Loading…
Direct hydrocracking of oxidized bio-oil to hydrocarbons
•Direct hydrocracking of oxidized bio-oil to produce liquid hydrocarbons was tested.•Hydrocarbon yield 36.6% higher than for raw bio-oil was achieved.•GC–MS results showed 99.2 area% of hydrocarbon compounds in the produced product.•The liquid hydrocarbons had 6.9% higher HHV than for HDO of raw bio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Fuel (Guildford) 2015-08, Vol.154 (C), p.268-274 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Direct hydrocracking of oxidized bio-oil to produce liquid hydrocarbons was tested.•Hydrocarbon yield 36.6% higher than for raw bio-oil was achieved.•GC–MS results showed 99.2 area% of hydrocarbon compounds in the produced product.•The liquid hydrocarbons had 6.9% higher HHV than for HDO of raw bio-oil.
Hydrodeoxygenation is considered a promising technology to convert bio-oils to liquid transportation fuels. Recently we tested a hydrodeoxygenation method to convert oxidized bio-oil to increase liquid fuel yield, reduce char and reduce required hydrogen. In this current study we tested direct hydrocracking of the oxidized bio-oil to produce high-energy liquid hydrocarbons. We tested various reaction conditions (reaction temperature, hydrogen pressure, time and catalyst type) on the hydrocracking of the oxidized bio-oil. Direct hydrocracking of the oxidized bio-oil produced 36.6% higher hydrocarbons yield compared to direct hydrocracking of the raw bio-oil. The hydrocarbons mixture produced had a higher heating value (HHV) of 43.6MJ/kg. The oxygen content and acid value were 0.5wt% and 0.3mgKOH/g, respectively. Density and viscosity were considerably low at 0.9g/ml and 1.8cSt, respectively. pH value was 8.4. The hydrocarbon mixture was also analyzed by GC–MS, FTIR, NMR and DHA. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-2361 1873-7153 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.080 |