniques so that they can be performed safely and provide maximum diagnostic yield.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Society of Radiology</pub><pmid>32691544</pmid><doi>10.3348/kjr.2019.0817</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6505-5940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6692-0924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-9467</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4720-2131</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1229-6929
ispartof Korean Journal of Radiology, 2020, 21(9), , pp.1087-1094
issn 1229-6929
2005-8330
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9553285
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Aged
Biopsy
Genitourinary Imaging
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy - methods
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound, High-Intensity Focused, Transrectal - methods
Work stations
방사선과학
title MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy: What Radiologists Should Know
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MRI-Targeted%20Prostate%20Biopsy:%20What%20Radiologists%20Should%20Know&rft.jtitle=Korean%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Das,%20Chandan%20J&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1094&rft.pages=1087-1094&rft.issn=1229-6929&rft.eissn=2005-8330&rft_id=info:doi/10.3348/kjr.2019.0817&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E2728159804%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-70be95c4613fcc84a0fa3ab467b9c7f0e437614279a279014acf236dfaaa94193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728159804&rft_id=info:pmid/32691544&rfr_iscdi=true