Loading…

Life-cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co-production of biofuels and bio-based chemicals: co-product handling methods and implications: Co-product handling methods and implications of life-cycle analysis of biofuel and bio-chemical co-producing biorefineries

New integrated biorefinery (IBR) concepts are being investigated to co-produce hydrocarbon fuels and high-value bio-based chemicals to improve the economic viability of IBRs, to enhance biomass resource utilization efficiencies, and to maximize potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. Unl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining bioproducts and biorefining, 2018-06, Vol.12 (5)
Main Authors: Cai, Hao, Han, Jeongwoo, Wang, Michael, Davis, Ryan, Biddy, Mary, Tan, Eric
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining
container_volume 12
creator Cai, Hao
Han, Jeongwoo
Wang, Michael
Davis, Ryan
Biddy, Mary
Tan, Eric
description New integrated biorefinery (IBR) concepts are being investigated to co-produce hydrocarbon fuels and high-value bio-based chemicals to improve the economic viability of IBRs, to enhance biomass resource utilization efficiencies, and to maximize potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. Unlike fuel-only biorefineries, IBRs may co-produce a significant amount of bio-based chemicals, whose emission implications for specific biorefinery products and the biorefinery as a whole need to be evaluated. We discuss this in principle and apply three sets of co-product handling methods to conduct life-cycle analysis (LCA) of modeled IBRs with co-production of two bioproduct examples - succinic acid and adipic acid - alongside a renewable diesel blendstock fuel product. The LCA results for the specific co-product handling methods that were examined shed light on potential artifacts of product-specific LCA with selected co-product methods. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each method and conclude that (i) a system-level or 'black-box' LCA allocation method is too simplistic to reflect appropriately the GHG burdens of distinctly different processing trains for fuels and chemicals in the IBR context, and (ii) the displacement method is the only co-product handling method that accounts fully for the emission effects of both the fuel product and the non-fuel bio-based co-products in the IBRs within the context of the existing fuel-focused GHG regulatory framework. Alternatively, biorefinery system-level LCA combines benefits of individual products to offer a complete picture. This system-level LCA approach offers a holistic LCA without somewhat arbitrary decisions either on an allocation basis or by the selection of an evaluation metric based on specific products.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bbb.1893
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1479634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1479634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_14796343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj01PAyEQhtFoYv1I-hOIdyqU3ep6bTQePHrw1gA7lDEsNAuN6b-XtbVq0oOeZg7P-84zhIwFnwjOpzda64m4a-QxGYlGTpngUpzs9-r1jJyn9MZ5PaurenQ0fkYLzGyMB6qC8puEiUZLMWRY9ipDSzXGHiwG6BESfcfsqIls1cd2bTLGMOCFsWvwqXR8BphWqUSNgw6N8un-R4S6AnkMS9pBdrHdhrBb-YIOhYWe_4Me7vvDX-y09lZfPt82Q_GvBy_JqS3CcLWbF-T68eFl_sRiyrhIBjMYZ2IIYPJCVLfNTFbyT9AHoRGLyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life-cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co-production of biofuels and bio-based chemicals: co-product handling methods and implications: Co-product handling methods and implications of life-cycle analysis of biofuel and bio-chemical co-producing biorefineries</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Cai, Hao ; Han, Jeongwoo ; Wang, Michael ; Davis, Ryan ; Biddy, Mary ; Tan, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, Hao ; Han, Jeongwoo ; Wang, Michael ; Davis, Ryan ; Biddy, Mary ; Tan, Eric ; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>New integrated biorefinery (IBR) concepts are being investigated to co-produce hydrocarbon fuels and high-value bio-based chemicals to improve the economic viability of IBRs, to enhance biomass resource utilization efficiencies, and to maximize potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. Unlike fuel-only biorefineries, IBRs may co-produce a significant amount of bio-based chemicals, whose emission implications for specific biorefinery products and the biorefinery as a whole need to be evaluated. We discuss this in principle and apply three sets of co-product handling methods to conduct life-cycle analysis (LCA) of modeled IBRs with co-production of two bioproduct examples - succinic acid and adipic acid - alongside a renewable diesel blendstock fuel product. The LCA results for the specific co-product handling methods that were examined shed light on potential artifacts of product-specific LCA with selected co-product methods. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each method and conclude that (i) a system-level or 'black-box' LCA allocation method is too simplistic to reflect appropriately the GHG burdens of distinctly different processing trains for fuels and chemicals in the IBR context, and (ii) the displacement method is the only co-product handling method that accounts fully for the emission effects of both the fuel product and the non-fuel bio-based co-products in the IBRs within the context of the existing fuel-focused GHG regulatory framework. Alternatively, biorefinery system-level LCA combines benefits of individual products to offer a complete picture. This system-level LCA approach offers a holistic LCA without somewhat arbitrary decisions either on an allocation basis or by the selection of an evaluation metric based on specific products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-104X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-1031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley</publisher><subject>09 BIOMASS FUELS ; biorefinery-level analysis ; co-product handling methods ; displacement method ; integrated biorefineries ; life-cycle analysis</subject><ispartof>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2018-06, Vol.12 (5)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000000205669411</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1479634$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jeongwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biddy, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Life-cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co-production of biofuels and bio-based chemicals: co-product handling methods and implications: Co-product handling methods and implications of life-cycle analysis of biofuel and bio-chemical co-producing biorefineries</title><title>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</title><description>New integrated biorefinery (IBR) concepts are being investigated to co-produce hydrocarbon fuels and high-value bio-based chemicals to improve the economic viability of IBRs, to enhance biomass resource utilization efficiencies, and to maximize potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. Unlike fuel-only biorefineries, IBRs may co-produce a significant amount of bio-based chemicals, whose emission implications for specific biorefinery products and the biorefinery as a whole need to be evaluated. We discuss this in principle and apply three sets of co-product handling methods to conduct life-cycle analysis (LCA) of modeled IBRs with co-production of two bioproduct examples - succinic acid and adipic acid - alongside a renewable diesel blendstock fuel product. The LCA results for the specific co-product handling methods that were examined shed light on potential artifacts of product-specific LCA with selected co-product methods. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each method and conclude that (i) a system-level or 'black-box' LCA allocation method is too simplistic to reflect appropriately the GHG burdens of distinctly different processing trains for fuels and chemicals in the IBR context, and (ii) the displacement method is the only co-product handling method that accounts fully for the emission effects of both the fuel product and the non-fuel bio-based co-products in the IBRs within the context of the existing fuel-focused GHG regulatory framework. Alternatively, biorefinery system-level LCA combines benefits of individual products to offer a complete picture. This system-level LCA approach offers a holistic LCA without somewhat arbitrary decisions either on an allocation basis or by the selection of an evaluation metric based on specific products.</description><subject>09 BIOMASS FUELS</subject><subject>biorefinery-level analysis</subject><subject>co-product handling methods</subject><subject>displacement method</subject><subject>integrated biorefineries</subject><subject>life-cycle analysis</subject><issn>1932-104X</issn><issn>1932-1031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj01PAyEQhtFoYv1I-hOIdyqU3ep6bTQePHrw1gA7lDEsNAuN6b-XtbVq0oOeZg7P-84zhIwFnwjOpzda64m4a-QxGYlGTpngUpzs9-r1jJyn9MZ5PaurenQ0fkYLzGyMB6qC8puEiUZLMWRY9ipDSzXGHiwG6BESfcfsqIls1cd2bTLGMOCFsWvwqXR8BphWqUSNgw6N8un-R4S6AnkMS9pBdrHdhrBb-YIOhYWe_4Me7vvDX-y09lZfPt82Q_GvBy_JqS3CcLWbF-T68eFl_sRiyrhIBjMYZ2IIYPJCVLfNTFbyT9AHoRGLyw</recordid><startdate>20180612</startdate><enddate>20180612</enddate><creator>Cai, Hao</creator><creator>Han, Jeongwoo</creator><creator>Wang, Michael</creator><creator>Davis, Ryan</creator><creator>Biddy, Mary</creator><creator>Tan, Eric</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000205669411</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180612</creationdate><title>Life-cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co-production of biofuels and bio-based chemicals: co-product handling methods and implications: Co-product handling methods and implications of life-cycle analysis of biofuel and bio-chemical co-producing biorefineries</title><author>Cai, Hao ; Han, Jeongwoo ; Wang, Michael ; Davis, Ryan ; Biddy, Mary ; Tan, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_14796343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>09 BIOMASS FUELS</topic><topic>biorefinery-level analysis</topic><topic>co-product handling methods</topic><topic>displacement method</topic><topic>integrated biorefineries</topic><topic>life-cycle analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jeongwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biddy, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, Hao</au><au>Han, Jeongwoo</au><au>Wang, Michael</au><au>Davis, Ryan</au><au>Biddy, Mary</au><au>Tan, Eric</au><aucorp>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life-cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co-production of biofuels and bio-based chemicals: co-product handling methods and implications: Co-product handling methods and implications of life-cycle analysis of biofuel and bio-chemical co-producing biorefineries</atitle><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle><date>2018-06-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>1932-104X</issn><eissn>1932-1031</eissn><abstract>New integrated biorefinery (IBR) concepts are being investigated to co-produce hydrocarbon fuels and high-value bio-based chemicals to improve the economic viability of IBRs, to enhance biomass resource utilization efficiencies, and to maximize potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. Unlike fuel-only biorefineries, IBRs may co-produce a significant amount of bio-based chemicals, whose emission implications for specific biorefinery products and the biorefinery as a whole need to be evaluated. We discuss this in principle and apply three sets of co-product handling methods to conduct life-cycle analysis (LCA) of modeled IBRs with co-production of two bioproduct examples - succinic acid and adipic acid - alongside a renewable diesel blendstock fuel product. The LCA results for the specific co-product handling methods that were examined shed light on potential artifacts of product-specific LCA with selected co-product methods. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each method and conclude that (i) a system-level or 'black-box' LCA allocation method is too simplistic to reflect appropriately the GHG burdens of distinctly different processing trains for fuels and chemicals in the IBR context, and (ii) the displacement method is the only co-product handling method that accounts fully for the emission effects of both the fuel product and the non-fuel bio-based co-products in the IBRs within the context of the existing fuel-focused GHG regulatory framework. Alternatively, biorefinery system-level LCA combines benefits of individual products to offer a complete picture. This system-level LCA approach offers a holistic LCA without somewhat arbitrary decisions either on an allocation basis or by the selection of an evaluation metric based on specific products.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/bbb.1893</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000205669411</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-104X
ispartof Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2018-06, Vol.12 (5)
issn 1932-104X
1932-1031
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1479634
source Wiley
subjects 09 BIOMASS FUELS
biorefinery-level analysis
co-product handling methods
displacement method
integrated biorefineries
life-cycle analysis
title Life-cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co-production of biofuels and bio-based chemicals: co-product handling methods and implications: Co-product handling methods and implications of life-cycle analysis of biofuel and bio-chemical co-producing biorefineries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A41%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life-cycle%20analysis%20of%20integrated%20biorefineries%20with%20co-production%20of%20biofuels%20and%20bio-based%20chemicals:%20co-product%20handling%20methods%20and%20implications:%20Co-product%20handling%20methods%20and%20implications%20of%20life-cycle%20analysis%20of%20biofuel%20and%20bio-chemical%20co-producing%20biorefineries&rft.jtitle=Biofuels,%20bioproducts%20and%20biorefining&rft.au=Cai,%20Hao&rft.aucorp=National%20Renewable%20Energy%20Lab.%20(NREL),%20Golden,%20CO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2018-06-12&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=1932-104X&rft.eissn=1932-1031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bbb.1893&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E1479634%3C/osti%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_14796343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true