Loading…

Comparison of RCF Scoring System to Clinical Decision for the Rey Complex Figure Using Machine-Learning Algorithm

Background and Purpose: Interpreting the Rey complex figure (RCF) requires a standard RCF scoring system and clinical decision by clinicians. The interpretation of RCF using clinical decision by clinicians might not be accurate in the diagnosing of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dementia and neurocognitive disorders 2021, 20(4), 64, pp.70-79
Main Authors: Simfukwe, Chanda, An, Seong Soo, Youn, Young Chul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-dd6ea4d3b672e1060c0d847ad8958af0587aae2bda6fe473196173c4edbabb7c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-dd6ea4d3b672e1060c0d847ad8958af0587aae2bda6fe473196173c4edbabb7c3
container_end_page 79
container_issue 4
container_start_page 70
container_title Dementia and neurocognitive disorders
container_volume 20
creator Simfukwe, Chanda
An, Seong Soo
Youn, Young Chul
description Background and Purpose: Interpreting the Rey complex figure (RCF) requires a standard RCF scoring system and clinical decision by clinicians. The interpretation of RCF using clinical decision by clinicians might not be accurate in the diagnosing of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia patients in comparison with the RCF scoring system. For this reason, a machine-learning algorithm was used to demonstrate that scoring RCF using clinical decision is not as accurate as of the RCF scoring system in predicting MCI or mild dementia patients from normal subjects. Methods: The RCF dataset consisted of 2,232 subjects with formal neuropsychological assessments. The RCF dataset was classified into 2 datasets. The first dataset was to compare normal vs. abnormal and the second dataset was to compare normal vs. MCI vs. mild dementia. Models were trained using a convolutional neural network for machine learning. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of models. Results: The trained model's accuracy for predicting cognitive states was 96% with the first dataset (normal vs. abnormal) and 88% with the second dataset (normal vs. MCI vs. mild dementia). The model had a sensitivity of 85% for detecting abnormal with an AUC of 0.847 with the first dataset. It had a sensitivity of 78% for detecting MCI or mild dementia with an AUC of 0.778 with the second dataset. Conclusions: Based on this study, the RCF scoring system has the potential to present more accurate criteria than the clinical decision for distinguishing cognitive impairment among patients. KCI Citation Count: 0
doi_str_mv 10.12779/dnd.2021.20.4.70
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nrf_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9884739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9884739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-dd6ea4d3b672e1060c0d847ad8958af0587aae2bda6fe473196173c4edbabb7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFrGzEQhUVpaUyaH9Cbrj2sK62kHe2lYLZ1E3ApOMlZaCWtrWZXcqVNqP99ZTsUOocZmHnvg-Eh9JGSJa0B2s822GVNalraki-BvEGLmkleERDwFi0oMFlR3oordJPzL1JK1g0l4j26YhxaAUAW6HcXp4NOPseA44C33Rrfm5h82OH7Y57dhOeIu9EHb_SIvzrjsy_SISY87x3euiM-EUb3B6_97jk5_JhP5h_a7H1w1cbpFE6L1bgr2Hk_fUDvBj1md_M6r9Hj-ttDd1ttfn6_61abytQgSWVt4zS3rG-gdpQ0xBArOWgrWyH1QIQErV3dW90MjgOjbVM-NtzZXvc9GHaNPl24IQ3qyXgVtT_PXVRPSa22D3eqlQXJ2qL9ctEenvvJWePCnPSoDslPOh3Pzv8vwe8L50VJIYVgUAD0AjAp5pzc8M9LiTrHpUpc6hRXaYorIOwvJr2JKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of RCF Scoring System to Clinical Decision for the Rey Complex Figure Using Machine-Learning Algorithm</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Simfukwe, Chanda ; An, Seong Soo ; Youn, Young Chul</creator><creatorcontrib>Simfukwe, Chanda ; An, Seong Soo ; Youn, Young Chul</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Purpose: Interpreting the Rey complex figure (RCF) requires a standard RCF scoring system and clinical decision by clinicians. The interpretation of RCF using clinical decision by clinicians might not be accurate in the diagnosing of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia patients in comparison with the RCF scoring system. For this reason, a machine-learning algorithm was used to demonstrate that scoring RCF using clinical decision is not as accurate as of the RCF scoring system in predicting MCI or mild dementia patients from normal subjects. Methods: The RCF dataset consisted of 2,232 subjects with formal neuropsychological assessments. The RCF dataset was classified into 2 datasets. The first dataset was to compare normal vs. abnormal and the second dataset was to compare normal vs. MCI vs. mild dementia. Models were trained using a convolutional neural network for machine learning. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of models. Results: The trained model's accuracy for predicting cognitive states was 96% with the first dataset (normal vs. abnormal) and 88% with the second dataset (normal vs. MCI vs. mild dementia). The model had a sensitivity of 85% for detecting abnormal with an AUC of 0.847 with the first dataset. It had a sensitivity of 78% for detecting MCI or mild dementia with an AUC of 0.778 with the second dataset. Conclusions: Based on this study, the RCF scoring system has the potential to present more accurate criteria than the clinical decision for distinguishing cognitive impairment among patients. KCI Citation Count: 0</description><identifier>ISSN: 1738-1495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2384-0757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12779/dnd.2021.20.4.70</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34795770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korean Dementia Association</publisher><subject>Original ; 신경과학</subject><ispartof>Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지), 2021, 20(4), 64, pp.70-79</ispartof><rights>2021 Korean Dementia Association 2021 Korean Dementia Association</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-dd6ea4d3b672e1060c0d847ad8958af0587aae2bda6fe473196173c4edbabb7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-dd6ea4d3b672e1060c0d847ad8958af0587aae2bda6fe473196173c4edbabb7c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2742-1759 ; 0000-0003-2845-8016</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585537/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585537/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002773906$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simfukwe, Chanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Seong Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Young Chul</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of RCF Scoring System to Clinical Decision for the Rey Complex Figure Using Machine-Learning Algorithm</title><title>Dementia and neurocognitive disorders</title><description>Background and Purpose: Interpreting the Rey complex figure (RCF) requires a standard RCF scoring system and clinical decision by clinicians. The interpretation of RCF using clinical decision by clinicians might not be accurate in the diagnosing of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia patients in comparison with the RCF scoring system. For this reason, a machine-learning algorithm was used to demonstrate that scoring RCF using clinical decision is not as accurate as of the RCF scoring system in predicting MCI or mild dementia patients from normal subjects. Methods: The RCF dataset consisted of 2,232 subjects with formal neuropsychological assessments. The RCF dataset was classified into 2 datasets. The first dataset was to compare normal vs. abnormal and the second dataset was to compare normal vs. MCI vs. mild dementia. Models were trained using a convolutional neural network for machine learning. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of models. Results: The trained model's accuracy for predicting cognitive states was 96% with the first dataset (normal vs. abnormal) and 88% with the second dataset (normal vs. MCI vs. mild dementia). The model had a sensitivity of 85% for detecting abnormal with an AUC of 0.847 with the first dataset. It had a sensitivity of 78% for detecting MCI or mild dementia with an AUC of 0.778 with the second dataset. Conclusions: Based on this study, the RCF scoring system has the potential to present more accurate criteria than the clinical decision for distinguishing cognitive impairment among patients. KCI Citation Count: 0</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>신경과학</subject><issn>1738-1495</issn><issn>2384-0757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUFrGzEQhUVpaUyaH9Cbrj2sK62kHe2lYLZ1E3ApOMlZaCWtrWZXcqVNqP99ZTsUOocZmHnvg-Eh9JGSJa0B2s822GVNalraki-BvEGLmkleERDwFi0oMFlR3oordJPzL1JK1g0l4j26YhxaAUAW6HcXp4NOPseA44C33Rrfm5h82OH7Y57dhOeIu9EHb_SIvzrjsy_SISY87x3euiM-EUb3B6_97jk5_JhP5h_a7H1w1cbpFE6L1bgr2Hk_fUDvBj1md_M6r9Hj-ttDd1ttfn6_61abytQgSWVt4zS3rG-gdpQ0xBArOWgrWyH1QIQErV3dW90MjgOjbVM-NtzZXvc9GHaNPl24IQ3qyXgVtT_PXVRPSa22D3eqlQXJ2qL9ctEenvvJWePCnPSoDslPOh3Pzv8vwe8L50VJIYVgUAD0AjAp5pzc8M9LiTrHpUpc6hRXaYorIOwvJr2JKg</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Simfukwe, Chanda</creator><creator>An, Seong Soo</creator><creator>Youn, Young Chul</creator><general>Korean Dementia Association</general><general>대한치매학회</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-1759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2845-8016</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Comparison of RCF Scoring System to Clinical Decision for the Rey Complex Figure Using Machine-Learning Algorithm</title><author>Simfukwe, Chanda ; An, Seong Soo ; Youn, Young Chul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-dd6ea4d3b672e1060c0d847ad8958af0587aae2bda6fe473196173c4edbabb7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>신경과학</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simfukwe, Chanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Seong Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Young Chul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Dementia and neurocognitive disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simfukwe, Chanda</au><au>An, Seong Soo</au><au>Youn, Young Chul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of RCF Scoring System to Clinical Decision for the Rey Complex Figure Using Machine-Learning Algorithm</atitle><jtitle>Dementia and neurocognitive disorders</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>70-79</pages><issn>1738-1495</issn><eissn>2384-0757</eissn><abstract>Background and Purpose: Interpreting the Rey complex figure (RCF) requires a standard RCF scoring system and clinical decision by clinicians. The interpretation of RCF using clinical decision by clinicians might not be accurate in the diagnosing of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia patients in comparison with the RCF scoring system. For this reason, a machine-learning algorithm was used to demonstrate that scoring RCF using clinical decision is not as accurate as of the RCF scoring system in predicting MCI or mild dementia patients from normal subjects. Methods: The RCF dataset consisted of 2,232 subjects with formal neuropsychological assessments. The RCF dataset was classified into 2 datasets. The first dataset was to compare normal vs. abnormal and the second dataset was to compare normal vs. MCI vs. mild dementia. Models were trained using a convolutional neural network for machine learning. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of models. Results: The trained model's accuracy for predicting cognitive states was 96% with the first dataset (normal vs. abnormal) and 88% with the second dataset (normal vs. MCI vs. mild dementia). The model had a sensitivity of 85% for detecting abnormal with an AUC of 0.847 with the first dataset. It had a sensitivity of 78% for detecting MCI or mild dementia with an AUC of 0.778 with the second dataset. Conclusions: Based on this study, the RCF scoring system has the potential to present more accurate criteria than the clinical decision for distinguishing cognitive impairment among patients. KCI Citation Count: 0</abstract><pub>Korean Dementia Association</pub><pmid>34795770</pmid><doi>10.12779/dnd.2021.20.4.70</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-1759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2845-8016</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1738-1495
ispartof Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지), 2021, 20(4), 64, pp.70-79
issn 1738-1495
2384-0757
language eng
recordid cdi_nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9884739
source PubMed Central Free
subjects Original
신경과학
title Comparison of RCF Scoring System to Clinical Decision for the Rey Complex Figure Using Machine-Learning Algorithm
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A48%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nrf_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20RCF%20Scoring%20System%20to%20Clinical%20Decision%20for%20the%20Rey%20Complex%20Figure%20Using%20Machine-Learning%20Algorithm&rft.jtitle=Dementia%20and%20neurocognitive%20disorders&rft.au=Simfukwe,%20Chanda&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=70-79&rft.issn=1738-1495&rft.eissn=2384-0757&rft_id=info:doi/10.12779/dnd.2021.20.4.70&rft_dat=%3Cnrf_pubme%3Eoai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9884739%3C/nrf_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-dd6ea4d3b672e1060c0d847ad8958af0587aae2bda6fe473196173c4edbabb7c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34795770&rfr_iscdi=true