Loading…

Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners

The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts. In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Imaging science in dentistry 2021, 51(1), , pp.63-71
Main Authors: Sonesson, Mikael, Al-Qabandi, Fahad, Månsson, Sven, Abdulraheem, Salem, Bondemark, Lars, Hellén-Halme, Kristina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title Imaging science in dentistry
container_volume 51
creator Sonesson, Mikael
Al-Qabandi, Fahad
Månsson, Sven
Abdulraheem, Salem
Bondemark, Lars
Hellén-Halme, Kristina
description The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts. In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used. Twelve orthodontic appliances were attached to the study casts and scanned. Turbo spin echo (TSE), TSE with high readout bandwidth, and TSE with view angle tilting and slice encoding for metal artefact correction were used to suppress metal artefacts. Artefacts were measured. In vivo, 6 appliances were scanned: 1) conventional stainless-steel brackets; 2) nickel-free brackets; 3) titanium brackets; 4) a Herbst appliance; 5) a fixed retainer; and 6) a rapid maxillary expander. The maxilla, mandible, nasopharynx, tongue, temporomandibular joints, and cranial base/eye globes were assessed. Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicated no artefacts and minor, moderate, and major artefacts, respectively. In vitro, titanium brackets and the fixed retainer created minor artefacts. In vivo, titanium brackets caused minor artefacts. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel free brackets, the fixed retainer, and the rapid maxillary expander caused major artefacts in the maxilla and mandible. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel-free brackets caused major artefacts in the eye globe (3-T). TSE with high readout bandwidth reduced image artefacts in both scanners. Titanium brackets, the Herbst appliance, and the fixed retainer caused minor artefacts in images of neurocranial structures (1.5-T and 3-T) when using TSE with high readout bandwidth.
doi_str_mv 10.5624/isd.20200199
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9764268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2510254501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSG2fkI0hs8Pd6OSBF5atSUKUqcB05tjc13diLvRvIv8ckbaAHLI3Glp95PWO9VfWc4JmQlL_x2c4ophiTtn1UnVLKWN0ohh8f95SeVOc5f8dlCaoaSZ5WJ4wpqlrJTqvpKo030cYweoP0MPReB-My0sGiL9fIb_TaIZ1G12kz5rdoHpD7NfQx6TGmHfIBbf2Y4p7fH7YR5XGyOzRlH9aIzES93N-ykrPRIbiUn1VPOt1nd36Xz6qvHz8sLz7Xi6tPlxfzRW0E5WNN2Upha6kRwhHFiVatca3rOKakw5JLIzpGpBVmZVpJhMLONlZZg7uuYU3HzqpXB92QOrg1HqL2-7yOcJtgfr28hLaRnEpV2MWBzT_dMK1gSGX4tNuX9NNQYlUCsoOWcC5bqUE7yoBzwWClFQVCsGmsZpxiWeRe_1fuvf82h5jWsNETFLoVBX93wAu7cda4MCbdP6h6eBP8TZliCwrjpvxHEXh5J5Dij8nlETY-G9f3Org4ZaCCYCq4wORvaybFnJPrjs8QDH9sBcVWcG-rgr_4t7UjfG8i9hvBbce-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2510254501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sonesson, Mikael ; Al-Qabandi, Fahad ; Månsson, Sven ; Abdulraheem, Salem ; Bondemark, Lars ; Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Sonesson, Mikael ; Al-Qabandi, Fahad ; Månsson, Sven ; Abdulraheem, Salem ; Bondemark, Lars ; Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts. In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used. Twelve orthodontic appliances were attached to the study casts and scanned. Turbo spin echo (TSE), TSE with high readout bandwidth, and TSE with view angle tilting and slice encoding for metal artefact correction were used to suppress metal artefacts. Artefacts were measured. In vivo, 6 appliances were scanned: 1) conventional stainless-steel brackets; 2) nickel-free brackets; 3) titanium brackets; 4) a Herbst appliance; 5) a fixed retainer; and 6) a rapid maxillary expander. The maxilla, mandible, nasopharynx, tongue, temporomandibular joints, and cranial base/eye globes were assessed. Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicated no artefacts and minor, moderate, and major artefacts, respectively. In vitro, titanium brackets and the fixed retainer created minor artefacts. In vivo, titanium brackets caused minor artefacts. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel free brackets, the fixed retainer, and the rapid maxillary expander caused major artefacts in the maxilla and mandible. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel-free brackets caused major artefacts in the eye globe (3-T). TSE with high readout bandwidth reduced image artefacts in both scanners. Titanium brackets, the Herbst appliance, and the fixed retainer caused minor artefacts in images of neurocranial structures (1.5-T and 3-T) when using TSE with high readout bandwidth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2233-7822</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2233-7830</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2233-7830</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5624/isd.20200199</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33828963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</publisher><subject>Clinical Medicine ; Dentistry ; Klinisk medicin ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medical and Health Sciences ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Odontologi ; Original ; Orthodontic Appliances ; Radiologi och bildbehandling ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging ; Skull ; 치의학</subject><ispartof>Imaging Science in Dentistry, 2021, 51(1), , pp.63-71</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2021 Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9885-0019 ; 0000-0002-4749-1076 ; 0000-0002-1760-0817 ; 0000-0002-5706-5142 ; 0000-0001-5284-8386 ; 0000-0001-8422-9344</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007402/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007402/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-42095$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://lup.lub.lu.se/record/9144696a-ae23-4453-ba82-110c7da34206$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002695908$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sonesson, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Qabandi, Fahad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Månsson, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulraheem, Salem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondemark, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creatorcontrib><title>Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners</title><title>Imaging science in dentistry</title><addtitle>Imaging Sci Dent</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts. In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used. Twelve orthodontic appliances were attached to the study casts and scanned. Turbo spin echo (TSE), TSE with high readout bandwidth, and TSE with view angle tilting and slice encoding for metal artefact correction were used to suppress metal artefacts. Artefacts were measured. In vivo, 6 appliances were scanned: 1) conventional stainless-steel brackets; 2) nickel-free brackets; 3) titanium brackets; 4) a Herbst appliance; 5) a fixed retainer; and 6) a rapid maxillary expander. The maxilla, mandible, nasopharynx, tongue, temporomandibular joints, and cranial base/eye globes were assessed. Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicated no artefacts and minor, moderate, and major artefacts, respectively. In vitro, titanium brackets and the fixed retainer created minor artefacts. In vivo, titanium brackets caused minor artefacts. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel free brackets, the fixed retainer, and the rapid maxillary expander caused major artefacts in the maxilla and mandible. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel-free brackets caused major artefacts in the eye globe (3-T). TSE with high readout bandwidth reduced image artefacts in both scanners. Titanium brackets, the Herbst appliance, and the fixed retainer caused minor artefacts in images of neurocranial structures (1.5-T and 3-T) when using TSE with high readout bandwidth.</description><subject>Clinical Medicine</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Klinisk medicin</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medical and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Odontologi</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliances</subject><subject>Radiologi och bildbehandling</subject><subject>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>치의학</subject><issn>2233-7822</issn><issn>2233-7830</issn><issn>2233-7830</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSG2fkI0hs8Pd6OSBF5atSUKUqcB05tjc13diLvRvIv8ckbaAHLI3Glp95PWO9VfWc4JmQlL_x2c4ophiTtn1UnVLKWN0ohh8f95SeVOc5f8dlCaoaSZ5WJ4wpqlrJTqvpKo030cYweoP0MPReB-My0sGiL9fIb_TaIZ1G12kz5rdoHpD7NfQx6TGmHfIBbf2Y4p7fH7YR5XGyOzRlH9aIzES93N-ykrPRIbiUn1VPOt1nd36Xz6qvHz8sLz7Xi6tPlxfzRW0E5WNN2Upha6kRwhHFiVatca3rOKakw5JLIzpGpBVmZVpJhMLONlZZg7uuYU3HzqpXB92QOrg1HqL2-7yOcJtgfr28hLaRnEpV2MWBzT_dMK1gSGX4tNuX9NNQYlUCsoOWcC5bqUE7yoBzwWClFQVCsGmsZpxiWeRe_1fuvf82h5jWsNETFLoVBX93wAu7cda4MCbdP6h6eBP8TZliCwrjpvxHEXh5J5Dij8nlETY-G9f3Org4ZaCCYCq4wORvaybFnJPrjs8QDH9sBcVWcG-rgr_4t7UjfG8i9hvBbce-</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Sonesson, Mikael</creator><creator>Al-Qabandi, Fahad</creator><creator>Månsson, Sven</creator><creator>Abdulraheem, Salem</creator><creator>Bondemark, Lars</creator><creator>Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creator><general>Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</general><general>대한영상치의학회</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>AGCHP</scope><scope>D95</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-0019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4749-1076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1760-0817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-5142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5284-8386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-9344</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners</title><author>Sonesson, Mikael ; Al-Qabandi, Fahad ; Månsson, Sven ; Abdulraheem, Salem ; Bondemark, Lars ; Hellén-Halme, Kristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical Medicine</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Klinisk medicin</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medical and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Odontologi</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliances</topic><topic>Radiologi och bildbehandling</topic><topic>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>치의학</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sonesson, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Qabandi, Fahad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Månsson, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulraheem, Salem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondemark, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Imaging science in dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sonesson, Mikael</au><au>Al-Qabandi, Fahad</au><au>Månsson, Sven</au><au>Abdulraheem, Salem</au><au>Bondemark, Lars</au><au>Hellén-Halme, Kristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners</atitle><jtitle>Imaging science in dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Imaging Sci Dent</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>63-71</pages><issn>2233-7822</issn><issn>2233-7830</issn><eissn>2233-7830</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts. In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used. Twelve orthodontic appliances were attached to the study casts and scanned. Turbo spin echo (TSE), TSE with high readout bandwidth, and TSE with view angle tilting and slice encoding for metal artefact correction were used to suppress metal artefacts. Artefacts were measured. In vivo, 6 appliances were scanned: 1) conventional stainless-steel brackets; 2) nickel-free brackets; 3) titanium brackets; 4) a Herbst appliance; 5) a fixed retainer; and 6) a rapid maxillary expander. The maxilla, mandible, nasopharynx, tongue, temporomandibular joints, and cranial base/eye globes were assessed. Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicated no artefacts and minor, moderate, and major artefacts, respectively. In vitro, titanium brackets and the fixed retainer created minor artefacts. In vivo, titanium brackets caused minor artefacts. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel free brackets, the fixed retainer, and the rapid maxillary expander caused major artefacts in the maxilla and mandible. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel-free brackets caused major artefacts in the eye globe (3-T). TSE with high readout bandwidth reduced image artefacts in both scanners. Titanium brackets, the Herbst appliance, and the fixed retainer caused minor artefacts in images of neurocranial structures (1.5-T and 3-T) when using TSE with high readout bandwidth.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</pub><pmid>33828963</pmid><doi>10.5624/isd.20200199</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-0019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4749-1076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1760-0817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-5142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5284-8386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-9344</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2233-7822
ispartof Imaging Science in Dentistry, 2021, 51(1), , pp.63-71
issn 2233-7822
2233-7830
2233-7830
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9764268
source PubMed Central
subjects Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Klinisk medicin
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical and Health Sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Odontologi
Original
Orthodontic Appliances
Radiologi och bildbehandling
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Skull
치의학
title Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A09%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orthodontic%20appliances%20and%20MR%20image%20artefacts:%20An%20exploratory%20in%20vitro%20and%20in%20vivo%20study%20using%201.5-T%20and%203-T%20scanners&rft.jtitle=Imaging%20science%20in%20dentistry&rft.au=Sonesson,%20Mikael&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=63-71&rft.issn=2233-7822&rft.eissn=2233-7830&rft_id=info:doi/10.5624/isd.20200199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E2510254501%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2510254501&rft_id=info:pmid/33828963&rfr_iscdi=true