Effect of the Ar-Ni(s) potential on the cross section for Ar+CH4/Ni{111} collision-induced desorption and the need for a more accurate CH4/Ni{111} potential

• Published in: The Journal of chemical physics 2005-01, Vol.122 (4), p.44704-44704
• Main Authors: Sun, Lipeng, Peterson, Kirk A, Alexeev, Yuri, Windus, Theresa, Kindt, James, Hase, William L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: ATOM COLLISIONS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; DESORPTION; Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory; INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY; METHANE; NICKEL; POTENTIAL ENERGY; SIMULATION
• ISSN: 0021-9606; 1089-7690
• DOI: 10.1063/1.1829993

In a previous paper [L. Sun, P. de Sainte Claire, O. Meroueh, and W. L Hase, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 535 (2001)], a classical trajectory simulation was reported of CH(4) desorption from Ni{111} by Ar-atom collisions. At an incident angle theta(i) of 60 degrees (with respect to the surface normal), the calculated collision-induced desorption (CID) cross sections are in excellent agreement with experiment. However, for smaller incident angles the calculated cross sections are larger than the experimental values and for normal collisions, theta(i)=0 degrees , the calculated cross sections are approximately a factor of 2 larger. This trajectory study used an analytic function for the Ar+Ni(s) intermolecular potential which gives an Ar-Ni{111} potential energy minimum which is an order of magnitude too deep. In the work reported here, the previous trajectory study is repeated with an Ar+Ni(s) analytic intermolecular potential which gives an accurate Ar-Ni{111} potential energy minimum and also has a different surface corrugation than the previous potential. Though there are significant differences between the two Ar+Ni(s) analytic potentials, they have no important effects on the CID dynamics and the cross sections reported here are nearly identical to the previous values. Zero-point energy motions of the surface and the CH(4)-Ni(s) intermolecular modes are considered in the simulation and they are found to have a negligible effect on the CID cross sections. Calculations of the intermolecular potential between CH(4) and a Ni atom, at various levels of theory, suggest that there are substantial approximations in the ab initio calculation used to develop the CH(4)+Ni{111} potential. The implication is that the differences between the trajectory and experimental CID cross sections may arise from an inaccurate CH(4)+Ni{111} potential used in the trajectory simulation.