Loading…
Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners
The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts. In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used....
Saved in:
Published in: | Imaging science in dentistry 2021, 51(1), , pp.63-71 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3 |
container_end_page | 71 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Imaging science in dentistry |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Sonesson, Mikael Al-Qabandi, Fahad Månsson, Sven Abdulraheem, Salem Bondemark, Lars Hellén-Halme, Kristina |
description | The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts.
In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used. Twelve orthodontic appliances were attached to the study casts and scanned. Turbo spin echo (TSE), TSE with high readout bandwidth, and TSE with view angle tilting and slice encoding for metal artefact correction were used to suppress metal artefacts. Artefacts were measured. In vivo, 6 appliances were scanned: 1) conventional stainless-steel brackets; 2) nickel-free brackets; 3) titanium brackets; 4) a Herbst appliance; 5) a fixed retainer; and 6) a rapid maxillary expander. The maxilla, mandible, nasopharynx, tongue, temporomandibular joints, and cranial base/eye globes were assessed. Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicated no artefacts and minor, moderate, and major artefacts, respectively.
In vitro, titanium brackets and the fixed retainer created minor artefacts. In vivo, titanium brackets caused minor artefacts. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel free brackets, the fixed retainer, and the rapid maxillary expander caused major artefacts in the maxilla and mandible. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel-free brackets caused major artefacts in the eye globe (3-T). TSE with high readout bandwidth reduced image artefacts in both scanners.
Titanium brackets, the Herbst appliance, and the fixed retainer caused minor artefacts in images of neurocranial structures (1.5-T and 3-T) when using TSE with high readout bandwidth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5624/isd.20200199 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9764268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2510254501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSG2fkI0hs8Pd6OSBF5atSUKUqcB05tjc13diLvRvIv8ckbaAHLI3Glp95PWO9VfWc4JmQlL_x2c4ophiTtn1UnVLKWN0ohh8f95SeVOc5f8dlCaoaSZ5WJ4wpqlrJTqvpKo030cYweoP0MPReB-My0sGiL9fIb_TaIZ1G12kz5rdoHpD7NfQx6TGmHfIBbf2Y4p7fH7YR5XGyOzRlH9aIzES93N-ykrPRIbiUn1VPOt1nd36Xz6qvHz8sLz7Xi6tPlxfzRW0E5WNN2Upha6kRwhHFiVatca3rOKakw5JLIzpGpBVmZVpJhMLONlZZg7uuYU3HzqpXB92QOrg1HqL2-7yOcJtgfr28hLaRnEpV2MWBzT_dMK1gSGX4tNuX9NNQYlUCsoOWcC5bqUE7yoBzwWClFQVCsGmsZpxiWeRe_1fuvf82h5jWsNETFLoVBX93wAu7cda4MCbdP6h6eBP8TZliCwrjpvxHEXh5J5Dij8nlETY-G9f3Org4ZaCCYCq4wORvaybFnJPrjs8QDH9sBcVWcG-rgr_4t7UjfG8i9hvBbce-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2510254501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sonesson, Mikael ; Al-Qabandi, Fahad ; Månsson, Sven ; Abdulraheem, Salem ; Bondemark, Lars ; Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Sonesson, Mikael ; Al-Qabandi, Fahad ; Månsson, Sven ; Abdulraheem, Salem ; Bondemark, Lars ; Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts.
In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used. Twelve orthodontic appliances were attached to the study casts and scanned. Turbo spin echo (TSE), TSE with high readout bandwidth, and TSE with view angle tilting and slice encoding for metal artefact correction were used to suppress metal artefacts. Artefacts were measured. In vivo, 6 appliances were scanned: 1) conventional stainless-steel brackets; 2) nickel-free brackets; 3) titanium brackets; 4) a Herbst appliance; 5) a fixed retainer; and 6) a rapid maxillary expander. The maxilla, mandible, nasopharynx, tongue, temporomandibular joints, and cranial base/eye globes were assessed. Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicated no artefacts and minor, moderate, and major artefacts, respectively.
In vitro, titanium brackets and the fixed retainer created minor artefacts. In vivo, titanium brackets caused minor artefacts. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel free brackets, the fixed retainer, and the rapid maxillary expander caused major artefacts in the maxilla and mandible. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel-free brackets caused major artefacts in the eye globe (3-T). TSE with high readout bandwidth reduced image artefacts in both scanners.
Titanium brackets, the Herbst appliance, and the fixed retainer caused minor artefacts in images of neurocranial structures (1.5-T and 3-T) when using TSE with high readout bandwidth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2233-7822</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2233-7830</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2233-7830</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5624/isd.20200199</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33828963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</publisher><subject>Clinical Medicine ; Dentistry ; Klinisk medicin ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medical and Health Sciences ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Odontologi ; Original ; Orthodontic Appliances ; Radiologi och bildbehandling ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging ; Skull ; 치의학</subject><ispartof>Imaging Science in Dentistry, 2021, 51(1), , pp.63-71</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2021 Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9885-0019 ; 0000-0002-4749-1076 ; 0000-0002-1760-0817 ; 0000-0002-5706-5142 ; 0000-0001-5284-8386 ; 0000-0001-8422-9344</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007402/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007402/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-42095$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://lup.lub.lu.se/record/9144696a-ae23-4453-ba82-110c7da34206$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002695908$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sonesson, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Qabandi, Fahad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Månsson, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulraheem, Salem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondemark, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creatorcontrib><title>Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners</title><title>Imaging science in dentistry</title><addtitle>Imaging Sci Dent</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts.
In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used. Twelve orthodontic appliances were attached to the study casts and scanned. Turbo spin echo (TSE), TSE with high readout bandwidth, and TSE with view angle tilting and slice encoding for metal artefact correction were used to suppress metal artefacts. Artefacts were measured. In vivo, 6 appliances were scanned: 1) conventional stainless-steel brackets; 2) nickel-free brackets; 3) titanium brackets; 4) a Herbst appliance; 5) a fixed retainer; and 6) a rapid maxillary expander. The maxilla, mandible, nasopharynx, tongue, temporomandibular joints, and cranial base/eye globes were assessed. Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicated no artefacts and minor, moderate, and major artefacts, respectively.
In vitro, titanium brackets and the fixed retainer created minor artefacts. In vivo, titanium brackets caused minor artefacts. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel free brackets, the fixed retainer, and the rapid maxillary expander caused major artefacts in the maxilla and mandible. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel-free brackets caused major artefacts in the eye globe (3-T). TSE with high readout bandwidth reduced image artefacts in both scanners.
Titanium brackets, the Herbst appliance, and the fixed retainer caused minor artefacts in images of neurocranial structures (1.5-T and 3-T) when using TSE with high readout bandwidth.</description><subject>Clinical Medicine</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Klinisk medicin</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medical and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Odontologi</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliances</subject><subject>Radiologi och bildbehandling</subject><subject>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>치의학</subject><issn>2233-7822</issn><issn>2233-7830</issn><issn>2233-7830</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSG2fkI0hs8Pd6OSBF5atSUKUqcB05tjc13diLvRvIv8ckbaAHLI3Glp95PWO9VfWc4JmQlL_x2c4ophiTtn1UnVLKWN0ohh8f95SeVOc5f8dlCaoaSZ5WJ4wpqlrJTqvpKo030cYweoP0MPReB-My0sGiL9fIb_TaIZ1G12kz5rdoHpD7NfQx6TGmHfIBbf2Y4p7fH7YR5XGyOzRlH9aIzES93N-ykrPRIbiUn1VPOt1nd36Xz6qvHz8sLz7Xi6tPlxfzRW0E5WNN2Upha6kRwhHFiVatca3rOKakw5JLIzpGpBVmZVpJhMLONlZZg7uuYU3HzqpXB92QOrg1HqL2-7yOcJtgfr28hLaRnEpV2MWBzT_dMK1gSGX4tNuX9NNQYlUCsoOWcC5bqUE7yoBzwWClFQVCsGmsZpxiWeRe_1fuvf82h5jWsNETFLoVBX93wAu7cda4MCbdP6h6eBP8TZliCwrjpvxHEXh5J5Dij8nlETY-G9f3Org4ZaCCYCq4wORvaybFnJPrjs8QDH9sBcVWcG-rgr_4t7UjfG8i9hvBbce-</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Sonesson, Mikael</creator><creator>Al-Qabandi, Fahad</creator><creator>Månsson, Sven</creator><creator>Abdulraheem, Salem</creator><creator>Bondemark, Lars</creator><creator>Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creator><general>Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</general><general>대한영상치의학회</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>AGCHP</scope><scope>D95</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-0019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4749-1076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1760-0817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-5142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5284-8386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-9344</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners</title><author>Sonesson, Mikael ; Al-Qabandi, Fahad ; Månsson, Sven ; Abdulraheem, Salem ; Bondemark, Lars ; Hellén-Halme, Kristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical Medicine</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Klinisk medicin</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medical and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Odontologi</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliances</topic><topic>Radiologi och bildbehandling</topic><topic>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>치의학</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sonesson, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Qabandi, Fahad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Månsson, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulraheem, Salem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondemark, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellén-Halme, Kristina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Imaging science in dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sonesson, Mikael</au><au>Al-Qabandi, Fahad</au><au>Månsson, Sven</au><au>Abdulraheem, Salem</au><au>Bondemark, Lars</au><au>Hellén-Halme, Kristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners</atitle><jtitle>Imaging science in dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Imaging Sci Dent</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>63-71</pages><issn>2233-7822</issn><issn>2233-7830</issn><eissn>2233-7830</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts.
In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used. Twelve orthodontic appliances were attached to the study casts and scanned. Turbo spin echo (TSE), TSE with high readout bandwidth, and TSE with view angle tilting and slice encoding for metal artefact correction were used to suppress metal artefacts. Artefacts were measured. In vivo, 6 appliances were scanned: 1) conventional stainless-steel brackets; 2) nickel-free brackets; 3) titanium brackets; 4) a Herbst appliance; 5) a fixed retainer; and 6) a rapid maxillary expander. The maxilla, mandible, nasopharynx, tongue, temporomandibular joints, and cranial base/eye globes were assessed. Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicated no artefacts and minor, moderate, and major artefacts, respectively.
In vitro, titanium brackets and the fixed retainer created minor artefacts. In vivo, titanium brackets caused minor artefacts. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel free brackets, the fixed retainer, and the rapid maxillary expander caused major artefacts in the maxilla and mandible. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel-free brackets caused major artefacts in the eye globe (3-T). TSE with high readout bandwidth reduced image artefacts in both scanners.
Titanium brackets, the Herbst appliance, and the fixed retainer caused minor artefacts in images of neurocranial structures (1.5-T and 3-T) when using TSE with high readout bandwidth.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</pub><pmid>33828963</pmid><doi>10.5624/isd.20200199</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-0019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4749-1076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1760-0817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-5142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5284-8386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-9344</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2233-7822 |
ispartof | Imaging Science in Dentistry, 2021, 51(1), , pp.63-71 |
issn | 2233-7822 2233-7830 2233-7830 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9764268 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Clinical Medicine Dentistry Klinisk medicin Magnetic Resonance Imaging Medical and Health Sciences Medicin och hälsovetenskap Odontologi Original Orthodontic Appliances Radiologi och bildbehandling Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging Skull 치의학 |
title | Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A09%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orthodontic%20appliances%20and%20MR%20image%20artefacts:%20An%20exploratory%20in%20vitro%20and%20in%20vivo%20study%20using%201.5-T%20and%203-T%20scanners&rft.jtitle=Imaging%20science%20in%20dentistry&rft.au=Sonesson,%20Mikael&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=63-71&rft.issn=2233-7822&rft.eissn=2233-7830&rft_id=info:doi/10.5624/isd.20200199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrf_k%3E2510254501%3C/proquest_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-23b80dd2c55e1841a89ce9ef4021f0646c5f316d5cbc961580ed7d8dc0ff737f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2510254501&rft_id=info:pmid/33828963&rfr_iscdi=true |