CT Angiography-Derived RECHARGE Score Predicts Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion

• Published in: Korean journal of radiology 2021, 22(5), , pp.697-705
• Main Authors: Li, Jiahui, Wang, Rui, Tesche, Christian, Schoepf, U Joseph, Pannell, Jonathan T, He, Yi, Huang, Rongchong, Chen, Yalei, Li, Jianan, Song, Xiantao
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Angioplasty; Calcification; Cardiology; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular Imaging; Catheters; Coronary vessels; Heart attacks; Iodine; Medical imaging; Patients; Scanners; Software; Success; Variables; 방사선과학
• ISSN: 1229-6929; 2005-8330
• DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0732

To investigate the feasibility and the accuracy of the coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived Registry of Crossboss and Hybrid procedures in France, the Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom (RECHARGE) score (RECHARGE ) for the prediction of procedural success and 30-minutes guidewire crossing in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO). One hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients (mean age, 54 years; 79% male) with 131 CTO lesions who underwent CCTA before catheter angiography (CA) with CTO-PCI were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The RECHARGE scores were calculated and compared with RECHARGECA and other CTA-based prediction scores, including Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan (J-CTO), CT Registry of CTO Revascularisation (CT-RECTOR), and Korean Multicenter CTO CT Registry (KCCT) scores. The procedural success rate of the CTO-PCI procedures was 72%, and 61% of cases achieved the 30-minutes wire crossing. No significant difference was observed between the RECHARGE score and the RECHARGECA score for procedural success (median 2 vs. median 2, = 0.084). However, the RECHARGE score was higher than the RECHARGECA score for the 30-minutes wire crossing (median 2 vs. median 1.5, = 0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the RECHARGE and RECHARGECA scores for predicting procedural success showed no statistical significance (0.718 vs. 0.757, = 0.655). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and the negative predictive value of the RECHARGE scores of ≤ 2 for predictive procedural success were 78%, 60%, 43%, and 87%, respectively. The RECHARGE score showed a discriminative performance that was comparable to those of the other CTA-based prediction scores (AUC = 0.718 vs. 0.665-0.717, all > 0.05). The non-invasive RECHARGE score performs better than the invasive determination for the prediction of the 30-minutes wire crossing of CTO-PCI. However, the RECHARGE score may not replace other CTA-based prediction scores for predicting CTO-PCI success.