Loading…

Techno-economic analysis of three different substrate removal and reuse strategies for III-V solar cells: Techno-economic analysis for III-V solar cells

The high cost of wafers suitable for epitaxial deposition of III-V solar cells has been a primary barrier to widespread use of these cells in low-concentration and one-sun terrestrial solar applications. A possible solution is to reuse the substrate many times, thus spreading its cost across many ce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Progress in photovoltaics 2016-05, Vol.24 (9)
Main Authors: Ward, J. Scott, Remo, Timothy, Horowitz, Kelsey, Woodhouse, Michael, Sopori, Bhushan, VanSant, Kaitlyn, Basore, Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page
container_title Progress in photovoltaics
container_volume 24
creator Ward, J. Scott
Remo, Timothy
Horowitz, Kelsey
Woodhouse, Michael
Sopori, Bhushan
VanSant, Kaitlyn
Basore, Paul
description The high cost of wafers suitable for epitaxial deposition of III-V solar cells has been a primary barrier to widespread use of these cells in low-concentration and one-sun terrestrial solar applications. A possible solution is to reuse the substrate many times, thus spreading its cost across many cells. We performed a bottom-up techno-economic analysis of three different strategies for substrate reuse in high-volume manufacturing: epitaxial lift-off, spalling, and the use of a porous germanium release layer. The analysis shows that the potential cost reduction resulting from substrate reuse is limited in all three strategies--not by the number of reuse cycles achievable, but by the costs that are incurred in each cycle to prepare the substrate for another epitaxial deposition. The dominant substrate-preparation cost component is different for each of the three strategies, and the cost-ranking of these strategies is subject to change if future developments substantially reduce the cost of epitaxial deposition.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pip.2776
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1290788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1290788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_12907883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcFqAjEURYNYUNuCn_DoPppMcTJxWyrOXoo7SeNLTYmJ5MVC_6Sf64guFbq6B-7hXsbGUkykENX04A-TSqm6x4ZSaM3lTK_7Z64rrrSeDdiI6FsIqRpdD9nfCu0uJo42xbT3Fkw04Zc8QXJQdhkRtt45zBgL0PGTSjYFIeM-_ZjQ2duOj4RwKb48EriUoW1b_gGUgslgMQSaw92nm_4Te3AmED5f85G9LN5Xb0ueqPgNWV-6uW4qoi0bWWmhmub1X9IJKaBeqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Techno-economic analysis of three different substrate removal and reuse strategies for III-V solar cells: Techno-economic analysis for III-V solar cells</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Ward, J. Scott ; Remo, Timothy ; Horowitz, Kelsey ; Woodhouse, Michael ; Sopori, Bhushan ; VanSant, Kaitlyn ; Basore, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Ward, J. Scott ; Remo, Timothy ; Horowitz, Kelsey ; Woodhouse, Michael ; Sopori, Bhushan ; VanSant, Kaitlyn ; Basore, Paul ; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>The high cost of wafers suitable for epitaxial deposition of III-V solar cells has been a primary barrier to widespread use of these cells in low-concentration and one-sun terrestrial solar applications. A possible solution is to reuse the substrate many times, thus spreading its cost across many cells. We performed a bottom-up techno-economic analysis of three different strategies for substrate reuse in high-volume manufacturing: epitaxial lift-off, spalling, and the use of a porous germanium release layer. The analysis shows that the potential cost reduction resulting from substrate reuse is limited in all three strategies--not by the number of reuse cycles achievable, but by the costs that are incurred in each cycle to prepare the substrate for another epitaxial deposition. The dominant substrate-preparation cost component is different for each of the three strategies, and the cost-ranking of these strategies is subject to change if future developments substantially reduce the cost of epitaxial deposition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-7995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-159X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pip.2776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley</publisher><subject>epitaxy ; GaAs ; III-V ; MATERIALS SCIENCE ; solar cells ; SOLAR ENERGY ; substrates</subject><ispartof>Progress in photovoltaics, 2016-05, Vol.24 (9)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1290788$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ward, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remo, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodhouse, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopori, Bhushan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanSant, Kaitlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basore, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Techno-economic analysis of three different substrate removal and reuse strategies for III-V solar cells: Techno-economic analysis for III-V solar cells</title><title>Progress in photovoltaics</title><description>The high cost of wafers suitable for epitaxial deposition of III-V solar cells has been a primary barrier to widespread use of these cells in low-concentration and one-sun terrestrial solar applications. A possible solution is to reuse the substrate many times, thus spreading its cost across many cells. We performed a bottom-up techno-economic analysis of three different strategies for substrate reuse in high-volume manufacturing: epitaxial lift-off, spalling, and the use of a porous germanium release layer. The analysis shows that the potential cost reduction resulting from substrate reuse is limited in all three strategies--not by the number of reuse cycles achievable, but by the costs that are incurred in each cycle to prepare the substrate for another epitaxial deposition. The dominant substrate-preparation cost component is different for each of the three strategies, and the cost-ranking of these strategies is subject to change if future developments substantially reduce the cost of epitaxial deposition.</description><subject>epitaxy</subject><subject>GaAs</subject><subject>III-V</subject><subject>MATERIALS SCIENCE</subject><subject>solar cells</subject><subject>SOLAR ENERGY</subject><subject>substrates</subject><issn>1062-7995</issn><issn>1099-159X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjcFqAjEURYNYUNuCn_DoPppMcTJxWyrOXoo7SeNLTYmJ5MVC_6Sf64guFbq6B-7hXsbGUkykENX04A-TSqm6x4ZSaM3lTK_7Z64rrrSeDdiI6FsIqRpdD9nfCu0uJo42xbT3Fkw04Zc8QXJQdhkRtt45zBgL0PGTSjYFIeM-_ZjQ2duOj4RwKb48EriUoW1b_gGUgslgMQSaw92nm_4Te3AmED5f85G9LN5Xb0ueqPgNWV-6uW4qoi0bWWmhmub1X9IJKaBeqA</recordid><startdate>20160510</startdate><enddate>20160510</enddate><creator>Ward, J. Scott</creator><creator>Remo, Timothy</creator><creator>Horowitz, Kelsey</creator><creator>Woodhouse, Michael</creator><creator>Sopori, Bhushan</creator><creator>VanSant, Kaitlyn</creator><creator>Basore, Paul</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160510</creationdate><title>Techno-economic analysis of three different substrate removal and reuse strategies for III-V solar cells: Techno-economic analysis for III-V solar cells</title><author>Ward, J. Scott ; Remo, Timothy ; Horowitz, Kelsey ; Woodhouse, Michael ; Sopori, Bhushan ; VanSant, Kaitlyn ; Basore, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_12907883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>epitaxy</topic><topic>GaAs</topic><topic>III-V</topic><topic>MATERIALS SCIENCE</topic><topic>solar cells</topic><topic>SOLAR ENERGY</topic><topic>substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ward, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remo, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodhouse, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopori, Bhushan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanSant, Kaitlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basore, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Progress in photovoltaics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ward, J. Scott</au><au>Remo, Timothy</au><au>Horowitz, Kelsey</au><au>Woodhouse, Michael</au><au>Sopori, Bhushan</au><au>VanSant, Kaitlyn</au><au>Basore, Paul</au><aucorp>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Techno-economic analysis of three different substrate removal and reuse strategies for III-V solar cells: Techno-economic analysis for III-V solar cells</atitle><jtitle>Progress in photovoltaics</jtitle><date>2016-05-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>9</issue><issn>1062-7995</issn><eissn>1099-159X</eissn><abstract>The high cost of wafers suitable for epitaxial deposition of III-V solar cells has been a primary barrier to widespread use of these cells in low-concentration and one-sun terrestrial solar applications. A possible solution is to reuse the substrate many times, thus spreading its cost across many cells. We performed a bottom-up techno-economic analysis of three different strategies for substrate reuse in high-volume manufacturing: epitaxial lift-off, spalling, and the use of a porous germanium release layer. The analysis shows that the potential cost reduction resulting from substrate reuse is limited in all three strategies--not by the number of reuse cycles achievable, but by the costs that are incurred in each cycle to prepare the substrate for another epitaxial deposition. The dominant substrate-preparation cost component is different for each of the three strategies, and the cost-ranking of these strategies is subject to change if future developments substantially reduce the cost of epitaxial deposition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/pip.2776</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-7995
ispartof Progress in photovoltaics, 2016-05, Vol.24 (9)
issn 1062-7995
1099-159X
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1290788
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects epitaxy
GaAs
III-V
MATERIALS SCIENCE
solar cells
SOLAR ENERGY
substrates
title Techno-economic analysis of three different substrate removal and reuse strategies for III-V solar cells: Techno-economic analysis for III-V solar cells
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A20%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Techno-economic%20analysis%20of%20three%20different%20substrate%20removal%20and%20reuse%20strategies%20for%20III-V%20solar%20cells:%20Techno-economic%20analysis%20for%20III-V%20solar%20cells&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20photovoltaics&rft.au=Ward,%20J.%20Scott&rft.aucorp=National%20Renewable%20Energy%20Lab.%20(NREL),%20Golden,%20CO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2016-05-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=9&rft.issn=1062-7995&rft.eissn=1099-159X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pip.2776&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E1290788%3C/osti%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_12907883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true