Loading…

Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models

reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reliability engineering & system safety 2017-02, Vol.158 (C), p.117-129
Main Authors: Zwirglmaier, Kilian, Straub, Daniel, Groth, Katrina M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83
container_end_page 129
container_issue C
container_start_page 117
container_title Reliability engineering & system safety
container_volume 158
creator Zwirglmaier, Kilian
Straub, Daniel
Groth, Katrina M.
description reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability. The proposed framework provides the foundation to resolve several needs frequently expressed by the HRA community. First, the developed extended BN structure reflects the causal paths found in cognitive psychology literature, thereby addressing the need for causal traceability and strong scientific basis in HRA. Secondly, the use of node reduction algorithms allows the BN to be condensed to a level of detail at which quantification is as straightforward as the techniques used in existing HRA. We illustrate the framework by developing a BN version of the critical data misperceived crew failure mode in the IDHEAS HRA method, which is currently under development at the US NRC [45]. We illustrate how the model could be quantified with a combination of expert-probabilities and information from operator performance databases such as SACADA. This paper lays the foundations necessary to expand the cognitive and quantitative foundations of HRA. •A framework for building traceable BNs for HRA, based on cognitive causal paths.•A qualitative BN structure, directly showing these causal paths is developed.•Node reduction algorithms are used for making the BN structure quantifiable.•BN quantified through expert estimates and observed data (Bayesian updating).•The framework is illustrated for a crew failure mode of IDHEAS.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1412602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0951832016306603</els_id><sourcerecordid>1944561511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFvEzEQhS1UJNLCH-BklfOmtnfXu5Z6gQgoUiUucOJgTe1J47Cxg8fbKv8er9JzTzN6-t5o3mPsoxRrKaS-2a8zEq1V3auwFlK8YSs5DqYRY6sv2EqYXjZjq8Q7dkm0F0J0ph9W7M8GjmXOIT5ylx5jKOEJuYOZYOJHKDviIfLdfIDIM04BHsIUyolDhOlEgfhzKDv-BU5IoSIRy3PKf_kheZzoPXu7hYnww8u8Yr-_ff21uWvuf37_sfl837jWmNL4ttcGVIcOQaMG3w26N2D8dlAePEjAAbQ36sELM3aj32rZDcK0So--92N7xa7PdxOVYMmFgm7nUozoipWdVFqoCn06Q8ec_s1Ixe7TnGsMstJ0Xa9lL2Wl1JlyORFl3NpjDgfIJyuFXZq2e7s0bZemF602XU23Z1PNjE8B8_IDRoc-5OUFn8Jr9v8_3YhN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1944561511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Zwirglmaier, Kilian ; Straub, Daniel ; Groth, Katrina M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zwirglmaier, Kilian ; Straub, Daniel ; Groth, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><description>reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability. The proposed framework provides the foundation to resolve several needs frequently expressed by the HRA community. First, the developed extended BN structure reflects the causal paths found in cognitive psychology literature, thereby addressing the need for causal traceability and strong scientific basis in HRA. Secondly, the use of node reduction algorithms allows the BN to be condensed to a level of detail at which quantification is as straightforward as the techniques used in existing HRA. We illustrate the framework by developing a BN version of the critical data misperceived crew failure mode in the IDHEAS HRA method, which is currently under development at the US NRC [45]. We illustrate how the model could be quantified with a combination of expert-probabilities and information from operator performance databases such as SACADA. This paper lays the foundations necessary to expand the cognitive and quantitative foundations of HRA. •A framework for building traceable BNs for HRA, based on cognitive causal paths.•A qualitative BN structure, directly showing these causal paths is developed.•Node reduction algorithms are used for making the BN structure quantifiable.•BN quantified through expert estimates and observed data (Bayesian updating).•The framework is illustrated for a crew failure mode of IDHEAS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-8320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian networks ; Bayesian updating ; Causal paths ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive factors ; Cognitive psychology ; HRA ; Mathematical models ; Network reliability ; Operator performance ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Reliability engineering</subject><ispartof>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety, 2017-02, Vol.158 (C), p.117-129</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1412602$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zwirglmaier, Kilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groth, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><title>Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models</title><title>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</title><description>reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability. The proposed framework provides the foundation to resolve several needs frequently expressed by the HRA community. First, the developed extended BN structure reflects the causal paths found in cognitive psychology literature, thereby addressing the need for causal traceability and strong scientific basis in HRA. Secondly, the use of node reduction algorithms allows the BN to be condensed to a level of detail at which quantification is as straightforward as the techniques used in existing HRA. We illustrate the framework by developing a BN version of the critical data misperceived crew failure mode in the IDHEAS HRA method, which is currently under development at the US NRC [45]. We illustrate how the model could be quantified with a combination of expert-probabilities and information from operator performance databases such as SACADA. This paper lays the foundations necessary to expand the cognitive and quantitative foundations of HRA. •A framework for building traceable BNs for HRA, based on cognitive causal paths.•A qualitative BN structure, directly showing these causal paths is developed.•Node reduction algorithms are used for making the BN structure quantifiable.•BN quantified through expert estimates and observed data (Bayesian updating).•The framework is illustrated for a crew failure mode of IDHEAS.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian networks</subject><subject>Bayesian updating</subject><subject>Causal paths</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive factors</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>HRA</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Network reliability</subject><subject>Operator performance</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><issn>0951-8320</issn><issn>1879-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFvEzEQhS1UJNLCH-BklfOmtnfXu5Z6gQgoUiUucOJgTe1J47Cxg8fbKv8er9JzTzN6-t5o3mPsoxRrKaS-2a8zEq1V3auwFlK8YSs5DqYRY6sv2EqYXjZjq8Q7dkm0F0J0ph9W7M8GjmXOIT5ylx5jKOEJuYOZYOJHKDviIfLdfIDIM04BHsIUyolDhOlEgfhzKDv-BU5IoSIRy3PKf_kheZzoPXu7hYnww8u8Yr-_ff21uWvuf37_sfl837jWmNL4ttcGVIcOQaMG3w26N2D8dlAePEjAAbQ36sELM3aj32rZDcK0So--92N7xa7PdxOVYMmFgm7nUozoipWdVFqoCn06Q8ec_s1Ixe7TnGsMstJ0Xa9lL2Wl1JlyORFl3NpjDgfIJyuFXZq2e7s0bZemF602XU23Z1PNjE8B8_IDRoc-5OUFn8Jr9v8_3YhN</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Zwirglmaier, Kilian</creator><creator>Straub, Daniel</creator><creator>Groth, Katrina M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models</title><author>Zwirglmaier, Kilian ; Straub, Daniel ; Groth, Katrina M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian networks</topic><topic>Bayesian updating</topic><topic>Causal paths</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive factors</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>HRA</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Network reliability</topic><topic>Operator performance</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zwirglmaier, Kilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groth, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zwirglmaier, Kilian</au><au>Straub, Daniel</au><au>Groth, Katrina M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models</atitle><jtitle>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>117-129</pages><issn>0951-8320</issn><eissn>1879-0836</eissn><abstract>reIn the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been identified as a powerful tool for human reliability analysis (HRA), with multiple advantages over traditional HRA methods. In this paper we illustrate how BNs can be used to include additional, qualitative causal paths to provide traceability. The proposed framework provides the foundation to resolve several needs frequently expressed by the HRA community. First, the developed extended BN structure reflects the causal paths found in cognitive psychology literature, thereby addressing the need for causal traceability and strong scientific basis in HRA. Secondly, the use of node reduction algorithms allows the BN to be condensed to a level of detail at which quantification is as straightforward as the techniques used in existing HRA. We illustrate the framework by developing a BN version of the critical data misperceived crew failure mode in the IDHEAS HRA method, which is currently under development at the US NRC [45]. We illustrate how the model could be quantified with a combination of expert-probabilities and information from operator performance databases such as SACADA. This paper lays the foundations necessary to expand the cognitive and quantitative foundations of HRA. •A framework for building traceable BNs for HRA, based on cognitive causal paths.•A qualitative BN structure, directly showing these causal paths is developed.•Node reduction algorithms are used for making the BN structure quantifiable.•BN quantified through expert estimates and observed data (Bayesian updating).•The framework is illustrated for a crew failure mode of IDHEAS.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-8320
ispartof Reliability engineering & system safety, 2017-02, Vol.158 (C), p.117-129
issn 0951-8320
1879-0836
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1412602
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Bayesian analysis
Bayesian networks
Bayesian updating
Causal paths
Cognitive ability
Cognitive factors
Cognitive psychology
HRA
Mathematical models
Network reliability
Operator performance
Reliability
Reliability analysis
Reliability engineering
title Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A24%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capturing%20cognitive%20causal%20paths%20in%20human%20reliability%20analysis%20with%20Bayesian%20network%20models&rft.jtitle=Reliability%20engineering%20&%20system%20safety&rft.au=Zwirglmaier,%20Kilian&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=117-129&rft.issn=0951-8320&rft.eissn=1879-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1944561511%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-d3569a24ecea6e6ad47659a9df72dada1ae7a6d92bd09848df6147093268d5d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1944561511&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true