Loading…

Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems

To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2016-07, Vol.121 (14), p.8269-8296
Main Authors: Barnes, Hannah C., Houze, Robert A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873
container_end_page 8296
container_issue 14
container_start_page 8269
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 121
creator Barnes, Hannah C.
Houze, Robert A.
description To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to develop the same mesoscale circulations as observations by assimilating radial velocity data from a Doppler radar. The same general layering of microphysical processes was found in observations and simulations with deposition anywhere above the 0°C level, aggregation at and above the 0°C level, melting at and below the 0°C level, and riming near the 0°C level. Thus, this study is consistent with the layered ice microphysical pattern portrayed in previous conceptual models and indicated by dual‐polarization radar data. Spatial variability of riming in the simulations suggests that riming in the midlevel inflow is related to convective‐scale vertical velocity perturbations. Finally, this study sheds light on limitations of current generally available bulk microphysical parameterizations. In each parameterization, the layers in which aggregation and riming took place were generally too thick and the frequency of riming was generally too high compared to the observations and theory. Additionally, none of the parameterizations produced similar details in every microphysical spatial pattern. Discrepancies in the patterns of microphysical processes between parameterizations likely factor into creating substantial differences in model reflectivity patterns. It is concluded that improved parameterizations of ice‐phase microphysics will be essential to obtain reliable, consistent model simulations of tropical oceanic MCSs. Key Points Simulated ice processes in the midlevel inflow are consistent with radar observations and theory Of the processes considered, simulated riming and aggregation differ the most from observations Disparate simulated ice microphysical patterns factor into reflectivity differences
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2016JD025074
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1342296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835650883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1uFDEMx0cIJKrSGw8QwYUDC_memSPaQqGqhIR64BZlMh411UyyxNlF-wC8Nx4WIcShIhc79k-2_5ab5rngbwTn8q3kwl5fcml4qx81Z1LYftP1vX38x2-_Pm0uEO85vY4rbfRZ82Obl50vEXNieWJ5QCgHGJlPI8O47Gdf6Yc7X6OfGZkKJeGKxgBsiaHk3d0RY1izJQdABGQxsUqJX1GK-RQDWwAzUgBYyOkAocYDMDxihQWfNU8mPyNc_Lbnze2H97fbj5ubz1eftu9uNkFbKza-bfXYC23lNBnDbRiGsLrewqiHSWsxeDtIQ8omUEHZVndCCTvagauuVefNi1PZjDU6DLFCuKNpEk3jhNJS9pagVyeI5HzbA1a3RAwwzz5B3qMTnTLW8K5T_4EK09KuxVr15T_ofd6XRGKd5NoKy7XuHqKolmhX0Wvb1yeKlo9YYHK7Ehdfjk5wt96C-_sWCFcn_Huc4fgg666vvlwaRTtTPwGI2rUF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811755063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Barnes, Hannah C. ; Houze, Robert A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Hannah C. ; Houze, Robert A. ; Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to develop the same mesoscale circulations as observations by assimilating radial velocity data from a Doppler radar. The same general layering of microphysical processes was found in observations and simulations with deposition anywhere above the 0°C level, aggregation at and above the 0°C level, melting at and below the 0°C level, and riming near the 0°C level. Thus, this study is consistent with the layered ice microphysical pattern portrayed in previous conceptual models and indicated by dual‐polarization radar data. Spatial variability of riming in the simulations suggests that riming in the midlevel inflow is related to convective‐scale vertical velocity perturbations. Finally, this study sheds light on limitations of current generally available bulk microphysical parameterizations. In each parameterization, the layers in which aggregation and riming took place were generally too thick and the frequency of riming was generally too high compared to the observations and theory. Additionally, none of the parameterizations produced similar details in every microphysical spatial pattern. Discrepancies in the patterns of microphysical processes between parameterizations likely factor into creating substantial differences in model reflectivity patterns. It is concluded that improved parameterizations of ice‐phase microphysics will be essential to obtain reliable, consistent model simulations of tropical oceanic MCSs. Key Points Simulated ice processes in the midlevel inflow are consistent with radar observations and theory Of the processes considered, simulated riming and aggregation differ the most from observations Disparate simulated ice microphysical patterns factor into reflectivity differences</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agglomeration ; Aggregation ; Brackish ; cloud microphysics ; Computer simulation ; Doppler radar ; Doppler sonar ; dual‐polarimetric radar ; Geophysics ; GEOSCIENCES ; Ice ; Inflow ; Marine ; Mathematical models ; Mesoscale convective complexes ; Mesoscale convective systems ; Mesoscale phenomena ; Microphysics ; Oceans ; Parameterization ; Parametrization ; particle identification algorithm ; Radar ; Radar data ; Radial velocity ; Reflectance ; Reflectivity ; Simulation ; Spatial data ; Spatial variability ; Spatial variations ; stratiform precipitation ; Tropical climate ; Velocity ; Vertical velocities ; Water inflow ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2016-07, Vol.121 (14), p.8269-8296</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1342296$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Hannah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houze, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to develop the same mesoscale circulations as observations by assimilating radial velocity data from a Doppler radar. The same general layering of microphysical processes was found in observations and simulations with deposition anywhere above the 0°C level, aggregation at and above the 0°C level, melting at and below the 0°C level, and riming near the 0°C level. Thus, this study is consistent with the layered ice microphysical pattern portrayed in previous conceptual models and indicated by dual‐polarization radar data. Spatial variability of riming in the simulations suggests that riming in the midlevel inflow is related to convective‐scale vertical velocity perturbations. Finally, this study sheds light on limitations of current generally available bulk microphysical parameterizations. In each parameterization, the layers in which aggregation and riming took place were generally too thick and the frequency of riming was generally too high compared to the observations and theory. Additionally, none of the parameterizations produced similar details in every microphysical spatial pattern. Discrepancies in the patterns of microphysical processes between parameterizations likely factor into creating substantial differences in model reflectivity patterns. It is concluded that improved parameterizations of ice‐phase microphysics will be essential to obtain reliable, consistent model simulations of tropical oceanic MCSs. Key Points Simulated ice processes in the midlevel inflow are consistent with radar observations and theory Of the processes considered, simulated riming and aggregation differ the most from observations Disparate simulated ice microphysical patterns factor into reflectivity differences</description><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>cloud microphysics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Doppler radar</subject><subject>Doppler sonar</subject><subject>dual‐polarimetric radar</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>GEOSCIENCES</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Inflow</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mesoscale convective complexes</subject><subject>Mesoscale convective systems</subject><subject>Mesoscale phenomena</subject><subject>Microphysics</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Parametrization</subject><subject>particle identification algorithm</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radar data</subject><subject>Radial velocity</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Reflectivity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Spatial variability</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>stratiform precipitation</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Vertical velocities</subject><subject>Water inflow</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNks1uFDEMx0cIJKrSGw8QwYUDC_memSPaQqGqhIR64BZlMh411UyyxNlF-wC8Nx4WIcShIhc79k-2_5ab5rngbwTn8q3kwl5fcml4qx81Z1LYftP1vX38x2-_Pm0uEO85vY4rbfRZ82Obl50vEXNieWJ5QCgHGJlPI8O47Gdf6Yc7X6OfGZkKJeGKxgBsiaHk3d0RY1izJQdABGQxsUqJX1GK-RQDWwAzUgBYyOkAocYDMDxihQWfNU8mPyNc_Lbnze2H97fbj5ubz1eftu9uNkFbKza-bfXYC23lNBnDbRiGsLrewqiHSWsxeDtIQ8omUEHZVndCCTvagauuVefNi1PZjDU6DLFCuKNpEk3jhNJS9pagVyeI5HzbA1a3RAwwzz5B3qMTnTLW8K5T_4EK09KuxVr15T_ofd6XRGKd5NoKy7XuHqKolmhX0Wvb1yeKlo9YYHK7Ehdfjk5wt96C-_sWCFcn_Huc4fgg666vvlwaRTtTPwGI2rUF</recordid><startdate>20160727</startdate><enddate>20160727</enddate><creator>Barnes, Hannah C.</creator><creator>Houze, Robert A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160727</creationdate><title>Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems</title><author>Barnes, Hannah C. ; Houze, Robert A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>cloud microphysics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Doppler radar</topic><topic>Doppler sonar</topic><topic>dual‐polarimetric radar</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>GEOSCIENCES</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Inflow</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mesoscale convective complexes</topic><topic>Mesoscale convective systems</topic><topic>Mesoscale phenomena</topic><topic>Microphysics</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Parametrization</topic><topic>particle identification algorithm</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radar data</topic><topic>Radial velocity</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Reflectivity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Spatial variability</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>stratiform precipitation</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Vertical velocities</topic><topic>Water inflow</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Hannah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houze, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnes, Hannah C.</au><au>Houze, Robert A.</au><aucorp>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2016-07-27</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>8269</spage><epage>8296</epage><pages>8269-8296</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to develop the same mesoscale circulations as observations by assimilating radial velocity data from a Doppler radar. The same general layering of microphysical processes was found in observations and simulations with deposition anywhere above the 0°C level, aggregation at and above the 0°C level, melting at and below the 0°C level, and riming near the 0°C level. Thus, this study is consistent with the layered ice microphysical pattern portrayed in previous conceptual models and indicated by dual‐polarization radar data. Spatial variability of riming in the simulations suggests that riming in the midlevel inflow is related to convective‐scale vertical velocity perturbations. Finally, this study sheds light on limitations of current generally available bulk microphysical parameterizations. In each parameterization, the layers in which aggregation and riming took place were generally too thick and the frequency of riming was generally too high compared to the observations and theory. Additionally, none of the parameterizations produced similar details in every microphysical spatial pattern. Discrepancies in the patterns of microphysical processes between parameterizations likely factor into creating substantial differences in model reflectivity patterns. It is concluded that improved parameterizations of ice‐phase microphysics will be essential to obtain reliable, consistent model simulations of tropical oceanic MCSs. Key Points Simulated ice processes in the midlevel inflow are consistent with radar observations and theory Of the processes considered, simulated riming and aggregation differ the most from observations Disparate simulated ice microphysical patterns factor into reflectivity differences</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2016JD025074</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2016-07, Vol.121 (14), p.8269-8296
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1342296
source Wiley; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agglomeration
Aggregation
Brackish
cloud microphysics
Computer simulation
Doppler radar
Doppler sonar
dual‐polarimetric radar
Geophysics
GEOSCIENCES
Ice
Inflow
Marine
Mathematical models
Mesoscale convective complexes
Mesoscale convective systems
Mesoscale phenomena
Microphysics
Oceans
Parameterization
Parametrization
particle identification algorithm
Radar
Radar data
Radial velocity
Reflectance
Reflectivity
Simulation
Spatial data
Spatial variability
Spatial variations
stratiform precipitation
Tropical climate
Velocity
Vertical velocities
Water inflow
Weather forecasting
title Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A17%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20observed%20and%20simulated%20spatial%20patterns%20of%20ice%20microphysical%20processes%20in%20tropical%20oceanic%20mesoscale%20convective%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Barnes,%20Hannah%20C.&rft.aucorp=Pacific%20Northwest%20National%20Lab.%20(PNNL),%20Richland,%20WA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2016-07-27&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=8269&rft.epage=8296&rft.pages=8269-8296&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2016JD025074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1835650883%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811755063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true