Loading…
Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models
reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability....
Saved in:
Published in: | Reliability engineering & system safety 2017-02, Vol.158 (C), p.117-129 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83 |
container_end_page | 129 |
container_issue | C |
container_start_page | 117 |
container_title | Reliability engineering & system safety |
container_volume | 158 |
creator | Zwirglmaier, Kilian Straub, Daniel Groth, Katrina M. |
description | reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability. The proposed framework provides the foundation to resolve several needs frequently expressed by the HRA community. First, the developed extended BN structure reflects the causal paths found in cognitive psychology literature, thereby addressing the need for causal traceability and strong scientific basis in HRA. Secondly, the use of node reduction algorithms allows the BN to be condensed to a level of detail at which quantification is as straightforward as the techniques used in existing HRA. We illustrate the framework by developing a BN version of the critical data misperceived crew failure mode in the IDHEAS HRA method, which is currently under development at the US NRC [45]. We illustrate how the model could be quantified with a combination of expert-probabilities and information from operator performance databases such as SACADA. This paper lays the foundations necessary to expand the cognitive and quantitative foundations of HRA.
•A framework for building traceable BNs for HRA, based on cognitive causal paths.•A qualitative BN structure, directly showing these causal paths is developed.•Node reduction algorithms are used for making the BN structure quantifiable.•BN quantified through expert estimates and observed data (Bayesian updating).•The framework is illustrated for a crew failure mode of IDHEAS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1412602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0951832016306603</els_id><sourcerecordid>1944561511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFvEzEQhS1UJNLCH-BklfOmtnfXu5Z6gQgoUiUucOJgTe1J47Cxg8fbKv8er9JzTzN6-t5o3mPsoxRrKaS-2a8zEq1V3auwFlK8YSs5DqYRY6sv2EqYXjZjq8Q7dkm0F0J0ph9W7M8GjmXOIT5ylx5jKOEJuYOZYOJHKDviIfLdfIDIM04BHsIUyolDhOlEgfhzKDv-BU5IoSIRy3PKf_kheZzoPXu7hYnww8u8Yr-_ff21uWvuf37_sfl837jWmNL4ttcGVIcOQaMG3w26N2D8dlAePEjAAbQ36sELM3aj32rZDcK0So--92N7xa7PdxOVYMmFgm7nUozoipWdVFqoCn06Q8ec_s1Ixe7TnGsMstJ0Xa9lL2Wl1JlyORFl3NpjDgfIJyuFXZq2e7s0bZemF602XU23Z1PNjE8B8_IDRoc-5OUFn8Jr9v8_3YhN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1944561511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Zwirglmaier, Kilian ; Straub, Daniel ; Groth, Katrina M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zwirglmaier, Kilian ; Straub, Daniel ; Groth, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><description>reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability. The proposed framework provides the foundation to resolve several needs frequently expressed by the HRA community. First, the developed extended BN structure reflects the causal paths found in cognitive psychology literature, thereby addressing the need for causal traceability and strong scientific basis in HRA. Secondly, the use of node reduction algorithms allows the BN to be condensed to a level of detail at which quantification is as straightforward as the techniques used in existing HRA. We illustrate the framework by developing a BN version of the critical data misperceived crew failure mode in the IDHEAS HRA method, which is currently under development at the US NRC [45]. We illustrate how the model could be quantified with a combination of expert-probabilities and information from operator performance databases such as SACADA. This paper lays the foundations necessary to expand the cognitive and quantitative foundations of HRA.
•A framework for building traceable BNs for HRA, based on cognitive causal paths.•A qualitative BN structure, directly showing these causal paths is developed.•Node reduction algorithms are used for making the BN structure quantifiable.•BN quantified through expert estimates and observed data (Bayesian updating).•The framework is illustrated for a crew failure mode of IDHEAS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-8320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian networks ; Bayesian updating ; Causal paths ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive factors ; Cognitive psychology ; HRA ; Mathematical models ; Network reliability ; Operator performance ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Reliability engineering</subject><ispartof>Reliability engineering & system safety, 2017-02, Vol.158 (C), p.117-129</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1412602$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zwirglmaier, Kilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groth, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><title>Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models</title><title>Reliability engineering & system safety</title><description>reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability. The proposed framework provides the foundation to resolve several needs frequently expressed by the HRA community. First, the developed extended BN structure reflects the causal paths found in cognitive psychology literature, thereby addressing the need for causal traceability and strong scientific basis in HRA. Secondly, the use of node reduction algorithms allows the BN to be condensed to a level of detail at which quantification is as straightforward as the techniques used in existing HRA. We illustrate the framework by developing a BN version of the critical data misperceived crew failure mode in the IDHEAS HRA method, which is currently under development at the US NRC [45]. We illustrate how the model could be quantified with a combination of expert-probabilities and information from operator performance databases such as SACADA. This paper lays the foundations necessary to expand the cognitive and quantitative foundations of HRA.
•A framework for building traceable BNs for HRA, based on cognitive causal paths.•A qualitative BN structure, directly showing these causal paths is developed.•Node reduction algorithms are used for making the BN structure quantifiable.•BN quantified through expert estimates and observed data (Bayesian updating).•The framework is illustrated for a crew failure mode of IDHEAS.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian networks</subject><subject>Bayesian updating</subject><subject>Causal paths</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive factors</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>HRA</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Network reliability</subject><subject>Operator performance</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><issn>0951-8320</issn><issn>1879-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFvEzEQhS1UJNLCH-BklfOmtnfXu5Z6gQgoUiUucOJgTe1J47Cxg8fbKv8er9JzTzN6-t5o3mPsoxRrKaS-2a8zEq1V3auwFlK8YSs5DqYRY6sv2EqYXjZjq8Q7dkm0F0J0ph9W7M8GjmXOIT5ylx5jKOEJuYOZYOJHKDviIfLdfIDIM04BHsIUyolDhOlEgfhzKDv-BU5IoSIRy3PKf_kheZzoPXu7hYnww8u8Yr-_ff21uWvuf37_sfl837jWmNL4ttcGVIcOQaMG3w26N2D8dlAePEjAAbQ36sELM3aj32rZDcK0So--92N7xa7PdxOVYMmFgm7nUozoipWdVFqoCn06Q8ec_s1Ixe7TnGsMstJ0Xa9lL2Wl1JlyORFl3NpjDgfIJyuFXZq2e7s0bZemF602XU23Z1PNjE8B8_IDRoc-5OUFn8Jr9v8_3YhN</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Zwirglmaier, Kilian</creator><creator>Straub, Daniel</creator><creator>Groth, Katrina M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models</title><author>Zwirglmaier, Kilian ; Straub, Daniel ; Groth, Katrina M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian networks</topic><topic>Bayesian updating</topic><topic>Causal paths</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive factors</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>HRA</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Network reliability</topic><topic>Operator performance</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zwirglmaier, Kilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groth, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Reliability engineering & system safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zwirglmaier, Kilian</au><au>Straub, Daniel</au><au>Groth, Katrina M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models</atitle><jtitle>Reliability engineering & system safety</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>117-129</pages><issn>0951-8320</issn><eissn>1879-0836</eissn><abstract>reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability. The proposed framework provides the foundation to resolve several needs frequently expressed by the HRA community. First, the developed extended BN structure reflects the causal paths found in cognitive psychology literature, thereby addressing the need for causal traceability and strong scientific basis in HRA. Secondly, the use of node reduction algorithms allows the BN to be condensed to a level of detail at which quantification is as straightforward as the techniques used in existing HRA. We illustrate the framework by developing a BN version of the critical data misperceived crew failure mode in the IDHEAS HRA method, which is currently under development at the US NRC [45]. We illustrate how the model could be quantified with a combination of expert-probabilities and information from operator performance databases such as SACADA. This paper lays the foundations necessary to expand the cognitive and quantitative foundations of HRA.
•A framework for building traceable BNs for HRA, based on cognitive causal paths.•A qualitative BN structure, directly showing these causal paths is developed.•Node reduction algorithms are used for making the BN structure quantifiable.•BN quantified through expert estimates and observed data (Bayesian updating).•The framework is illustrated for a crew failure mode of IDHEAS.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-8320 |
ispartof | Reliability engineering & system safety, 2017-02, Vol.158 (C), p.117-129 |
issn | 0951-8320 1879-0836 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1412602 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Bayesian networks Bayesian updating Causal paths Cognitive ability Cognitive factors Cognitive psychology HRA Mathematical models Network reliability Operator performance Reliability Reliability analysis Reliability engineering |
title | Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A24%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capturing%20cognitive%20causal%20paths%20in%20human%20reliability%20analysis%20with%20Bayesian%20network%20models&rft.jtitle=Reliability%20engineering%20&%20system%20safety&rft.au=Zwirglmaier,%20Kilian&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=117-129&rft.issn=0951-8320&rft.eissn=1879-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1944561511%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1944561511&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |