Loading…

Prospective CO2 saline resource estimation methodology: Refinement of existing US-DOE-NETL methods based on data availability

Carbon storage resource estimation in subsurface saline formations plays an important role in establishing the scale of carbon capture and storage activities for governmental policy and commercial project decision-making. Prospective CO2 resource estimation of large regions or subregions, such as a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of greenhouse gas control 2016-11, Vol.54 (P1), p.242-249
Main Authors: Goodman, Angela, Sanguinito, Sean, Levine, Jonathan S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-44972375fc873f3db1d8ebadf823ef58bb44449d74d17389333053ad11db84fd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-44972375fc873f3db1d8ebadf823ef58bb44449d74d17389333053ad11db84fd3
container_end_page 249
container_issue P1
container_start_page 242
container_title International journal of greenhouse gas control
container_volume 54
creator Goodman, Angela
Sanguinito, Sean
Levine, Jonathan S.
description Carbon storage resource estimation in subsurface saline formations plays an important role in establishing the scale of carbon capture and storage activities for governmental policy and commercial project decision-making. Prospective CO2 resource estimation of large regions or subregions, such as a basin, occurs at the initial screening stages of a project using only limited publicly available geophysical data, i.e. prior to project-specific site selection data generation. As the scale of investigation is narrowed and selected areas and formations are identified, prospective CO2 resource estimation can be refined and uncertainty narrowed when site-specific geophysical data are available. Here, we refine the United States Department of Energy – National Energy Technology Laboratory (US-DOE-NETL) methodology as the scale of investigation is narrowed from very large regional assessments down to selected areas and formations that may be developed for commercial storage. In addition, we present a new notation that explicitly identifies differences between data availability and data sources used for geologic parameters and efficiency factors as the scale of investigation is narrowed. This CO2 resource estimation method is available for screening formations in a tool called CO2-SCREEN.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.09.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1344494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1016_j_ijggc_2016_09_009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-44972375fc873f3db1d8ebadf823ef58bb44449d74d17389333053ad11db84fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkF1PwyAUhonRxDn9Bd4Q71uhtCv1zsz5kSzO6HZNKBw6mq4sBRd34X-XuZ0bDuHhzTkPQreUpJTQyX2b2rZpVJrFS0qqlJDqDI0oL3lCaM7PY18WJCk4m1yiK-9bQiY0PozQ78fg_BZUsDvA00WGvexsD3gA774HBRh8sBsZrOvxBsLaade5Zv-AP8FEbgN9wM5g-LGR6xu8-kqeFrPkfbacn3iPa-lB4xigZZBY7qTtZG07G_bX6MLIzsPN6Ryj1fNsOX1N5ouXt-njPFGsrEKS51WZsbIwipfMMF1TzaGW2vCMgSl4XeexKl3mmpaMV4wxUjCpKdU1z41mY3R3zHVxSuGVDaDWyvV9XFxQdvicR4gdIRWV-AGM2A5x9WEvKBEHzaIV_5rFQbMglYia2R_DHXOK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective CO2 saline resource estimation methodology: Refinement of existing US-DOE-NETL methods based on data availability</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Goodman, Angela ; Sanguinito, Sean ; Levine, Jonathan S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Angela ; Sanguinito, Sean ; Levine, Jonathan S. ; National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</creatorcontrib><description>Carbon storage resource estimation in subsurface saline formations plays an important role in establishing the scale of carbon capture and storage activities for governmental policy and commercial project decision-making. Prospective CO2 resource estimation of large regions or subregions, such as a basin, occurs at the initial screening stages of a project using only limited publicly available geophysical data, i.e. prior to project-specific site selection data generation. As the scale of investigation is narrowed and selected areas and formations are identified, prospective CO2 resource estimation can be refined and uncertainty narrowed when site-specific geophysical data are available. Here, we refine the United States Department of Energy – National Energy Technology Laboratory (US-DOE-NETL) methodology as the scale of investigation is narrowed from very large regional assessments down to selected areas and formations that may be developed for commercial storage. In addition, we present a new notation that explicitly identifies differences between data availability and data sources used for geologic parameters and efficiency factors as the scale of investigation is narrowed. This CO2 resource estimation method is available for screening formations in a tool called CO2-SCREEN.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1750-5836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.09.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier</publisher><subject>CO2 resource estimation ; CO2 sequestration ; data availability ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; geologic storage ; GEOSCIENCES ; saline formations</subject><ispartof>International journal of greenhouse gas control, 2016-11, Vol.54 (P1), p.242-249</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-44972375fc873f3db1d8ebadf823ef58bb44449d74d17389333053ad11db84fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-44972375fc873f3db1d8ebadf823ef58bb44449d74d17389333053ad11db84fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3004-3303 ; 0000000330043303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1344494$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguinito, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jonathan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective CO2 saline resource estimation methodology: Refinement of existing US-DOE-NETL methods based on data availability</title><title>International journal of greenhouse gas control</title><description>Carbon storage resource estimation in subsurface saline formations plays an important role in establishing the scale of carbon capture and storage activities for governmental policy and commercial project decision-making. Prospective CO2 resource estimation of large regions or subregions, such as a basin, occurs at the initial screening stages of a project using only limited publicly available geophysical data, i.e. prior to project-specific site selection data generation. As the scale of investigation is narrowed and selected areas and formations are identified, prospective CO2 resource estimation can be refined and uncertainty narrowed when site-specific geophysical data are available. Here, we refine the United States Department of Energy – National Energy Technology Laboratory (US-DOE-NETL) methodology as the scale of investigation is narrowed from very large regional assessments down to selected areas and formations that may be developed for commercial storage. In addition, we present a new notation that explicitly identifies differences between data availability and data sources used for geologic parameters and efficiency factors as the scale of investigation is narrowed. This CO2 resource estimation method is available for screening formations in a tool called CO2-SCREEN.</description><subject>CO2 resource estimation</subject><subject>CO2 sequestration</subject><subject>data availability</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>geologic storage</subject><subject>GEOSCIENCES</subject><subject>saline formations</subject><issn>1750-5836</issn><issn>1878-0148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkF1PwyAUhonRxDn9Bd4Q71uhtCv1zsz5kSzO6HZNKBw6mq4sBRd34X-XuZ0bDuHhzTkPQreUpJTQyX2b2rZpVJrFS0qqlJDqDI0oL3lCaM7PY18WJCk4m1yiK-9bQiY0PozQ78fg_BZUsDvA00WGvexsD3gA774HBRh8sBsZrOvxBsLaade5Zv-AP8FEbgN9wM5g-LGR6xu8-kqeFrPkfbacn3iPa-lB4xigZZBY7qTtZG07G_bX6MLIzsPN6Ryj1fNsOX1N5ouXt-njPFGsrEKS51WZsbIwipfMMF1TzaGW2vCMgSl4XeexKl3mmpaMV4wxUjCpKdU1z41mY3R3zHVxSuGVDaDWyvV9XFxQdvicR4gdIRWV-AGM2A5x9WEvKBEHzaIV_5rFQbMglYia2R_DHXOK</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Goodman, Angela</creator><creator>Sanguinito, Sean</creator><creator>Levine, Jonathan S.</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-3303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000330043303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Prospective CO2 saline resource estimation methodology: Refinement of existing US-DOE-NETL methods based on data availability</title><author>Goodman, Angela ; Sanguinito, Sean ; Levine, Jonathan S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-44972375fc873f3db1d8ebadf823ef58bb44449d74d17389333053ad11db84fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>CO2 resource estimation</topic><topic>CO2 sequestration</topic><topic>data availability</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>geologic storage</topic><topic>GEOSCIENCES</topic><topic>saline formations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguinito, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jonathan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of greenhouse gas control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodman, Angela</au><au>Sanguinito, Sean</au><au>Levine, Jonathan S.</au><aucorp>National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective CO2 saline resource estimation methodology: Refinement of existing US-DOE-NETL methods based on data availability</atitle><jtitle>International journal of greenhouse gas control</jtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>P1</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>242-249</pages><issn>1750-5836</issn><eissn>1878-0148</eissn><abstract>Carbon storage resource estimation in subsurface saline formations plays an important role in establishing the scale of carbon capture and storage activities for governmental policy and commercial project decision-making. Prospective CO2 resource estimation of large regions or subregions, such as a basin, occurs at the initial screening stages of a project using only limited publicly available geophysical data, i.e. prior to project-specific site selection data generation. As the scale of investigation is narrowed and selected areas and formations are identified, prospective CO2 resource estimation can be refined and uncertainty narrowed when site-specific geophysical data are available. Here, we refine the United States Department of Energy – National Energy Technology Laboratory (US-DOE-NETL) methodology as the scale of investigation is narrowed from very large regional assessments down to selected areas and formations that may be developed for commercial storage. In addition, we present a new notation that explicitly identifies differences between data availability and data sources used for geologic parameters and efficiency factors as the scale of investigation is narrowed. This CO2 resource estimation method is available for screening formations in a tool called CO2-SCREEN.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.09.009</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-3303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000330043303</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1750-5836
ispartof International journal of greenhouse gas control, 2016-11, Vol.54 (P1), p.242-249
issn 1750-5836
1878-0148
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1344494
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects CO2 resource estimation
CO2 sequestration
data availability
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
geologic storage
GEOSCIENCES
saline formations
title Prospective CO2 saline resource estimation methodology: Refinement of existing US-DOE-NETL methods based on data availability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A48%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20CO2%20saline%20resource%20estimation%20methodology:%20Refinement%20of%20existing%20US-DOE-NETL%20methods%20based%20on%20data%20availability&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20greenhouse%20gas%20control&rft.au=Goodman,%20Angela&rft.aucorp=National%20Energy%20Technology%20Lab.%20(NETL),%20Pittsburgh,%20PA,%20and%20Morgantown,%20WV%20(United%20States).%20In-house%20Research&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=P1&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=242-249&rft.issn=1750-5836&rft.eissn=1878-0148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.09.009&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_osti_%3E10_1016_j_ijggc_2016_09_009%3C/crossref_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-44972375fc873f3db1d8ebadf823ef58bb44449d74d17389333053ad11db84fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true