Loading…
Standardization of chemical analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio-oil: history, challenges, and current status of methods
In this perspective, we discuss the standardization of analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio‐oils, including the current status of methods, and our opinions on future directions. First, the history of past standardization efforts is summarized, and both successful and unsuccessful validation of an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining bioproducts and biorefining, 2016-09, Vol.10 (5), p.496-507 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-afb3a199e03031a422a2d386b59e81b6566e092ccd19a68e67bd229ebe535e1a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-afb3a199e03031a422a2d386b59e81b6566e092ccd19a68e67bd229ebe535e1a3 |
container_end_page | 507 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 496 |
container_title | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Ferrell III, Jack R. Olarte, Mariefel V. Christensen, Earl D. Padmaperuma, Asanga B. Connatser, Raynella M. Stankovikj, Filip Meier, Dietrich Paasikallio, Ville |
description | In this perspective, we discuss the standardization of analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio‐oils, including the current status of methods, and our opinions on future directions. First, the history of past standardization efforts is summarized, and both successful and unsuccessful validation of analytical techniques highlighted. The majority of analytical standardization studies to‐date has tested only physical characterization techniques. Here, we present results from an international round robin on the validation of chemical characterization techniques for bio‐oils. Techniques tested included acid number, carbonyl titrations using two different methods (one at room temperature and one at 80 °C), 31P NMR for determination of hydroxyl groups, and a quantitative gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) method. Both carbonyl titration and acid number methods have yielded acceptable inter‐laboratory variabilities. 31P NMR produced acceptable results for aliphatic and phenolic hydroxyl groups, but not for carboxylic hydroxyl groups. As shown in previous round robins, GC‐MS results were more variable. Reliable chemical characterization of bio‐oils will enable upgrading research and allow for detailed comparisons of bio‐oils produced at different facilities. Reliable analytics are also needed to enable an emerging bioenergy industry, as processing facilities often have different analytical needs and capabilities than research facilities. We feel that correlations in reliable characterizations of bio‐oils will help strike a balance between research and industry, and will ultimately help to ‐determine metrics for bio‐oil quality. Finally, the standardization of additional analytical methods is needed, particularly for upgraded bio‐oils. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bbb.1661 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1319212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1819138330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-afb3a199e03031a422a2d386b59e81b6566e092ccd19a68e67bd229ebe535e1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEEqUg8REsThya4rHXTsyNraBFqqiqLSo3y3YmrMEbL7ZXEPjyTVi0EodKPc07_ObPm1dVL4GeAqXsjbX2FKSER9URKM5qoBweH_Tiy9PqWc7fKBVSLMRR9WdVzNCZ1Pnfpvg4kNgTt8aNdyYQM5gwlr-yoFsP_scOM-ljItsxxTBmn4n1sY4-vCVrn0tM48nUbkLA4Svmk2lCR9wuJRwKycWUXZ4XbLCsY5efV096EzK--FePq88f3t-cXdSXV-cfz95d1m4hG6hNb7kBpZDyyYtZMGZYx1tphcIWrBRSIlXMuQ6UkS3KxnaMKbQouEAw_Lh6tZ8bc_E6Oz-bcXEY0BUNHBQDNkGv99A2xdlm0RufHYZgBoy7rKHlQijWNvwBKCjgLZ_OPaAuxZwT9nqb_MakUQPVc156ykvPeU1ovUd_-oDjvZxeLpf_89Pf8deBN-m7lg1vhL79dK6vVze3sr1Y6Wt-B7tJpq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819138330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardization of chemical analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio-oil: history, challenges, and current status of methods</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Ferrell III, Jack R. ; Olarte, Mariefel V. ; Christensen, Earl D. ; Padmaperuma, Asanga B. ; Connatser, Raynella M. ; Stankovikj, Filip ; Meier, Dietrich ; Paasikallio, Ville</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferrell III, Jack R. ; Olarte, Mariefel V. ; Christensen, Earl D. ; Padmaperuma, Asanga B. ; Connatser, Raynella M. ; Stankovikj, Filip ; Meier, Dietrich ; Paasikallio, Ville ; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States) ; Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>In this perspective, we discuss the standardization of analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio‐oils, including the current status of methods, and our opinions on future directions. First, the history of past standardization efforts is summarized, and both successful and unsuccessful validation of analytical techniques highlighted. The majority of analytical standardization studies to‐date has tested only physical characterization techniques. Here, we present results from an international round robin on the validation of chemical characterization techniques for bio‐oils. Techniques tested included acid number, carbonyl titrations using two different methods (one at room temperature and one at 80 °C), 31P NMR for determination of hydroxyl groups, and a quantitative gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) method. Both carbonyl titration and acid number methods have yielded acceptable inter‐laboratory variabilities. 31P NMR produced acceptable results for aliphatic and phenolic hydroxyl groups, but not for carboxylic hydroxyl groups. As shown in previous round robins, GC‐MS results were more variable. Reliable chemical characterization of bio‐oils will enable upgrading research and allow for detailed comparisons of bio‐oils produced at different facilities. Reliable analytics are also needed to enable an emerging bioenergy industry, as processing facilities often have different analytical needs and capabilities than research facilities. We feel that correlations in reliable characterizations of bio‐oils will help strike a balance between research and industry, and will ultimately help to ‐determine metrics for bio‐oil quality. Finally, the standardization of additional analytical methods is needed, particularly for upgraded bio‐oils. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-104X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-1031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>09 BIOMASS FUELS ; analysis ; analytical ; bio-oil ; Biomass ; Design of experiments ; Gas chromatography ; Hydroxyl groups ; INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY ; Mass spectrometry ; Mathematical analysis ; Pyrolysis ; round robin ; Standardization ; titration</subject><ispartof>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2016-09, Vol.10 (5), p.496-507</ispartof><rights>2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-afb3a199e03031a422a2d386b59e81b6566e092ccd19a68e67bd229ebe535e1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-afb3a199e03031a422a2d386b59e81b6566e092ccd19a68e67bd229ebe535e1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1319212$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferrell III, Jack R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olarte, Mariefel V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Earl D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmaperuma, Asanga B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connatser, Raynella M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankovikj, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Dietrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paasikallio, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Standardization of chemical analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio-oil: history, challenges, and current status of methods</title><title>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</title><addtitle>Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref</addtitle><description>In this perspective, we discuss the standardization of analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio‐oils, including the current status of methods, and our opinions on future directions. First, the history of past standardization efforts is summarized, and both successful and unsuccessful validation of analytical techniques highlighted. The majority of analytical standardization studies to‐date has tested only physical characterization techniques. Here, we present results from an international round robin on the validation of chemical characterization techniques for bio‐oils. Techniques tested included acid number, carbonyl titrations using two different methods (one at room temperature and one at 80 °C), 31P NMR for determination of hydroxyl groups, and a quantitative gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) method. Both carbonyl titration and acid number methods have yielded acceptable inter‐laboratory variabilities. 31P NMR produced acceptable results for aliphatic and phenolic hydroxyl groups, but not for carboxylic hydroxyl groups. As shown in previous round robins, GC‐MS results were more variable. Reliable chemical characterization of bio‐oils will enable upgrading research and allow for detailed comparisons of bio‐oils produced at different facilities. Reliable analytics are also needed to enable an emerging bioenergy industry, as processing facilities often have different analytical needs and capabilities than research facilities. We feel that correlations in reliable characterizations of bio‐oils will help strike a balance between research and industry, and will ultimately help to ‐determine metrics for bio‐oil quality. Finally, the standardization of additional analytical methods is needed, particularly for upgraded bio‐oils. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</description><subject>09 BIOMASS FUELS</subject><subject>analysis</subject><subject>analytical</subject><subject>bio-oil</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Hydroxyl groups</subject><subject>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Pyrolysis</subject><subject>round robin</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>titration</subject><issn>1932-104X</issn><issn>1932-1031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEEqUg8REsThya4rHXTsyNraBFqqiqLSo3y3YmrMEbL7ZXEPjyTVi0EodKPc07_ObPm1dVL4GeAqXsjbX2FKSER9URKM5qoBweH_Tiy9PqWc7fKBVSLMRR9WdVzNCZ1Pnfpvg4kNgTt8aNdyYQM5gwlr-yoFsP_scOM-ljItsxxTBmn4n1sY4-vCVrn0tM48nUbkLA4Svmk2lCR9wuJRwKycWUXZ4XbLCsY5efV096EzK--FePq88f3t-cXdSXV-cfz95d1m4hG6hNb7kBpZDyyYtZMGZYx1tphcIWrBRSIlXMuQ6UkS3KxnaMKbQouEAw_Lh6tZ8bc_E6Oz-bcXEY0BUNHBQDNkGv99A2xdlm0RufHYZgBoy7rKHlQijWNvwBKCjgLZ_OPaAuxZwT9nqb_MakUQPVc156ykvPeU1ovUd_-oDjvZxeLpf_89Pf8deBN-m7lg1vhL79dK6vVze3sr1Y6Wt-B7tJpq0</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Ferrell III, Jack R.</creator><creator>Olarte, Mariefel V.</creator><creator>Christensen, Earl D.</creator><creator>Padmaperuma, Asanga B.</creator><creator>Connatser, Raynella M.</creator><creator>Stankovikj, Filip</creator><creator>Meier, Dietrich</creator><creator>Paasikallio, Ville</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Standardization of chemical analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio-oil: history, challenges, and current status of methods</title><author>Ferrell III, Jack R. ; Olarte, Mariefel V. ; Christensen, Earl D. ; Padmaperuma, Asanga B. ; Connatser, Raynella M. ; Stankovikj, Filip ; Meier, Dietrich ; Paasikallio, Ville</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-afb3a199e03031a422a2d386b59e81b6566e092ccd19a68e67bd229ebe535e1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>09 BIOMASS FUELS</topic><topic>analysis</topic><topic>analytical</topic><topic>bio-oil</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Hydroxyl groups</topic><topic>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Pyrolysis</topic><topic>round robin</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>titration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrell III, Jack R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olarte, Mariefel V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Earl D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmaperuma, Asanga B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connatser, Raynella M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankovikj, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Dietrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paasikallio, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrell III, Jack R.</au><au>Olarte, Mariefel V.</au><au>Christensen, Earl D.</au><au>Padmaperuma, Asanga B.</au><au>Connatser, Raynella M.</au><au>Stankovikj, Filip</au><au>Meier, Dietrich</au><au>Paasikallio, Ville</au><aucorp>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</aucorp><aucorp>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardization of chemical analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio-oil: history, challenges, and current status of methods</atitle><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle><addtitle>Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>507</epage><pages>496-507</pages><issn>1932-104X</issn><eissn>1932-1031</eissn><abstract>In this perspective, we discuss the standardization of analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio‐oils, including the current status of methods, and our opinions on future directions. First, the history of past standardization efforts is summarized, and both successful and unsuccessful validation of analytical techniques highlighted. The majority of analytical standardization studies to‐date has tested only physical characterization techniques. Here, we present results from an international round robin on the validation of chemical characterization techniques for bio‐oils. Techniques tested included acid number, carbonyl titrations using two different methods (one at room temperature and one at 80 °C), 31P NMR for determination of hydroxyl groups, and a quantitative gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) method. Both carbonyl titration and acid number methods have yielded acceptable inter‐laboratory variabilities. 31P NMR produced acceptable results for aliphatic and phenolic hydroxyl groups, but not for carboxylic hydroxyl groups. As shown in previous round robins, GC‐MS results were more variable. Reliable chemical characterization of bio‐oils will enable upgrading research and allow for detailed comparisons of bio‐oils produced at different facilities. Reliable analytics are also needed to enable an emerging bioenergy industry, as processing facilities often have different analytical needs and capabilities than research facilities. We feel that correlations in reliable characterizations of bio‐oils will help strike a balance between research and industry, and will ultimately help to ‐determine metrics for bio‐oil quality. Finally, the standardization of additional analytical methods is needed, particularly for upgraded bio‐oils. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/bbb.1661</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-104X |
ispartof | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2016-09, Vol.10 (5), p.496-507 |
issn | 1932-104X 1932-1031 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1319212 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | 09 BIOMASS FUELS analysis analytical bio-oil Biomass Design of experiments Gas chromatography Hydroxyl groups INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Mass spectrometry Mathematical analysis Pyrolysis round robin Standardization titration |
title | Standardization of chemical analytical techniques for pyrolysis bio-oil: history, challenges, and current status of methods |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A37%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardization%20of%20chemical%20analytical%20techniques%20for%20pyrolysis%20bio-oil:%20history,%20challenges,%20and%20current%20status%20of%20methods&rft.jtitle=Biofuels,%20bioproducts%20and%20biorefining&rft.au=Ferrell%20III,%20Jack%20R.&rft.aucorp=National%20Renewable%20Energy%20Lab.%20(NREL),%20Golden,%20CO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=507&rft.pages=496-507&rft.issn=1932-104X&rft.eissn=1932-1031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bbb.1661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1819138330%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-afb3a199e03031a422a2d386b59e81b6566e092ccd19a68e67bd229ebe535e1a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819138330&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |