Loading…
Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems
To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2016-07, Vol.121 (14), p.8269-8296 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873 |
container_end_page | 8296 |
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 8269 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Barnes, Hannah C. Houze, Robert A. |
description | To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to develop the same mesoscale circulations as observations by assimilating radial velocity data from a Doppler radar. The same general layering of microphysical processes was found in observations and simulations with deposition anywhere above the 0°C level, aggregation at and above the 0°C level, melting at and below the 0°C level, and riming near the 0°C level. Thus, this study is consistent with the layered ice microphysical pattern portrayed in previous conceptual models and indicated by dual‐polarization radar data. Spatial variability of riming in the simulations suggests that riming in the midlevel inflow is related to convective‐scale vertical velocity perturbations. Finally, this study sheds light on limitations of current generally available bulk microphysical parameterizations. In each parameterization, the layers in which aggregation and riming took place were generally too thick and the frequency of riming was generally too high compared to the observations and theory. Additionally, none of the parameterizations produced similar details in every microphysical spatial pattern. Discrepancies in the patterns of microphysical processes between parameterizations likely factor into creating substantial differences in model reflectivity patterns. It is concluded that improved parameterizations of ice‐phase microphysics will be essential to obtain reliable, consistent model simulations of tropical oceanic MCSs.
Key Points
Simulated ice processes in the midlevel inflow are consistent with radar observations and theory
Of the processes considered, simulated riming and aggregation differ the most from observations
Disparate simulated ice microphysical patterns factor into reflectivity differences |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2016JD025074 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1342296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835650883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1uFDEMx0cIJKrSGw8QwYUDC_memSPaQqGqhIR64BZlMh411UyyxNlF-wC8Nx4WIcShIhc79k-2_5ab5rngbwTn8q3kwl5fcml4qx81Z1LYftP1vX38x2-_Pm0uEO85vY4rbfRZ82Obl50vEXNieWJ5QCgHGJlPI8O47Gdf6Yc7X6OfGZkKJeGKxgBsiaHk3d0RY1izJQdABGQxsUqJX1GK-RQDWwAzUgBYyOkAocYDMDxihQWfNU8mPyNc_Lbnze2H97fbj5ubz1eftu9uNkFbKza-bfXYC23lNBnDbRiGsLrewqiHSWsxeDtIQ8omUEHZVndCCTvagauuVefNi1PZjDU6DLFCuKNpEk3jhNJS9pagVyeI5HzbA1a3RAwwzz5B3qMTnTLW8K5T_4EK09KuxVr15T_ofd6XRGKd5NoKy7XuHqKolmhX0Wvb1yeKlo9YYHK7Ehdfjk5wt96C-_sWCFcn_Huc4fgg666vvlwaRTtTPwGI2rUF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811755063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Barnes, Hannah C. ; Houze, Robert A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Hannah C. ; Houze, Robert A. ; Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to develop the same mesoscale circulations as observations by assimilating radial velocity data from a Doppler radar. The same general layering of microphysical processes was found in observations and simulations with deposition anywhere above the 0°C level, aggregation at and above the 0°C level, melting at and below the 0°C level, and riming near the 0°C level. Thus, this study is consistent with the layered ice microphysical pattern portrayed in previous conceptual models and indicated by dual‐polarization radar data. Spatial variability of riming in the simulations suggests that riming in the midlevel inflow is related to convective‐scale vertical velocity perturbations. Finally, this study sheds light on limitations of current generally available bulk microphysical parameterizations. In each parameterization, the layers in which aggregation and riming took place were generally too thick and the frequency of riming was generally too high compared to the observations and theory. Additionally, none of the parameterizations produced similar details in every microphysical spatial pattern. Discrepancies in the patterns of microphysical processes between parameterizations likely factor into creating substantial differences in model reflectivity patterns. It is concluded that improved parameterizations of ice‐phase microphysics will be essential to obtain reliable, consistent model simulations of tropical oceanic MCSs.
Key Points
Simulated ice processes in the midlevel inflow are consistent with radar observations and theory
Of the processes considered, simulated riming and aggregation differ the most from observations
Disparate simulated ice microphysical patterns factor into reflectivity differences</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agglomeration ; Aggregation ; Brackish ; cloud microphysics ; Computer simulation ; Doppler radar ; Doppler sonar ; dual‐polarimetric radar ; Geophysics ; GEOSCIENCES ; Ice ; Inflow ; Marine ; Mathematical models ; Mesoscale convective complexes ; Mesoscale convective systems ; Mesoscale phenomena ; Microphysics ; Oceans ; Parameterization ; Parametrization ; particle identification algorithm ; Radar ; Radar data ; Radial velocity ; Reflectance ; Reflectivity ; Simulation ; Spatial data ; Spatial variability ; Spatial variations ; stratiform precipitation ; Tropical climate ; Velocity ; Vertical velocities ; Water inflow ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2016-07, Vol.121 (14), p.8269-8296</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1342296$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Hannah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houze, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to develop the same mesoscale circulations as observations by assimilating radial velocity data from a Doppler radar. The same general layering of microphysical processes was found in observations and simulations with deposition anywhere above the 0°C level, aggregation at and above the 0°C level, melting at and below the 0°C level, and riming near the 0°C level. Thus, this study is consistent with the layered ice microphysical pattern portrayed in previous conceptual models and indicated by dual‐polarization radar data. Spatial variability of riming in the simulations suggests that riming in the midlevel inflow is related to convective‐scale vertical velocity perturbations. Finally, this study sheds light on limitations of current generally available bulk microphysical parameterizations. In each parameterization, the layers in which aggregation and riming took place were generally too thick and the frequency of riming was generally too high compared to the observations and theory. Additionally, none of the parameterizations produced similar details in every microphysical spatial pattern. Discrepancies in the patterns of microphysical processes between parameterizations likely factor into creating substantial differences in model reflectivity patterns. It is concluded that improved parameterizations of ice‐phase microphysics will be essential to obtain reliable, consistent model simulations of tropical oceanic MCSs.
Key Points
Simulated ice processes in the midlevel inflow are consistent with radar observations and theory
Of the processes considered, simulated riming and aggregation differ the most from observations
Disparate simulated ice microphysical patterns factor into reflectivity differences</description><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>cloud microphysics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Doppler radar</subject><subject>Doppler sonar</subject><subject>dual‐polarimetric radar</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>GEOSCIENCES</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Inflow</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mesoscale convective complexes</subject><subject>Mesoscale convective systems</subject><subject>Mesoscale phenomena</subject><subject>Microphysics</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Parametrization</subject><subject>particle identification algorithm</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radar data</subject><subject>Radial velocity</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Reflectivity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Spatial variability</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>stratiform precipitation</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Vertical velocities</subject><subject>Water inflow</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNks1uFDEMx0cIJKrSGw8QwYUDC_memSPaQqGqhIR64BZlMh411UyyxNlF-wC8Nx4WIcShIhc79k-2_5ab5rngbwTn8q3kwl5fcml4qx81Z1LYftP1vX38x2-_Pm0uEO85vY4rbfRZ82Obl50vEXNieWJ5QCgHGJlPI8O47Gdf6Yc7X6OfGZkKJeGKxgBsiaHk3d0RY1izJQdABGQxsUqJX1GK-RQDWwAzUgBYyOkAocYDMDxihQWfNU8mPyNc_Lbnze2H97fbj5ubz1eftu9uNkFbKza-bfXYC23lNBnDbRiGsLrewqiHSWsxeDtIQ8omUEHZVndCCTvagauuVefNi1PZjDU6DLFCuKNpEk3jhNJS9pagVyeI5HzbA1a3RAwwzz5B3qMTnTLW8K5T_4EK09KuxVr15T_ofd6XRGKd5NoKy7XuHqKolmhX0Wvb1yeKlo9YYHK7Ehdfjk5wt96C-_sWCFcn_Huc4fgg666vvlwaRTtTPwGI2rUF</recordid><startdate>20160727</startdate><enddate>20160727</enddate><creator>Barnes, Hannah C.</creator><creator>Houze, Robert A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160727</creationdate><title>Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems</title><author>Barnes, Hannah C. ; Houze, Robert A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>cloud microphysics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Doppler radar</topic><topic>Doppler sonar</topic><topic>dual‐polarimetric radar</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>GEOSCIENCES</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Inflow</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mesoscale convective complexes</topic><topic>Mesoscale convective systems</topic><topic>Mesoscale phenomena</topic><topic>Microphysics</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Parametrization</topic><topic>particle identification algorithm</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radar data</topic><topic>Radial velocity</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Reflectivity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Spatial variability</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>stratiform precipitation</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Vertical velocities</topic><topic>Water inflow</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Hannah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houze, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnes, Hannah C.</au><au>Houze, Robert A.</au><aucorp>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2016-07-27</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>8269</spage><epage>8296</epage><pages>8269-8296</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>To equitably compare the spatial pattern of ice microphysical processes produced by three microphysical parameterizations with each other, observations, and theory, simulations of tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were forced to develop the same mesoscale circulations as observations by assimilating radial velocity data from a Doppler radar. The same general layering of microphysical processes was found in observations and simulations with deposition anywhere above the 0°C level, aggregation at and above the 0°C level, melting at and below the 0°C level, and riming near the 0°C level. Thus, this study is consistent with the layered ice microphysical pattern portrayed in previous conceptual models and indicated by dual‐polarization radar data. Spatial variability of riming in the simulations suggests that riming in the midlevel inflow is related to convective‐scale vertical velocity perturbations. Finally, this study sheds light on limitations of current generally available bulk microphysical parameterizations. In each parameterization, the layers in which aggregation and riming took place were generally too thick and the frequency of riming was generally too high compared to the observations and theory. Additionally, none of the parameterizations produced similar details in every microphysical spatial pattern. Discrepancies in the patterns of microphysical processes between parameterizations likely factor into creating substantial differences in model reflectivity patterns. It is concluded that improved parameterizations of ice‐phase microphysics will be essential to obtain reliable, consistent model simulations of tropical oceanic MCSs.
Key Points
Simulated ice processes in the midlevel inflow are consistent with radar observations and theory
Of the processes considered, simulated riming and aggregation differ the most from observations
Disparate simulated ice microphysical patterns factor into reflectivity differences</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2016JD025074</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2016-07, Vol.121 (14), p.8269-8296 |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1342296 |
source | Wiley; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agglomeration Aggregation Brackish cloud microphysics Computer simulation Doppler radar Doppler sonar dual‐polarimetric radar Geophysics GEOSCIENCES Ice Inflow Marine Mathematical models Mesoscale convective complexes Mesoscale convective systems Mesoscale phenomena Microphysics Oceans Parameterization Parametrization particle identification algorithm Radar Radar data Radial velocity Reflectance Reflectivity Simulation Spatial data Spatial variability Spatial variations stratiform precipitation Tropical climate Velocity Vertical velocities Water inflow Weather forecasting |
title | Comparison of observed and simulated spatial patterns of ice microphysical processes in tropical oceanic mesoscale convective systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A17%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20observed%20and%20simulated%20spatial%20patterns%20of%20ice%20microphysical%20processes%20in%20tropical%20oceanic%20mesoscale%20convective%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Barnes,%20Hannah%20C.&rft.aucorp=Pacific%20Northwest%20National%20Lab.%20(PNNL),%20Richland,%20WA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2016-07-27&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=8269&rft.epage=8296&rft.pages=8269-8296&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2016JD025074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1835650883%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-a774d91462ff5506cbbc2ff5a6ed4bf441ba6b25454fe3c367481316d6b03873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811755063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |